nach oben

Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports

Erschienen in:

01.12.2013 | Demyelinating Disorders (DN Bourdette and V Yadav, Section Editors)

Misdiagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: Frequency, Causes, Effects, and Prevention

verfasst von: Andrew J. Solomon, Brian G. Weinshenker

Erschienen in: Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports | Ausgabe 12/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

A diagnosis of multiple sclerosis is heavily influenced by clinical judgment. Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis is common and has important consequences for patients and the cost of healthcare. Although rigorous data about the frequency and causes of misdiagnosis are lacking, misinterpretation and misapplication of clinical and radiographic diagnostic criteria and terminology are likely important factors. Appropriate and stringent application of diagnostic criteria and continued vigilance for “red flags” suggesting alternative diagnoses are strategies critical for prevention of misdiagnosis.

Millar JH, Allison RS. Familial incidence of disseminated sclerosis in Northern Ireland. Ulster Med J. 1954;23 Suppl 2:29–92.PubMed

Poser CM, Brinar VV. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: an historical review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2004;106:147–58. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.02.004.PubMedCrossRef

Broman T, Bergmann L, Fog T, Gilland O, Hyllested K, Lindberg-Broman AM, et al. Aspects on classification methods in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 1965;13(Pt 2):543–8.PubMed

Schumacker GA, Beebe G, Kibler RF, Kurland LT, Kurtzke JF, McDowell F, et al. Problems of Experimental Trials of Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: report by the Panel on The Evaluation of Experimental Trials of Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1965;122:552–68.PubMedCrossRef

Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, McDonald WI, Davis FA, Ebers GC, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol. 1983;13:227–31. doi:10.1002/ana.410130302.PubMedCrossRef

McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001;50:121–7.PubMedCrossRef

Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G, Filippi M, Hartung HP, Kappos L, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the "McDonald Criteria". Ann Neurol. 2005;58:840–6. doi:10.1002/ana.20703.PubMedCrossRef

Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011;69:292–302. doi:10.1002/ana.22366.PubMedCrossRef

•• Selchen D, Bhan V, Blevins G, Devonshire V, Duquette P, Grand'Maison F, et al. MS, MRI, and the 2010 McDonald criteria: a Canadian expert commentary. Neurology. 2012;79(23 Suppl 2):S1–S15. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318277d144. Important contemporary commentary regarding the limitations of current MS diagnostic crtieria.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Herndon RM. Multiple sclerosis mimics. Adv Neurol. 2006;98:161–6.PubMed

11.

Bowen J. Diagnosing multiple sclerosis and its imitators. Phys Med Rehab Clin NA. 2005;16:359–81. doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2005.01.011.CrossRef

12.

Miller DH, Weinshenker BG, Filippi M, Banwell BL, Cohen JA, Freedman MS, et al. Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: a consensus approach. Mult Scler. 2008;14:1157–74. doi:10.1177/1352458508096878.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Natowicz MR, Bejjani B. Genetic disorders that masquerade as multiple sclerosis. Am J Med Genet. 1994;49:149–69. doi:10.1002/ajmg.1320490202.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Davis RL, Robertson DM. Textbook of neuropathology. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1990.

15.

Engell T. A clinico-pathoanatomical study of multiple sclerosis diagnosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 1988;78:39–44.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Herndon RMBB. Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Semin Neurol. 1985;5:94–8.CrossRef

17.

Rudick RA, Schiffer RB, Schwetz KM, Herndon RM. Multiple sclerosis. The problem of incorrect diagnosis. Arch Neurol. 1986;43:578–83.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Noseworthy JH, Rice GP. Trichlorethylene poisoning mimicking multiple sclerosis. Can J Neurol Sci. 1988;15:87–8.PubMed

19.

Bender GP, Schapiro RT. Primary CNS lymphoma presenting as multiple sclerosis. A case study. Minn Med. 1989;72:157–60.PubMed

20.

Bussone G, La Mantia L, Grazzi L, Lamperti E, Salmaggi A, Strada L. Neurobrucellosis mimicking multiple sclerosis: a case report. Eur Neurol. 1989;29:238–40.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Scott TF, Hess D, Brillman J. Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome mimicking multiple sclerosis clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Int Med. 1994;154:917–20.CrossRef

22.

