nach oben

Erschienen in:

12.09.2018

Clinical outcome of left ventricular multipoint pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Erschienen in: Heart Failure Reviews | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for selected patients with systolic heart failure. Unlike conventional biventricular pacing (BIP), the left ventricular multipoint pacing (MPP) can increase the number of left ventricular pacing sites via a quadripolar lead positioned in the coronary sinus. This synthetic study was conducted to integratively and quantitatively evaluate the clinical outcome of MPP in comparison with BIP. We systematically searched the databases of EMBASE, Ovid medline, and Cochrane Library through May 2018 for studies comparing the clinical outcome of MPP with BIP in the patients who accepted CRT. Hospitalization for reason of heart failure, left ventricular eject fraction (LVEF), CRT response, all-cause morbidity, and cardiovascular death rate was collected for meta-analysis. A total of 11 studies with 29,606 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with BIP group, MPP decreased heart failure hospitalization (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.50; P < 0.00001), improved LVEF (mean difference, 4.97; 95% CI, 3.11 to 6.83; P < 0.00001), increased CRT response (OR, 3.64; 95% CI, 1.68 to 7.87; P = 0.001), and decreased all-cause morbidity (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.26–0.66; P = 0.0002) and cardiovascular death rate (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.11–0.40; P < 0.00001). The published literature demonstrates that MPP was more effective than BIP in the heart failure patients who accepted cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Normand C, Linde C, Singh J, Dickstein K (2018) Indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A comparison of the major international guidelines. JACC Heart Fail 6(4):308–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2018.01.022 CrossRefPubMed

Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, Bordachar P, Boriani G, Breithardt OA, Cleland J, Deharo JC, Delgado V, Elliott PM, Gorenek B, Israel CW, Leclercq C, Linde C, Mont L, Padeletti L, Sutton R, Vardas PE, Zamorano JL, Achenbach S, Baumgartner H, Bax JJ, Bueno H, Dean V, Deaton C, Erol C, Fagard R, Ferrari R, Hasdai D, Hoes AW, Kirchhof P, Knuuti J, Kolh P, Lancellotti P, Linhart A, Nihoyannopoulos P, Piepoli MF, Ponikowski P, Sirnes PA, Tamargo JL, Tendera M, Torbicki A, Wijns W, Windecker S, Kirchhof P, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Badano LP, Aliyev F, Bansch D, Baumgartner H, Bsata W, Buser P, Charron P, Daubert JC, Dobreanu D, Faerestrand S, Hasdai D, Hoes AW, Le Heuzey JY, Mavrakis H, McDonagh T, Merino JL, Nawar MM, Nielsen JC, Pieske B, Poposka L, Ruschitzka F, Tendera M, Van Gelder IC, Wilson CM (2013) 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the task force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European heart rhythm association (EHRA). Eur Heart J 34(29):2281–2329. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht150 CrossRefPubMed

Carluccio E, Biagioli P, Alunni G, Murrone A, Zingarini G, Coiro S, D’Antonio A, Mengoni A, Cerasa MF, Ambrosio G (2017) Non-cardiac factors for prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: the value of baseline, and of serial changes, in red cell distribution width. Int J Cardiol 243:347–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.123 CrossRefPubMed

Kydd AC, Khan FZ, Ring L, Pugh PJ, Virdee MS, Dutka DP (2014) Development of a multiparametric score to predict left ventricular remodelling and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur J Heart Fail 16(11):1206–1213. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.167 CrossRefPubMed

Martin CA, Gajendragadkar PR, Pugh PJ (2014) Unusual cause of poor response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Heart 100(6):514. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305340 CrossRefPubMed

Thompson N, Derval N (2016) Left ventricular endocardial stimulation in patients with a poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: What Is Next? JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2(7):810–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2016.06.003 CrossRefPubMed

Wang J, Su Y, Bai J, Wang W, Qin S, Ge J (2014) Elevated pulmonary artery pressure predicts poor outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 40(2):171–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-014-9890-2 CrossRefPubMed

Werys K, Petryka-Mazurkiewicz J, Blaszczyk L, Misko J, Spiewak M, Malek LA, Mazurkiewicz L, Milosz-Wieczorek B, Marczak M, Kubik A, Dabrowska A, Piatkowska-Janko E, Sawionek B, Wijesurendra R, Piechnik SK, Bogorodzki P (2016) Cine dyscontractility index: a novel marker of mechanical dyssynchrony that predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 44(6):1483–1492. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25295 CrossRefPubMed

Auricchio A, Heggermont WA (2018) Technology advances to improve response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: what clinicians should know. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 71(6):477–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2018.01.006 CrossRef

10.

