nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.12.2012

Geographic Variation in Trends and Characteristics of Teen Childbearing among American Indians and Alaska Natives, 1990–2007

verfasst von: Phyllis A. Wingo, Catherine A. Lesesne, Ruben A. Smith, Lori de Ravello, David K. Espey, Teshia G. Arambula Solomon, Myra Tucker, Judith Thierry

Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Ausgabe 9/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

To study teen birth rates, trends, and socio-demographic and pregnancy characteristics of AI/AN across geographic regions in the US. The birth rate for US teenagers 15–19 years reached a historic low in 2009 (39.1 per 1,000) and yet remains one of the highest teen birth rates among industrialized nations. In the US, teen birth rates among Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, and American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) youth are consistently two to three times the rate among non-Hispanic white teens. Birth certificate data for females younger than age 20 were used to calculate birth rates (live births per 1,000 women) and joinpoint regression to describe trends in teen birth rates by age (<15, 15–17, 18–19) and region (Aberdeen, Alaska, Bemidji, Billings, California, Nashville, Oklahoma, Portland, Southwest). Birth rates for AI/AN teens varied across geographic regions. Among 15–19-year-old AI/AN, rates ranged from 24.35 (California) to 123.24 (Aberdeen). AI/AN teen birth rates declined from the early 1990s into the 2000s for all three age groups. Among 15–17-year-olds, trends were approximately level during the early 2000s–2007 in six regions and declined in the others. Among 18–19-year-olds, trends were significantly increasing during the early 2000s–2007 in three regions, significantly decreasing in one, and were level in the remaining regions. Among AI/AN, cesarean section rates were lower in Alaska (4.1%) than in other regions (16.4–26.6%). This is the first national study to describe regional variation in AI/AN teen birth rates. These data may be used to target limited resources for teen pregnancy intervention programs and guide research.

Hamilton, B. E., et al. (2010). Births: Preliminary data for 2009. National vital statistics reports (Vol. 59, p. 3). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

United Nations Statistics Division. (2011). Demographic yearbook 2006, table 11: Live-birth rates by age of mother and urban/rural residence: Latest available year. Available at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/dyb/dyb2006.htm. Accessed 7 Jan 2011.

Martin, J. A., et al. (2010). Births: Final data for 2007. National vital statistics reports (Vol. 58, no. 24). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

Johnson, J., et al. (2008). The importance of geographic data aggregation in assessing disparities in American Indian prenatal care. American Journal of Public Health, 12, e1–e7. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.148908.

Castor, M. L., et al. (2006). A nationwide population-based study identifying health disparities between American Indians/Alaska Natives and the general populations living in select urban counties. American Journal of Public Health, 96(8), 1478–1484.PubMedCrossRef

Grossman, D. C., et al. (1994). Health status of urban American Indians and Alaska Natives. JAMA, 271(11), 845–850.PubMedCrossRef

Bertolli, J., et al. (1984). AI/AN race/ethnicity data validation workgroup. Racial misidentification of American Indians/Alaska Natives in the HIV/AIDS reporting systems of five states and one urban health jurisdiction, U.S., 1984–2002. Public Health Reports, 122, 382–391.

Indian Health Service. (2003). Regional differences in Indian Health, 2000–2001. Division of Program Statistics, Office of Program Support, Office of Public Health, Indian Health Service, Bethesda, Maryland.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Indian Health Service. (2009). Indian Health surveillance report—sexually transmitted diseases, 2007. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats/IHS/default.htm. Accessed 2 Dec 2010.

10.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. (2011). Data sets and documentation for birth data. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/birth_methods.htm Accessed 7 Jan 2011.

11.

National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems. (2011). Vital statistics data research request process. Available at: http://www.naphsis.org/index.asp?bid=1261. Accessed 18 Jan 2011.

12.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. (2009). Technical Appendix from vital statistics of the United States 2003 natality [Online]. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2009.

13.

Ingram D. D., et al. (2003). United States Census 2000 population with bridged race categories. Vital Health Statistics, 2(135), 1–55.

14.

Parker, J. D., et al. (2004). Bridging between two standards for collecting information on race and ethnicity: An application to Census 2000 and vital rates. Public Health Reports, 119(2), 192–205.PubMed

15.

Schenker, N., & Parker, J. D. (2003). From single-race reporting to multiple-race reporting: using imputation methods to bridge the transition. Statistics in Medicine, 22(9), 1571–1587.PubMedCrossRef

16.

National Cancer Institute-SEER Program. (2011). Statistical resources. U.S. population data [Online]. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/resources. Accessed 22 April 2011.

17.

Arias, E., et al. (2008). The validity of race and Hispanic origin reporting on death certificates in the United States. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Statistics, 2(148). Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchsdata/series/sr_02/sr02_148.pdf. Accessed January 7, 2011.

18.

Espey, D. K., et al. (2008). Methods for improving cancer surveillance data in American Indian/Alaska Native populations. Cancer, 113(5), 1120–1130.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Thoroughman, D. A., et al. (2002). Racial misclassification of American Indians in Oklahoma state surveillance data for sexually transmitted diseases. American Journal of Epidemiology, 155, 1137–1141.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Baumeister, L., et al. (2000). The validity of information on “race” and “Hispanic ethnicity” in California birth certificate data. HSR, 35(4), 869–883.PubMed

21.