Vrethem M, Thuomas KA, Hillman J. Cavernous angioma of the brain stem mimicking multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:875–6. doi:10.1056/nejm199703203361213.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Dougan CF, Coulthard A, Cartlidge NE, Burn DJ. Familial cavernous angiomas masquerading as multiple sclerosis. Postgrad Med J. 1998;74:489–91.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Russo MB, Brooks FR, Fontenot J, Dopler BM, Neely ET, Halliday AW. Conversion disorder presenting as multiple sclerosis. Milit Med. 1998;163:709–10.

25.

Cader MZ, Winer JB. Lesson of the week: cavernous haemangioma mimicking multiple sclerosis. BMJ (Clin Res ed). 1999;318:1604–5.CrossRef

26.

Ormsby A, Prayson RA, Heard R. Angiotrophic large cell lymphoma mimicking multiple sclerosis associated transverse myelitis. J Clin Neurosci. 1999;6:408–10. doi:10.1054/jocn.1998.0091.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Evans RW, Rolak LA. Migraine vs multiple sclerosis. Headache. 2001;41:97–8.PubMedCrossRef

28.

O'Riordan S, Nor AM, Hutchinson M. CADASIL imitating multiple sclerosis: the importance of MRI markers. Mult Scler. 2002;8:430–2.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Tiryaki E, Azzarelli B, Biller J. Superficial siderosis of the central nervous system in a patient with chronic subarachnoid hemorrhage misdiagnosed as multiple sclerosis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2002;11:288–9. doi:10.1053/jscd.2002.129618.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Fernandez-Fernandez FJ, Rivera-Gallego A, de la Fuente-Aguado J, Perez-Fernandez S, Munoz-Fernandez D. Antiphospholipid syndrome mimicking multiple sclerosis in two patients. Eur J Int Med. 2006;17:500–2. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2006.02.018.CrossRef

31.

Rafalowska J, Dziewulska D, Podlecka A, Zakrzewska-Pniewska B. Extensive mixed vascular malformation clinically imitating multiple sclerosis—case report. Clin Neuropathol. 2006;25:237–42.PubMed

32.

Saip S, Uluduz D, Erkol G. Fabry disease mimicking multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2007;109:361–3. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2006.12.006.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Beeravolu LR, Frohman EM, Frohman TC, Remington GM, Lee S, Levin MC. Pearls & Oy-sters: "Not multiple sclerosis" and the changing face of HTLV-1: a case report of downbeat nystagmus. Neurology. 2009;72:e119–20. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181aa5316.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Boentert M, Kraus J, Kloska S, Dittrich R, Nabavi DG, Niederstadt T, et al. Obliterating intracranial vasculopathy mimicking multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2009;120:68–71. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01121.x.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Chebel S, Barboura I, Boughammoura-Bouatay A, Ammar M, Ferchichi S, Miled A, et al. Adult-type metachromatic leukodystrophy mimicking multiple sclerosis. Can J Neurol Sci. 2009;36:521–3.PubMed

36.

Matsuo Y, Kamezaki K, Takeishi S, Takenaka K, Eto T, Nonami A, et al. Encephalomyelitis mimicking multiple sclerosis associated with chronic graft-vs-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Int Med (Tokyo, Japan). 2009;48:1453–6.CrossRef

37.

Papadimas GK, Rentzos M, Zouvelou V, Kilidireas K, Konstantinopoulou A, Kokotis P, et al. Superficial siderosis of central nervous system mimicking multiple sclerosis. Neurologist. 2009;15:153–5. doi:10.1097/NRL.0b013e31818a5d3a.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Brinar VV, Habek M. Rare infections mimicking MS. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010;112:625–8. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.04.011.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Utsuki S, Oka H, Miyazaki T, Yamazaki T, Yasui Y, Fujii K, et al. Primary central nervous system large B-cell lymphoma with prolific, mixed T-cell and macrophage infiltrates, mimicking multiple sclerosis. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2010;27:59–63. doi:10.1007/s10014-010-0264-x.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Stricker RB, Johnson L. 'Rare' infections mimicking multiple sclerosis: consider Lyme disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011;113:259–60. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.11.017.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Dorfman LJ, Fischbein NJ, Woodard JI, Choudhri O, Bell-Stephens TE, Steinberg GK. Moyamoya disease can masquerade as multiple sclerosis. Neurologist. 2012;18:398–403. doi:10.1097/NRL.0b013e31826a99a1.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Ohe Y, Hayashi T, Mishima K, Nishikawa R, Sasaki A, Matsuda H, et al. Central nervous system lymphoma initially diagnosed as tumefactive multiple sclerosis after brain biopsy. Int Med (Tokyo, Japan). 2013;52:483–8.CrossRef

43.

