nach oben

Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Erschienen in:

01.01.2007 | ORIGINAL PAPER

From Principles to Practice: A Study of Implementation of Supported Housing for Psychiatric Consumers

verfasst von: Yin-Ling Irene Wong, Michael Filoromo, Julie Tennille

Erschienen in: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research | Ausgabe 1/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

In the post-deinstitutionalization era, supported housing has emerged as a housing and service approach considered most conducive to the goal of consumer empowerment and community integration. Although prior research found beneficial effects of supported housing, little empirical work has been done on identifying the gaps between the principles and practice of supported housing. Using multiple data sources on 27 supported independent living (SIL) programs for psychiatric consumers in a large metropolitan community, this paper examines the extent to which these programs are implemented in accordance with supported housing. Findings suggest consistency with as well as deviation from the supported housing approach in regard to consumer choice, typical and normalized housing, resource accessibility, consumer control and provision of individualized and flexible support. This study suggests methods for assessing housing programs for psychiatric consumers along these domains. Implications for the development of housing programs that promote consumer empowerment and community integration are discussed.

Twenty-eight percent of the 406 consumers refused to participate when contacted for the study and another 10% did not participate for reasons other than refusal. The reasons include inability to locate study participant, hospitalization and other institutionalization, psychiatric relapse and other illnesses, deaths, and potential participants’ scheduling for discharge from SIL.

Of the 538 consumers in SIL programs at the time of the study, one had no address information and another was incarcerated.

Block groups are census units comprising of several street blocks. A census tract is comprised of roughly 5 block groups. In Philadelphia, a block group has an average of 840 persons. In this study, we included 1785 block groups with 10 people or more.

We did not include stable and affordable housing because SIL housing is considered permanent housing and residents pay no more than 30% of their income on rent.

Race distribution is constructed as a three-category variable. The categories are, respectively, white, black, and others.

Take a hypothetical example where there are three buildings, each with 16 mental health consumers. Building A has 64 rental units, building B has 32 rental units and building C has 16 rental units. According to the sliding scale captured in Fig. 2, building A is a highly normalized environment (25% of consumers in the building), building B a moderately normalized environment (50% of consumers) and building C a lowly normalized environment (100% consumers).

To illustrate, a building with four mental health consumers is less likely to create an image problem than a building with 16 consumers, although consumers occupy 100% of the units in both buildings.

SIL residents under the master-lease condition signed their rental contract with and paid monthly rent to their housing or service provider (either the 1260 HDC or residential support team).

Seven of the 27 residential support teams had all their consumers living in properties that were owned by the agencies operating the SIL teams.

SRO housing refers to a unit that contains no sanitary facilities or food preparation facilities, or contains one but not both types of facilities. In other words, a tenant in a SRO needs to share cooking facilities or bathroom with residents living in other SROs.

Allen, M. (2003). Waking Rip van Winkle: Why developments in the last 20 years should teach the mental health system not to use housing as a tool of coercion. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 1–19.CrossRef

Arens, D. A. (1993). What do the neighbors think now? Community residences on Long Island, New York. Community Mental Health Journal, 29(3), 235–244.PubMedCrossRef

Blanch, A. K., Carling, P. J., & Ridgway, P. (1988). Normal housing with specialized supports: A psychiatric rehabilitation approach to living in the community. Rehabilitation Psychology, 33(1), 47–55.CrossRef

Bond G. (not dated). Manuscript on Housing

Carling, P. J. (1992). Homes or group homes? Future approaches to housing, support, and integration for people with psychiatric disabilities. Adult Residential Care Journal, 6(2), 87–96.

Carling, P. J. (1993). Housing and supports for persons with mental illness: Emerging approaches to research and practice. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 44(5), 439–449.PubMed

Carling, P. J. (1995). Return to community: Building support systems for people with psychiatric disabilities. New York: Guilford Press.

Essock, S. M., Covell, N. H., & Weissman, E. M. (2004). Inside the black box: The importance of monitoring treatment implementation. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(3), 613–615.PubMed

Hogan, M. F. (2004). Updated schizophrenia PORT treatment recommendations. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(3), 623–625.PubMed

Hogan, M. F., & Carling, P. J. (1992). Normal housing: A key element of a supported housing approach for people with psychiatric disabilities. Community Mental Health Journal, 28(3), 215–226.PubMedCrossRef

Hopper, K., & Barrow, S. M. (2003). Two genealogies of supported housing and their implications for outcome assessment. Psychiatric Services, 54(1), 50–54.PubMedCrossRef

Kruzich, J. M. (1985). Community integration of the mentally ill in residential facilities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13(5), 553–563.PubMedCrossRef

Lehman, A. F., Dixon, L. B., Kernan, E., DeForge, B., & Postrado, L. (1997). A randomized trial of assertive community treatment for homeless persons with severe mental illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54(11), 1038–1043.PubMed

McHugo, G. J., Bebout, R. R., Harris, M., Cleghorn, S., Herring, G., Xie, H., Becker, D., & Drake, R. E. (2004). A randomized controlled trial of integrated versus parallel housing services for homeless adults with mental illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(4), 969–982.PubMed

National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors. (1996). Position statement on housing and supports for people with psychiatric disabilities. Alexandria, VA: NASMHPD.

