nach oben

Cancer Causes & Control

Erschienen in:

01.06.2006 | Original Paper

Celebremos La Salud! A Community Randomized Trial of Cancer Prevention (United States)

verfasst von: Beti Thompson, Gloria Coronado, Lu Chen, Ilda Islas

Erschienen in: Cancer Causes & Control | Ausgabe 5/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Compared to non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics in the United States are at higher risk for certain types of cancer.

Methods

In a randomized controlled trial of 20 communities, we examined whether a comprehensive intervention influenced cancer screening behaviors and lifestyle practices in rural communities in Eastern Washington State. Cross-sectional surveys at baseline and post-intervention included interviews with a random sample of approximately 100 households per community. The interview included questions on ever use and recent use of Pap test, mammogram, and fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy, fruit and vegetable consumption and smoking practices.

Results

We found few significant changes in use of screening services for cervical (Pap test), breast (mammogram) or colorectal cancer (fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy) between intervention and control communities. We found no significant differences in fruit and vegetable consumption nor in smoking prevalence between the two groups. We found more awareness of and participation in intervention activities in the treatment communities than the control communities.

Conclusions

Our null findings might be attributable to the low dose of the intervention, a cohort effect, or contamination of the effect in non-intervention communities. Further research to identify effective strategies to improve cancer prevention lifestyle behaviors and screening practices are needed.

U.S. Census Bureau (2000) Differences in Population by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin, for the United States: 1990 to 2000 (Table 4)

U.S. Census Bureau (2001) Population by Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin, for All Ages and for 18 Years and Over, for the United States: 2000 (Table 1)

Ramirez AG, McAlister A, Gallion KJ et al (1995) Community level cancer control in a Texas barrio: Part I—Theoretical basis, implementation, and process evaluation. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 18:117–122PubMed

Kristal AR, Shattuck AL, Patterson RE (1999) Differences in fat-related dietary patterns between black, Hispanic and White women: results from the Women’s Health Trial Feasibility Study in Minority Populations. Public Health Nutrition 2(3):253–262PubMed

Mishra SI, Chavez LR, Magana JR, Nava P, Valdez RB, Hubbell FA (1998) Improving breast cancer control among Latinas: evaluation of a theory-based educational program. Health Educ Behav 25(5):653–670PubMed

Ramirez AG, Suarez L, Laufman L, Barroso C, Chalela P (2000) Hispanic women’s breast and cervical cancer knowledge, attitudes, and screening behaviors. Am J Health Promot 14(5):292–300PubMed

Coronado G, Thompson B, Koepsell TD, Schwartz SM, McLerran D (2004) Use of Pap test among Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites in a rural setting. Prev Med 38(6):713–722CrossRefPubMed

Shah M, Zhu K, Wu H, Potter J (2005) Hispanic acculturation and utilization of cervical cancer screening in the US. Prev Med (November 2005, Epub ahead of print)

Chao A, Gilliland FD, Hunt WC, Bulterys M, Becker TM, Key CR (1998) Increasing incidence of colon and rectal cancer among Hispanics and American Indians in New Mexico (United States), 1969–94. Cancer Causes Control 9(2):137–144CrossRefPubMed

10.

Ries LA, Wingo PA, Miller DS et al (2000) The annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973–1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer. Cancer 88(10):2398–2424CrossRefPubMed

11.

Lawrence D, Graber JE, Mills SL, Meissner HI, Warnecke R (2003) Smoking cessation interventions in U.S. racial/ethnic minority populations: an assessment of the literature. Prev Med 36(2):204–216CrossRefPubMed

12.

Puschel K, Thompson B, Coronado GD, Lopez LC, Kimball AM (2001) Factors related to cancer screening in Hispanics: a comparison of the perceptions of Hispanic community members, health care providers, and representatives of organizations that serve Hispanics. Health Educ Behav 28(5):573–590PubMed

13.

Gilliland FD, Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Stauber P, Key CR (2000) Patterns of mammography use among Hispanic, American Indian, and non-Hispanic White women in New Mexico, 1994–1997. Am J Epidemiol 152(5):432–437CrossRefPubMed

14.

Lusk SL (1998) Culturally sensitive interventions for Hispanics. AAOHN J 46(12):589–592PubMed

15.

