Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 4/2020

19.11.2019 | Original Research

Differences in Rates of High-Value and Low-Value Care Between Community Health Centers and Private Practices

verfasst von: Carlos Irwin A. Oronce, MD, MPH, Robert J. Fortuna, MD, MPH

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Community health centers (CHCs) are an integral part of the health care safety net. As health systems seek to improve value, it is important to understand the quality of care provided by CHCs.

Objective

To evaluate the performance of CHCs compared with private practices on a comprehensive set of high-value and low-value care measures.

Design

This cross-sectional study used data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2010 through 2012. We compared CHCs with private practices using logistic regression models that adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, number of chronic illnesses, rural versus urban location, region of country, and survey year.

Setting/Participants

We included outpatient visits to generalist physicians at either CHCs or private practices by patients 18 years and older.

Main Measures

We examined 12 measures of high-value care and 7 measures of low-value care.

Results

A total of 29,155 physician visits, representing 584,208,173 weighted visits, from 2010 through 2012 were included. CHCs were more likely to provide high-value care by ordering beta-blockers in CHF (46.9% vs. 36.5%; aOR 2.56; 95%CI 1.18–5.56), statins in diabetes (37.0% vs 35.5%; aOR 1.35; 95%CI 1.02–1.79), and providing treatment for osteoporosis (35.7% vs 23.2%; aOR 1.77; 95%CI 1.05–3.00) compared with private practices. CHCs were more likely to avoid low-value screening EKGs (98.7% vs. 88.0%; aOR 11.03; 95%CI 2.67–45.52), CBCs (75.9% vs. 65.7%; aOR 1.72; 95%CI 1.18–2.53), or urinalyses (86.0% vs. 80.5%; aOR 1.87; 95%CI 1.11–3.14) during a general medical exam. CHCs were also less likely to prescribe antibiotics for a URI (48.3% vs. 63.1%; aOR 0.59; 95%CI 0.40–0.88).

Conclusions

On a number of high-value and low-value measures of care, CHCs performed similar to or better than private practices. As healthcare delivery reforms continue to progress, CHCs are well positioned to provide high-value healthcare.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenbaum S, Paradise J, Markus A, Sharac J, Tran C, Reynolds D. Community Health Centers : Recent Growth and the Role of the ACA. Washington, DC; 2016. Rosenbaum S, Paradise J, Markus A, Sharac J, Tran C, Reynolds D. Community Health Centers : Recent Growth and the Role of the ACA. Washington, DC; 2016.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldman LE, Chu PW, Tran H, Romano MJ, Stafford RS. Federally qualified health centers and private practice performance on ambulatory care measures. Am J Prev Med 2012;43(2):142-149.CrossRef Goldman LE, Chu PW, Tran H, Romano MJ, Stafford RS. Federally qualified health centers and private practice performance on ambulatory care measures. Am J Prev Med 2012;43(2):142-149.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma J, Stafford RS. Quality of US outpatient care: temporal changes and racial/ethnic disparities. Arch Intern Med 2005;165(12):1354-1361.CrossRef Ma J, Stafford RS. Quality of US outpatient care: temporal changes and racial/ethnic disparities. Arch Intern Med 2005;165(12):1354-1361.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hing E, Kurtzman E, Lau DT, Taplin C, Bindman AB. Characteristics of primary care physicians in patient-centered medical home practices: United States, 2013. Natl Health Stat Report 2017;(101). Hing E, Kurtzman E, Lau DT, Taplin C, Bindman AB. Characteristics of primary care physicians in patient-centered medical home practices: United States, 2013. Natl Health Stat Report 2017;(101).
Metadaten
Titel
Differences in Rates of High-Value and Low-Value Care Between Community Health Centers and Private Practices
verfasst von
Carlos Irwin A. Oronce, MD, MPH
Robert J. Fortuna, MD, MPH
Publikationsdatum
19.11.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05544-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 4/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Healing Arts

The Code Switch

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Erhöhte Mortalität bei postpartalem Brustkrebs

07.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Auch für Trägerinnen von BRCA-Varianten gilt: Erkranken sie fünf bis zehn Jahre nach der letzten Schwangerschaft an Brustkrebs, ist das Sterberisiko besonders hoch.

Hypertherme Chemotherapie bietet Chance auf Blasenerhalt

07.05.2024 Harnblasenkarzinom Nachrichten

Eine hypertherme intravesikale Chemotherapie mit Mitomycin kann für Patienten mit hochriskantem nicht muskelinvasivem Blasenkrebs eine Alternative zur radikalen Zystektomie darstellen. Kölner Urologen berichten über ihre Erfahrungen.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Medizinstudium Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Vorhofflimmern bei Jüngeren gefährlicher als gedacht

06.05.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Immer mehr jüngere Menschen leiden unter Vorhofflimmern. Betroffene unter 65 Jahren haben viele Risikofaktoren und ein signifikant erhöhtes Sterberisiko verglichen mit Gleichaltrigen ohne die Erkrankung.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.