Bax JJ, Delgado V (2017) Cardiac resynchronization therapy with multipoint left ventricular lead pacing. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 3(13):1519–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2017.10.013 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25(9):603–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z CrossRefPubMed

13.

Niazi I, Baker J, Corbisiero R, Love C, Martin D, Sheppard R, Worley SJ, Varma N, Lee K, Tomassoni G (2017) Safety and efficacy of multipoint pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy. The multipoint pacing trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 3(13):1510–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2017.06.022 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Pappone C, Calović Z, Cuko A, McSpadden LC, Ryu K, Jordan CD, Saviano M, Baldi M, Pappone A, Dozza L, Giannelli L, Fragakis N, Vicedomini G, Santinelli V (2015) Multipoint left ventricular pacing provides additional echocardiographic benefit to responders and non-responders to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J Suppl 17:A12–A17. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/suv005 CrossRef

15.

Sterlinski M, Sokal A, Lenarczyk R, Van Heuverswyn F, Rinaldi CA, Vanderheyden M, Khalameizer V, Francis D, Heynens J, Stegemann B, Cornelussen R (2016) In heart failure patients with left bundle branch block single lead multispot left ventricular pacing does not improve acute hemodynamic response to conventional biventricular pacing. A multicenter prospective, interventional, non-randomized study. PLoS One 11(4):e0154024. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154024 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

van Everdingen WM, Zweerink A, Salden OAE, Cramer MJ, Doevendans PA, Engels EB, van Rossum AC, Prinzen FW, Vernooy K, Allaart CP, Meine M (2018) Pressure-volume loop analysis of multipoint pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Clinical Electrophysiol 4:881–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2018.02.005 CrossRef

17.

Zanon F, Marcantoni L, Baracca E, Pastore G, Giau G, Rigatelli G, Lanza D, Picariello C, Aggio S, Giatti S, Zuin M, Roncon L, Pacetta D, Noventa F, Prinzen FW (2018) Hemodynamic comparison of different multisites and multipoint pacing strategies in cardiac resynchronization therapies. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 7:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-018-0362-y CrossRef

18.

Alonso P, Andrés A, Osca J, Cano O, José M, De Carranza ST, De Ros JO (2014) Improvement in hemodynamics and contractility with multipoint left ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 67(10):859–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2014.06.008 CrossRef

19.

Cabrera Bueno F, Alzueta Rodriguez J, Olague de Ros J, Fernandez-Lozano I, Garcia Guerrero JJ, de la Concha JF, Hernandez Madrid A, Tolosana Viu JM, Osca Asensi J, Barrera Cordero A, Llorente Hernangomez E (2013) Improvement in hemodynamic response using a quadripolar LV lead. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 36(8):963–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12172 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Menardi E, Ballari GP, Goletto C, Rossetti G, Vado A (2015) Characterization of ventricular activation pattern and acute hemodynamics during multipoint left ventricular pacing. Heart Rhythm 12(8):1762–1769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.04.029 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Osca J, Alonso P, Cano O, Andres A, Miro V, Tello MJS, Olagüe J, Martínez L, Salvador A (2016) The use of multisite left ventricular pacing via quadripolar lead improves acute haemodynamics and mechanical dyssynchrony assessed by radial strain speckle tracking: initial results. Europace 18(4):560–567. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv211 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Valzania C, Eriksson MJ, Biffi M, Boriani G, Gadler F (2013) Acute changes in electromechanical parameters during different pacing configurations using a quadripolar left ventricular lead. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 38(1):61–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-013-9812-8 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Zanon F, Baracca E, Pastore G, Marcantoni L, Fraccaro C, Lanza D, Picariello C, Aggio S, Roncon L, Dell’Avvocata F, Rigatelli G, Pacetta D, Noventa F, Prinzen FW (2015) Multipoint pacing by a left ventricular quadripolar lead improves the acute hemodynamic response to CRT compared with conventional biventricular pacing at any site. Heart Rhythm 12(5):975–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.01.034 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Arias MA, Pachon M, Puchol A, Jimenez-Lopez J, Rodriguez-Padial L (2012) Acute and mid-term outcomes of transvenous implant of a new left ventricular quadripolar lead versus bipolar leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from a single-center prospective database. Cardiol J 19(5):470–478CrossRefPubMed

25.