Bracht N, Kingsbury L, Rissel C (1998) A five-stage community organization model for health promotion: empowerment and partnership strategies. In: Bracht N (ed) Health promotion at the community level: new advances, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 83–104

16.

Thompson B, Nettekoven L, Ferster D, Stanley LC, Thompson J, Corbett KK (1995) Mobilizing the COMMIT communities for smoking control. In: Thompson B (ed) Community-based interventions for smokers: The COMMIT field experience, Monograph 6. US Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, pp 53–73

17.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2001) Cigarette smoking-related mortality. http:www.cdc/tobacco/researchdata/healthconsequences/mortali.htm. Accessed 9/20/01

18.

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2004) Prevalence Data, Nationwide—2002 Tobacco Use. http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brffs/race.asp? Accessed July 6, 2004

19.

Woodruff SI, Zaslow KA, Candelaria J, Elder JP (1997) Effects of gender and acculturation on nutrition-related factors among limited-English proficient Hispanic adults. Ethn Dis 7(2):121–126PubMed

20.

Elder JP, Castro FG, de Moor C et al (1991) Differences in cancer-risk-related behaviors in Latino and Anglo adults. Prev Med 20(6):751–763CrossRefPubMed

21.

Otero-Sabogal R, Sabogal F, Perez-Stable EJ, Hiatt RA (1995) Dietary practices, alcohol consumption, and smoking behavior: ethnic, sex, and acculturation differences. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr (18):73–82

22.

Winkleby MA, Albright CL, Howard-Pitney B, Lin J, Fortmann SP (1994) Hispanic/white differences in dietary fat intake among low educated adults and children. Prev Med 23(4):465–473CrossRefPubMed

23.

Neuhouser ML, Thompson B, Coronado GD, Solomon CC (2004) Higher fat intake and lower fruit and vegetables intakes are associated with greater acculturation among Mexicans living in Washington state. J Am Diet Assoc 104(1):51–57CrossRefPubMed

24.

Bermudez OI, Falcon LM, Tucker KL (2000) Intake and food sources of macronutrients among older Hispanic adults: association with ethnicity, acculturation, and lengthy of residence in the U.S. J Am Diet Assoc 100(6):665–673PubMed

25.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2002) National Health Interview Survey. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm. Accessed 8/22/02

26.

American Cancer Society (2003) Cancer facts and figures for Hispanics/Latinos 2003–2005. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA

27.

Krieger N, Quesenberry C Jr., Peng T et al (1999) Social class, race/ethnicity, and incidence of breast, cervix, colon, lung, and prostate cancer among Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White residents of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1988–92 (United States). Cancer Causes Control 10(6):525–537CrossRefPubMed

28.

Mills PK, Kwong S (2001) Cancer incidence in the United Farmworkers of America (UFW), 1987–1997. Am J Ind Med 40(5):596–603PubMed

29.

Jones AR, Caplan LS, Davis MK (2003) Racial/ethnic differences in the self-reported use of screening mammography. J Commun Health 28(5):303–316CrossRef

30.

Ramirez AG, Talavera GA, Villarreal R et al (2000) Breast cancer screening in regional Hispanic populations. Health Educ Res 15(5):559–568CrossRefPubMed

31.

Harmon MP, Castro FG, Coe K (1996) Acculturation and cervical cancer: knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors of Hispanic women. Women Health 24(3):37–57PubMed

32.

O’Brien K, Cokkinides V, Jemal A et al (2003) Cancer Statistics for Hispanics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 53(4):208–226PubMed

33.

del Carmen MG, Montz FJ, Bristow RE, Bovicelli A, Cornelison T, Trimble E (1999) Ethnic differences in patterns of care of stage 1A(1) and stage 1A(2) cervical cancer: a SEER database study. Gynecol Oncol 75(1):113–117PubMed

34.

Howe SL, Delfino RJ, Taylor TH, Anton-Culver H (1998). The risk of invasive cervical cancer among Hispanics: evidence for targeted preventive interventions. Prev Med 27(5 Pt 1):674–680PubMed

35.

Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Richards T, Wilson KM (2003) Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among Hispanic and non-Hispanic women residing near the United States-Mexico border, 1999–2000. Family Commun Health 26(2):130–139

36.

