Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2007

01.11.2007 | Original Article

The Association between Treatment Preferences and Trajectories of Care at the End-of-Life

verfasst von: JoAnne Alissi Cosgriff, MD, MPH, Margaret Pisani, MD, MPH, Elizabeth H. Bradley, PhD, John R. O’Leary, MA, Terri R. Fried, MD

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 11/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Honoring patients’ treatment preferences is a key component of high-quality end-of-life care.

Objective

To determine the association of preferences with end-of-life care.

Design

Observational cohort study.

Participants

118 community-dwelling persons age ≥65 years with advanced disease who died in a study which prospectively assessed treatment preferences.

Measurements

End-of-life care was categorized according to four pathways: (1) relief of symptoms only, (2) limited attempt to reverse acute process with rapid change to symptomatic relief, (3) more intensive attempt to reverse acute process with eventual change to symptomatic relief, and (4) highly intensive attempt to reverse acute process with no change in goal.

Results

Adjusting for diagnosis, those with greater willingness to undergo intensive treatment (defined as a desire for invasive therapies despite ≥50% chance of death) were significantly more likely to receive care with an initial goal of life prolongation (pathways 2–4) [odds ratio 4.73 (95% confidence interval 1.39–16.08)] than those with lower willingness. Nonetheless, mismatches between preferences and pathways were frequent. Only 1 of 27 participants (4%) with lower willingness to undergo intensive treatment received highly intensive intervention (pathway 4); 53 of 91 participants (58%) with greater willingness to undergo intensive treatment received symptom control only (pathway 1).

