Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 5/2015

01.05.2015 | Patient Engagement Special Section

Building new roles and relationships in research: a model of patient engagement research

verfasst von: Nancy Marlett, Svetlana Shklarov, Deborah Marshall, Maria Jose Santana, Tracy Wasylak

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 5/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Patient engagement is influenced by institutional ideologies, professional attitudes and patient readiness to accept new, engaged roles. This article provides an opportunity to consider a new role for patients who are trained to conduct patient experience research using qualitative methods.

Methods

The emergence of the role of patient engagement researcher was studied using a grounded theory with 21 patients over one-year internship and 125 research participants. Data were collected using tape recordings, field notes and student assignments. These were analyzed using open and selective coding, memoing, categorizing themes.

Results

Patients’ education level (from high school to PhD), cultural background (immigrant experience, seniors), employment (employed full or part time, receiving disability benefits or retired), age (late 30 s—75) and gender (17 women and four men) were diverse. Main categories (emancipating patient experience; qualifying for research; leading sitting down; working data together; seeding change) are organized by the dialectic of co-creation as the roles of patient and researcher merge. A theoretical model is proposed.

Discussion

The theoretical model provides a glimpse into the process of merging two distinct roles of patient and researcher and in the process unleashes a force for change.

Conclusions

The emergence of a dialectic from polar opposite roles is difficult to locate in health or other institutions where power differentials exist but there are indications that this new role might become a template for other merged roles in patient-led medical teams.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Domecq, J. P., Prutzky, G., Elryiah, T., Wong, Z., et al. (2014). Patient engagement in research: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 89.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Domecq, J. P., Prutzky, G., Elryiah, T., Wong, Z., et al. (2014). Patient engagement in research: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 89.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gallivan, J., Kovacs Burns, K. A., Bellows, M., Eigensehe, C. (2012) The many faces of patient engagement. The Journal of Participatory Medicine, 4, e32. Gallivan, J., Kovacs Burns, K. A., Bellows, M., Eigensehe, C. (2012) The many faces of patient engagement. The Journal of Participatory Medicine, 4, e32.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gauvin, F. P. (2010). Patient and service user engagement: An environmental scan. Report submitted to the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. Gauvin, F. P. (2010). Patient and service user engagement: An environmental scan. Report submitted to the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Staniszewska, S., Denegri, S. (2013) Patient and public involvement in research: Future challenges. Evidence Based Nursing, 16(3), 69. Staniszewska, S., Denegri, S. (2013) Patient and public involvement in research: Future challenges. Evidence Based Nursing, 16(3), 69.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Devine, E. B., et al. (2013). A model for incorporating patient and stakeholder voices in a learning health care network: Washington State’s Comparative Effectiveness Research Translation Network. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(8 Suppl), 122–129.CrossRef Devine, E. B., et al. (2013). A model for incorporating patient and stakeholder voices in a learning health care network: Washington State’s Comparative Effectiveness Research Translation Network. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(8 Suppl), 122–129.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. New Jersey: Aldine Transaction, Inc. Network. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. New Jersey: Aldine Transaction, Inc. Network.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Glaser, B. G. (2001). The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press. Glaser, B. G. (2001). The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Glaser, B. G. (2003). The grounded theory perspective II: Description’s remodeling of Grounded Theory methodology. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press. Glaser, B. G. (2003). The grounded theory perspective II: Description’s remodeling of Grounded Theory methodology. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Glaser, B. G. (2005). The grounded theory perspective III: Theoretical coding. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press. Glaser, B. G. (2005). The grounded theory perspective III: Theoretical coding. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernandez, C.A. (1991). The lived experience of Type 1 diabetes: Implications for diabetes education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Hernandez, C.A. (1991). The lived experience of Type 1 diabetes: Implications for diabetes education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). Handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage. Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). Handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (Introducing Qualitative series), 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (Introducing Qualitative series), 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Morse, J. M., Stern, P. N., Corbin, J., Bowers, B., Charmaz, K., Clarke, A. E. (2009). Developing grounded theory: The second generation. California: Left Coast Press. Morse, J. M., Stern, P. N., Corbin, J., Bowers, B., Charmaz, K., Clarke, A. E. (2009). Developing grounded theory: The second generation. California: Left Coast Press.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mays, N., Pope, C. (1995). Qualitative research: Observational methods in health care settings. British Medical Journal, 311, 182. Mays, N., Pope, C. (1995). Qualitative research: Observational methods in health care settings. British Medical Journal, 311, 182.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Corbin, J., Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Corbin, J., Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Shklarov, S., Wasylak, T., Marlett, N., Marshall, D., Noseworthy, T. (2013). Patients matter: Engaging patients as collaborators to improve osteoarthritis (OA) care in Alberta. Final project report. Submitted to the Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement.www.ucalgary.ca. Access 23 July. Shklarov, S., Wasylak, T., Marlett, N., Marshall, D., Noseworthy, T. (2013). Patients matter: Engaging patients as collaborators to improve osteoarthritis (OA) care in Alberta. Final project report. Submitted to the Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement.www.​ucalgary.​ca. Access 23 July.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Staniszewska, S., Haywood, K. L., Brett, J., & Tutton, L. (2012). Patient and public involvement in patient-reported outcome measures: Evolution not revolution. Patient, 5(2), 79–87.CrossRefPubMed Staniszewska, S., Haywood, K. L., Brett, J., & Tutton, L. (2012). Patient and public involvement in patient-reported outcome measures: Evolution not revolution. Patient, 5(2), 79–87.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Nicklin, J., Cramp, F., Kirwan, J., Urban, M., Hewlett, S. (2010). Collaboration with patients in the design of patient-reported outcome measures: Capturing the experience of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Research (Hoboken), 62(11), 1552–1558. Nicklin, J., Cramp, F., Kirwan, J., Urban, M., Hewlett, S. (2010). Collaboration with patients in the design of patient-reported outcome measures: Capturing the experience of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Research (Hoboken), 62(11), 1552–1558.
Metadaten
Titel
Building new roles and relationships in research: a model of patient engagement research
verfasst von
Nancy Marlett
Svetlana Shklarov
Deborah Marshall
Maria Jose Santana
Tracy Wasylak
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2015
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0845-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2015

Quality of Life Research 5/2015 Zur Ausgabe