Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Epidemiology 12/2008

01.12.2008 | Commentary

Appropriate epidemiologic methods as a prerequisite for valid study results

verfasst von: Andreas Stang

Erschienen in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Ausgabe 12/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

As in every research field, valid scientific results are a product of clear thinking and excellent methodology. The domain of observational studies in contrast to experimental studies is especially prone to systematic errors because many factors cannot be controlled by the investigator. Therefore, observational studies frequently suffer from confounding, nonresponse bias, misclassification, and mismeasurement bias that threaten the validity of study results. In contrast to other biomedical research fields, epidemiology is a quite young discipline [1] and the methodology of epidemiology to address these potential errors by either preventing them by design or controlling them by analysis is still evolving nowadays [2]. It is therefore good news to observe that the European Journal of Epidemiology published several articles that were explicitly dedicated to epidemiologic methods in recent years. The aim of this commentary is to highlight some of the methodological articles published in this journal. For this purpose, I give for each highlighted article a little introduction, thereafter summarize the authors’ study (indented text), and finally comment on the implications of the authors’ findings. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Morabia A. History of epidemiologic methods and concepts. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag; 2004. Morabia A. History of epidemiologic methods and concepts. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag; 2004.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Orsini N, Bellocco R, Bottai M, Pagano M, Wolk A. Reproducibility of the past year and historical self-administered total physical activity questionnaire among older women. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22:363–8. doi:10.1007/s10654-006-9102-1.PubMedCrossRef Orsini N, Bellocco R, Bottai M, Pagano M, Wolk A. Reproducibility of the past year and historical self-administered total physical activity questionnaire among older women. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22:363–8. doi:10.​1007/​s10654-006-9102-1.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Robins JM, Greenland S. The role of model selection in causal inference from nonexperimental data. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;123:392–402.PubMed Robins JM, Greenland S. The role of model selection in causal inference from nonexperimental data. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;123:392–402.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lash TL, Fink AK. Semi-automated sensitivity analysis to assess systematic errors in observational data. Epidemiology. 2003;14:451–8.PubMed Lash TL, Fink AK. Semi-automated sensitivity analysis to assess systematic errors in observational data. Epidemiology. 2003;14:451–8.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tolonen H, Helakorpi S, Talala K, Helasoja V, Martelin T, Prattala R. 25-year trends and socio-demographic differences in response rates: Finnish adult health behaviour survey. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21:409–15. doi:10.1007/s10654-006-9019-8.PubMedCrossRef Tolonen H, Helakorpi S, Talala K, Helasoja V, Martelin T, Prattala R. 25-year trends and socio-demographic differences in response rates: Finnish adult health behaviour survey. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21:409–15. doi:10.​1007/​s10654-006-9019-8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Iwasaki M, Yamamoto S, Otani T, Inoue M, Hanaoka T, Sobue T, et al. Generalizability of relative risk estimates from a well-defined population to a general population. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21:253–62. doi:10.1007/s10654-006-0004-z.PubMedCrossRef Iwasaki M, Yamamoto S, Otani T, Inoue M, Hanaoka T, Sobue T, et al. Generalizability of relative risk estimates from a well-defined population to a general population. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21:253–62. doi:10.​1007/​s10654-006-0004-z.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Boffetta P, McLaughlin JK, La Vecchia C, Tarone RE, Lipworth L, Blot WJ. False-positive results in cancer epidemiology: a plea for epistemological modesty. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:988–95. doi:10.1093/jnci/djn191.PubMedCrossRef Boffetta P, McLaughlin JK, La Vecchia C, Tarone RE, Lipworth L, Blot WJ. False-positive results in cancer epidemiology: a plea for epistemological modesty. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:988–95. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djn191.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology. 2007;18:805–35.PubMedCrossRef Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology. 2007;18:805–35.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Richiardi L, Baussano I, Vizzini L, Douwes J, Pearce N, Merletti F. Feasibility of recruiting a birth cohort through the Internet: the experience of the NINFEA cohort. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22:831–7. doi:10.1007/s10654-007-9194-2.PubMedCrossRef Richiardi L, Baussano I, Vizzini L, Douwes J, Pearce N, Merletti F. Feasibility of recruiting a birth cohort through the Internet: the experience of the NINFEA cohort. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22:831–7. doi:10.​1007/​s10654-007-9194-2.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothman KJ. Modern epidemiology. 1st ed. Boston: Little, Brown and Company; 1986. Rothman KJ. Modern epidemiology. 1st ed. Boston: Little, Brown and Company; 1986.
Metadaten
Titel
Appropriate epidemiologic methods as a prerequisite for valid study results
verfasst von
Andreas Stang
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2008
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Ausgabe 12/2008
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-008-9299-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2008

European Journal of Epidemiology 12/2008 Zur Ausgabe