Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Quality of Life Research
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 3/2013

01.04.2013

Assessment of response shift using two structural equation modeling techniques

verfasst von: Pranav K. Gandhi, L. Douglas Ried, I-Chan Huang, Carole L. Kimberlin, Teresa L. Kauf

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 3/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To identify response shift using two structural equation modeling (SEM) techniques.

Study design and setting

Hypertensive patients (n = 909) with coronary artery disease (CAD) completed SF-36 surveys at both baseline and 1-year follow-up. Response shift was identified using Oort and Schmitt SEM techniques. The type of response shift linked to changes in various parameters of the SEM measurement model is defined differently for both SEM approaches. Effect sizes were calculated for the impact of response shift on the change of SF-36 domain scores when using the Oort approach.

Results

Both Oort and Schmitt SEM approaches identified response shift only in the SF-36 physical functioning (PF) scale. The effect size of recalibration on the change of PF domain scores when using the Oort approach was −0.12.

Conclusion

This study showed that hypertensive patients with CAD experienced a response shift over a 1-year period. Both the SEM approaches identified response shift (uniform recalibration using the Oort approach and recalibration using the Schmitt approach); however, both approaches use different parameters to define and test response shift. We found that either the variation in analytic methods or the sample used may influence the identification and type of response shift.
Literatur
1.
Goodwin, P. J., Black, J. T., Bordeleau, L. J., & Ganz, P. A. (2003). Health-related quality of life measurement in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer—taking stock. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 95(4), 263–281.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Sprangers, M. A., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1507–1515.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Schwartz, C. E., & Sprangers, M. A. (1999). Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality of life research. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1531–1548.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Ried, L. D., Tueth, M. J., Taylor, M. D., Sauer, B. C., Lopez, L. M., & Pepine, C. J. (2006). Depressive symptoms in coronary artery disease patients after hypertensive treatment. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 40, 597–604.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Chobanian, A. V., Bakris, G. L., Black, H. R., Cushman, W. C., Green, L. A., & Izzo, J. L., Jr. (2003). For the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 2560–2572.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Ahmed, S., Mayo, N., Corbiere, M., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Hanley, J., & Cohen, R. (2005). Change in quality of life of people with stroke over time: True change or response shift? Quality of Life Research, 14, 611–627.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Schmitt, N. (1982). The use of analysis of covariance structures to assess beta and gamma change. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17, 343–358.CrossRef
9.
Schmitt, N., Pulakos, E. D., & Lieblein, A. (1984). Comparison of three techniques to assess group-level beta and gamma change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 249–260.CrossRef
10.
Schaubroeck, J., & Green, S. G. (1989). Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for assessing change during organizational entry. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 892–900.CrossRef
11.
Oort, F. J. (2005). Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change. Quality of Life Research, 14, 587–598.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Ahmed, S., Bourbeau, J., Maltais, F., & Mansour, A. (2009). The Oort structural equation modeling approach detected a response shift after a COPD self-management program not detected by the Schmitt technique. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1165–1172.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Oort, F. J., Visser, M. R. M., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2005). An application of structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change in quality of life data from cancer patients undergoing invasive surgery. Quality of Life Research, 14, 599–609.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70.CrossRef
15.
Visser, M., Oort, F., & Sprangers, M. (2005). Methods to detect response shift in quality of life data: A convergent validity study. Quality of Life Research, 14, 629–639.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Ried, L. D., Tueth, M. J., Handberg, E., Kupfer, S., Pepine, C. J., & the INVEST study group. (2005). A study of antihypertensive drugs and depressive symptoms (SADD-Sx) in patients treated with a calcium antagonist versus an atenolol hypertension treatment strategy in the international verapamil sr-trandolapril study (INVEST). Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, 398–406.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Pepine, C. J., Handberg-Thurmond, E., Marks, R. G., Conlon, M., Cooper-DeHoff, R., Volkers, P., et al. (1998). Rationale and design of the International Verapamil SR/Trandolapril Study (INVEST): An Internet-based randomized trial in coronary artery disease patients with hypertension. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 32, 1228–1237.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Pepine, C. J., Handberg, E. M., Cooper-DeHoff, R. M., Marks, R. G., Kowey, P., Messerli, F. H., et al. (2003). A calcium antagonist vs a non-calcium antagonist hypertension treatment strategy for patients with coronary artery disease. The International Verapamil-Trandolapril Study (INVEST): A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290, 2805–2816.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Anonymous. (1997). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. Cardiovascular Research, 35, 2–3.CrossRef
