Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 6/2013

01.08.2013

Health Care Utilization in the First Year of Life among Small- and Large- for-Gestational Age Term Infants

verfasst von: Patricia M. Dietz, Joanne H. Rizzo, Lucinda J. England, William M. Callaghan, Kimberly K. Vesco, F. Carol Bruce, Joanna E. Bulkley, Andrea J. Sharma, Mark C. Hornbrook

Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Ausgabe 6/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess if small- and large-for gestational age term infants have greater health care utilization during the first year of life. The sample included 28,215 singleton term infants (37–42 weeks) without major birth defects delivered from 1998 through 2007 and continuously enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Northwest for 12 months after delivery. Birth weight for gestational age was categorized into 3 levels: <10th percentile (SGA), 10–90th percentile (AGA), >90th percentile (LGA). Length of delivery hospitalization, re-hospitalizations and sick/emergency room visits were obtained from electronic records. Logistic regression models estimated associations between birth weight category and re-hospitalization. Generalized linear models estimated adjusted mean number of sick/emergency visits. Among term infants, 6.2 % were SGA and 13.9 % were LGA. Of infants born by cesarean section, SGA infants had 2.7 higher odds [95 % 1.9, 3.8] than AGA infants of staying ≥5 nights during the delivery hospitalization; of those born vaginally, SGA infants had 1.5 higher adjusted odds [95 % 1.1, 2.1] of staying ≥4 nights. LGA compared to AGA infants had higher odds of re-hospitalization within 2 weeks of delivery [OR 1.25, 95 % CI 0.99, 1.58] and of a length of stay ≥4 days during that hospitalization [OR 2.6, 95 % CI 1.3, 5.0]. The adjusted mean number of sick/emergency room visits was slightly higher in SGA (7.8) than AGA (7.5) infants (P < .05). Term infants born SGA or LGA had greater health care utilization than their counterparts, although the increase in utilization beyond the initial delivery hospitalization was small.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Minior, V. K., & Divon, M. Y. (1998). Fetal growth restriction at term: Myth or reality? Obstetrics and Gynecology, 92(1), 57–60.PubMedCrossRef Minior, V. K., & Divon, M. Y. (1998). Fetal growth restriction at term: Myth or reality? Obstetrics and Gynecology, 92(1), 57–60.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang, X., Decker, A., Platt, R. W., & Kramer, M. S. (2008). How big is too big? The perinatal consequences of fetal macrosomia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 198(5), 517.e1–517.e6.CrossRef Zhang, X., Decker, A., Platt, R. W., & Kramer, M. S. (2008). How big is too big? The perinatal consequences of fetal macrosomia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 198(5), 517.e1–517.e6.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Stotland, N. E., Caughey, A. B., Breed, E. M., & Escobar, G. J. (2004). Risk factors and obstetric complications associated with macromia. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 87(3), 220–226.PubMedCrossRef Stotland, N. E., Caughey, A. B., Breed, E. M., & Escobar, G. J. (2004). Risk factors and obstetric complications associated with macromia. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 87(3), 220–226.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat McIntire, D. D., Bloom, S. L., Casey, B. M., & Leveno, K. J. (1999). Birthweight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. New England Journal of Medicine, 340(16), 1234–1238.PubMedCrossRef McIntire, D. D., Bloom, S. L., Casey, B. M., & Leveno, K. J. (1999). Birthweight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. New England Journal of Medicine, 340(16), 1234–1238.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Seeds, J. W., & Peng, J. (1998). Impaired growth and risk of fetal death: Is the tenth percentile the appropriate standard? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 178, 658–669.PubMedCrossRef Seeds, J. W., & Peng, J. (1998). Impaired growth and risk of fetal death: Is the tenth percentile the appropriate standard? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 178, 658–669.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hornbrook, M. C., Whitlock, E. P., Berg, C. J., et al. (2006). Development of an algorithm to identify pregnancy episodes in an integrated health care delivery system. Health Services Research, 42, 908–927.CrossRef Hornbrook, M. C., Whitlock, E. P., Berg, C. J., et al. (2006). Development of an algorithm to identify pregnancy episodes in an integrated health care delivery system. Health Services Research, 42, 908–927.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Callaghan, W. M., & Dietz, P. M. (2010). Differences in birth weight for gestational age distributions according to the measures used to assign gestational age. American Journal of Epidemiology, 171(7), 826–836.PubMedCrossRef Callaghan, W. M., & Dietz, P. M. (2010). Differences in birth weight for gestational age distributions according to the measures used to assign gestational age. American Journal of Epidemiology, 171(7), 826–836.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Maisels, M. S., & Kring, E. A. (1998). Length of stay, jaundice, and hospital readmission. Pediatrics, 101, 995–998.PubMedCrossRef Maisels, M. S., & Kring, E. A. (1998). Length of stay, jaundice, and hospital readmission. Pediatrics, 101, 995–998.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Qiu, X., Lodha, A., Shah, P. S., Sankaran, K., Seshia, M. M., Yee, W., et al. (2012). Canadian Neonatal Network. Neonatal outcomes for small for gestational age preterm infants in Canada. American Journal of Perinatology, 29(2), 87–94.PubMedCrossRef Qiu, X., Lodha, A., Shah, P. S., Sankaran, K., Seshia, M. M., Yee, W., et al. (2012). Canadian Neonatal Network. Neonatal outcomes for small for gestational age preterm infants in Canada. American Journal of Perinatology, 29(2), 87–94.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Luu, T. M., Lefebvre, F., Riley, P., & Infante-Rivard, C. (2010). Continuing utilisation of specialised health services in extremely preterm infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 95(5), F320–F325.PubMedCrossRef Luu, T. M., Lefebvre, F., Riley, P., & Infante-Rivard, C. (2010). Continuing utilisation of specialised health services in extremely preterm infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 95(5), F320–F325.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bird, T. M., Bronstein, J. M., Hall, R. W., Lowery, C. L., Nugent, R., & Mays, G. P. (2010). Late preterm infants: birth outcomes and health care utilization in the first year. Pediatrics, 126(2), e311–e319.PubMedCrossRef Bird, T. M., Bronstein, J. M., Hall, R. W., Lowery, C. L., Nugent, R., & Mays, G. P. (2010). Late preterm infants: birth outcomes and health care utilization in the first year. Pediatrics, 126(2), e311–e319.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Health Care Utilization in the First Year of Life among Small- and Large- for-Gestational Age Term Infants
verfasst von
Patricia M. Dietz
Joanne H. Rizzo
Lucinda J. England
William M. Callaghan
Kimberly K. Vesco
F. Carol Bruce
Joanna E. Bulkley
Andrea J. Sharma
Mark C. Hornbrook
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2013
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Ausgabe 6/2013
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1082-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2013

Maternal and Child Health Journal 6/2013 Zur Ausgabe