Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Epidemiology 6/2017

30.06.2017 | META-ANALYSIS

Diagnostic performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy combined with fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: meta-analysis and modeling

verfasst von: Tobias Niedermaier, Korbinian Weigl, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner

Erschienen in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), which reliably detects neoplasms in the distal colon and rectum but not in the proximal colon, has been shown to reduce incidence and mortality of distal colorectal cancer (CRC). Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) detect the majority of CRCs and some proportion of adenomas also in the proximal colon. We assessed the expected diagnostic performance of combined application of FS and FIT. We systematically reviewed screening studies conducted in an average risk population that reported specificities and site-specific sensitivities of FITs for detection of CRC or advanced adenoma (AA). Only studies that conducted colonoscopy in all subjects were included. PubMed and Web of Science were searched until May 13, 2016. Reference lists of eligible studies were also screened. Sensitivity of FS was derived from colonoscopy results, assuming the same sensitivity as colonoscopy for left-sided neoplasms and follow-up colonoscopy after detection of distal adenomas. Bivariate meta-analyses were used to derive summary estimates of overall sensitivity and specificity of individual and joint application of both tests. Ten eligible studies were identified. Summary estimates (95% confidence intervals) of overall sensitivity for detecting CRC and AA were 65% (56–74%) and 27% (23–31%) for FIT alone, 67% (58–75%) and 67% (59–75%) for FS alone, and 89% (83–92%) and 75% (68–80%), respectively, for the combination of both tests. The pooled specificity (95% CI) of FIT was 92% (90–95%). Adding a FIT to a once-only screening FS would substantially increase sensitivity of CRC screening at a modest loss in specificity.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Segnan N, Armaroli P, Bonelli L, et al. Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial–SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(17):1310–22. doi:10.1093/jnci/djr284.CrossRefPubMed Segnan N, Armaroli P, Bonelli L, et al. Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial–SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(17):1310–22. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djr284.CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner H, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ. 2014;348:g2467. doi:10.1136/bmj.g2467.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brenner H, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ. 2014;348:g2467. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​g2467.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sovich JL, Sartor Z, Misra S. Developments in screening tests and strategies for colorectal cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:326728(326728). doi:10.1155/2015/326728. Sovich JL, Sartor Z, Misra S. Developments in screening tests and strategies for colorectal cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:326728(326728). doi:10.​1155/​2015/​326728.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Sturmer T, Hoffmeister M. Potential for colorectal cancer prevention of sigmoidoscopy versus colonoscopy: population-based case control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(3):494–9. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0460.CrossRefPubMed Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM, Sturmer T, Hoffmeister M. Potential for colorectal cancer prevention of sigmoidoscopy versus colonoscopy: population-based case control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(3):494–9. doi:10.​1158/​1055-9965.​EPI-06-0460.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitlock EP, Lin J, Liles E, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review. Evidence synthesis no. 65, Part 1. AHRQ publication no. 08-05124-EF-1. Rockville, Maryland, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, October 2008. Rockville, MD, 2008. Whitlock EP, Lin J, Liles E, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review. Evidence synthesis no. 65, Part 1. AHRQ publication no. 08-05124-EF-1. Rockville, Maryland, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, October 2008. Rockville, MD, 2008.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakazato MYH, Matsushita H, Sato K, Fujita K, Yamanaka Y, Imai Y. Immunologic fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening. Jpn Med Assoc J. 2006;49(5/6):203–7. Nakazato MYH, Matsushita H, Sato K, Fujita K, Yamanaka Y, Imai Y. Immunologic fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening. Jpn Med Assoc J. 2006;49(5/6):203–7.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut. 2009;58(2):241–8. doi:10.1136/gut.2008.156448.CrossRefPubMed Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut. 2009;58(2):241–8. doi:10.​1136/​gut.​2008.​156448.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Park DI, Ryu S, Kim YH, et al. Comparison of guaiac-based and quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood testing in a population at average risk undergoing colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(9):2017–25. doi:10.1038/ajg.2010.179.CrossRefPubMed Park DI, Ryu S, Kim YH, et al. Comparison of guaiac-based and quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood testing in a population at average risk undergoing colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(9):2017–25. doi:10.​1038/​ajg.​2010.​179.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Khalid-de Bakker CA, Jonkers DM, Sanduleanu S, et al. Test performance of immunologic fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy compared with primary colonoscopy screening for colorectal advanced adenomas. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011;4(10):1563–71. doi:10.1158/1940-6207.capr-11-0076.CrossRefPubMed Khalid-de Bakker CA, Jonkers DM, Sanduleanu S, et al. Test performance of immunologic fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy compared with primary colonoscopy screening for colorectal advanced adenomas. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011;4(10):1563–71. doi:10.​1158/​1940-6207.​capr-11-0076.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM, et al. Immunochemical fecal occult blood testing is equally sensitive for proximal and distal advanced neoplasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(10):1570–8. doi:10.1038/ajg.2012.249.CrossRefPubMed de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM, et al. Immunochemical fecal occult blood testing is equally sensitive for proximal and distal advanced neoplasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(10):1570–8. doi:10.​1038/​ajg.​2012.​249.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiu HM, Lee YC, Tu CH, et al. Association between early stage colon neoplasms and false-negative results from the fecal immunochemical test. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(7):832-8.e1-2. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.01.013. Chiu HM, Lee YC, Tu CH, et al. Association between early stage colon neoplasms and false-negative results from the fecal immunochemical test. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(7):832-8.e1-2. doi:10.​1016/​j.​cgh.​2013.​01.​013.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​b2535.