20.
Saris-Baglama, R. N., Dewey, C. J., Chisholm, G. B., Kosinski, M., Bjorner, J. B., & Ware, J. E. (2004) SF-36 Health outcomes scoring software, pp 1–157.
21.
Ware, J. E., Snow, K. K., Kosinski, M., & Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
22.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8. Lincolnwood, Il: Scientific Software Internatonal Inc.
23.
SAS Institute. SAS users guide, version 9.1. (2004) Cary, NC; SAS institute, Inc.
24.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: London: Guilford Press.
25.
Barclay-Goddard, R., Lix, L. M., Tate, R., Weinberg, L., & Mayo, N. E. (2009). Response shift was identified over multiple occasions with a structural equation modeling framework. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1181–1188.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
27.
King-Kallimanis, B., Oort, F. J., Visser, M. R. M., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2009). Structural equation modeling of health-related quality-of-life data illustrates the measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1157–1164.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Bar-On, D., Lazar, A., & Amir, M. (2000). Quantitative assessment of response shift in QOL research. Social Indicators Research, 49, 37–49.CrossRef
29.
de Graff, J. C., Ubbink, D. Th., Kools, E. J. C., Chamuleau, S. A. J., & Jacobs, M. J. H. M. (2002). The impact of peripheral and coronary artery disease on health-related quality of life. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 16, 495–500.CrossRef
30.
Mitchell, R. A., Imperial, E., Kelleher, P., Brunker, P., & Gass, G. (1991). Perceived health problems in subjects with varying cardiovascular diagnoses. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 14, 505–512.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Sevinc, S., & Akyol, A. D. (2010). Cardiac risk factors and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19, 1315–1325.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Bass, C., Akhras, F., Upward, J., Keates, J., Lowe, D., Harry, J., et al. (1987). Does atenolol improve physical and psychological function after coronary artery bypass surgery: A controlled study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 31, 521–529.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Macintyre, S., Ford, G., & Hunt, K. (1999). Do women ‘over-report’ morbidity? Men’s and women’s responses to structured prompting on a standard question on long standing illness. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 89–98.PubMedCrossRef
34.
McCreary, D. R., Newcomb, M. D., & Sadava, S. W. (1998). Dimensions of the male gender role: A confirmatory analysis in men and women. Sex Roles, 39, 81–95.CrossRef
35.
Barclay-Goddard, R., Epstein, J. D., & Mayo, N. E. (2009). Response shift: A brief overview and proposed research priorities. Quality of Life Research, 18, 335–346.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Brossart, D., Clay, D., & Willson, V. (2002). Methodological and statistical considerations for threats to internal validity in pediatric outcome data: Response shift in self-report outcomes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27, 97–107.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Mayo, N. E., Scott, S. C., & Ahmed, S. (2009). Case management poststroke did not induce response shift: The value of residuals. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62, 1148–1156.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Mayo, N. E., Scott, S. C., Dendukuri, N., Ahmed, S., & Wood-Dauphinee, S. (2008). Identifying response shift statistically at the individual level. Quality of Life Research, 17, 627–639.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Bloem, E. F., van Zuuren, F. J., Koeneman, M. A., Rapkin, B. D., Visser, M. R. M., Koning, C. C. E., et al. (2008). Clarifying quality of life assessment: Do theoretical models capture the underlying cognitive processes? Quality of Life Research, 17, 1093–1102.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Assessment of response shift using two structural equation modeling techniques
verfasst von
Pranav K. Gandhi
L. Douglas Ried
I-Chan Huang
Carole L. Kimberlin
Teresa L. Kauf
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2013
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0171-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2013

Quality of Life Research 3/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Brief Communication

Evaluation of the French version of the 4-item index of the Acne-QoL (AcneQ4fr)

Brief Communication

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of PedsQL 3.0 Arthritis Module: a quality-of-life measure for patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Turkey

Erratum

Erratum to: Environmental risk and protective factors of adolescents’ and youths’ mental health: differences between parents’ appraisal and self-reports

Brief Communication

Psychometric assessment of the patient activation measure short form (PAM-13) in rural settings

OriginalPaper

Socio-behavioral predictors of self-reported oral health-related quality of life

OriginalPaper

Psychometric evaluation of the Danish and Swedish Satisfaction with Life Scale in first episode psychosis patients