Forleo GB, Di Biase L, Panattoni G, Mantica M, Parisi Q, Martino A, Pappalardo A, Sergi D, Tesauro M, Papavasileiou LP, Santini L, Calò L, Tondo C, Natale A, Romeo F (2014) Improved implant and postoperative lead performance in CRT-D patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. A 6-month follow-up analysis from a multicenter prospective comparative study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 42(1):59–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-014-9956-1 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Crossley GH, Biffi M, Johnson B, Lin A, Gras D, Hussin A, Cuffio A, Collier JL, El-Chami M, Li S, Holloman K, Exner DV (2015) Performance of a novel left ventricular lead with short bipolar spacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: primary results of the Attain Performa quadripolar left ventricular lead study. Heart Rhythm 12(4):751–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.019 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Philippon F, Liu L, Fung JW, Deharo JC, Anselme F, Delnoy PP, Crijns H, Morillo CA, Krahn AD, Gutleben K, Delumeau J, Molin F (2015) Left ventricular three-dimensional quadripolar lead acute clinical study: the LILAC study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 38(4):438–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12584 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Rinaldi CA, Leclercq C, Kranig W, Kacet S, Betts T, Bordachar P, Gutleben KJ, Shetty A, Donal E, Keel A, Ryu K, Farazi TG, Simon M, Naqvi TZ (2014) Improvement in acute contractility and hemodynamics with multipoint pacing via a left ventricular quadripolar pacing lead. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 40(1):75–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-014-9891-1 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Shetty AK, Duckett SG, Bostock J, Roy D, Ginks M, Hamid S, Rosenthal E, Razavi R, Rinaldi CA (2011) Initial single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 34(4):484–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.03003.x CrossRefPubMed

30.

Vado A, Menardi E, Rossetti G, Ballari G, Feola M, Bobbio M (2014) Single-center experience of a quadripolar pacing lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 39(2):161–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-013-9849-8 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Ziacchi M, Saporito D, Zardini M, Luzi M, Quartieri F, Morgagni G, De Maria E, Bertini M, Carinci V, Boriani G, Biffi M (2016) Left ventricular reverse remodeling elicited by a quadripolar lead: results from the multicenter Per4mer study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 39(3):250–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12792 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Forleo GB, Di Biase L, Della Rocca DG, Panattoni G, Mantica M, Santamaria M, Pappalardo A, Panigada S, Santini L, Natale A, Romeo F (2012) Impact of previous myocardial infarction on outcomes of CRT patients implanted with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. Results from a multicentric prospective study. Int J Cardiol 160(2):145–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.077 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Calo L, Martino A, de Ruvo E, Minati M, Fratini S, Rebecchi M, Lanzillo C, Fagagnini A, Borrelli A, De Luca L, Sciarra L (2014) Acute echocardiographic optimization of multiple stimulation configurations of cardiac resynchronization therapy through quadripolar left ventricular pacing: a tailored approach. Am Heart J 167(4):546–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2013.12.028 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Osca J, Alonso P, Cano O, Sanchez JM, Tejada D, Andres A, Sancho Tello MJ, Olague J (2015) The use of quadripolar left ventricular leads improves the hemodynamic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing Clinical Electrophysiol 38(3):326–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12545 CrossRef

35.

Umar F, Taylor RJ, Stegemann B, Marshall H, Flannigan S, Lencioni M, De Bono J, Griffith M, Leyva F (2016) Haemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy using single-vein, three-pole, multipoint left ventricular pacing in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and a left ventricular free wall scar: the MAESTRO study. Europace 18(8):1227–1234. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv396 CrossRefPubMed

36.

