nach oben

European Journal of Ageing

Erschienen in:

02.04.2016 | Review Article

How aging affects self-reports

verfasst von: Bärbel Knäuper, Kimberly Carrière, Melodie Chamandy, Zhen Xu, Norbert Schwarz, Natalie O. Rosen

Erschienen in: European Journal of Ageing | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

A lot of information used in aging research relies on self-reports. Surveys or questionnaires are used to assess quality of life, attitudes toward aging, experiences of aging, subjective well-being, symptomatology, health behaviors, financial information, medication adherence, etc. Growing evidence suggests that older and younger respondents are differentially affected by questionnaire features and the cognitive tasks that question answering pose. This research has shown that age-related changes in cognitive and communicative functioning can lead to age-related differences in self-reports that are erroneously interpreted as real age differences in attitudes and behaviors. The current review highlights how the processes underlying respondents’ self-report change as a function of respondents’ age; it updates our previous reviews of this literature.

Abeele MV, Beullens K, Roe K (2013) Measuring mobile phone use: gender, age and real usage level in relation to the accuracy and validity of self-reported mobile phone use. Mob Med Comm 1:213–236CrossRef

Andrews FM, Herzog AR (1986) The quality of survey data as related to age of respondent. J Am Stat Assoc 81:403–410CrossRef

Baddeley AD (2007) Working memory, thought and action. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef

Belson WA (1981) The design and understanding of survey questions. Gower, London

Bodenhausen GV, Wyer RS (1987) Social cognition and social reality: Information acquisition and use in the laboratory and the real world. In: Sudman S (ed) Hippler HJ, Schwarz M. Social information processing and survey methodology. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 6–41

Borchelt M, Gilberg R, Horgas AL, Geiselmann B (1999) On the significance of morbidity and disability in old age. In: Baltes PB, Mayer KU (eds) The Berlin aging study: aging from 70 to 100. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 403–429

Bradburn NM, Rips LJ, Shevell SK (1987) Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science 236:157–161CrossRef

Clark HH, Schober MF (1992) Asking questions and influencing answers. In: Tanur JM (ed) Questions about questions. Russel Sage, New York, pp 15–48

Coiner TF, Schober MF, Conrad FG, Ehlen P (2002) Assessing respondents’ need for clarification in web surveys using age-based user modeling. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association. American Statistical Association, Alexandria

Colsher PL, Wallace RB (1989) Data quality and age: health and psychobehavioral correlates of item nonresponse and inconsistent responses. J Geront 44:P45–P52CrossRef

Conrad FG, Schober MF (2000) Clarifying question meaning in a household telephone survey. Public Opin Quart 64:1–28CrossRef

Fox MT, Sidani S, Streiner D (2007) Using standardized survey items with older adults hospitalized for chronic illness. Res Nurs Health 30:468–481CrossRef

Gergen KJ, Beck KW (1966) Communication in the interview and the disengaged respondent. Public Opin Quart 30:385–398CrossRef

Grice P (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL (eds) Syntax and semantics, vol 3., Speech actsAcademic Press, New York, pp 41–58

Hartshorne JK, Germine LT (2015) When does cognitive functioning peak? The asynchronous rise and fall of different cognitive abilities across the life span. Psychol Sci 26:433–443CrossRef

Herzog AR, Dielman L (1985) Age differences in response accuracy for factual survey questions. J Geront 40:350–357CrossRef

Holbrook A, Cho YI, Johnson T (2006) The impact of question and respondent characteristics on comprehension and mapping difficulties. Public Opin Quart 70:565–595CrossRef

Kaldenberg DO, Koenig HF, Becker BW (1994) Mail survey response rate patterns in a population of the elderly: does response deteriorate with age? Public Opin Quart 58:68–76CrossRef

Knäuper B (1999) The impact of age and education on response order effects in attitude measurement. Public Opin Quart 63:347–370CrossRef

Knäuper B, Belli RF, Hill DH, Herzog AR (1997) Question difficulty and respondents’ cognitive ability: the impact on data quality. J Off Stat 13:181–199

Knäuper B, Schwarz N, Park DC (2004) Frequency reports across age groups. J Off Stat 20:91–96

Knäuper B, Schwarz N, Park D, Fritsch A (2007) The perils of interpreting age differences in attitude reports: question order effects decrease with age. J Off Stat 23:1–14

Krestar M, Looman W, Powers S, Dawson N, Judge K (2012) Including individuals with memory impairment in the research process: the importance of scales and response categories used in surveys. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 7:70–79CrossRef

Krosnick JA (1991) Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Appl Cognit Psychol 5:213–236CrossRef

Krosnick JA, Alwin DF (1987) An evaluation of a cognitive theory of response-order effects in survey measurement. Public Opin Quart 51:201–219CrossRef

Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Visser PS (2006) Optimizing brief assessments in research on the psychology of aging: a pragmatic approach to self-report measurement. In: Carstensen LL, Hartel CR (eds) When I’m 64. National Academies Press, Washington DC, p 231

Linton M (1982) Transformations of memory in everyday life. In: Neisser U (ed) Memory observed: remembering in natural contexts. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 77–91

Mathiowetz NA, Duncan GJ (1988) Out of work, out of mind: response errors in retrospective reports of unemployment. J Bus Econ Stat 6:221–229

Maxfield M, Kluck B, Greenberg J, Pyszczynski T, Cox CR, Solomon S, Weise D (2007) Age-related differences in responses to thoughts of one’s own death: mortality salience and judgments of moral transgressions. Psychol Aging 22:341–353CrossRef

Menon G, Raghubir P, Schwarz N (1995) Behavioral frequency judgments: an accessibility-diagnosticity framework. J Cons Res 22:212–228CrossRef

Neisser U (1986) Nested structure in autobiographical memory. In: Rubin DC (ed) Autobiogra-phical memory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 71–88CrossRef

Olton DS, Becker JT, Handelmann GE (1980) Hippocampal function: working memory or cognitive mapping? Phys Psychol 8:239–246CrossRef

Reed AE, Mikels JA, Löckenhoff CE (2013) Preferences for choice across adulthood: age trajectories and potential mechanisms. Psychol Aging 28:625–632CrossRef

Rodgers WL, Herzog R, Andrews FM (1988) Interviewing older adults: validity of self-reports of satisfaction. Psychol Aging 3:264–272CrossRef

Roedder John D, Cole CA (1986) Age differences in information processing: understanding deficits in young and elderly consumers. J Cons Res 13:297–315CrossRef

Rossi N, Isaacowitz DM (2006) What is important to me right now? Age differences in domain selectivity depend on the measure. Ageing Int 31:24–43CrossRef

Schmitz MF, Russell DW, Cutrona CE (2002) The validity of self-reports of physician use among the older population. J Appl Geront 21:203–219CrossRef

Schuman H, Presser S (1981) Questions and answers in attitude surveys. Academic Press, New York

Schwarz N (1995) What respondents learn from questionnaires: the survey interview and the logic of conversation. Int Stat Rev 63:153–168CrossRef

Schwarz N (1996) Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods and the logic of conversation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

Schwarz N (1999a) Self-reports: how the questions shape the answers. Am Psychol 54:93–105CrossRef

Schwarz N (1999b) Frequency reports of physical symptoms and health behaviors: How the questionnaire determines the results. In: Park DC, Morrell RW, Shifren K (eds) Processing medical information in aging patients: Cognitive and human factors perspectives. Erlbaum, Mahaw, pp 93–108

Schwarz N (2005) Measurement: Aging and the psychology of self-report. In: Carstensen LL, Hartel CR (eds) When I’m 64: Aging frontiers in social psychology, personality, and adult developmental psychology. National Academic Press, Washington DC, pp 219–230

Schwarz N, Knäuper B (2000) Cognition, aging, and self-reports. In: Park D, Schwarz N (eds) Cognitive aging: a primer. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, pp 233–252

Schwarz N, Oyserman D (2001) Asking questions about behavior: cognition, communication and questionnaire construction. Am J Eval 22:127–160CrossRef

Schwarz N, Sudman S (1994) Autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective reports. Springer Verlag, New YorkCrossRef

Schwarz N, Hippler HJ, Deutsch B, Strack F (1985) Response categories: effects on behavioral reports and comparative judgments. Public Opin Quart 49:388–395CrossRef

Schwarz N, Park D, Knäuper B, Sudman S (eds) (1999) Cognition, aging, and self-reports. Psychology Press, Philadelphia

Strack F, Martin L (1987) Thinking, judging, and communicating: A process account of context effects in attitude surveys. In: Hippler HJ, Schwarz N, Sudman S (eds) Social information processing and survey methodology. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 123–148sCrossRef

Strube G (1987) Answering survey questions: The role of memory. In: Hippler HJ, Schwarz N, Sudman S (eds) Social information processing and survey methodology. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 86–101CrossRef

Sudman S, Bradburn N, Schwarz N (1996) Thinking about answers: The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

Tourangeau R (1984) Cognitive science and survey methods: a cognitive perspective. In: Jabine T, Straf M, Tanur J, Tourangeau R (eds) Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bridge between disciplines. National Academy Press, Washington DC, pp 73–100

Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinski K (2000) The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRef

Tourangeau R, Singer E, Presser S (2003) Context effects in attitude surveys: effects on remote items and impact on predictive validity. Soc Methods Res 31:486–513CrossRef

van der Zouwen J, Smit JH, van der Horst MHL (2005): Reporting the frequency and duration of household tasks by elderly respondents: The effect of different interview strategies on data quality. In: Proceedings of the 60th AAPOR annual conference, May 12–15, 2005, American Statistical Association, Alexandria, pp 4007–4014

Yoon C, Feinberg F, Schwarz N (2010) Why do older consumers tell us they are more satisfied? In: Drolet A, Schwarz N, Yoon C (eds) The aging consumer: Perspectives from psychology and economics. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York, pp 209–228

Zelinski EM, Burnight KP (1997) Sixteen-year longitudinal and time-lag changes in memory and cognition in older adults. Psychol Aging 12:503–523CrossRef

Titel: How aging affects self-reports
verfasst von: Bärbel Knäuper
Kimberly Carrière
Melodie Chamandy
Zhen Xu
Norbert Schwarz
Natalie O. Rosen
Publikationsdatum: 02.04.2016
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: European Journal of Ageing / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 1613-9372
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-9380
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-016-0369-0

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Predictors of religious participation of older Europeans in good and poor health

Predictors of social leisure activities in older Europeans with and without multimorbidity

Participation in formal learning activities of older Europeans in poor and good health

Increasing social participation of older people: are there different barriers for those in poor health? Introduction to the special section

Uncovering the care setting–turnover intention relationship of geriatric nurses

Do predictors of volunteering in older age differ by health status?