Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations 1/2005

01.03.2005 | Original Article

Partial ceramic crowns. Influence of preparation design and luting material on margin integrity—a scanning electron microscopic study

verfasst von: Marianne Federlin, C. Sipos, K.-A. Hiller, B. Thonemann, G. Schmalz

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 1/2005

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This in vitro study examines the effects of three preparation designs and different luting agents on the marginal integrity of partial ceramic crowns. One hundred forty-four extracted human molars were prepared according to the following preparation designs: A. Coverage of functional cusps, B. Horizontal reduction of functional cusps and C. Complete reduction of functional cusps. Partial ceramic crowns (Vita Mark II, Cerec 3 System) were bonded to the cavities with: Variolink II/Excite (Vivadent), Panavia F/ED primer (Kuraray), Dyract/Prime and Bond NT (Detrey/Dentsply), and Fuji Plus/GC cavity conditioner (GC). The specimens were exposed to thermocycling and mechanical loading. Marginal adaptation was assessed on replicas using quantitative margin analysis in the scanning electron microscope (SEM). Significant differences were observed between the preparation designs in general. Coverage of functional cusps with preparation of butt joints and use of Variolink as luting material showed a tendency toward the lowest values for compromised adhesion, especially within the dentin. Significant differences could be determined between luting systems: resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) caused fracture of the restorations and revealed higher values than all other luting materials for compromised adhesion at ceramic-luting agent and tooth-luting agent interfaces. The dentin-luting material interface, in general, showed higher percentages of compromised adhesion (38–100%) than enamel- and ceramic-luting material interfaces (0–30%). In conclusion, the SEM data indicate that, with adhesively bonded partial ceramic crowns, retentive preparation is not contraindicated and the choice of luting material is more relevant than the preparation design. Margins below the cemento-enamel junction reveal significant loss of adhesion in spite of adhesive luting techniques. The RMGIC cannot be recommended as a luting material for feldspathic partial ceramic crowns.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Besek MJ, Mörmann WH, Lutz F (1996) Curing of composites under CEREC inlays. In: Mörmann WH (ed) CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry. CEREC 10 year Anniversary Symposium. Quintessence, Berlin, pp 347–360 Besek MJ, Mörmann WH, Lutz F (1996) Curing of composites under CEREC inlays. In: Mörmann WH (ed) CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry. CEREC 10 year Anniversary Symposium. Quintessence, Berlin, pp 347–360
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bindl A, Mörmann WH (2003) Clinical and SEM evaluation of all-ceramic chair-side CAD/CAM generated partial crowns. Eur J Oral Sci 111:163–169PubMed Bindl A, Mörmann WH (2003) Clinical and SEM evaluation of all-ceramic chair-side CAD/CAM generated partial crowns. Eur J Oral Sci 111:163–169PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Broderson S (1994) Complete-crown and partial-coverage tooth preparation designs for bonded cast ceramic restorations. Quintessence Int 25:535–539PubMed Broderson S (1994) Complete-crown and partial-coverage tooth preparation designs for bonded cast ceramic restorations. Quintessence Int 25:535–539PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Burke FJT (1996) Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns: the effect of increased tooth preparation. Quintessence Int 27:115–121PubMed Burke FJT (1996) Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns: the effect of increased tooth preparation. Quintessence Int 27:115–121PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Federlin M, Schmidt S, Hiller K-A, Thonemann B, Schmalz G (2004) Partial ceramic crowns: influence of preparation design and luting material on marginal integrity in vitro: a microleakage study. Oper Dent (accepted for publication) Federlin M, Schmidt S, Hiller K-A, Thonemann B, Schmalz G (2004) Partial ceramic crowns: influence of preparation design and luting material on marginal integrity in vitro: a microleakage study. Oper Dent (accepted for publication)
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Feilzer AJ, Kakaboura AI, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1995) The influence of water sorption on the development of setting shrinkage stress in traditional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 11:186–190CrossRefPubMed Feilzer AJ, Kakaboura AI, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1995) The influence of water sorption on the development of setting shrinkage stress in traditional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 11:186–190CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Felden A, Schmalz G, Federlin M, Hiller KA (1998) Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: results up to seven years. Clin Oral Invest 2:161–167CrossRef Felden A, Schmalz G, Federlin M, Hiller KA (1998) Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: results up to seven years. Clin Oral Invest 2:161–167CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Felden A, Schmalz G, Hiller KA (2000) Retrospective clinical study and survival analysis on partial ceramic crowns: results up to seven years. Clin Oral Invest 4:199–205CrossRef Felden A, Schmalz G, Hiller KA (2000) Retrospective clinical study and survival analysis on partial ceramic crowns: results up to seven years. Clin Oral Invest 4:199–205CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Krämer