Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 6/2015

01.06.2015

Selected Findings from the Cross-Site Evaluation of the Federal Healthy Start Program

verfasst von: Vonna Lou Caleb Drayton, Deborah Klein Walker, Sarah W. Ball, Sara M. A. Donahue, Rebecca V. Fink

Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Ausgabe 6/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Initiated in 1991, the Federal Healthy Start Program includes 105 community-based projects in 39 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. Healthy Start projects work collaboratively with stakeholders to ensure participants’ continuity of care during pregnancy through 2 years postpartum. This evaluation of Healthy Start projects examined relationships between implementation of nine core service and system program components and improvements in birth and project outcomes. Program components and outcomes were examined using data from a 2010 Healthy Start project director (PD) survey (N = 104 projects) and 2009 performance measure data from the Maternal and Child Health Bureau Discretionary Grant Information System (N = 98 projects). We explored bivariate relationships between the nine core program components and (a) intermediate and long-term project outcomes and (b) birth outcomes. We assessed independent associations of implementation of all core program components with birth outcomes, adjusting for project characteristics and activities. In 2010, 57 projects implemented all nine core program components: 104 implemented all five core service components and 69 implemented all four core systems components. Implementation of all core program components was significantly associated with several PD-reported intermediate and long-term project outcomes, but was not associated with singleton low birth weight or infant mortality among participants’ infants. This evaluation revealed a mixed set of relationships between Healthy Start projects’ implementation of the core program components and achievement of project outcomes. Although the findings demonstrated a positive impact of Healthy Start projects on birth outcomes, only a few associations were statistically significant.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Health Resources and Services Administration. (2001). Healthy Start Guidance, 2001. Rockville, MD: Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Health Resources and Services Administration. (2001). Healthy Start Guidance, 2001. Rockville, MD: Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Health Resources and Services Administration. (2005). Healthy Start Guidance, 2005. Rockville, MD: Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Health Resources and Services Administration. (2005). Healthy Start Guidance, 2005. Rockville, MD: Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Health Resources and Services Administration. (2009). Healthy Start Guidance, 2010. Rockville, MD: Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Health Resources and Services Administration. (2009). Healthy Start Guidance, 2010. Rockville, MD: Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Health Resources and Services Administration. (2006). A Profile of Healthy Start: Findings From Phase I of the Evaluation, 2006. Rockville, MD: Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Health Resources and Services Administration. (2006). A Profile of Healthy Start: Findings From Phase I of the Evaluation, 2006. Rockville, MD: Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Brand, A., Walker, D. K., Hargreaves, M., & Rosenbach, M. (2010). Intermediate outcomes, strategies, and challenges of eight Healthy Start Projects. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(5), 654–665.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Brand, A., Walker, D. K., Hargreaves, M., & Rosenbach, M. (2010). Intermediate outcomes, strategies, and challenges of eight Healthy Start Projects. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(5), 654–665.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenbach, M., O’Neil, S., Cook, B., Trebino, L., & Walker, D. K. (2010). Characteristics, access, utilization, satisfaction, and outcomes of healthy start participants in eight sites. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(5), 666–679.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Rosenbach, M., O’Neil, S., Cook, B., Trebino, L., & Walker, D. K. (2010). Characteristics, access, utilization, satisfaction, and outcomes of healthy start participants in eight sites. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(5), 666–679.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Abt Associates. (2012). Methodology for Analysis of Health Resources Service Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau Healthy Start Performance Measures, September 2012. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates. Abt Associates. (2012). Methodology for Analysis of Health Resources Service Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau Healthy Start Performance Measures, September 2012. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Will, J. A., Hall, I., Cheney, T., & Driscoll, M. (2005). Flower Power: Assessing the impact of the Magnolia Project on reducing poor birth outcomes in an at-risk neighborhood. Journal of Applied Sociology/Sociological Practice, 22.2/7(2), 74–90. Will, J. A., Hall, I., Cheney, T., & Driscoll, M. (2005). Flower Power: Assessing the impact of the Magnolia Project on reducing poor birth outcomes in an at-risk neighborhood. Journal of Applied Sociology/Sociological Practice, 22.2/7(2), 74–90.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Salihu, H. M., Mbah, A. K., Jeffers, D., Alio, A. P., & Berry, L. (2009). Healthy Start program and feto-infant morbidity outcomes: Evaluation of program effectiveness. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 13(1), 56–65. doi:10.1007/s10995-008-0400-y.CrossRefPubMed Salihu, H. M., Mbah, A. K., Jeffers, D., Alio, A. P., & Berry, L. (2009). Healthy Start program and feto-infant morbidity outcomes: Evaluation of program effectiveness. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 13(1), 56–65. doi:10.​1007/​s10995-008-0400-y.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kothari, C. L., Wendt, A., Oemeeka, L., Overton, J., & Sweezy, L. C. (2011). Assessing maternal risk for fetal-infant mortality: A population-based study to prioritize risk reduction in a Healthy Start community. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 15(1), 68–76. doi:10.1007/s10995-009-0561-3.CrossRefPubMed Kothari, C. L., Wendt, A., Oemeeka, L., Overton, J., & Sweezy, L. C. (2011). Assessing maternal risk for fetal-infant mortality: A population-based study to prioritize risk reduction in a Healthy Start community. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 15(1), 68–76. doi:10.​1007/​s10995-009-0561-3.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Livingood, W. C., Brady, C., Pierce, K., Atrash, H., Hou, T., & Bryant, T, 3rd. (2010). Impact of pre-conception health care: evaluation of a social determinants focused intervention. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(3), 382–391.CrossRefPubMed Livingood, W. C., Brady, C., Pierce, K., Atrash, H., Hou, T., & Bryant, T, 3rd. (2010). Impact of pre-conception health care: evaluation of a social determinants focused intervention. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(3), 382–391.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Selected Findings from the Cross-Site Evaluation of the Federal Healthy Start Program
verfasst von
Vonna Lou Caleb Drayton
Deborah Klein Walker
Sarah W. Ball
Sara M. A. Donahue
Rebecca V. Fink
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Ausgabe 6/2015
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1635-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2015

Maternal and Child Health Journal 6/2015 Zur Ausgabe