Pappone C, Calovic Z, Vicedomini G, Cuko A, McSpadden LC, Ryu K, Romano E, Baldi M, Saviano M, Pappone A, Ciaccio C, Giannelli L, Ionescu B, Petretta A, Vitale R, Fundaliotis A, Tavazzi L, Santinelli V (2015) Multipoint left ventricular pacing in a single coronary sinus branch improves mid-term echocardiographic and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 26(1):58–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12513 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Pappone C, Ćalović Ž, Vicedomini G, Cuko A, McSpadden LC, Ryu K, Romano E, Saviano M, Baldi M, Pappone A, Ciaccio C, Giannelli L, Ionescu B, Petretta A, Vitale R, Fundaliotis A, Tavazzi L, Santinelli V (2014) Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients. Heart Rhythm 11(3):394–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.11.023 CrossRefPubMed

38.

Seger M, Hanser F, Dichtl W, Stuehlinger M, Hintringer F, Trieb T, Pfeifer B, Berger T (2014) Non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology in a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator patient with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. Europace 16(5):743–749. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu045 CrossRefPubMed

39.

Behar JM, Bostock J, Zhu Li AP, Chin HM, Jubb S, Lent E, Gamble J, Foley PW, Betts TR, Rinaldi CA, Herring N (2015) Cardiac resynchronization therapy delivered via a multipolar left ventricular lead is associated with reduced mortality and elimination of phrenic nerve stimulation: long-term follow-up from a multicenter registry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 26(5):540–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.12625 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Forleo GB, Biase L, Bharmi R, Dalal N, Panattoni G, Pollastrelli A, Tesauro M, Santini L, Natale A, Romeo F (2015) Hospitalization rates and associated cost analysis of cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable defibrillator and quadripolar vs. bipolar left ventricular leads: a comparative effectiveness study. Europace 17(1):101–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu290 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Pappone C, Ćalović Ž, Vicedomini G, Cuko A, McSpadden LC, Ryu K, Jordan CD, Romano E, Baldi M, Saviano M, Pappone A, Vitale R, Catalano C, Ciaccio C, Giannelli L, Ionescu B, Petretta A, Fragakis N, Fundaliotis A, Tavazzi L, Santinelli V (2015) Improving cardiac resynchronization therapy response with multipoint left ventricular pacing: twelve-month follow-up study. Heart Rhythm 12(6):1250–1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.02.008 CrossRefPubMed

42.

Bencardino G, Monaco A, Russo E, Colizzi C, Perna F, Pelargonio G, Narducci ML, Gabrielli FA, Lanza GA, Rebuzzi AG, Crea F (2016) Outcome of patients treated by cardiac resynchronization therapy using a quadripolar left ventricular lead. Circ J 80(3):613–618. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0932 CrossRefPubMed

43.

Turakhia MP, Cao M, Fischer A, Nabutovsky Y, Sloman LS, Dalal N, Gold MR (2016) Reduced mortality associated with quadripolar compared to bipolar left ventricular leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2(4):426–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2016.02.007 CrossRefPubMed

44.

Zanon F, Marcantoni L, Baracca E, Pastore G, Lanza D, Fraccaro C, Picariello C, Conte L, Aggio S, Roncon L, Pacetta D, Badie N, Noventa F, Prinzen FW (2016) Optimization of left ventricular pacing site plus multipoint pacing improves remodeling and clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy at 1 year. Heart Rhythm 13(8):1644–1651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.05.015 CrossRefPubMed

45.

Behar JM, Chin HMS, Fearn S, Ormerod JOM, Gamble J, Foley PWX, Bostock J, Claridge S, Jackson T, Sohal M, Antoniadis AP, Razavi R, Betts TR, Herring N, Rinaldi CA (2017) Cost-effectiveness analysis of quadripolar versus bipolar left ventricular leads for cardiac resynchronization defibrillator therapy in a large, multicenter UK registry. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 3(2):107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2016.04.009 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Forleo GB, Santini L, Giammaria M, Potenza D, Curnis A, Calabrese V, Ricciardi D, D’Agostino C, Notarstefano P, Ribatti V, Morani G, Mantica M, Di Biase L, Bertaglia E, Calò L, Zanon F (2017) Multipoint pacing via a quadripolar left-ventricular lead: preliminary results from the Italian registry on multipoint left-ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (IRON-MPP). Europace 19(7):1170–1177. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw094 CrossRefPubMed

47.

Gu M, Jin H, Hua W, Fan XH, Ding LG, Wang J, Niu HX, Cai C, Zhang S (2017) Repetitive optimizing left ventricular pacing configurations with quadripolar leads improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(37):e8066. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008066 CrossRef

48.