Newman, S. J. (2001). Housing and mental illness: A critical review of the literature. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

Ogilvie, R. (1997). The state of supported housing for mental health consumers: A literature review. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 21(2), 122–131.

Parkinson, S., Nelson, G., & Horgan, S. (1999). From housing to homes: A review of the literature on housing approaches for psychiatric consumer/survivors. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 18(1), 145–164.PubMed

Ridgway, P., & Zipple, A. M. (1990). The paradigm shift in residential services: From the linear continuum to supported housing approaches. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 13(4), 11–31.

Ridgway, P., & Rapp, C. A. (1997). The active ingredients of effective supported housing: A research synthesis. The University of Kansas, Kansas: Lawrence.

Rog, D. J. (2004). The evidence on supported housing. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27(4), 334–344.PubMedCrossRef

Rog, D. J., & Randolph F. L. (2002). A multisite evaluation of supported housing: Lessons learned from cross-site collaboration. New Directions for Evaluation, 94, 61–72.CrossRef

Segal, S. P., & Aviram, U. (1978). The mentally ill in community-based sheltered care: A study of community care and social integration. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Segal, S. P., & Everett-Dille, L. (1980). Coping styles and factors in male/female social integration. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 61(1), 8–20.PubMedCrossRef

Segal, S. P., Silverman, C., & Baumohl, J. (1989). Seeking person-environment fit in community care placement. Journal of Social Issues, 45(3), 49–64.CrossRef

Stein, L. I., & Test, M. A. (1980). Alternative to mental hospital treatment: I. Conceptual model, treatment programs, and clinical evaluation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37(4), 392–397.PubMed

Timko, C. (1996). Physical characteristics of residential psychiatric and substance abuse programs: Organizational determinants and patient outcomes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24(1), 173–192.PubMedCrossRef

Trute, B., & Segal, S. P. (1976). Census tract predictors and the social integration of sheltered care residents. Social Psychiatry, 11, 153–161.

Tsemberis, S., Gulcur, L., & Nakae, M. (2004). Housing first, consumer choice, and harm reduction for homeless individuals with a dual diagnosis. American Journal of Public Health, 94(4), 651–656.PubMedCrossRef

Tsemberis, S. (1999). From streets to homes: An innovative approach to supported housing for homeless adults with psychiatric disabilities. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(2), 225–241.CrossRef

Tsemberis, S. J., Moran, L., Shinn, M., Asmussen, S. M., & Shern, D. L. (2003). Consumer preference programs for individuals who are homeless and have psychiatric disabilities: A drop-in center and a supported housing program. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32(3), 305–317.PubMedCrossRef

Wahl, O. F. (1993). Community impact of group homes for mentally ill adults. Community Mental Health Journal, 29(3), 247–259.PubMedCrossRef

Wolfensberger, W. (1972). The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto (Ont) Canada: National Institute on Mental Retardation.

Wong, Y.-L. I., & Solomon, P. L. (2002). Community integration of persons with psychiatric disabilities in supportive independent housing: A conceptual model and methodological considerations. Mental Health Services Research, 4(1), 13–28.CrossRef

Titel: From Principles to Practice: A Study of Implementation of Supported Housing for Psychiatric Consumers
verfasst von: Yin-Ling Irene Wong
Michael Filoromo
Julie Tennille
Publikationsdatum: 01.01.2007
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research / Ausgabe 1/2007
Print ISSN: 0894-587X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3289
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-006-0058-y

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Wartezeit nicht kürzer, aber Arbeit flexibler

Psychotherapie Medizin aktuell

Fünf Jahren nach der Neugestaltung der Psychotherapie-Richtlinie wurden jetzt die Effekte der vorgenommenen Änderungen ausgewertet. Das Hauptziel der Novellierung war eine kürzere Wartezeit auf Therapieplätze. Dieses Ziel wurde nicht erreicht, es gab jedoch positive Auswirkungen auf andere Bereiche.

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

From Principles to Practice: A Study of Implementation of Supported Housing for Psychiatric Consumers

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Wartezeit nicht kürzer, aber Arbeit flexibler

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Update Psychiatrie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2007

Vocational Rehabilitation for Persons with Mental Illness in the People’s Republic of China

Reduction of Concurrent Antipsychotic Prescribing Practices Through the Use of PSYCKES

Costs of Clubhouses: An International Perspective

State Infant/Toddler Program Policies for Eligibility and Services Provision for Young Children with Autism

Complex Adaptive Systems: A Response to Luchins

Computerized Performance Monitoring Systems: Learning and Living with its Limitations

Neu im Fachgebiet Psychiatrie

Wartezeit nicht kürzer, aber Arbeit flexibler

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Update Psychiatrie