Murray TJ, Murray SJ. Characteristics of patients found not to have multiple sclerosis. Can Med Assoc J. 1984;131:336–7.PubMed

44.

Carmosino MJ, Brousseau KM, Arciniegas DB, Corboy JR. Initial evaluations for multiple sclerosis in a university multiple sclerosis center: outcomes and role of magnetic resonance imaging in referral. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:585–90. doi:10.1001/archneur.62.4.585.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Brousseau KM, Arciniegas DB, Carmosino MJ, Corboy JR. The differential diagnosis of Axis I psychopathology presenting to a university-based multiple sclerosis clinic. Mult Scler. 2007;13:749–53. doi:10.1177/1352458506075032.PubMedCrossRef

46.

Pelidou SH, Giannopoulos S, Tzavidi S, Tsifetaki N, Kitsos G, Stefanou D, et al. Neurological manifestations of connective tissue diseases mimicking multiple sclerosis. Rheumatol Int. 2007;28:15–20. doi:10.1007/s00296-007-0384-8.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Poser CM. Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis and beta-interferon. Lancet. 1997;349:1916. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)63920-7.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Nielsen JM, Korteweg T, Barkhof F, Uitdehaag BM, Polman CH. Overdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis and magnetic resonance imaging criteria. Ann Neurol. 2005;58:781–3. doi:10.1002/ana.20632.PubMedCrossRef

49.

• Solomon AJ, Klein EP, Bourdette D. "Undiagnosing" multiple sclerosis: the challenge of misdiagnosis in MS. Neurology. 2012;78:1986–91. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318259e1b2. Recent survey concerning MS misdiagnosis providing data on frequency and hypothesized causes.

50.

Poser CM, Brinar VV. Problems with diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2001;358:1746–7. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06842-8.

51.

Rudick RA. Diagnostic criteria in multiple sclerosis: headed in the right direction but still a ways to go. Ann Neurol. 2011;69:234–6. doi:10.1002/ana.22388.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Schiffer RB, Giang DW, Mushlin A, Ketonen L, Joy S, Kido D, et al. Perils and pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. The Rochester-Toronto MRI Study Group. J Neuroimag. 1993;3:81–8.

53.

Whiting P, Harbord R, Main C, Deeks JJ, Filippini G, Egger M, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: systematic review. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2006;332:875–84. doi:10.1136/bmj.38771.583796.7C.CrossRef

54.

Kim SS, Richman DP, Johnson WO, Hald JK, Agius MA. Limited utility of current MRI criteria for distinguishing multiple sclerosis from common mimickers: primary and secondary CNS vasculitis, lupus and Sjogren's syndrome. Multiple Sclerosis. 2013. doi:10.1177/1352458513491329.

55.

• Liu S, Kullnat J, Bourdette D, Simon J, Kraemer DF, Murchison C, et al. Prevalence of brain magnetic resonance imaging meeting Barkhof and McDonald criteria for dissemination in space among headache patients. Multiple Sclerosis. 2013. doi:10.1177/1352458512471874. Recent study demonstrating the limitations of MS imaging crtieria.

56.

Charil A, Yousry TA, Rovaris M, Barkhof F, De Stefano N, Fazekas F, et al. MRI and the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: expanding the concept of "no better explanation". Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:841–52. doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70572-5.PubMedCrossRef

57.

Polman CH, Wolinsky JS, Reingold SC. Multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria: three years later. Mult Scler. 2005;11:5–12.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Okuda DT, Mowry EM, Beheshtian A, Waubant E, Baranzini SE, Goodin DS, et al. Incidental MRI anomalies suggestive of multiple sclerosis: the radiologically isolated syndrome. Neurology. 2009;72:800–5. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000335764.14513.1a.PubMedCrossRef

59.