Leyva F, Zegard A, Qiu T, Acquaye E, Ferrante G, Walton J, Marshall H (2017) Cardiac resynchronization therapy using quadripolar versus non-quadripolar left ventricular leads programmed to biventricular pacing with single-site left ventricular pacing: impact on survival and heart failure hospitalization. J Am Heart Assoc 6(10):e007026. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007026 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Leshem E, Suleiman M, Laish-Farkash A, Haim M, Geist M, Luria D, Glikson M, Goldenberg I, Michowitz Y (2018) Impact of quadripolar LV leads on heart failure hospitalization rates among patients implanted with CRT-D: data from the Israeli ICD registry. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 51(1):5–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-017-0305-z CrossRefPubMed

50.

Turagam MK, Afzal MR, Iskander S, Reddy M, Di Biase L, Natale A, Lakkireddy D (2016) A meta-analysis of quadripolar versus bipolar left ventricular leads on post-procedural outcomes. J Atr Fibrillation 9(2):7–11. https://doi.org/10.4022/jafib.1472 CrossRef

51.

Zaidi SIM, Panchal HB, Khan AA, Murtaza G, Rahman ZU, Baloch ZQ, Mungo N, Ramu V (2017) Outcomes in quadripolar vs bipolar left ventricular leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT): a meta-analysis of seven studies. Cardiology (Switzerland) 137:245–349. https://doi.org/10.1159/000477751 CrossRef

52.

Rao P, Faddis M (2017) Cardiac resynchronisation therapy: current indications, management and basic troubleshooting. Heart 103(24):2000–2007. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310656 CrossRefPubMed

53.

Zhang B, Guo J, Zhang G (2017) Comparison of triple-site ventricular pacing versus conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with systolic heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies. J Arrhythm 34(1):55–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12018 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Bordachar P, Gras D, Clementy N, Defaye P, Mondoly P, Boveda S, Anselme F, Klug D, Piot O, Sadoul N, Babuty D, Leclercq C (2017) Clinical impact of an additional left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization nonresponders: the V(3) trial. Heart Rhythm 15:870–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.12.028 CrossRefPubMed

55.

Leclercq C, Lercher P, Lunati M, Rordorf R, Landolina M, Pappone C, Mangual J, McSpadden L, Badie N, Singh J (2018) Influence of etiology, QRS duration, and baseline systolic function on longterm CRT response rate with multipoint pacing: a multicenter experience. Europace 20:i215. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euy015 CrossRef

56.

Zegard A, Qiu T, Acquaye E, Marshall H, Leyva F (2017) Cardiac resynchronization therapy using quadripolar versus non-quadripolar left ventricular leads programmed to single-site left ventricular pacing impact on survival and heart failure hospitalization. Europace 19:iii120CrossRef

57.

Tomassoni GF, Baker J, Corbisiero R, Love CJ, Martin DT, Sheppard RC, Worley SJ, Lee K, Lee LY, Cohorn C, Niazi I (2017) Impact of multipoint™ pacing (MPP) programming on clinical outcomes with a quadripolar CRT-D system in the MPP IDE study. Heart Rhythm 14(5):S38

Titel: Clinical outcome of left ventricular multipoint pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Publikationsdatum: 12.09.2018
Erschienen in: Heart Failure Reviews / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1382-4147
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7322
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-018-9737-5

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

25.04.2024 | Hypotonie | Nachrichten

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Clinical outcome of left ventricular multipoint pacing versus conventional biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Adipositas-Medikament auch gegen Schlafapnoe wirksam

Komplette Revaskularisation bei Infarkt: Neue Studie setzt ein Fragezeichen

Update Kardiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

Implantable devices to monitor patients with heart failure

Transcatheter valve interventions in heart failure: new answers to old questions

Clinical outcomes with biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular conduction defects

Left ventricular restoration devices post myocardial infarction

Percutaneous support of the failing left and right ventricle—recommendations for the use of mechanical device therapy

Electrical manipulation of the failing heart

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Adipositas-Medikament auch gegen Schlafapnoe wirksam

Komplette Revaskularisation bei Infarkt: Neue Studie setzt ein Fragezeichen

Update Kardiologie