25.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakama H, Zhang B, Abdul Fattah AS, Kamijo N. Does stool collection method affect outcomes in immunochemical fecal occult blood testing? Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(6):871–5.CrossRefPubMed Nakama H, Zhang B, Abdul Fattah AS, Kamijo N. Does stool collection method affect outcomes in immunochemical fecal occult blood testing? Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(6):871–5.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(5):352–9.CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(5):352–9.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Giorgi Rossi P, Vicentini M, Sacchettini C, et al. Impact of screening program on incidence of colorectal cancer: a cohort study in Italy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;. doi:10.1038/ajg.2015.240.PubMed Giorgi Rossi P, Vicentini M, Sacchettini C, et al. Impact of screening program on incidence of colorectal cancer: a cohort study in Italy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;. doi:10.​1038/​ajg.​2015.​240.PubMed
33.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Wilschut J, Knudsen AB, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM. AHRQ technology assessments. Cost-effectiveness of DNA stool testing to screen for colorectal cancer. rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2007. Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Wilschut J, Knudsen AB, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM. AHRQ technology assessments. Cost-effectiveness of DNA stool testing to screen for colorectal cancer. rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2007.
37.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA. A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med. 2001;20(19):2865–84.CrossRefPubMed Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA. A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med. 2001;20(19):2865–84.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng TI, Wong JM, Hong CF, et al. Colorectal cancer screening in asymptomaic adults: comparison of colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and fecal occult blood tests. J Formos Med Assoc. 2002;101(10):685–90.PubMed Cheng TI, Wong JM, Hong CF, et al. Colorectal cancer screening in asymptomaic adults: comparison of colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and fecal occult blood tests. J Formos Med Assoc. 2002;101(10):685–90.PubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Haug U, Knudsen AB, Brenner H, Kuntz KM. Is fecal occult blood testing more sensitive for left- versus right-sided colorectal neoplasia? A systematic literature review. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2011;11(6):605–16. doi:10.1586/erm.11.41.CrossRefPubMed Haug U, Knudsen AB, Brenner H, Kuntz KM. Is fecal occult blood testing more sensitive for left- versus right-sided colorectal neoplasia? A systematic literature review. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2011;11(6):605–16. doi:10.​1586/​erm.​11.​41.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitlock EP, Lin J, Liles E, et al. US Preventive Services Task Force evidence syntheses, formerly systematic evidence reviews. Screening for colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008. Whitlock EP, Lin J, Liles E, et al. US Preventive Services Task Force evidence syntheses, formerly systematic evidence reviews. Screening for colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008.
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Colorectal cancers not detected by screening flexible sigmoidoscopy in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(3):612–20. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.024.CrossRefPubMed Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Colorectal cancers not detected by screening flexible sigmoidoscopy in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(3):612–20. doi:10.​1016/​j.​gie.​2011.​10.​024.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Sajid MS, Caswell JF, Abbas MA, Baig MK, McFall MR. Improving the view during flexible sigmoidoscopy: a systematic review of published randomized, controlled trials comparing the use of oral bowel preparation versus enema bowel preparation. Updates Surg. 2015;67(3):247–56. doi:10.1007/s13304-015-0295-2.CrossRefPubMed Sajid MS, Caswell JF, Abbas MA, Baig MK, McFall MR. Improving the view during flexible sigmoidoscopy: a systematic review of published randomized, controlled trials comparing the use of oral bowel preparation versus enema bowel preparation. Updates Surg. 2015;67(3):247–56. doi:10.​1007/​s13304-015-0295-2.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirai HW, Tsoi KK, Chan JY, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: faecal occult blood tests show lower colorectal cancer detection rates in the proximal colon in colonoscopy-verified diagnostic studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;. doi:10.1111/apt.13556. Hirai HW, Tsoi KK, Chan JY, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: faecal occult blood tests show lower colorectal cancer detection rates in the proximal colon in colonoscopy-verified diagnostic studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;. doi:10.​1111/​apt.​13556.
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin JS, Piper MA, Perdue LA, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Evidence syntheses, no. 135. AHRQ publication no. 14-05203-EF-1: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016. Rockville (MD) 2016. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27441328. Lin JS, Piper MA, Perdue LA, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Evidence syntheses, no. 135. AHRQ publication no. 14-05203-EF-1: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016. Rockville (MD) 2016. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​27441328.
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Brenner H, Altenhofen L, Katalinic A, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Hoffmeister M. Sojourn time of preclinical colorectal cancer by sex and age: estimates from the German National Screening Colonoscopy Database. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(10):1140–6. doi:10.1093/aje/kwr188.CrossRefPubMed Brenner H, Altenhofen L, Katalinic A, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Hoffmeister M. Sojourn time of preclinical colorectal cancer by sex and age: estimates from the German National Screening Colonoscopy Database. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(10):1140–6. doi:10.​1093/​aje/​kwr188.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Halloran SP, Launoy G, Zappa M, International Agency for Research on C. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition—faecal occult blood testing. Endoscopy. 2012;44(Suppl 3):SE65–87. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1309791.PubMed Halloran SP, Launoy G, Zappa M, International Agency for Research on C. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition—faecal occult blood testing. Endoscopy. 2012;44(Suppl 3):SE65–87. doi:10.​1055/​s-0032-1309791.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Diagnostic performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy combined with fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: meta-analysis and modeling
verfasst von
Tobias Niedermaier
Korbinian Weigl
Michael Hoffmeister
Hermann Brenner
Publikationsdatum
30.06.2017
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-017-0279-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

European Journal of Epidemiology 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe