Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 5/2010

01.06.2010

Reference values for the Quality of Life Index in the general Swedish population 18–80 years of age

verfasst von: Mats T. Gullberg, Gunilla Hollman-Frisman, Anna-Christina Ek

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 5/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim in the present study was to establish underlying dimensions of quality of life in Sweden, measured by QLI, and to obtain reference values among a representative sample between 18 and 80 years of age from the general Swedish population.

Method

A total of 1,680 randomly selected persons completed the questionnaire (57% response rate). All data were coded and entered into the statistical software. Factor analysis, maximum-likelihood method with oblique rotation, was employed to explore and reveal underlying dimensions of the QLI. To describe QLI total and subscale reference values for different age groups and men and women, respectively, means and 95% CI as well as medians and quartiles were used. For comparisons related to demographic and background variables, parametric and non-parametric analyses were used (α = 0.01). All data were analysed using SPSS 14.0 statistical software.

Results

Four underlying dimensions emerged: Family and friends, Health and functioning, Social and economic and Psychological/spiritual. Mean values for the total QLI and the four subscales ranged between 17.2 and 23.7 (possible range = 0.0–30.0).

Conclusions

The overall QLI and subscale scores correspond with those presented by other researchers. Population-based measures of generic quality of life and underlying dimensions are important considering the gain when results from specific patient groups are viewed.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Tatarkiewicz, W. (1976). Analysis of happiness. Nijhoff: The Hague. Tatarkiewicz, W. (1976). Analysis of happiness. Nijhoff: The Hague.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Allardt, E. (1976). Dimensions of welfare in a Comparative Scandinavian Study. Acta Sociologica, 19(3), 227–239.CrossRef Allardt, E. (1976). Dimensions of welfare in a Comparative Scandinavian Study. Acta Sociologica, 19(3), 227–239.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nordenfelt, L. (1994). Towards a theory of happiness: A subjectivist notion of quality of life. In L. Nordenfelt (Ed.), Concepts and measurement of quality of life in health care (pp. 35–57). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Nordenfelt, L. (1994). Towards a theory of happiness: A subjectivist notion of quality of life. In L. Nordenfelt (Ed.), Concepts and measurement of quality of life in health care (pp. 35–57). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Naess, S. (1987). Quality of life research: Concepts, methods and applications. Oslo: Institute of Applied Social Science. Naess, S. (1987). Quality of life research: Concepts, methods and applications. Oslo: Institute of Applied Social Science.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Brülde, B. (2007). Happiness theories of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(1), 15–49.CrossRef Brülde, B. (2007). Happiness theories of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(1), 15–49.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat The WHOQOL Group. (1995). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science and Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409.CrossRef The WHOQOL Group. (1995). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science and Medicine, 41(10), 1403–1409.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrans, C. E., Powers, M. J. (1992). Psychometric assessment of the Quality of Life Index. Research in Nursing & Health, 15(1), 29–38.CrossRef Ferrans, C. E., Powers, M. J. (1992). Psychometric assessment of the Quality of Life Index. Research in Nursing & Health, 15(1), 29–38.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 1–39.CrossRef Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 1–39.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrans, C. E. (1990). Quality of life: Conceptual issues. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 6(4), 248–254.CrossRefPubMed Ferrans, C. E. (1990). Quality of life: Conceptual issues. Seminars in Oncology Nursing, 6(4), 248–254.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Medical Care, 30, 473–483.CrossRefPubMed Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Medical Care, 30, 473–483.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sullivan, M., Karlsson, J., & Ware, J. (1995). The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey-I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Social Science and Medicine, 41, 1349–1358.CrossRefPubMed Sullivan, M., Karlsson, J., & Ware, J. (1995). The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey-I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Social Science and Medicine, 41, 1349–1358.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Persson, L.-O., Karlsson, J., Bengtsson, C., Steen, B., & Sullivan, M. (1998). The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey II. Evaluation of clinical validity: Results from population studies of elderly and women in Gothenburg. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1095–1103.CrossRefPubMed Persson, L.-O., Karlsson, J., Bengtsson, C., Steen, B., & Sullivan, M. (1998). The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey II. Evaluation of clinical validity: Results from population studies of elderly and women in Gothenburg. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1095–1103.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sullivan, M., & Karlsson, J. (1998). The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: Results from normative population. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1005–1113.CrossRef Sullivan, M., & Karlsson, J. (1998). The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: Results from normative population. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1005–1113.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrans, C. E., & Powers, M. J. (1985). Quality of life index: Development and psychometric properties. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(1), 15–24.PubMed Ferrans, C. E., & Powers, M. J. (1985). Quality of life index: Development and psychometric properties. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(1), 15–24.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gustafsson, G. B., & Hamrin, E. K. (1996). Assessing disabled elderly with the Swedish version of the Quality of Life Index. In G. B. Gustafsson (Ed.), Quality of life and functional capacity among elderly with locomotor disability (pp. 74–87). Linköping, Sweden: Department of Caring Sciences, Linköping University. Linköping Studies in Health Sciences, Thesis no. 23. Gustafsson, G. B., & Hamrin, E. K. (1996). Assessing disabled elderly with the Swedish version of the Quality of Life Index. In G. B. Gustafsson (Ed.), Quality of life and functional capacity among elderly with locomotor disability (pp. 74–87). Linköping, Sweden: Department of Caring Sciences, Linköping University. Linköping Studies in Health Sciences, Thesis no. 23.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Child, D. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis, 3rd rev. ed. London: Continuum. Child, D. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis, 3rd rev. ed. London: Continuum.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC. Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Haybron, D. (2007). Life satisfaction, ethical reflection, and the science of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(1), 99–138.CrossRef Haybron, D. (2007). Life satisfaction, ethical reflection, and the science of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(1), 99–138.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagell, P., & Westergren, A. (2006). The significance of importance: An evaluation of Ferrans and powers’ quality of life index. Quality of Life Research, 15(5), 867–876.CrossRefPubMed Hagell, P., & Westergren, A. (2006). The significance of importance: An evaluation of Ferrans and powers’ quality of life index. Quality of Life Research, 15(5), 867–876.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Rustøen, T., Wiklund, I., Hanestad, B. R., & Burckhardt, C. S. (1999). Validity and reliability of the Norwegian version of the Ferrans and powers quality of life index. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 13(2), 96–101.CrossRefPubMed Rustøen, T., Wiklund, I., Hanestad, B. R., & Burckhardt, C. S. (1999). Validity and reliability of the Norwegian version of the Ferrans and powers quality of life index. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 13(2), 96–101.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Reference values for the Quality of Life Index in the general Swedish population 18–80 years of age
verfasst von
Mats T. Gullberg
Gunilla Hollman-Frisman
Anna-Christina Ek
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2010
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 5/2010
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9627-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2010

Quality of Life Research 5/2010 Zur Ausgabe