Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 1/2015

01.01.2015 | Original Paper

Effective diameter of the aortic annulus prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: influence of area-based versus perimeter-based calculation

verfasst von: K. von Aspern, B. Foldyna, C. D. Etz, A. Hoyer, F. Girrbach, D. Holzhey, C. Lücke, M. Grothoff, A. Linke, F. W. Mohr, M. Gutberlet, L. Lehmkuhl

Erschienen in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

In computed tomography (CT) evaluation prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation area- and perimeter-based calculation of the aortic annulus diameter, the so-called effective annulus diameter (ED), is the preferred parameter for decision making regarding prosthesis sizes. Currently, it is unclear how relevant the differences between the two methods of measurement are and how they are influenced by the cardiac cycle. The aim of this study was to compare area- and perimeter-based measurements in computed tomography derived aortic annulus sizing. A total of 60 patients who underwent evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation were included in this study. All patients received pre-procedural ECG gated CT. The aortic annulus area and perimeter were measured and the derived ED compared using parametric statistics and Bland and Altman analysis. The mean patient age was 80.2 ± 4 years. Systolic aortic annulus area and perimeter were higher compared to diastolic results (mean difference area 12.8 ± 24 mm2 and perimeter 0.72 ± 1 mm; p = 0.009–0.068). Both the area- and perimeter-based ED had a good agreement within two standard deviations for systolic and diastolic measurements. Effective diameter measurements derived from the area were significantly smaller compared to perimeter-based measurements (mean difference: systolic 0.72 ± 0.3 mm and diastolic 0.81 ± 0.4 mm; p < 0.001). While the area-based ED was significantly influenced by the cardiac cycle with a mean difference of 0.4 ± 0.6 mm (p = 0.009), no significant difference was found for the perimeter-based ED (mean difference: 0.2 ± 0.4; p = 0.07). For patients undergoing CT evaluation prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation, the perimeter-based effective annulus diameter provides a reliable parameter for annulus sizing without significant affection by the cardiac cycle and therefore facilitates annulus measurements with a single heart phase. However, perimeter-based diameters of the annulus are significantly larger than area-based diameters.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Holmes DR Jr, Mack MJ, Kaul S, Agnihotri A, Alexander KP, Bailey SR et al (2012) American Heart A, American Society of E, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic S, Heart Failure Society of A, Mended H, Society of Cardiovascular A, Society of Cardiovascular Computed T, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic R. 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement: developed in collabration with the American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Heart Failure Society of America, Mended Hearts, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:e29–e84PubMedCrossRef Holmes DR Jr, Mack MJ, Kaul S, Agnihotri A, Alexander KP, Bailey SR et al (2012) American Heart A, American Society of E, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic S, Heart Failure Society of A, Mended H, Society of Cardiovascular A, Society of Cardiovascular Computed T, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic R. 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement: developed in collabration with the American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Heart Failure Society of America, Mended Hearts, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:e29–e84PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363:1597–1607PubMedCrossRef Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG et al (2010) Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363:1597–1607PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J, Schoenhagen P, Min JK, Leipsic JA (2012) SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6:366–380PubMedCrossRef Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J, Schoenhagen P, Min JK, Leipsic JA (2012) SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6:366–380PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmkuhl L, Foldyna B, Haensig M, von Aspern K, Lucke C, Andres C et al (2013) Role of preprocedural computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Rofo 185:66–67 Lehmkuhl L, Foldyna B, Haensig M, von Aspern K, Lucke C, Andres C et al (2013) Role of preprocedural computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Rofo 185:66–67
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmkuhl LH, von Aspern K, Foldyna B, Grothoff M, Nitzsche S, Kempfert J et al (2013) Comparison of aortic root measurements in patients undergoing transapical aortic valve implantation (TA-AVI) using three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT): differences and variability. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:417–424PubMedCrossRef Lehmkuhl LH, von Aspern K, Foldyna B, Grothoff M, Nitzsche S, Kempfert J et al (2013) Comparison of aortic root measurements in patients undergoing transapical aortic valve implantation (TA-AVI) using three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT): differences and variability. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:417–424PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dill KE, George E, Abbara S, Cummings K, Francois CJ, Gerhard-Herman MD et al (2013) ACR appropriateness criteria imaging for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Radiol 10:957–965PubMedCrossRef Dill KE, George E, Abbara S, Cummings K, Francois CJ, Gerhard-Herman MD et al (2013) ACR appropriateness criteria imaging for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Radiol 10:957–965PubMedCrossRef