N (2000) Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. Oper Dent 25:459–465PubMed Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Krämer N (2000) Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. Oper Dent 25:459–465PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Bey B (1997) Clinical and quantitative margin analysis of feldspathic ceramic inlays at 4 years. Clin Oral Invest 1:163–168CrossRef Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Bey B (1997) Clinical and quantitative margin analysis of feldspathic ceramic inlays at 4 years. Clin Oral Invest 1:163–168CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Haller B, Thull R, Klaiber B, Schmitz A (1990) Reinforcement of cusps with adhesively luted inlays in MOD cavities [German]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 45: 660–664 Haller B, Thull R, Klaiber B, Schmitz A (1990) Reinforcement of cusps with adhesively luted inlays in MOD cavities [German]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 45: 660–664
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hürzeler M, Zimmermann E, Mörmann WH (1990) Marginal adaptation of machined ceramic onlays in vitro [German]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:715–720PubMed Hürzeler M, Zimmermann E, Mörmann WH (1990) Marginal adaptation of machined ceramic onlays in vitro [German]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:715–720PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jedynakiewicz NM, Martin N (1996) Procedures for multi-cusp restorations. In: Mörmann WH (ed) CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry. CEREC 10 year Anniversary Symposium. Quintessence, Berlin, pp 143–152 Jedynakiewicz NM, Martin N (1996) Procedures for multi-cusp restorations. In: Mörmann WH (ed) CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry. CEREC 10 year Anniversary Symposium. Quintessence, Berlin, pp 143–152
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Krejci I, Lutz F (1990) In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems. Correlation with in-vivo results [German]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:1445–1449PubMed Krejci I, Lutz F (1990) In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems. Correlation with in-vivo results [German]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 100:1445–1449PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kunzelmann KH (1999) Ceramic restorations—state of the art of ceramic inserts, ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns [German]. Bayerisches Zahnärzteblatt 3:17–22 Kunzelmann KH (1999) Ceramic restorations—state of the art of ceramic inserts, ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns [German]. Bayerisches Zahnärzteblatt 3:17–22
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lang H, Schüler N, Nolden R (1998) Ceramic inlay or partial ceramic crown? [German.] Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 53:53–56 Lang H, Schüler N, Nolden R (1998) Ceramic inlay or partial ceramic crown? [German.] Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 53:53–56
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lang H, Schwan R, Nolden R (1994) Deflection of restored teeth [German]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 49:812–816 Lang H, Schwan R, Nolden R (1994) Deflection of restored teeth [German]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 49:812–816
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Leevailoj C, Platt JA, Cochran MA, Moore BK (1998) In vitro study of fracture incidence and compressive fracture load of all-ceramic crowns cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer and other luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 80:699–707PubMed Leevailoj C, Platt JA, Cochran MA, Moore BK (1998) In vitro study of fracture incidence and compressive fracture load of all-ceramic crowns cemented with resin-modified glass ionomer and other luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 80:699–707PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehl A, Godescha P, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R (1996) Marginal integrity of composite and ceramic inlays in large MOD cavities [German]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 51:701–704 Mehl A, Godescha P, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R (1996) Marginal integrity of composite and ceramic inlays in large MOD cavities [German]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 51:701–704
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehl A, Pfeiffer A, Kremers L, Hickel R (1998) Marginal integrity of Cerec II inlays in extensive MOD cavities [German]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 53:57–60 Mehl A, Pfeiffer A, Kremers L, Hickel R (1998) Marginal integrity of Cerec II inlays in extensive MOD cavities [German]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 53:57–60
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pröbster L (2001) Are all ceramic crowns and bridges scientifically accepted? [German.]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 56:575–576 Pröbster L (2001) Are all ceramic crowns and bridges scientifically accepted? [German.]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 56:575–576
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiss B, Walther W (2000) Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan-Meier analysis of Cerec restorations. Int J Computerized Dent 3:9–23 Reiss B, Walther W (2000) Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan-Meier analysis of Cerec restorations. Int J Computerized Dent 3:9–23
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ (1998) Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 80:280–301PubMed Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ (1998) Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 80:280–301PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Roulet JF, Janda R (2001) Future ceramic systems. Oper Dent Suppl 6:211–228 Roulet JF, Janda R (2001) Future ceramic systems. Oper Dent Suppl 6:211–228
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Roulet JF (1997) Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam—results up to 6 years. Clin Oral Invest 1:40–46CrossRef Roulet JF (1997) Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam—results up to 6 years. Clin Oral Invest 1:40–46CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmalz G, Guertsen W (2001) Ceramic inlays and veneers. Scientific statement of the German Dental Association [German]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 56:347–348 Schmalz G, Guertsen W (2001) Ceramic inlays and veneers. Scientific statement of the German Dental Association [German]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 56:347–348
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Seghi RR, Denry IL, Rosenstiel SF (1995) Relative fracture toughness and hardness of new dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 74:145–150PubMed Seghi RR, Denry IL, Rosenstiel SF (1995) Relative fracture toughness and hardness of new dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 74:145–150PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JWV (1998) A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 56:263–267CrossRefPubMed Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JWV (1998) A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 56:263–267CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Sorensen JA, Munksgaard E (1996) Relative gap formation adjacent to ceramic inlays with combinations of resin cements and dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 76:472–476CrossRefPubMed Sorensen JA, Munksgaard E (1996) Relative gap formation adjacent to ceramic inlays with combinations of resin cements and dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 76:472–476CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Staehle HJ (1999) Minimally invasive restorative treatment. J Adhesive Dent 1:267–284 Staehle HJ (1999) Minimally invasive restorative treatment. J Adhesive Dent 1:267–284
31.
Zurück zum Zitat St-Georges AJ, Sturdevant JR, Swift EJ Jr, Thompson JY (2003) Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J Prosthet Dent 89:551–557CrossRefPubMed St-Georges AJ, Sturdevant JR, Swift EJ Jr, Thompson JY (2003) Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J Prosthet Dent 89:551–557CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Tidehag P, Gunne J (1995) A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 8: 456–460PubMed Tidehag P, Gunne J (1995) A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 8: 456–460PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schmalz G, Hiller KA (1995) Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 11:161–168CrossRefPubMed Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schmalz G, Hiller KA (1995) Resin-modified glass ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 11:161–168CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schmalz G, Hiller KA (1997) SEM analysis of marginal expansion and gap formation in class II composite restorations. Dent Mater 13:192–197PubMed Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schmalz G, Hiller KA (1997) SEM analysis of marginal expansion and gap formation in class II composite restorations. Dent Mater 13:192–197PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schmalz G, Schams A (1997) Clinical evaluation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic inlays in vivo: 2-year results. Clin Oral Invest 1:27–34CrossRef Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schmalz G, Schams A (1997) Clinical evaluation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic inlays in vivo: 2-year results. Clin Oral Invest 1:27–34CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat van Dijken JWV, Hasselrot L, Örmin A, Olofsson AL (2001) Restorations with extensive dentin/enamel-bonded ceramic coverage. A 5-year follow-up. Eur J Oral Sci 109:222–229CrossRefPubMed van Dijken JWV, Hasselrot L, Örmin A, Olofsson AL (2001) Restorations with extensive dentin/enamel-bonded ceramic coverage. A 5-year follow-up. Eur J Oral Sci 109:222–229CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat van Dijken JWV, Örmin A, Olofsson AL (1999) Clinical performance of pressed ceramic inlays luted with resin-modified glass ionomer and autopolymerizing resin composite cements. J Prosthet Dent 82:529–535PubMed van Dijken JWV, Örmin A, Olofsson AL (1999) Clinical performance of pressed ceramic inlays luted with resin-modified glass ionomer and autopolymerizing resin composite cements. J Prosthet Dent 82:529–535PubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner J, Schmalz G, Hiller K-A, Schmalz G (2003) Long-term clinical performance and longevity of gold alloy vs. ceramic partial crowns. Clin Oral Invest 7:80–85CrossRef Wagner J, Schmalz G, Hiller K-A, Schmalz G (2003) Long-term clinical performance and longevity of gold alloy vs. ceramic partial crowns. Clin Oral Invest 7:80–85CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Partial ceramic crowns. Influence of preparation design and luting material on margin integrity—a scanning electron microscopic study
verfasst von
Marianne Federlin
C. Sipos
K.-A. Hiller
B. Thonemann
G. Schmalz
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2005
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 1/2005
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-004-0276-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2005

Clinical Oral Investigations 1/2005 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.