Conclusions

The association between preferences and trajectories of end-of-life care suggests that preferences are used to guide treatment decision-making. In contrast to concerns that patients are receiving unwanted aggressive care, mismatches between preferences and trajectories were more frequently in the direction of patients receiving less aggressive care than they are willing to undergo.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Council on Scientific Affairs AMA. Good care of the dying patient. JAMA. 1996;275:474–8.CrossRef Council on Scientific Affairs AMA. Good care of the dying patient. JAMA. 1996;275:474–8.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lynn J. Measuring quality of care at the end of life: a statement of principles. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:526–7.PubMed Lynn J. Measuring quality of care at the end of life: a statement of principles. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:526–7.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sachs GA, Ahronheim JC, Rhymes JA, Volicer L, Lynn J. Good care of dying patients: the alternative to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43:553–62.PubMed Sachs GA, Ahronheim JC, Rhymes JA, Volicer L, Lynn J. Good care of dying patients: the alternative to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995;43:553–62.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lynn J, Teno JM, Phillips RS, et al. Perceptions by family members of the dying experience of older and seriously ill patients. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:97–106.PubMed Lynn J, Teno JM, Phillips RS, et al. Perceptions by family members of the dying experience of older and seriously ill patients. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:97–106.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Teno JM, Clarridge BR, Casey V, et al. Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care. JAMA. 2004;291:88–93.PubMedCrossRef Teno JM, Clarridge BR, Casey V, et al. Family perspectives on end-of-life care at the last place of care. JAMA. 2004;291:88–93.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen LM, Germain MJ, Woods AL, Mirot A, Burleson JA. The family perspective of ESRD deaths. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;45:154–61.PubMedCrossRef Cohen LM, Germain MJ, Woods AL, Mirot A, Burleson JA. The family perspective of ESRD deaths. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;45:154–61.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Teno JM, Fisher ES, Hamel MB, Coppola K, Dawson NV. Medical care inconsistent with patients’ treatment goals: association with 1-year Medicare resource use and survival. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:496–500.PubMedCrossRef Teno JM, Fisher ES, Hamel MB, Coppola K, Dawson NV. Medical care inconsistent with patients’ treatment goals: association with 1-year Medicare resource use and survival. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:496–500.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:493–7.PubMedCrossRef Shalowitz DI, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:493–7.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Karlsen S, Addington-Hall J. How do cancer patients who die at home differ from those who die elsewhere? Palliat Med. 1998;12:279–86.PubMedCrossRef Karlsen S, Addington-Hall J. How do cancer patients who die at home differ from those who die elsewhere? Palliat Med. 1998;12:279–86.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomes B, Higginson IJ. Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill patients with cancer: systematic review. BMJ. 2006;332:515–21.PubMedCrossRef Gomes B, Higginson IJ. Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill patients with cancer: systematic review. BMJ. 2006;332:515–21.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratner E, Norlander L, McSteen K. Death at home following a targeted advance-care planning process at home: the kitchen table discussion. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:778–81.PubMedCrossRef Ratner E, Norlander L, McSteen K. Death at home following a targeted advance-care planning process at home: the kitchen table discussion. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:778–81.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee MA, Brummel-Smith K, Meyer J, Drew N, London MR. Physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST): outcomes in a PACE program. Program of all-inclusive care for the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:1219–25.PubMed Lee MA, Brummel-Smith K, Meyer J, Drew N, London MR. Physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST): outcomes in a PACE program. Program of all-inclusive care for the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:1219–25.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamel MB, Teno JM, Goldman L, et al. Patient age and decisions to withhold life-sustaining treatments from seriously ill, hospitalized adults. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:116–25.PubMed Hamel MB, Teno JM, Goldman L, et al. Patient age and decisions to withhold life-sustaining treatments from seriously ill, hospitalized adults. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:116–25.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Somogyi-Zalud E, Zhong Z, Hamel MB, Lynn J. The use of life-sustaining treatments in hospitalized persons aged 80 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:930–4.PubMedCrossRef Somogyi-Zalud E, Zhong Z, Hamel MB, Lynn J. The use of life-sustaining treatments in hospitalized persons aged 80 and older. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:930–4.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rose JH, O’Toole EE, Dawson NV, et al. Perspectives, preferences, care practices, and outcomes among older and middle-aged patients with late-stage cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4907–17.PubMedCrossRef Rose JH, O’Toole EE, Dawson NV, et al. Perspectives, preferences, care practices, and outcomes among older and middle-aged patients with late-stage cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4907–17.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Danis M, Southerland LI, Garrett JM, et al. A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:882–8.PubMedCrossRef Danis M, Southerland LI, Garrett JM, et al. A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:882–8.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Danis M, Mutran E, Garrett JM, et al. A prospective study of the impact of patient preferences on life-sustaining treatment and hospital cost. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:1811–7.PubMedCrossRef Danis M, Mutran E, Garrett JM, et al. A prospective study of the impact of patient preferences on life-sustaining treatment and hospital cost. Crit Care Med. 1996;24:1811–7.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenfeld KE, Wenger NS, Kagawa-Singer M. End-of-life decision making: a qualitative study of elderly individuals. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:620–5.PubMedCrossRef Rosenfeld KE, Wenger NS, Kagawa-Singer M. End-of-life decision making: a qualitative study of elderly individuals. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:620–5.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fried TR, Bradley EH. What matters to older seriously ill persons making treatment decisions? A qualitative study. J Palliat Med. 2003;6:237–44.PubMedCrossRef Fried TR, Bradley EH. What matters to older seriously ill persons making treatment decisions? A qualitative study. J Palliat Med. 2003;6:237–44.PubMedCrossRef
20.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Fried TR, Byers AL, Gallo WT, et al. Prospective study of health status preferences and changes in preferences over time in older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:890–5.PubMedCrossRef Fried TR, Byers AL, Gallo WT, et al. Prospective study of health status preferences and changes in preferences over time in older adults. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:890–5.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat The Connecticut Hospice Inc. Summary guidelines for initiation of advanced care. Branford, CT: John Thompson Institute; 1996. The Connecticut Hospice Inc. Summary guidelines for initiation of advanced care. Branford, CT: John Thompson Institute; 1996.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Murphy DJ, Knaus WA, Lynn J. Study population in SUPPORT: patients (as defined by disease categories and mortality projections), surrogates, and physicians. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:11S–28S.PubMedCrossRef Murphy DJ, Knaus WA, Lynn J. Study population in SUPPORT: patients (as defined by disease categories and mortality projections), surrogates, and physicians. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:11S–28S.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179–86.PubMed Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969;9:179–86.PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged: the index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914–9.PubMed Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged: the index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914–9.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Fried TR, Bradley EH, Towle VR. Assessment of patient preferences: Integrating treatments and outcomes. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002;57:S348–54.PubMed Fried TR, Bradley EH, Towle VR. Assessment of patient preferences: Integrating treatments and outcomes. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002;57:S348–54.PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA. 1995;274:1591–8.CrossRef The SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA. 1995;274:1591–8.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Brody J. Facing up to the inevitable, in search of a good death. New York Times. 2003 Dec 30; Sect. F:F5–6. Brody J. Facing up to the inevitable, in search of a good death. New York Times. 2003 Dec 30; Sect. F:F5–6.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Lunney JR, Lynn J, Foley DJ, Lipson S, Guralnik JM. Patterns of functional decline at the end of life. JAMA. 2003;289:2387–92.PubMedCrossRef Lunney JR, Lynn J, Foley DJ, Lipson S, Guralnik JM. Patterns of functional decline at the end of life. JAMA. 2003;289:2387–92.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lynn J, Harrell F, Jr., Cohn F, Wagner D, Connors AF, Jr. Prognoses of seriously ill hospitalized patients on the days before death: implications for patient care and public policy. New Horiz. 1997;5:56–61.PubMed Lynn J, Harrell F, Jr., Cohn F, Wagner D, Connors AF, Jr. Prognoses of seriously ill hospitalized patients on the days before death: implications for patient care and public policy. New Horiz. 1997;5:56–61.PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Hershberger RE, Nauman D, Walker TL, Dutton D, Burgess D. Care processes and clinical outcomes of continuous outpatient support with inotropes (COSI) in patients with refractory endstage heart failure. J Card Fail. 2003;9:180–7.PubMedCrossRef Hershberger RE, Nauman D, Walker TL, Dutton D, Burgess D. Care processes and clinical outcomes of continuous outpatient support with inotropes (COSI) in patients with refractory endstage heart failure. J Card Fail. 2003;9:180–7.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284:2476–82.PubMedCrossRef Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284:2476–82.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Singer PA, Martin DK, Kelner M. Quality end-of-life care: patients’ perspectives. JAMA. 1999;281:163–8.PubMedCrossRef Singer PA, Martin DK, Kelner M. Quality end-of-life care: patients’ perspectives. JAMA. 1999;281:163–8.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Covinsky KE, Fuller JD, Yaffe K, et al. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:S187–93.PubMed Covinsky KE, Fuller JD, Yaffe K, et al. Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: findings of the SUPPORT project. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:S187–93.PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Haidet P, Hamel MB, Davis RB, et al. Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation, and physician–patient communication among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Am J Med. 1998;105:222–9.PubMedCrossRef Haidet P, Hamel MB, Davis RB, et al. Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation, and physician–patient communication among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Am J Med. 1998;105:222–9.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Fagerlin A, Schneider CE. Enough. The failure of the living will. Hastings Cent Rep. 2004;34:30–42.PubMedCrossRef Fagerlin A, Schneider CE. Enough. The failure of the living will. Hastings Cent Rep. 2004;34:30–42.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Pritchard RS, Fisher ES, Teno JM, et al. Influence of patient preferences and local health system characteristics on the place of death. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Risks and Outcomes of Treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:1242–50.PubMed Pritchard RS, Fisher ES, Teno JM, et al. Influence of patient preferences and local health system characteristics on the place of death. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Risks and Outcomes of Treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:1242–50.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The Association between Treatment Preferences and Trajectories of Care at the End-of-Life
verfasst von
JoAnne Alissi Cosgriff, MD, MPH
Margaret Pisani, MD, MPH
Elizabeth H. Bradley, PhD
John R. O’Leary, MA
Terri R. Fried, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 11/2007
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0362-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2007

Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.