nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

01.10.2010

Interference with activities due to pain and fatigue: accuracy of ratings across different reporting periods

verfasst von: Joan E. Broderick, Stefan Schneider, Joseph E. Schwartz, Arthur A. Stone

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 8/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This study examined the impact of different reporting period lengths on the accuracy of items measuring interference due to pain and fatigue with work, walking, and relations with others.

Methods

Six items from well-established instruments (Brief Pain Inventory, Brief Fatigue Inventory, SF-36) were investigated in a prospective study of 117 patients with chronic rheumatological illness. Daily ratings were compared with recall ratings of 1, 3, 7, and 28-day reporting periods.

Results

The level of recall ratings (RRs) for reporting periods of 3 days or more were significantly higher than the level of aggregated end-of-day (EOD) ratings. Correspondence between aggregated EOD and RRs was good (r ≥ .80) regardless of the length of the reporting period. Ratings of interference for a single day were highly correlated with aggregated EOD for up to 14 days prior to the single rating (r ≥ .76).

Conclusions

Recall ratings with reporting periods of up to a month yield good correspondence with aggregated daily ratings, although the absolute level of the rating will be inflated for recall periods of 3 days or longer.

In contrast to analyses of the correspondence between aggregated momentary reports and RRs in which we have adjusted average momentary reports for unreliability [7], we did not adjust averages of EOD reports for unreliability. We consider a set of obtained momentary reports as a random and incomplete sample of all possible moments of a reporting period. By contrast, the combination of EOD reports can be regarded as an exhaustive representation of all possible moments within a reporting period.

Mendoza, T. R., Wang, X. S., Cleeland, C. S., Morrissey, M., Johnson, B. A., Wendt, J. K., et al. (1999). The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: Use of the Brief Fatigue Inventory. Cancer, 85(5), 1186–1196.CrossRefPubMed

Daut, R. L., & Cleeland, C. S. (1982). The prevalence and severity of pain in cancer. Cancer, 50(9), 1913–1918.CrossRefPubMed

Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., et al. (1993). The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(5), 365–376.CrossRefPubMed

Ware, J. E. (1993). SF-36 health survey: Manual & interpretive guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.

Kerns, R., Turk, D., & Rudy, T. (1985). The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI). Pain, 23, 345–356.CrossRefPubMed

Salovey, P., Smith, A., Turk, D. C., Jobe, J. B., & Willis, G. B. (1993). The accuracy of memories for pain: Not so bad most of the time. American Pain Society Journal, 2, 184–191.

Broderick, J. E., Schwartz, J. E., Vikingstad, G., Pribbernow, M., Grossman, S., & Stone, A. A. (2008). The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods. Pain, 139, 146–157.CrossRefPubMed

Stone, A., Broderick, J., Kaell, A., DelesPaul, P., & Porter, L. (2000). Does the peak-end phenomenon observed in laboratory pain studies apply to real-world pain in rheumatoid arthritics? Journal of Pain, 1(3), 212–217.PubMed

Fredrickson, B. (2000). Extracting meaning from past affective experiences: The importance of peaks, ends, and specific emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 14(4), 577–606.CrossRef

10.

Keller, S. D., Bayliss, M. S., Ware, J. E., Jr., Hsu, M. A., Damiano, A. M., & Goss, T. F. (1997). Comparison of responses to SF-36 Health Survey questions with one-week and four-week recall periods. Health Services Research, 32(3), 367–384.PubMed

11.

Stone, A. A., Broderick, J. E., Schwartz, J. E., & Schwarz, N. (2008). Context effects in survey ratings of health, symptoms, and satisfaction. Medical Care, 46(7), 662–667.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Stone, A., Broderick, J., Shiffman, S., & Schwartz, J. (2004). Understanding recall of weekly pain from a momentary assessment perspective: Absolute accuracy, between- and within-person consistency, and judged change in weekly pain. Pain, 107, 61–69.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Williams, D. A., Gendreau, M., Hufford, M. R., Groner, K., Gracely, R. H., & Clauw, D. J. (2004). Pain assessment in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: A consideration of methods for clinical trials. Clinical Journal of Pain, 20(5), 348–356.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Dewey, J. E. (2000). How to Score Version 2 of the SF-36 Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.

15.

Krupp, L. B., LaRocca, N. G., Muir-Nash, J., & Steinberg, A. D. (1989). The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol, 46(10), 1121–1123.PubMed

16.

Stone, A., Shiffman, S., Schwartz, J., Broderick, J., & Hufford, M. (2002). Patient non-compliance with paper diaries. British Medical Journal, 324(7347), 1193–1194.CrossRefPubMed

17.

van den Brink, M., Bandell-Hoekstra, E. N., & Abu-Saad, H. H. (2001). The occurrence of recall bias in pediatric headache: A comparison of questionnaire and diary data. Headache, 41(1), 11–20.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Interference with activities due to pain and fatigue: accuracy of ratings across different reporting periods
verfasst von: Joan E. Broderick
Stefan Schneider
Joseph E. Schwartz
Arthur A. Stone
Publikationsdatum: 01.10.2010
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 8/2010
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9681-x

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Interference with activities due to pain and fatigue: accuracy of ratings across different reporting periods

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2010

Measuring community integration after spinal cord injury: validation of the Sydney psychosocial reintegration scale and community integration measure

Gender differences in health-related quality-of-life are partly explained by sociodemographic and socioeconomic variation between adult men and women in the US: evidence from four US nationally representative data sets

Invariance test of the Multidimensional Body Self-Relations Questionnaire: do women with breast cancer interpret this measure differently?

Quality of life, subjective well-being, and religiosity in Muslim college students

Quality of life of patients with oesophageal cancer in Taiwan: validation and application of the Taiwan Chinese (Mandarin) version of the EORTC QLQ-OES18: a brief communication

Chemotherapy-related polyneuropathy may deteriorate quality of life in patients with B-cell lymphoma