nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

01.01.2016

Relevance of community structures and neighbourhood characteristics for participation of older adults: a qualitative study

verfasst von: Ralf Strobl, Werner Maier, Alicja Ludyga, Andreas Mielck, Eva Grill

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Community and neighbourhood structures contribute not only to the health and well-being, but also to the participation of older adults. The degree of participation depends on both the living environment and the individual’s personal characteristics, preferences and perception. However, there is still limited empirical evidence on how community and neighbourhood structures are linked to participation and health in the aged population.

Methods

A qualitative exploratory approach was chosen with a series of problem-centred, semi-structured focus group discussions. Study participants were selected from within the city of Augsburg, Southern Germany, and from two municipalities in surrounding rural districts. The interviews took place in 2013. Structuring content analysis was used to identify key concepts.

Results

We conducted 11 focus group discussions with a total of 78 different study participants. The study participants (33 men and 45 women) had a mean age of 74 years (range 65–92 years). Only two study participants lived in an assisted living facility. Of all study participants, 77 % lived in urban and 23 % in rural areas. We extracted four metacodes (‘Usual activities’, ‘Requirements for participation’, ‘Barriers to participation’ and ‘Facilitators for participation’) and 15 subcodes. Health and poorly designed infrastructure were mentioned as important barriers to participation, and friendship and neighbourhood cohesion as important facilitators.

Conclusions

This qualitative study revealed that poor design and accessibility of municipal infrastructure are major barriers to participation in old age in Germany. Community and neighbourhood structures can be part of the problem but also part of the solution when accessibility and social networks are taken into account.

Diez Roux, A. V., & Mair, C. (2010). Neighborhoods and health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1186, 125–145.PubMedCrossRef

Yen, I. H., Michael, Y. L., & Perdue, L. (2009). Neighborhood environment in studies of health of older adults: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(5), 455–463.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Mendes de Leon, C. F., Glass, T. A., & Berkman, L. F. (2003). Social engagement and disability in a community population of older adults: The New Haven EPESE. American Journal of Epidemiology, 157(7), 633–642.PubMedCrossRef

Nummela, O., Sulander, T., Rahkonen, O., & Uutela, A. (2008). Associations of self-rated health with different forms of leisure activities among ageing people. Inernational Journal of Public Health, 53(5), 227–235.CrossRef

Buchman, A. S., Boyle, P. A., Leurgans, S. E., Evans, D. A., & Bennett, D. A. (2009). Pulmonary function, muscle strength, and incident mobility disability in elders. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 6(7), 581–587.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Fratiglioni, L., Paillard-Borg, S., & Winblad, B. (2004). An active and socially integrated lifestyle in late life might protect against dementia. Lancet Neurology, 3(6), 343–353.PubMedCrossRef

Agahi, N., Silverstein, M., & Parker, M. G. (2011). Late-life and earlier participation in leisure activities: Their importance for survival among older persons. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 35(3), 210–222.CrossRef

Gartlehner, G., & Flamm, M. (2013). Is the Cochrane collaboration prepared for the era of patient-centred outcomes research? The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, ED000054.PubMed

Agren, G., & Berensson, K. (2006). Healthy ageing—A challenge for Europe (Vol. 29). Stockholm: Swedish National Institute of Public Health.

10.

Levasseur, M., Richard, L., Gauvin, L., & Raymond, E. (2010). Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: Proposed taxonomy of social activities. Social Science and Medicine, 71(12), 2141–2149.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

11.

Johnson, J. K., Sarkisian, N., & Williamson, J. B. (2014). Using a micro-level model to generate a macro-level model of productive successful aging. Gerontologist, 55(1), 107–119.

12.

Rechel, B., Grundy, E., Robine, J. M., Cylus, J., Mackenbach, J. P., Knai, C., et al. (2013). Ageing in the European Union. Lancet, 381(9874), 1312–1322.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Nummela, O., Sulander, T., Rahkonen, O., Karisto, A., & Uutela, A. (2008). Social participation, trust and self-rated health: A study among ageing people in urban, semi-urban and rural settings. Health Place, 14(2), 243–253.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Li, F., Fisher, K. J., Brownson, R. C., & Bosworth, M. (2005). Multilevel modelling of built environment characteristics related to neighbourhood walking activity in older adults. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59(7), 558–564.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

15.

Shigematsu, R., Sallis, J. F., Conway, T. L., Saelens, B. E., Frank, L. D., Cain, K. L., et al. (2009). Age differences in the relation of perceived neighborhood environment to walking. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 41(2), 314–321.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Bowling, A., & Stafford, M. (2007). How do objective and subjective assessments of neighbourhood influence social and physical functioning in older age? Findings from a British survey of ageing. Social Science and Medicine, 64(12), 2533–2549.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Lawton, M. P., & Nahemow, L. (1973). An ecological theory of adaptive behavior and aging. In M. P. Lawton & C. Eisdorfer (Eds.), The psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 657–667). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

18.

Berkman, L. F., Glass, T., Brissette, I., & Seeman, T. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science and Medicine, 51(6), 843–857.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Gilbert, K. L., Quinn, S. C., Goodman, R. M., Butler, J., & Wallace, J. (2013). A meta-analysis of social capital and health: A case for needed research. Journal of Health Psychology, 18(11), 1385–1399.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

20.

Hertzman, C., Power, C., Matthews, S., & Manor, O. (2001). Using an interactive framework of society and lifecourse to explain self-rated health in early adulthood. Social Science and Medicine, 53(12), 1575–1585.PubMedCrossRef

21.

World Health Organisation (WHO). (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO.

22.

Elliott, J., Gale, C. R., Parsons, S., Kuh, D., & The, H. S. T. (2014). Neighbourhood cohesion and mental wellbeing among older adults: A mixed methods approach. Social Science and Medicine, 107C, 44–51.CrossRef

23.

Scammell, M. K. (2010). Qualitative environmental health research: An analysis of the literature, 1991–2008. Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(8), 1146–1154.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

24.

Bloor, M., Frankland, J., & Thomas, M. (2001). Focus groups in social research. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.

25.

Gough, A., Afzal, M., & Bagnali, G. (2006). Participative or patronizing? An evaluation of the role and purpose of research undertaken with older people. http://www.britishgerontology.org/Public/869/AverilOsbornProjectNov2006.pdf.

26.

Walker, A. (2007). Why involve older people in research? Age and Ageing, 36(5), 481–483.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Lamnek, S. (2010). Qualitative Sozialforschung (5th ed.). Basel: Beltz.

28.

Noble, M., Wright, G., Smith, G., & Dibben, C. (2006). Measuring multiple deprivation at the small-area level. Environment and Planning A, 38(1), 169–185.CrossRef

29.

Kuznetsov, L., Maier, W., Hunger, M., Meyer, M., & Mielck, A. (2011). Associations between regional socioeconomic deprivation and cancer risk: Analysis of Population-based Cancer Registry data from Bavaria, Germany. Preventive Medicine, 53(4–5), 328–330.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Maier, W., Fairburn, J., & Mielck, A. (2012). Regional deprivation and mortality in Bavaria. Development of a community-based index of multiple deprivation. Gesundheitswesen, 74(7), 416–425.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

32.

Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). London: SAGE Publications.

33.

Witzel, A. (1982). Verfahren der qualitativen Sozialforschung. Überblick und Alternativen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

34.

Witzel, A. (2000). The problem-centered interview. In Forum: Qualitative social research.

35.

Schmidt, C. (2004). The analysis of semi-structured interviews. In E. Kardorff, I. Steinke, & U. Flick (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 253–258). London: SAGE Publications.

36.

Holsti, O. R. (1968). Content analysis. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 596–692). Berlin: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

37.

Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. In Forum: Qualitative social research.

38.

Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. In E. Kardorff, I. Steinke, & U. Flick (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 266–269). London: SAGE Publications.

39.

Michael, Y. L., Green, M. K., & Farquhar, S. A. (2006). Neighborhood design and active aging. Health Place, 12(4), 734–740.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

40.

Baum, F., & Palmer, C. (2002). ‘Opportunity structures’: Urban landscape, social capital and health promotion in Australia. Health Promotion International, 17(4), 351–361.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Richard, L., Gauvin, L., Gosselin, C., & Laforest, S. (2009). Staying connected: Neighbourhood correlates of social participation among older adults living in an urban environment in Montreal, Quebec. Health Promotion International, 24(1), 46–57.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Rasinaho, M., Hirvensalo, M., Leinonen, R., Lintunen, T., & Rantanen, T. (2007). Motives for and barriers to physical activity among older adults with mobility limitations. Journal of Aging Physical Activity, 15(1), 90–102.PubMed

43.

Siegenthaler, K. L., & Vaughan, J. (1998). Older women in retirement communities: Perceptions of recreation and leisure. Leisure Sciences, 20(1), 53–66.CrossRef

44.

United Nations (2008). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml

45.

Kneupper, C. W., & Rubin, G. (1975). Personalization in modern society: A diagnostic application of general systems theory. PsycINFO, 32(2), 169–181.

46.

Strobl, R., Maier, W., Mielck, A., Fuchs, J., Richter-Kornweitz, A., Gostomzyk, J., et al. (2014). Living conditions: Stumbling block or path to successful ageing? Results of the Augsburg regional conference “Living environment, age and health”. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz, 57(9), 1120–1126.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Litwin, H. (2000). Activity, social network and well-being: An empirical examination. Canadian Journal on Aging-Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement, 19(3), 343–362.CrossRef

48.

Duay, D. L., & Bryan, V. C. (2006). Senior adults’ perceptions of successful aging. Educational Gerontology, 32(6), 423–445.CrossRef

49.

Larson, R., Mannell, R., & Zuzanek, J. (1986). Daily well-being of older adults with friends and family. Psychology and Aging, 1(2), 117–126.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Chen, S. Y., & Fu, Y. C. (2008). Leisure participation and enjoyment among the elderly: Individual characteristics and sociability. Educational Gerontology, 34(10), 871–889.CrossRef

51.

Gilbert, K. L., Quinn, S. C., Goodman, R. M., Butler, J., & Wallace, J. (2013). A meta-analysis of social capital and health: A case for needed research. J Health Psychol, 18(11), 1385–1399.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

52.

Sirgy, M. J., & Cornwell, T. (2002). How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 59(1), 79–114.CrossRef

53.

Valderas, J. M., & Alonso, J. (2008). Patient reported outcome measures: A model-based classification system for research and clinical practice. Quality of Life Research, 17(9), 1125–1135.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Wilson, I. B., & Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical-variables with health-related quality-of-life—A conceptual-model of patient outcomes. JAMA, 273(1), 59–65.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf, T. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘age-friendly’ cities. Critical Social Policy, 32(4), 597–617.CrossRef

Titel: Relevance of community structures and neighbourhood characteristics for participation of older adults: a qualitative study
verfasst von: Ralf Strobl
Werner Maier
Alicja Ludyga
Andreas Mielck
Eva Grill
Publikationsdatum: 01.01.2016
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1049-9

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Impact of untreated dental caries and its clinical consequences on the oral health-related quality of life of schoolchildren aged 8–10 years

How dead is dead? Qualitative findings from participants of combined traditional and lead-time time trade-off valuations

Development and validation of a carers quality-of-life questionnaire for parkinsonism (PQoL Carers)

Anemia has a negative impact on self-rated health in kidney transplant recipients with well-functioning grafts: findings from an 8-year follow-up study

Estimating minimally important difference (MID) in PROMIS pediatric measures using the scale-judgment method

Social support in older people: lessons from a developing country