Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Diabetes Reports
Erschienen in: Current Diabetes Reports 5/2017

01.05.2017 | Economics and Policy in Diabetes (ES Huang and AA Baig, Section Editors)

Population Health Management for Diabetes: Health Care System-Level Approaches for Improving Quality and Addressing Disparities

verfasst von: Julie A. Schmittdiel, Anjali Gopalan, Mark W. Lin, Somalee Banerjee, Christopher V. Chau, Alyce S. Adams

Erschienen in: Current Diabetes Reports | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Population care approaches for diabetes have the potential to improve the quality of care and decrease diabetes-related mortality and morbidity. Population care strategies are particularly relevant as accountable care organizations (ACOs), patient-centered medical homes (PCMH), and integrated delivery systems are increasingly focused on managing chronic disease care at the health system level. This review outlines the key elements of population care approaches for diabetes in the current health care environment.

Recent Findings

Population care approaches proactively identify diabetes patients through disease registries and electronic health record data and utilize multidisciplinary care teams, personalized provider feedback, and decision support tools to target and care for patients at risk for poor outcomes. Existing evidence suggests that these strategies can improve care outcomes and potentially ameliorate existing race/ethnic disparities in health care. However, such strategies may be less effective for patients who are disengaged from the health care system.

Summary

As population care for diabetes continues to evolve, future initiatives should consider ways to tailor population care to meet individual patient needs, while leveraging improvements in clinical information systems and care integration to optimally manage and prevent diabetes in the future.
Literatur
1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2011). National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention http://​www.​cdc.​gov/​diabetes/​pubs/​statsreport14.​htm. Accessed July 22, 2014.
2.
Fox CS, Coady S, Sorlie PD, D'Agostino Sr RB, Pencina MJ, Vasan RS, et al. Increasing cardiovascular disease burden due to diabetes mellitus: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2007;115:1544–50.
3.
Franco OH, Steyerberg EW, Hu FB, Mackenbach J, Nusselder W. Associations of diabetes mellitus with total life expectancy and life expectancy with and without cardiovascular disease. ArchInternMed. 2007;167:1145–51.
4.
Rodbard HW, Green AJ, Fox KM, et al. Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on prescription medication burden and out-of-pocket healthcare expenses. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87(3):360–5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the United States in 2007. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:596–615.CrossRef
6.
Zhang P, Brown MB, Bilik D, Ackermann RT, Li R, Herman WH. Health utility scores for people with type 2 diabetes in U.S. managed care health plans: results from Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD). Diabetes Care. 2012;35:2250–6.
7.
Dall TM, Zhang Y, Chen YJ, et al. The economic burden of diabetes. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(2):297–303.CrossRefPubMed
8.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes 2016. Diabetes Care. 2016;36(Suppl1):S1–2. doi:10.​2337/​dc16-S001.
9.
Gonder-Frederick LA, Cox DJ, Ritterband LM. Diabetes and behavioral medicine: the second decade. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70:611–25.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Gregg EW, Sattar N, Ali MK. The changing face of diabetes complications. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(6):537–47.CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
13.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2015 National healthcare quality and disparities report and 5th anniversary update on the national quality strategy. AHRQ Publication No. 16–0015. April 2016.
14.
National Quality Forum. Risk adjustment for socioeconomic status or other sociodemographic factors. Technical report. August 15, 2014.
15.
16.
Schmittdiel JA, Nichols GA, Dyer W, Steiner JF, Karter AJ, Raebel M. Health care system-level approaches to improving performance on Medicare STAR medication adherence metrics for diabetes patients. Med Care. 2015;5394:332–7.
17.
Marcotte L, Seidman J, Trudel K, et al. Achieving meaningful use of health information technology: a guide for physicians to the EHR incentive programs. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(9):731–6.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Rittenhouse DR, Thom DH, Schmittdiel JA. Developing a policy-relevant research agenda for the patient-centered medical home: a focus on outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(6):593–600.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Rittenhouse DR, Shortell SM, Fisher ES. Primary care and accountable care—two essential elements of delivery-system reform. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(24):2301–3.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Selby JV, Beal AC, Frank L. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA. 2012;307(15):1583–4.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Schmittdiel J, Bodenheimer T, Solomon NA, Gillies RR, Shortell SM. Brief report: the prevalence and use of chronic disease registries in physician organizations. A national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(9):855–8.
22.
Watts, Brook, Renee H. Lawrence, Paul Drawz, Cameron Carter, Amy Hirsch Shumaker, and Elizabeth F. Kern. Development and implementation of team-based panel management tools: filling the gap between patient and population information systems. Population Health Management 19, no. 4 (2016): 232–39. doi:10.​1089/​pop.​2015.​0093
23.
Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002;288(14):1775–9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. The Chronic Care Model part 2. JAMA, October 16, 2002. Vol 288, no. 15.
25.
Li R, Bodenheimer T, Simon J, Gillies RR, Casalino L, Schmittdiel J. Organizational factors affecting the adoption of diabetes care management process in physician organizations. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(10):2312–6.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Neuwirth EE, Schmittdiel J, Tallman K, Bellows J. Panel management population care program adoption and spread: what have we learned? Perm J. 2007;11(3):12–20.