Hahn, R. A., et al. (1992). Inconsistencies in coding of race and ethnicity between birth and death in US infants: a new look at infant mortality, 1983 through 1985. JAMA, 267, 259–263.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Jim, M. A., et al. (2006). Racial misclassification of American Indians residing near IHS facilities: Poster P-47, final program and abstracts. Presented at the 2006 North American Association of Central Cancer Registries Annual Conference, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, June 10–16, 2006.

23.

National Cancer Institute, SEER Program, Statistical Research Program. (2011). Joinpoint regression program [Online]. Available at: http://srab.cancer.gov/joinpoint/. Accessed 7 Jan 2011.

24.

Tiwari, R. C., et al. (2005). Bayesian model selection for join point regression with application to age-adjusted cancer rates. Applied Statistics, 54(5), 919–939.CrossRef

25.

National Cancer Institute. (2005). Cancer trends progress report: 2005 update. Appendix: Methodology for characterizing trends. National Cancer Institute [Online]. Available at: http://progressreport.cancer.gov/2005/appendices_methodology.asp. Accessed 7 Jan 2011.

26.

National Conference of State Legislatures. (2011). Federal and state recognized tribes. Available at: http://www.ncsl.org/?tabid=13278#State. Accessed 3 Feb 2011.

27.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (2011). Administration for native American programs. Available at: http://www.policyalmanac.org/culture/archive/native_americans_02.shtml. Accessed 15 Feb 2011.

28.

Gavin, L., et al. (2009). Sexual and reproductive health of persons aged 10–24 years—United States, 2002–2007. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 58(6), 1–58.

29.

Hellerstedt, W. L., et al. (2006). Environmental, social, and personal correlates of having ever had sexual intercourse among American Indian youths. AJPH, 96(12), 2228–2234.CrossRef

30.

Kaufman, C. E., et al. (2007). Culture, context, and sexual risk among Northern Plains American Indian youth. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 2152–2164.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Rutman, S., et al. (2008). Urban American Indian and Alaska Native youth: Youth risk behavior survey 1997–2003. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 12(1), 76–81.PubMedCrossRef

32.

The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. (2008). American Indian/Alaska Native youth and teen pregnancy prevention. Science Says #39, 39:3. Available at: http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/resources/sciencesays.aspx. Accessed July 16, 2011.

33.

Menaker, F., & Hamilton, B. E. (2010). Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS data brief, no 35. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

34.

Leeman, L., & Leeman, R. (2003). A native American community with a 7% cesarean delivery rate: Does case mix, ethnicity, or labor management explain the low rate? The Annals of Family Medicine, 1, 36–43.CrossRef

35.

Mahoney, S. F., & Malcoe, L. H. (2005). Cesarean delivery in native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian Health Service? BIRTH, 32(3), 170–178.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Hamilton B. E., & Ventura S. J. (2003). Characteristics of births to single-and multiple-race women (Vol. 55. no. 5), California, Hawaii, Pennsylvania, Utah, and Washington. NVSS 2007. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr55/nvsr55_15.pdf. Accessed May 13, 2011.

37.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Office of adolescent health. Teenage pregnancy prevention: Grantees. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ash/oah/prevention/grantees/index.html. Accessed 15 Feb 2011.

38.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). Office of adolescent health. Teenage pregnancy prevention: Summary of funded research and development programs for 2010. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ash/oah/prevention/grantees/research_2010_projects.html. Accessed 18 Jan 2011.

39.

Smith, M., et al. (2011). Craig Rushing S, and the Native STAND Curriculum Development Group. Evaluation of Native STAND: A peer educator curriculum for reducing Native American youth sexual risk-taking. In press: Health Education Monograph, 28(1). Available at conference: http://www.indiana.edu/~aids/conferences.html. Accessed 17 Feb 2011.

40.

Barlow, A., et al. (2006). Home-visiting intervention to improve child care among American Indian adolescent mothers. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 160, 1101–1107.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Walkup, J. T., et al. (2009). Randomized controlled trial of a paraprofessional-delivered in-home intervention for young reservation-based American Indian mothers. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 48(6), 591–601.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Johnson, M., et al. (2010). Syphilis outbreak among American Indians, Arizona, 2007–2009. MMWR, 59(06), 158–161. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5906a2.htm. Accessed 31 Oct 2011.

43.

Garwick, A. W., et al. (2008). Native teen voices: Adolescent pregnancy prevention recommendations. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42(1), 81–88.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Geographic Variation in Trends and Characteristics of Teen Childbearing among American Indians and Alaska Natives, 1990–2007
verfasst von: Phyllis A. Wingo
Catherine A. Lesesne
Ruben A. Smith
Lori de Ravello
David K. Espey
Teshia G. Arambula Solomon
Myra Tucker
Judith Thierry
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2012
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal / Ausgabe 9/2012
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0924-4

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2012

Parental Weight (Mis)Perceptions: Factors Influencing Parents’ Ability to Correctly Categorise Their Child’s Weight Status

Validation of the Alcohol Use Module from a Multidimensional Prenatal Psychosocial Risk Screening Instrument

Social and Institutional Factors that Affect Breastfeeding Duration Among WIC Participants in Los Angeles County, California

Aligning Method with Theory: A Comparison of Two Approaches to Modeling the Social Determinants of Health

Environments for Healthy Living (EFHL) Griffith Birth Cohort Study: Background and Methods

Early Predictors of Obesity and Cardiovascular Risk Among American Indian Children