Bourdette D, Yadav V. The radiologically isolated syndrome revisited: when is it presymptomatic multiple sclerosis? Neurology. 2011;76:680–1. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820e7769.PubMedCrossRef

60.

Bourdette D, Yadav V. Treat patients with radiologically isolated syndrome when the MRI brain scan shows dissemination in time no. Multiple. 2012;18:1529–30. doi:10.1177/1352458512462075.CrossRef

61.

Spain R, Bourdette D. The radiologically isolated syndrome: look (again) before you treat. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2011;11:498–506. doi:10.1007/s11910-011-0213-z.PubMedCrossRef

62.

Groopman JE. How doctors think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2007.

63.

Boissy AR, Ford PJ. A touch of MS: therapeutic mislabeling. Neurology. 2012;78:1981–5. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318259e0ec.PubMedCrossRef

64.

Tullman MJ. Overview of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and disease progression associated with multiple sclerosis. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19(2 Suppl):S15–20.PubMed

65.

Rudick RA, Miller AE. Multiple sclerosis or multiple possibilities: the continuing problem of misdiagnosis. Neurology. 2012;78:1904–6. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318259e2e2.PubMedCrossRef

66.

Solomon AJ, Klein E. Disclosing a misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis: do no harm? Continuum. 2013;19(4 Multiple Sclerosis):1087–91. doi:10.1212/01.CON.0000433281.18146.5b.PubMed

67.

Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington: National Academy Press; 2000.

68.

Dobson R, Ramagopalan S, Davis A, Giovannoni G. Cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal bands in multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndromes: a meta-analysis of prevalence, prognosis and effect of latitude. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2012-304695.

69.

Alvarez-Cermeno JC, Villar LM. Multiple sclerosis: oligoclonal bands-a useful tool to avoid MS misdiagnosis. Nature Rev Neurol. 2013. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2013.74.

70.

Hutchinson M. CSF oligoclonal bands are important in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, unreasonably downplayed by the McDonald Criteria 2010: commentary. Mult Scler. 2013;19:719–20. doi:10.1177/1352458513485496.PubMedCrossRef

71.

Sandberg-Wollheim M, Olsson T. Cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal bands are important in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, unreasonably downplayed by the McDonald criteria 2010: yes. Mult Scler. 2013;19:714–6. doi:10.1177/1352458513480011.PubMedCrossRef

72.

Bates D. Treatment effects of immunomodulatory therapies at different stages of multiple sclerosis in short-term trials. Neurology. 2011;76(1 Suppl 1):S14–25. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182050388.PubMedCrossRef

73.

Coyle PK. Early treatment of multiple sclerosis to prevent neurologic damage. Neurology. 2008;71(24 Suppl 3):S3–7. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31818f3d6f.PubMedCrossRef

74.

Goodin DS, Reder AT, Ebers GC, Cutter G, Kremenchutzky M, Oger J, et al. Survival in MS: a randomized cohort study 21 years after the start of the pivotal IFNbeta-1b trial. Neurology. 2012;78:1315–22. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182535cf6.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Misdiagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: Frequency, Causes, Effects, and Prevention
verfasst von: Andrew J. Solomon
Brian G. Weinshenker
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2013
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports / Ausgabe 12/2013
Print ISSN: 1528-4042
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6293
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-013-0403-y

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Frühe Alzheimertherapie lohnt sich

25.04.2024 AAN-Jahrestagung 2024 Nachrichten

Ist die Tau-Last noch gering, scheint der Vorteil von Lecanemab besonders groß zu sein. Und beginnen Erkrankte verzögert mit der Behandlung, erreichen sie nicht mehr die kognitive Leistung wie bei einem früheren Start. Darauf deuten neue Analysen der Phase-3-Studie Clarity AD.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2013

Depression and Parkinson’s Disease: Current Knowledge

Amyloid Imaging in Atypical Presentations of Alzheimer’s Disease

Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

Imaging of Neuroinflammation in Parkinsonian Syndromes with Positron Emission Tomography

Neuro-ophthalmologic Complications of Neoplastic Leptomeningeal Disease