Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 1/2015

01.03.2015 | Review Article

The Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Bill 2013: content, commentary, controversy

verfasst von: B. D. Kelly

Erschienen in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Ireland’s Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Bill (2013) aims to reform the law relating to persons who require assistance exercising their decision-making capacity. When finalised, the Bill will replace Ireland’s outdated Ward of Court system which has an all-or-nothing approach to capacity; does not adequately define capacity; is poorly responsive to change; makes unwieldy provision for appointing decision-makers; and has insufficient provision for review.

Aims

To explore the content and implications of the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Bill.

Methods

Review of the content of the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Bill and related literature.

Results

The new Bill includes a presumption of capacity and defines lack of capacity. All interventions must minimise restriction of rights and freedom, and have due regard for “dignity, bodily integrity, privacy and autonomy”. The Bill proposes legal frameworks for “assisted decision-making” (where an individual voluntarily appoints someone to assist with specific decisions relating to personal welfare or property and affairs, by, among other measures, assisting the individual to communicate his or her “will and preferences”); “co-decision-making” (where the Circuit Court declares the individual’s capacity is reduced but he or she can make specific decisions with a co-decision-maker to share authority); “decision-making representatives” (substitute decision-making); “enduring power of attorney”; and “informal decision-making on personal welfare matters” (without apparent oversight).

Conclusions

These measures, if implemented, will shift Ireland’s capacity laws away from an approach based on “best interests” to one based on “will and preferences”, and increase compliance with the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
For relevant case-law relating to deprivation of liberty, see: HL v UK (Bournewood) (2004) 40 EHRR 761; DD v Lithuania (2012) ECHR 254; Stanev v Bulgaria (2012) EHRR 46.
 
2
Section 69 of the Mental Health Act 2001 reads: “(1) A person shall not place a patient in seclusion or apply mechanical means of bodily restraint to the patient unless such seclusion or restraint is determined, in accordance with the rules made under subsection (2), to be necessary for the purposes of treatment or to prevent the patient from injuring himself or herself or others and unless the seclusion or restraint complies with such rules. (2) The Commission shall make rules providing for the use of seclusion and mechanical means of bodily restraint on a patient. (3) A person who contravenes this section or a rule made under this section shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding £1,500. (4) In this section “patient” includes (a) a child in respect of whom an order under section 25 is in force, and (b) a voluntary patient”. Rules governing the use of seclusion and restraint are available on the website of the Mental Health Commission: http://​www.​mhcirl.​ie/​Mental_​Health_​Act_​2001/​Mental_​Health_​Commission_​Rules/​Seclusion_​and_​Mechanical_​Restraint/​ (website verified, 8 March, 2014).
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Leonard P, McLaughlin M (2009) Capacity legislation for Ireland: filling the legislative gaps. Ir J Psychol Med 26:165–168 Leonard P, McLaughlin M (2009) Capacity legislation for Ireland: filling the legislative gaps. Ir J Psychol Med 26:165–168
3.
Zurück zum Zitat United Nations (2006) Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. United Nations, Geneva United Nations (2006) Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. United Nations, Geneva
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartlett P, Lewis O, Thorold O (2007) Mental disability and the European Convention on Human Rights (International studies in human rights, volume 90). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden/Boston Bartlett P, Lewis O, Thorold O (2007) Mental disability and the European Convention on Human Rights (International studies in human rights, volume 90). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden/Boston
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Medical Council (2009) Guide to professional conduct and ethics for registered practitioners, 7th edn. Medical Council, Dublin Medical Council (2009) Guide to professional conduct and ethics for registered practitioners, 7th edn. Medical Council, Dublin
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hughes JC (2013) Best interests. In: Jacob R, Gunn N, Holland A (eds) Mental capacity legislation: principles and practice. RCPsych Publications, London, pp 33–53 Hughes JC (2013) Best interests. In: Jacob R, Gunn N, Holland A (eds) Mental capacity legislation: principles and practice. RCPsych Publications, London, pp 33–53
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartlett P (2005) Blackstone’s guide to the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Oxford University Press, Oxford Bartlett P (2005) Blackstone’s guide to the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Oxford University Press, Oxford
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Samsi K, Manthorpe J, Nagendran T, Heath H (2012) Challenges and expectations of the Mental Capacity Act 2005: an interview-based study of community-based specialist nurses working in dementia care. J Clin Nurs 21:1697–1705CrossRefPubMed Samsi K, Manthorpe J, Nagendran T, Heath H (2012) Challenges and expectations of the Mental Capacity Act 2005: an interview-based study of community-based specialist nurses working in dementia care. J Clin Nurs 21:1697–1705CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartlett P (2012) (2010) Informal admissions and deprivation of liberty under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. In: Gostin L, McHale J, Fennell P, Mackay RD, Bartlett P (eds) Principles of mental health law and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 385–412 Bartlett P (2012) (2010) Informal admissions and deprivation of liberty under the Mental Capacity Act 2005. In: Gostin L, McHale J, Fennell P, Mackay RD, Bartlett P (eds) Principles of mental health law and policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 385–412
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Shannon J (2013) New capacity Bill has gaps in human rights protection. Irish Med News 34:4 Shannon J (2013) New capacity Bill has gaps in human rights protection. Irish Med News 34:4
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hotopf M (2013) The assessment of mental capacity. In: Jacob R, Gunn N, Holland A (eds) Mental capacity legislation: principles and practice. RCPsych Publications, London, pp 15–32 Hotopf M (2013) The assessment of mental capacity. In: Jacob R, Gunn N, Holland A (eds) Mental capacity legislation: principles and practice. RCPsych Publications, London, pp 15–32
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacob R, Fistein E (2013) Clinical ambiguities in the assessment of capacity. In: Jacob R, Gunn N, Holland A (eds) Mental capacity legislation: principles and practice. RCPsych Publications, London, pp 96–108 Jacob R, Fistein E (2013) Clinical ambiguities in the assessment of capacity. In: Jacob R, Gunn N, Holland A (eds) Mental capacity legislation: principles and practice. RCPsych Publications, London, pp 96–108
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacob R, Holland A (2013) Introduction. In: Jacob R, Gunn N, Holland A (eds) Mental capacity legislation: principles and practice. RCPsych Publications, London, pp 1–14 Jacob R, Holland A (2013) Introduction. In: Jacob R, Gunn N, Holland A (eds) Mental capacity legislation: principles and practice. RCPsych Publications, London, pp 1–14
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Welsh SF (2013) Provisions of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. In: Jacob R, Gunn N, Holland A (eds) Mental capacity legislation: principles and practice. RCPsych Publications, London, pp 54–77 Welsh SF (2013) Provisions of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. In: Jacob R, Gunn N, Holland A (eds) Mental capacity legislation: principles and practice. RCPsych Publications, London, pp 54–77
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Welsh SF, Keeling A (2013) The deprivation of liberty safeguards. In: Jacob R, Gunn N, Holland A (eds) Mental capacity legislation: principles and practice. RCPsych Publications, London, pp 78–95 Welsh SF, Keeling A (2013) The deprivation of liberty safeguards. In: Jacob R, Gunn N, Holland A (eds) Mental capacity legislation: principles and practice. RCPsych Publications, London, pp 78–95
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Steering Group on the Review of the Mental Health Act 2001 (2012) Interim report of the Steering Group on the Review of the Mental Health Act 2001. Department of Health, Dublin Steering Group on the Review of the Mental Health Act 2001 (2012) Interim report of the Steering Group on the Review of the Mental Health Act 2001. Department of Health, Dublin
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Costello J (2013) Bill on assisted decision-making will support the vulnerable. Irish Times 29 July Costello J (2013) Bill on assisted decision-making will support the vulnerable. Irish Times 29 July
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kennedy H (2012) ‘Libertarian’ groupthink not helping mentally ill. Irish Times 12 September Kennedy H (2012) ‘Libertarian’ groupthink not helping mentally ill. Irish Times 12 September
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis O (2010) The expressive, educational and proactive roles of human rights. In: McSherry B, Weller P (eds) Rethinking rights-based mental health laws. Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, pp 97–128 Lewis O (2010) The expressive, educational and proactive roles of human rights. In: McSherry B, Weller P (eds) Rethinking rights-based mental health laws. Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, pp 97–128
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly BD (2014) An end to psychiatric detention? Implications of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Br J Psychiatry 204:174-175. Doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.135475 Kelly BD (2014) An end to psychiatric detention? Implications of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Br J Psychiatry 204:174-175. Doi:10.​1192/​bjp.​bp.​113.​135475
Metadaten
Titel
The Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Bill 2013: content, commentary, controversy
verfasst von
B. D. Kelly
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2015
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0021-1265
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-4362
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-014-1096-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.