Benard VB, Lee NC, Piper M, Richardson L (2001) Race-specific results of Papanicolaou testing and the rate of cervical neoplasia in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1991–1998 (United States). Cancer Causes Control 12(1):61–68CrossRefPubMed

37.

Coronado GD, Koepsell TD, Thompson B, Schwartz SM, Wharton RS, Grossman JE (2002) Assessing cervical cancer risk in Hispanics. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prevent 11(10 Pt 1):979–984

38.

Coughlin SS, Thompson TD, Hall HI, Logan P, Uhler RJ (2002) Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998–1999. Cancer 94(11):2801–2812CrossRefPubMed

39.

Rawl SM, Menon U, Champion V (2002) Colorectal cancer screening: an overview of current trends. Nurs Clin North Am 37(2):225–245PubMed

40.

Wolf RL, Zybert P, Brouse CH et al (2001) Knowledge, beliefs, and barriers relevant to colorectal cancer screening in an urban population: a pilot study. Family Commun Health 24(3):34–47

41.

Goel MS, Wee CC, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Ngo-Metzger Q, Phillips RS (2003) Racial and ethnic disparities in cancer screening (Populations at risk). J Gen Intern Med 18:1028–1035PubMed

42.

Bastani R, Gallardo N, Maxwell A (2001) Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among ethnically diverse and average risk individuals. J Psychosoc Oncol 19(3/4):65–84CrossRef

43.

Thompson B, Coronado GD, Solomon CC, McClerran DF, Neuhouser ML, Feng Z (2002) Cancer prevention behaviors and socioeconomic status among Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites in a rural population in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 13(8):719–728CrossRefPubMed

44.

Hancock L, Sanson-Fisher R, Perkins J, McClintok A, Howley P, Gibberd R (2001) Effect of a community action program on adult quit smoking rates in rural Australian towns: the CART project. Prev Med 32:118–127PubMed

45.

Commit Research Group (1995) Community intervention trial for smoking cessation (COMMIT): I. Cohort results from a four-year community intervention. Am J Public Health 85(2):183–192

46.

Shannon J, Kristal AR, Curry SJ, Beresford SA (1997) Application of a behavioral approach to measuring dietary change: the fat- and fiber-related diet behavior questionnaire. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prevent 6(5):355–361

47.

Subar AF, Heimendinger J, Patterson BH, Krebs-Smith SM, Pivonka E, Kessler R (1995) Fruit and vegetable intake in the United States: the baseline survey of the five a day for better health program. Am J Health Promot 9(5):352–360PubMed

48.

Sorensen G, Thompson B, Glanz K et al (1996) Work-site based cancer prevention: primary results from the Working Well Trial. Am J Public Health 86(7):939–947PubMed

49.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, 2nd and 3rd edn. International Medical Publishing Inc., McClean, VA

50.

Coronado GD, Thompson B, McLerran D, Schwartz SM, Koepsell TD (2005) A short acculturation scale for Mexican American populations. Ethn Dis 15:53–62

51.

SAS 9.0 for Windows [computer program] (2002) Version. Cary, North Carolina

52.

Farquhar JW, Fortmann SP, Flora JA et al (1990) Effects of communitywide education on cardiovascular disease risk factors. The Stanford Five-City Project. JAMA 264(3):359–365CrossRefPubMed

53.

Luepker RV, Rastam L, Hannan PJ et al (1996) Community education for cardiovascular disease prevention. Morbidity and mortality results from the Minnesota Heart Health Program. Am J Epidemiol 144(4):351–362PubMed

54.

Mittelmark MB (1999) Health promotion at the community level: lessons from diverse perspectives. In: Bracht N (ed) Health promotion at the community level: new advances, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 3–27

55.

Thompson B, Coronado G, Neuhouser ML, Chen L (2005) Colorectal carcinoma screening among Hispanics and Non-Hispanic Whites in a rural setting. Cancer 103(12):2491–2498CrossRefPubMed

56.

Fitzgibbon ML, Stolley MR, Avellone ME, Sugerman S, Chavez N (1996) Involving parents in cancer risk reduction: a program for Hispanic American families. Health Psychol 15(6):413–422CrossRefPubMed

57.