27.
Kuyakov R, Bowen J, Ewen E, West SL, Daoud Y, Fleming N, Masica A. Electronic health record use to classify patients with newly diagnosed versus preexisting type 2 diabetes: infrastructure for comparative effectiveness research and population health management. Popul Health Manag. 2012;15(1):3–11.CrossRef
28.
Vaghefi I, Hughes JB, Law S, Lortie M, Leaver C, Lapointe L. Understanding the impact of electronic medical record use on practice-based population health management: a mixed-method study. JMIR Med Inform. 2016;4:e10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Sequist TD, Adams A, Zhang F, Ross-Degnan D, Ayanian JZ. Effect of quality improvement on racial disparities in diabetes care. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(6):675–81.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Wagner EH. The role of patient care teams in chronic care management. BMJ 2000.
31.
Krishnan S, Nash F, Baker N, Fowler D, Rayman G. Reduction in diabetic amputations over 11 years in a defined U.K. population: benefits of multidisciplinary team work and continuous prospective audit. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(1):99–101.CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
•• Berkowitz SA, Percac-Lima S, Ashburner JM, Chang Y, Zai AH, He W, Grant RW, Atlas SJ. Building equity improvement into quality improvement: reducing socioeconomic disparities in colorectal cancer screening as part of population health management. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(7):942–9. doi:10.​1007/​s11606-015-3227-4. This study gives a strong example of an intervention to improve population care outreach and reduce disparities and uses a robust evaluation approach to determine its effectiveness.
34.
Tsui EW, Wang G, Zahler A, Simoyan OM, White MV, Mckee M. A multilingual population health management program. J Ambul Care Manage. 2013;36(2):140–6.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Bartolome RE, Chen A, Handler J, Platt ST, Gould B. Population care management and team-based approach to reduce racial disparities among African Americans/blacks with hypertension. Perm J. 2016;20(1):53–9. doi:10.​7812/​TPP/​15-052.
36.
Traylor A, Schmittdiel JA, Uratsu CS, Mangione CM, Subramanian U. Adherence to cardiovascular disease medications: does patient-provider race/ethnicity and language concordance matter? J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(11):1172–7.
37.
Beaverson, Janice M., and Jaewon Ryu. Quality at Kaiser Permanente: using the population care model. Maryland Medicine : MM : A Publication of MEDCHI, the Maryland State Medical Society 12, no. 2 (2011): 15, 17.
38.
•• Wiley JA, Rittenhouse DR, Shortell SM, Casalino LP, Ramsay PP, Bibi S, Ryan AM, Copeland KR, Alexander JA. Managing chronic illness: physician practices increased the use of care management and medical home processes. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015;34(1):78–86. This important policy paper outlines the increase in population care management processes nationally and ties them to key policy innovations such as pubic reporting and pay for performance. CrossRef
39.
40.
Casalino L, Gillies RR, Shortell SM, Schmittdiel J, Bodenheimer T, Oswald N, Schauffler H, Wang MC. External incentives, information technology, and organized processes to improve health care quality for patients with chronic diseases. JAMA. 2003;289(4):434–41.CrossRefPubMed
41.
42.
Glasgow RE, Orleans CT, Wagner EH, Curry SJ, Solberg LI. Does the chronic care model serve as a template for improving prevention? The Milbank Quarterly. 79(4):579–612.
43.
44.
Bojadzievski T and Gabbay RA. Patient-centered medical home and diabetes. Diabetes Care. 34: 1047–1053.
45.
Ackermann RT, Duru K, Albu J, Schmittdiel JA, Soumerai SB, Ali MK, Gregg E. Evaluating diabetes health policies using natural experiments: the natural experiments for translation in diabetes (NEXT-D) study. Am J Prev Med. 2015;48(6):747–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(3):759–69.CrossRef
47.
Schmittdiel J, Grumbach K, Selby JV. Health care system-based participatory research: an approach for sustainable translational research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(3):256–9.
48.
Schmittdiel JA, Desai J, Schroeder E, Paolino A, Nichols G, Lawrence J, O’Connor P, Ohnsorg K, Newton K, Steiner J. Methods for engaging stakeholders in comparative effectiveness research: a patient-centered approach to improving diabetes care. Healthc(Amst). 2015;3(2):80–8.
Metadaten
Titel
Population Health Management for Diabetes: Health Care System-Level Approaches for Improving Quality and Addressing Disparities
verfasst von
Julie A. Schmittdiel
Anjali Gopalan
Mark W. Lin
Somalee Banerjee
Christopher V. Chau
Alyce S. Adams
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Diabetes Reports / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1534-4827
Elektronische ISSN: 1539-0829
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-017-0858-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Current Diabetes Reports 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Obesity (J McCaffery, Section Editor)

Pharmacotherapy of Obesity: Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice

Immunology, Transplantation, and Regenerative Medicine (L Piemonti and V Sordi, Section Editors)

T-cell Metabolism as a Target to Control Autoreactive T Cells in β-Cell Autoimmunity

Hospital Management of Diabetes (A Wallia and JJ Seley, Section Editors)

Treatment of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)/Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar State (HHS): Novel Advances in the Management of Hyperglycemic Crises (UK Versus USA)

Diabetes and Pregnancy (MF Hivert, Section Editor)

MicroRNAs in Pregnancy and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Emerging Role in Maternal Metabolic Regulation

Microvascular Complications—Nephropathy (M Afkarian, Section Editor)

Precision Medicine Approaches to Diabetic Kidney Disease: Tissue as an Issue

Other Forms of Diabetes and Its Complications (JJ Nolan, Section Editor)

Diabetes in Cushing Disease

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

25.04.2024 | Hypotonie | Nachrichten

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 | Parkinson-Krankheit | Nachrichten

Viel Bewegung in der Parkinsonforschung

25.04.2024 | Nierenkarzinom | Nachrichten

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC
weitere anzeigen

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise