nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.12.2013 | Original Article

Effects of orthodontic treatment on human alveolar bone density distribution

verfasst von: Hechang Huang, Michael Richards, Tamer Bedair, Henry W. Fields, J. Martin Palomo, William M. Johnston, Do-Gyoon Kim

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 9/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of this study was to examine if non-invasive clinical cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based degree of bone mineralization (DBM) measurement can be used to detect the different results from orthodontic treatment between the maxilla and mandible in human patients.

Materials and methods

CBCT images were taken before and after orthodontic treatment from 43 patients (19 males and 24 females, 14.36 ± 1.50 years). A histogram of computed tomography (CT) attenuation value, which is equivalent to the DBM, was obtained from the alveolar cortical (AC), trabecular (AT), and enamel (E) regions of each image. Mean, standard deviation (SD), and coefficient of variation (COV) of the CT attenuation values were computed. The regional variations and percentage (%) differences between the E and alveolar regions of the CT attenuation parameters at the maxilla and mandible were analyzed before and after orthodontic treatment.

Results

The AC had higher mean and variability (SD and COV) than the AT before and after treatment (p < 0.001). The variability was higher in the mandibular AC than in the maxillar AC (p < 0.01) independent of orthodontic treatment. The percentage (%) difference of variability of CT attenuation values changed for both AT and AC in the maxilla after orthodontic treatment, while that changed for only the AT (p < 0.02), but not for AC, in the mandible (p > 0.16).

Conclusions

The alveolar cortical region of the mandible responded differently to orthodontic treatment compared with other alveolar regions.

Clinical relevance

The CBCT-based DBM analysis can be used clinically to assess alveolar bone quality changes induced by orthodontic treatment to improve treatment planning and result evaluation.

Redlich M, Shoshan S, Palmon A (1999) Gingival response to orthodontic force. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116:152–158PubMedCrossRef

Baumrind S (1969) A reconsideration of the propriety of the “pressure-tension” hypothesis. Am J Orthod 55:12–22PubMedCrossRef

Engstrom C, Granstrom G, Thilander B (1988) Effect of orthodontic force on periodontal tissue metabolism. A histologic and biochemical study in normal and hypocalcemic young rats. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 93:486–495PubMedCrossRef

Miyoshi K, Igarashi K, Saeki S, Shinoda H, Mitani H (2001) Tooth movement and changes in periodontal tissue in response to orthodontic force in rats vary depending on the time of day the force is applied. Eur J Orthodont 23:329–338CrossRef

Krishnan V, Davidovitch Z (2006) Cellular, molecular, and tissue-level reactions to orthodontic force. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129:469.e1–e32. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.007

Rygh P (1973) Ultrastructural changes in pressure zones of human periodontium incident to orthodontic tooth movement. Acta Odontol Scand 31:109–122PubMedCrossRef

Rygh P (1973) Ultrastructural changes of the periodontal fibers and their attachment in rat molar periodontium incident to orthodontic tooth movement. Scand J Dent Res 81:467–480PubMed

Grimm FM (1972) Bone bending, a feature of orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod 62:384–393PubMedCrossRef

Katona TR, Paydar NH, Akay HU, Roberts WE (1995) Stress analysis of bone modeling response to rat molar orthodontics. J Biomech 28:27–38PubMed

10.

Keeling SD, King GJ, McCoy EA, Valdez M (1993) Serum and alveolar bone phosphatase changes reflect bone turnover during orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103:320–326PubMedCrossRef

11.

Lilja E, Lindskog S, Hammarstrom L (1984) Alkaline phosphatase activity and tetracycline incorporation during initial orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Acta Odontol Scand 42:1–11PubMedCrossRef

12.

King GJ, Keeling SD, Wronski TJ (1991) Histomorphometric study of alveolar bone turnover in orthodontic tooth movement. Bone 12:401–409PubMedCrossRef

13.

Melsen B (1999) Biological reaction of alveolar bone to orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod 69:151–158. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0151:BROABT>2.3.CO;2 PubMed

14.

Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Yabuuchi T, Ando R, Roberts WE, Garetto LP (2008) Histomorphometric evaluation of alveolar bone turnover between the maxilla and the mandible during experimental tooth movement in dogs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133:889–897PubMedCrossRef

15.

Hsu J-T, Chang H-W, Huang H-L, Yu J-H, Li Y-F, Tu M-G (2010) Bone density changes around teeth during orthodontic treatment. Clin Oral Investig 15:511–519. doi:10.1007/s00784-010-0410-1 CrossRef

16.

Chang HW, Huang HL, Yu JH, Hsu JT, Li YF, Wu YF (2012) Effects of orthodontic tooth movement on alveolar bone density. Clin Oral Investig 16:679–688. doi:10.1007/s00784-011-0552-9

17.

Roschger P, Fratzl P, Eschberger J, Klaushofer K (1998) Validation of quantitative backscattered electron imaging for the measurement of mineral density distribution in human bone biopsies. Bone 23:319–326PubMedCrossRef

18.

Ruffoni D, Fratzl P, Roschger P, Klaushofer K, Weinkamer R (2007) The bone mineralization density distribution as a fingerprint of the mineralization process. Bone 40:1308–1319PubMedCrossRef

19.

Follet H, Boivin G, Rumelhart C, Meunier PJ (2004) The degree of mineralization is a determinant of bone strength: a study on human calcanei. Bone 34:783–789PubMedCrossRef

20.

Kim DG, Shertok D, Ching Tee B, Yeni YN (2011) Variability of tissue mineral density can determine physiological creep of human vertebral cancellous bone. J Biomech 44:1660–1665. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.03.025 PubMedCrossRef

21.

Verna C, Zaffe D, Siciliani G (1999) Histomorphometric study of bone reactions during orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Bone 24:371–379PubMedCrossRef

22.

Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P (2006) Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 72:75–80PubMed

23.

Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG (2005) Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128:803–811. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.034 PubMedCrossRef

24.

Scarfe WC, Farman AG (2008) What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 52:707–730. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.005 PubMedCrossRef

25.

Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW (2009) Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol 82:35–40. doi:10.1259/bjr/31419627 PubMedCrossRef

26.

Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL (2003) Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and orthophos plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 32:229–234PubMedCrossRef

27.

Naitoh M, Katsumata A, Mitsuya S, Kamemoto H, Ariji E (2004) Measurement of mandibles with microfocus x-ray computerized tomography and compact computerized tomography for dental use. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19:239–246PubMed

28.

Nomura Y, Watanabe H, Honda E, Kurabayashi T (2010) Reliability of voxel values from cone-beam computed tomography for dental use in evaluating bone mineral density. Clin Oral Implants Res 21:558–562. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01896.x PubMedCrossRef

29.

Kwong JC, Palomo JM, Landers MA, Figueroa A, Hans MG (2008) Image quality produced by different cone-beam computed tomography settings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133:317–327. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.02.053 PubMedCrossRef

30.

Loubele M, Jacobs R, Maes F, Denis K, White S, Coudyzer W, Lambrichts I, van Steenberghe D, Suetens P (2008) Image quality vs radiation dose of four cone beam computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37:309–318. doi:10.1259/dmfr/16770531 PubMedCrossRef

31.

Verna C, Dalstra M, Melsen B (2000) The rate and the type of orthodontic tooth movement is influenced by bone turnover in a rat model. Eur J Orthod 22:343–352PubMedCrossRef

32.

Kuhn JL, Goldstein SA, Feldkamp LA, Goulet RW, Jesion G (1990) Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure. J Orthop Res 8:833–842. doi:10.1002/jor.1100080608 PubMedCrossRef

33.

Naitoh M, Hirukawa A, Katsumata A, Ariji E (2009) Evaluation of voxel values in mandibular cancellous bone: relationship between cone-beam computed tomography and multislice helical computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:503–506. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01672.x PubMedCrossRef

34.

González-García R, Monje F (2011) The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT. Clin Oral Implants Res. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02390.x

35.

Marquezan M, Lau TC, Mattos CT, Cunha AC, Nojima LI, Sant'Anna EF, Souza MM, Araujo MT (2012) Bone mineral density. Angle Orthod 82:62–66. doi:10.2319/031811-192.1 PubMedCrossRef

36.

Bryant JA, Drage NA, Richmond S (2008) Study of the scan uniformity from an i-CAT cone beam computed tomography dental imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 37:365–374. doi:10.1259/dmfr/13227258 PubMedCrossRef

37.

Nackaerts O, Maes F, Yan H, Couto Souza P, Pauwels R, Jacobs R (2011) Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 22:873–879. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02076.x PubMedCrossRef

38.

Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, Ariji E, Langlais RP (2007) Effects of image artifacts on gray-value density in limited-volume cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104:829–836. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.12.005 PubMedCrossRef

39.

Smith CE (1998) Cellular and chemical events during enamel maturation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 9:128–161PubMedCrossRef

40.

Demirci M, Tuncer S, Yuceokur AA (2010) Prevalence of caries on individual tooth surfaces and its distribution by age and gender in university clinic patients. Eur J Dent 4:270–279PubMed

41.

Yao W, Cheng Z, Koester KJ, Ager JW, Balooch M, Pham A, Chefo S, Busse C, Ritchie RO, Lane NE (2007) The degree of bone mineralization is maintained with single intravenous bisphosphonates in aged estrogen-deficient rats and is a strong predictor of bone strength. Bone 41:804–812PubMedCrossRef

42.

Busse B, Hahn M, Soltau M, Zustin J, Puschel K, Duda GN, Amling M (2009) Increased calcium content and inhomogeneity of mineralization render bone toughness in osteoporosis: mineralization, morphology and biomechanics of human single trabeculae. Bone 45:1034–1043. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2009.08.002 PubMedCrossRef

43.

Ames MS, Hong S, Lee HR, Fields HW, Johnston WM, Kim DG (2010) Estrogen deficiency increases variability of tissue mineral density of alveolar bone surrounding teeth. Arch Oral Biol 55:599–605. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.05.011 PubMedCrossRef

44.

Allen MR, Turek JJ, Phipps RJ, Burr DB (2011) Greater magnitude of turnover suppression occurs earlier after treatment initiation with risedronate than alendronate. Bone 49:128–132. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2010.07.011 PubMedCrossRef

45.

Huja SS, Fernandez SA, Hill KJ, Li Y (2006) Remodeling dynamics in the alveolar process in skeletally mature dogs. Anat Rec Part A 288A:1243–1249CrossRef

46.

Huja SS, Beck FM (2008) Bone remodeling in maxilla, mandible, and femur of young dogs. Anatomical Record (Hoboken, NJ: 2007) 291:1–5CrossRef

47.

Randall LE, Beck FM, Huja SS (2011) Bone remodeling surrounding primary teeth in skeletally immature dogs. Angle Orthod 81:931–937. doi:10.2319/021611-114.1 PubMedCrossRef

48.

Hylander WL, Crompton AW (1986) Jaw movements and patterns of mandibular bone strain during mastication in the monkey Macaca fascicularis. Arch Oral Biol 31:841–848PubMedCrossRef

49.

Daegling DJ, Hylander WL (2000) Experimental observation, theoretical models, and biomechanical inference in the study of mandibular form. Am J Phys Anthropol 112:541–551PubMedCrossRef

50.

Ravosa MJ, Johnson KR, Hylander WL (2000) Strain in the galago facial skull. J Morphol 245:51–66. doi:10.1002/1097-4687(200007)245:1<51::AID-JMOR4>3.0.CO;2-7 PubMedCrossRef

51.

