Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2008

01.06.2008 | Original Article

The STARD Statement for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Application to the History and Physical Examination

verfasst von: David L. Simel, MD MHS, Drummond Rennie, MD, Patrick M. M. Bossuyt, PhD

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 6/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Objective

The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) statement provided guidelines for investigators conducting diagnostic accuracy studies. We reviewed each item in the statement for its applicability to clinical examination diagnostic accuracy research, viewing each discrete aspect of the history and physical examination as a diagnostic test.

Setting

Nonsystematic review of the STARD statement.

Interventions

Two former STARD Group participants and 1 editor of a journal series on clinical examination research reviewed each STARD item. Suggested interpretations and comments were shared to develop consensus.

Measurements and Main Results

The STARD Statement applies generally well to clinical examination diagnostic accuracy studies. Three items are the most important for clinical examination diagnostic accuracy studies, and investigators should pay particular attention to their requirements: describe carefully the patient recruitment process, describe participant sampling and address if patients were from a consecutive series, and describe whether the clinicians were masked to the reference standard tests and whether the interpretation of the reference standard test was masked to the clinical examination components or overall clinical impression. The consideration of these and the other STARD items in clinical examination diagnostic research studies would improve the quality of investigations and strengthen conclusions reached by practicing clinicians.

Conclusions

The STARD statement provides a very useful framework for diagnostic accuracy studies. The group correctly anticipated that there would be nuances applicable to studies of the clinical examination. We offer guidance that should enhance their usefulness to investigators embarking on original studies of a patient’s history and physical examination.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al., for the STARD Group. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Initiative. Clinical Chem. 2003;49:1–6.CrossRef Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al., for the STARD Group. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD Initiative. Clinical Chem. 2003;49:1–6.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem. 2003;49:7–18.PubMedCrossRef Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem. 2003;49:7–18.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rennie D. Improving reports of studies of diagnostic tests. The STARD initiative. J Am Med Assoc. 2003;289:89–90.CrossRef Rennie D. Improving reports of studies of diagnostic tests. The STARD initiative. J Am Med Assoc. 2003;289:89–90.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. J Am Med Assoc. 1996;276:637–9.CrossRef Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. J Am Med Assoc. 1996;276:637–9.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt G, Rennie D. Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature. Chicago, IL: AMA; 2002. Guyatt G, Rennie D. Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature. Chicago, IL: AMA; 2002.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Moons KG, Harrell FE. Sensitivity and specificity should be de-emphasized in diagnostic accuracy studies. Acad Radiol. 2003;10:670–2.PubMedCrossRef Moons KG, Harrell FE. Sensitivity and specificity should be de-emphasized in diagnostic accuracy studies. Acad Radiol. 2003;10:670–2.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams JW, Simel DL, Roberts L, Samsa G. Clinical evaluation for sinusitis: the value of a good history and physical examination. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:705–10.PubMed Williams JW, Simel DL, Roberts L, Samsa G. Clinical evaluation for sinusitis: the value of a good history and physical examination. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:705–10.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Vandenbroucke JP, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM. Case-control and two-gate designs in diagnostic accuracy studies. Clin Chem. 2005;51:1335–41.PubMedCrossRef Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Vandenbroucke JP, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM. Case-control and two-gate designs in diagnostic accuracy studies. Clin Chem. 2005;51:1335–41.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao G, Fisch L, Srinivasan S, et al. Simel DL, Rennie D, eds. Does this Patient have Parkinson’s Disease? J Am Med Assoc. 2003;289:347–53. Rao G, Fisch L, Srinivasan S, et al. Simel DL, Rennie D, eds. Does this Patient have Parkinson’s Disease? J Am Med Assoc. 2003;289:347–53.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bachmann LM, Puhan MA, Riet G, Bossuyt PM. Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: literature survey. Br J Med. 2006;332:1127–9.CrossRef Bachmann LM, Puhan MA, Riet G, Bossuyt PM. Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: literature survey. Br J Med. 2006;332:1127–9.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Simel DL, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(8):763–70.PubMedCrossRef Simel DL, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(8):763–70.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361–87.PubMedCrossRef Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361–87.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Simel DL, Halvorsen RA, Feussner JR. Quantitating bedside diagnosis: clinical evaluation of ascites. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:423–8.PubMedCrossRef Simel DL, Halvorsen RA, Feussner JR. Quantitating bedside diagnosis: clinical evaluation of ascites. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:423–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Turnbull JM. Is listening for abdominal bruits useful in the evaluation of hypertension? J Am Med Assoc. 1995;274:1299–301.CrossRef Turnbull JM. Is listening for abdominal bruits useful in the evaluation of hypertension? J Am Med Assoc. 1995;274:1299–301.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasselblad V, Hedges LV. Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests. Psychol Bull. 1995;117:167–78.PubMedCrossRef Hasselblad V, Hedges LV. Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests. Psychol Bull. 1995;117:167–78.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Scherer K, Bedlack RS, Simel DL. Simel DL, Rennie D, eds. Does This Patient Have Myasthenia Gravis? J Am Med Assoc. 2005;293:1906–14. Scherer K, Bedlack RS, Simel DL. Simel DL, Rennie D, eds. Does This Patient Have Myasthenia Gravis? J Am Med Assoc. 2005;293:1906–14.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Simel DL, DeLong ER, Feussner JR, Matchar DB. Intermediate, indeterminate, and uninterpretable diagnostic test results. Med Decis Mak. 1987;7:107–14.CrossRef Simel DL, DeLong ER, Feussner JR, Matchar DB. Intermediate, indeterminate, and uninterpretable diagnostic test results. Med Decis Mak. 1987;7:107–14.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Holleman DR, Simel DL. Quantitative assessments from the clinical examination: how should clinicians integrate the numerous results? J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:165–71.PubMed Holleman DR, Simel DL. Quantitative assessments from the clinical examination: how should clinicians integrate the numerous results? J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:165–71.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The STARD Statement for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Application to the History and Physical Examination
verfasst von
David L. Simel, MD MHS
Drummond Rennie, MD
Patrick M. M. Bossuyt, PhD
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 6/2008
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0583-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2008

Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Die „Zehn Gebote“ des Endokarditis-Managements

30.04.2024 Endokarditis Leitlinie kompakt

Worauf kommt es beim Management von Personen mit infektiöser Endokarditis an? Eine Kardiologin und ein Kardiologe fassen die zehn wichtigsten Punkte der neuen ESC-Leitlinie zusammen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.