Valdez A, Banerjee K, Ackerson L, Fernandez M (2002) A multimedia breast cancer education intervention for low-income Latinas. J Commun Health 27(1):33–51CrossRef

58.

Earp JA, Eng E, O’Malley MS et al (2002) Increasing use of mammography among older, rural African American women: results from a community trial. Am J Public Health 92(4):646–654PubMed

59.

Andersen MR, Yasui Y, Meischke H, Kuniyuki A, Etzioni R, Urban N (2000) The effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities. Am J Prev Med 18(3):199–207CrossRefPubMed

60.

Commit Research Group (1995) Community intervention trial for smoking cessation (COMMIT): II. Changes in adult cigarette smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health 85(2):193–200

61.

Susser M (1995) The tribulations of trials—intervention in communities. Am J Public Health 85(2):156–158PubMed

62.

Feng Z, Thompson B (2002) Some design issues in a community intervention trial. Control Clin Trials 23(4):431–449PubMed

63.

Fisher EB Jr (1995) The results of the COMMIT trial. Community intervention trial for smoking cessation. Am J Public Health 85(2):159–160PubMed

64.

Fiore MC, Baker TB (1995) Smoking cessation treatment and the good doctor club. Am J Public Health 85(2):161–163PubMed

65.

Hancock L, Sanson-Fisher R, Perkins J, Corkrey R, Burton R, Reid S (2001) Effect of a community action intervention on cervical cancer screening rates in rural Australian towns: The CART Project. Prev Med 32:109–117PubMed

66.

Thompson B, Coronado G, Snipes S, Puschel K (2003) Methodologic advances and ongoing challenges in designing community-based health promotion programs. Ann Rev Public Health 24:315–340CrossRef

67.

Fisher EB, Auslander WF, Munro JF, Arfken CL, Brownson RC, Owens NW (1998) Neighbors for a smoke free north side: evaluation of a community organization approach to promoting smoking cessation among African Americans. Am J Public Health 88(11):1658–1663PubMed

Titel: Celebremos La Salud! A Community Randomized Trial of Cancer Prevention (United States)
verfasst von: Beti Thompson
Gloria Coronado
Lu Chen
Ilda Islas
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2006
Verlag: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Erschienen in: Cancer Causes & Control / Ausgabe 5/2006
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-006-0006-x

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Nodal-negativ nach neoadjuvanter Chemo: Axilladissektion verzichtbar?

03.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Wenn bei Mammakarzinomen durch eine neoadjuvante Chemotherapie ein Downstaging von nodal-positiv zu nodal-negativ gelingt, scheint es auch ohne Axilladissektion nur selten zu axillären Rezidiven zu kommen.

Wo hapert es noch bei der Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie?

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Bestrahlung nach Prostatektomie: mehr Schaden als Nutzen?

02.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Eine adjuvante Radiotherapie nach radikaler Prostata-Op. bringt den Betroffenen wahrscheinlich keinen Vorteil. Im Gegenteil: Durch die Bestrahlung steigt offenbar das Risiko für Harn- und Stuhlinkontinenz.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten.

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Celebremos La Salud! A Community Randomized Trial of Cancer Prevention (United States)

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Nodal-negativ nach neoadjuvanter Chemo: Axilladissektion verzichtbar?

Wo hapert es noch bei der Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie?

Bestrahlung nach Prostatektomie: mehr Schaden als Nutzen?

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Update Onkologie

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2006

Re: Glaser et al

The Future of Cancer Surveillance

Patterns of Disparity: Ethnic and Socio-economic Trends in Breast Cancer Mortality in New Zealand

Beliefs about Tobacco Industry (mal)Practices and Youth Smoking Behaviour: Insight for Future Tobacco Control Campaigns (Canada)

Frequent Tanning Bed Use, Weight Concerns, and Other Health Risk Behaviors in Adolescent Females (United States)

O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Leu84Phe and Ile143Val Polymorphisms and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in the Nurses’ Health Study and Physicians’ Health Study (United States)

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Nodal-negativ nach neoadjuvanter Chemo: Axilladissektion verzichtbar?

Wo hapert es noch bei der Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie?

Bestrahlung nach Prostatektomie: mehr Schaden als Nutzen?

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Update Onkologie