7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurvitch R, Webb JG, Yuan R, Johnson M, Hague C, Willson AB et al (2011) Aortic annulus diameter determination by multidetector computed tomography: reproducibility, applicability, and implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4:1235–1245PubMedCrossRef Gurvitch R, Webb JG, Yuan R, Johnson M, Hague C, Willson AB et al (2011) Aortic annulus diameter determination by multidetector computed tomography: reproducibility, applicability, and implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4:1235–1245PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kempfert J, Van Linden A, Lehmkuhl L, Rastan AJ, Holzhey D, Blumenstein J et al (2012) Aortic annulus sizing: echocardiographic versus computed tomography derived measurements in comparison with direct surgical sizing. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 42:627–633PubMedCrossRef Kempfert J, Van Linden A, Lehmkuhl L, Rastan AJ, Holzhey D, Blumenstein J et al (2012) Aortic annulus sizing: echocardiographic versus computed tomography derived measurements in comparison with direct surgical sizing. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 42:627–633PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmkuhl L, Foldyna B, von Aspern K, Lucke C, Grothoff M, Nitzsche S et al (2013) Inter-individual variance and cardiac cycle dependency of aortic root dimensions and shape as assessed by ECG-gated multi-slice computed tomography in patients with severe aortic stenosis prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is it crucial for correct sizing? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:693–703PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lehmkuhl L, Foldyna B, von Aspern K, Lucke C, Grothoff M, Nitzsche S et al (2013) Inter-individual variance and cardiac cycle dependency of aortic root dimensions and shape as assessed by ECG-gated multi-slice computed tomography in patients with severe aortic stenosis prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: is it crucial for correct sizing? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:693–703PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Linden A, Kempfert J, Blumenstein J, Mollmann H, Kim WK, Alkaya S et al (2014) Manual versus automatic detection of aortic annulus plane in a computed tomography scan for transcatheter aortic valve implantation screening. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 46:207–212PubMedCrossRef Van Linden A, Kempfert J, Blumenstein J, Mollmann H, Kim WK, Alkaya S et al (2014) Manual versus automatic detection of aortic annulus plane in a computed tomography scan for transcatheter aortic valve implantation screening. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 46:207–212PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat de Heer LM, Budde RP, Mali WP, de Vos AM, van Herwerden LA, Kluin J (2011) Aortic root dimension changes during systole and diastole: evaluation with ECG-gated multidetector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1195–1204PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef de Heer LM, Budde RP, Mali WP, de Vos AM, van Herwerden LA, Kluin J (2011) Aortic root dimension changes during systole and diastole: evaluation with ECG-gated multidetector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1195–1204PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160PubMedCrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, Borenstein N, Tron C, Bauer F et al (2002) Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation 106:3006–3008PubMedCrossRef Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, Borenstein N, Tron C, Bauer F et al (2002) Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case description. Circulation 106:3006–3008PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe Y, Morice MC, Bouvier E, Leong T, Hayashida K, Lefevre T et al (2013) Automated 3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multidetector computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4:1235–1245 Watanabe Y, Morice MC, Bouvier E, Leong T, Hayashida K, Lefevre T et al (2013) Automated 3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multidetector computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4:1235–1245
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Schultz C, Moelker A, Tzikas A, Piazza N, de Feyter P, van Geuns RJ et al (2010) The use of MSCT for the evaluation of the aortic root before transcutaneous aortic valve implantation: the Rotterdam approach. EuroIntervention 6:505–511PubMedCrossRef Schultz C, Moelker A, Tzikas A, Piazza N, de Feyter P, van Geuns RJ et al (2010) The use of MSCT for the evaluation of the aortic root before transcutaneous aortic valve implantation: the Rotterdam approach. EuroIntervention 6:505–511PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pershad A, Stone D, Morris MF, Fang K, Gellert G (2013) Aortic annulus measurement and relevance to successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a new technique using 3D TEE. J Interv Cardiol 26:302–309PubMedCrossRef Pershad A, Stone D, Morris MF, Fang K, Gellert G (2013) Aortic annulus measurement and relevance to successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a new technique using 3D TEE. J Interv Cardiol 26:302–309PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamdan A, Guetta V, Konen E, Goitein O, Segev A, Raanani E et al (2012) Deformation dynamics and mechanical properties of the aortic annulus by 4-dimensional computed tomography: insights into the functional anatomy of the aortic valve complex and implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:119–127PubMedCrossRef Hamdan A, Guetta V, Konen E, Goitein O, Segev A, Raanani E et al (2012) Deformation dynamics and mechanical properties of the aortic annulus by 4-dimensional computed tomography: insights into the functional anatomy of the aortic valve complex and implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:119–127PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Blanke P, Siepe M, Reinohl J, Zehender M, Beyersdorf F, Schlensak C et al (2010) Assessment of aortic annulus dimensions for Edwards SAPIEN Transapical Heart Valve implantation by computed tomography: calculating average diameter using a virtual ring method. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 38:750–758PubMedCrossRef Blanke P, Siepe M, Reinohl J, Zehender M, Beyersdorf F, Schlensak C et al (2010) Assessment of aortic annulus dimensions for Edwards SAPIEN Transapical Heart Valve implantation by computed tomography: calculating average diameter using a virtual ring method. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 38:750–758PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Effective diameter of the aortic annulus prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation: influence of area-based versus perimeter-based calculation
verfasst von
K. von Aspern
B. Foldyna
C. D. Etz
A. Hoyer
F. Girrbach
D. Holzhey
C. Lücke
M. Grothoff
A. Linke
F. W. Mohr
M. Gutberlet
L. Lehmkuhl
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Elektronische ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-014-0527-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.