Meikle MC (2006) The tissue, cellular, and molecular regulation of orthodontic tooth movement: 100 years after Carl Sandstedt. Eur J Orthod 28:221–240. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjl001 PubMedCrossRef

52.

Fyhrie DP, Vashishth D (2000) Bone stiffness predicts strength similarly for human vertebral cancellous bone in compression and for cortical bone in tension. Bone 26:169–173. doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00246-x PubMedCrossRef

53.

Roberts WE, Arbuckle GR, Analoui M (1996) Rate of mesial translation of mandibular molars using implant-anchored mechanics. Angle Orthod 66:331–338. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(1996)066<0331:ROMTOM>2.3.CO;2 PubMed

54.

Roberts WE (2005) Bone physiology, metabolism, and biomechanics in orthodontic practice. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL (eds) Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 221–292

55.

Boyce TM, Fyhrie DP, Glotkowski MC, Radin EL, Schaffler MB (1998) Damage type and strain mode associations in human compact bone bending fatigue. J Orthop Res 16:322–329. doi:10.1002/jor.1100160308 PubMedCrossRef

56.

Reilly GC, Currey JD (1999) The development of microcracking and failure in bone depends on the loading mode to which it is adapted. J Exp Biol 202:543–552PubMed

57.

Verna C, Dalstra M, Lee TC, Cattaneo PM, Melsen B (2004) Microcracks in the alveolar bone following orthodontic tooth movement: a morphological and morphometric study. Eur J Orthod 26:459–467PubMedCrossRef

58.

Burr DB, Martin RB, Schaffler MB, Radin EL (1985) Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage. J Biomech 18:189–200PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Effects of orthodontic treatment on human alveolar bone density distribution
verfasst von: Hechang Huang
Michael Richards
Tamer Bedair
Henry W. Fields
J. Martin Palomo
William M. Johnston
Do-Gyoon Kim
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2013
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 9/2013
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0906-y

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

19.04.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Werden Personen mit Vorhofflimmern in der Blanking-Periode nach einer Katheterablation gegen eine bestehende Parodontitis behandelt, verbessert dies die Erfolgsaussichten. Dafür sprechen die Resultate einer prospektiven Untersuchung.

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

11.04.2024 Endokarditis Nachrichten

Bei welchen Personen eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe zur Prävention einer infektiösen Endokarditis nach invasiven zahnärztlichen Eingriffen sinnvoll ist, wird diskutiert. Neue Daten stehen im Einklang mit den europäischen Leitlinienempfehlungen.

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

08.04.2024 Zahnmedizin Nachrichten

Der Aufbau von Geweben und Organen während der Embryonalentwicklung wird von den Zellen bemerkenswert choreografiert. Für diesen Prozess braucht es spezielle sogenannte „Organisatoren“. In einer aktuellen Veröffentlichung im Fachjournal Nature Cell Biology berichten Forschende durch welchen Vorgang diese Organisatoren im Gewebe entstehen und wie sie dann die Bildung von Zähnen orchestrieren.

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

11.03.2024 Kinderzahnmedizin Nachrichten

Infolge der Umbenennung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnheilkunde in Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnmedizin (DGKiZ) wird deren Mitgliederzeitschrift Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde in Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnmedizin umbenannt. Aus diesem Grunde trägt die erste Ausgabe in 2024 erstmalig den neuen Titel.

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2013

Chemometric analysis of the consumption of oral rinse chlorite (ClO2 −) by human salivary biomolecules

Perioperative use of an anti-inflammatory drug on tooth sensitivity caused by in-office bleaching: a randomized, triple-blind clinical trial

Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissue changes in the orofacial region after tooth-borne and bone-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion

Radiographic follow-up of periapical status after endodontic treatment of teeth with and without apical periodontitis

Endotoxins potentiate COX-2 and RANKL expression in compressed PDL cells

Computer-assisted flapless implant placement reduces the incidence of surgery-related bacteremia

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter