Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 12/2010

01.12.2010 | Symposium: Papers Presented at the 2009 Closed Meeting of the International Hip Society

Long-term Results for Minor Column Allografts in Revision Hip Arthroplasty

verfasst von: Paul T. H. Lee, MB BCh, FRCS (Eng), FRCS (Orth), Guy Raz, MD, Oleg A. Safir, MD, MED, FRCSC, David J. Backstein, MD, MED, FRCSC, Allan E. Gross, MD, FRCSC, OOnt

Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Ausgabe 12/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

While acetabular structural allografts provide an important alternative for reconstructions, concerns remain with long-term graft resorption, collapse, and failure. Midterm studies of minor column (shelf) allograft suggest reasonable survival but long-term survival is unknown.

Questions/purposes

We therefore assessed long-term graft/cup survivorship, functional scores, radiographic resorption, and complications associated with minor column allograft.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 74 patients (85 hips) with a mean age of 54 years (range, 28–83 years) undergoing acetabular cup revision using a minor column allograft. A minor column allograft was used in uncontained acetabular bone defects sized between 30% and 50% of the acetabulum. Graft failure was considered to occur when the graft required revision with another graft, metal augment, reconstruction cage, or excision arthroplasty. The minimum followup was 5 years (mean, 16 years; range, 5.3–25 years).

Results

Twenty-three patients (27 hips) had rerevision for all causes at a mean time to rerevision of 6.9 years (range, 0.1–23). Fifteen grafts failed at a mean time-to-rerevision of 6.1 years (range, 0.5–23.2). The 15- and 20-year Kaplan-Meier survivorships were 61% and 55% for cups and 78% for grafts with rerevision for all causes as end point. With rerevision for aseptic loosening as end point, survivorships were 67% and 61% for cups and 81% for grafts. The mean modified Harris hip scores were 41 (range, 20–60) preoperatively, 73 (range, 40–95) at 1 year postoperatively and 73 (range, 26–93) at last followup.

Conclusion

The data may provide a long-term benchmark by which future treatments for Type III defects can be measured.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Buttaro MA, Comba F, Pusso R, Piccaluga F. Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2482–2490.CrossRefPubMed Buttaro MA, Comba F, Pusso R, Piccaluga F. Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2482–2490.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Antonio JA. Periprosthetic bone loss of the acetabulum. Classification and management. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992;23:279.PubMed D’Antonio JA. Periprosthetic bone loss of the acetabulum. Classification and management. Orthop Clin North Am. 1992;23:279.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorey F, Amstutz HC. Survivorship analysis in the evaluation of joint replacement. J Arthroplasty. 1986;1:63–69.CrossRefPubMed Dorey F, Amstutz HC. Survivorship analysis in the evaluation of joint replacement. J Arthroplasty. 1986;1:63–69.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fawcett K, Barr AR. Tissue Banking. Arlington, VA: American Association of Tissue Banks; 1987. Fawcett K, Barr AR. Tissue Banking. Arlington, VA: American Association of Tissue Banks; 1987.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Garbuz D, Morsi E, Mohamed N, Gross AE. Classification and reconstruction in revision acetabular arthroplasty with bone stock deficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;323:98–107.CrossRef Garbuz D, Morsi E, Mohamed N, Gross AE. Classification and reconstruction in revision acetabular arthroplasty with bone stock deficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;323:98–107.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerber A, Pisan M, Zurakowski D, Isler B. Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2358–2364.PubMed Gerber A, Pisan M, Zurakowski D, Isler B. Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2358–2364.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross AE, Allan DG, Catre M, Garbuz DG, Stockley I. Bone grafts in hip replacement surgery. The pelvic side. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:679–695.PubMed Gross AE, Allan DG, Catre M, Garbuz DG, Stockley I. Bone grafts in hip replacement surgery. The pelvic side. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:679–695.PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera A, Martínez AA, Cuenca J, Canales V. Management of types III and IV acetabular deficiencies with the longitudinal oblong revision cup. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:857–864.CrossRefPubMed Herrera A, Martínez AA, Cuenca J, Canales V. Management of types III and IV acetabular deficiencies with the longitudinal oblong revision cup. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:857–864.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Jasty M, Harris W. Salvage total hip reconstruction in patients with major acetabular bone deficiency using structural femoral head allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:63–67.PubMed Jasty M, Harris W. Salvage total hip reconstruction in patients with major acetabular bone deficiency using structural femoral head allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:63–67.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Koster G, Rading S. Revision of failed acetabular components utilizing a cementless oblong cup: an average 9-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:603–608.CrossRefPubMed Koster G, Rading S. Revision of failed acetabular components utilizing a cementless oblong cup: an average 9-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:603–608.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lakstein D, Backstein DJ, Safir O, Kosashvili Y, Gross AE. Trabecular metal for acetabular defects with 50% of less host bone contact. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2318–2324.CrossRefPubMed Lakstein D, Backstein DJ, Safir O, Kosashvili Y, Gross AE. Trabecular metal for acetabular defects with 50% of less host bone contact. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2318–2324.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Q, Zhou YX, Xu HJ, Tang J, Guo SJ, Tang QH. Safe zone for transacetabular screw fixation in prosthetic acetabular reconstruction of high developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2880–2885.CrossRefPubMed Liu Q, Zhou YX, Xu HJ, Tang J, Guo SJ, Tang QH. Safe zone for transacetabular screw fixation in prosthetic acetabular reconstruction of high developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2880–2885.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Morag G, Zalzal P, Liberman B, Safir O, Flint M, Gross AE. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients with a previous total hip replacement for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1068–1072.CrossRefPubMed Morag G, Zalzal P, Liberman B, Safir O, Flint M, Gross AE. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients with a previous total hip replacement for developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1068–1072.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mowe JC. Standards for Tissue Banking. Arlington, VA: American Association of Tissue Banks; 1988. Mowe JC. Standards for Tissue Banking. Arlington, VA: American Association of Tissue Banks; 1988.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Murray D. The hip. In: Pynsent D, Fairbank J, Carr A, eds. Outcome Measurements in Orthopaedics. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993:198–227. Murray D. The hip. In: Pynsent D, Fairbank J, Carr A, eds. Outcome Measurements in Orthopaedics. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993:198–227.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9:33–44.CrossRefPubMed Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9:33–44.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni A, Saleh L, Jaroszynski G, Wong P, Woodgate I, Davis A, Gross AE. Development, test reliability and validation of a classification for revision hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:50–56.CrossRefPubMed Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni A, Saleh L, Jaroszynski G, Wong P, Woodgate I, Davis A, Gross AE. Development, test reliability and validation of a classification for revision hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:50–56.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, Clauss M, Mau H, Breusch SJ. Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2-17 years. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:234–241.CrossRefPubMed Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, Clauss M, Mau H, Breusch SJ. Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2-17 years. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:234–241.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegmeth A, Duncan CP, Masri BS, Kim WY, Garbuz DS. Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:199–205.CrossRefPubMed Siegmeth A, Duncan CP, Masri BS, Kim WY, Garbuz DS. Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:199–205.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sporer SM, O’Rourke M, Chong P, Paprosky WG. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:760–765.CrossRefPubMed Sporer SM, O’Rourke M, Chong P, Paprosky WG. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:760–765.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. The use of trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:83–86.CrossRefPubMed Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. The use of trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:83–86.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Unger AS, Lewis RJ, Gruen T. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:1002–1009.CrossRefPubMed Unger AS, Lewis RJ, Gruen T. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:1002–1009.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Haaren EH, Heyligers IC, Alexander FG, Wuisman PI. High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:296–300.CrossRefPubMed Van Haaren EH, Heyligers IC, Alexander FG, Wuisman PI. High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:296–300.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Weeden SH, Schmidt RH. The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:151–155.CrossRefPubMed Weeden SH, Schmidt RH. The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:151–155.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Woodgate I, Gross AE. Minor column structural acetabular allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:75–85.CrossRefPubMed Woodgate I, Gross AE. Minor column structural acetabular allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:75–85.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Long-term Results for Minor Column Allografts in Revision Hip Arthroplasty
verfasst von
Paul T. H. Lee, MB BCh, FRCS (Eng), FRCS (Orth)
Guy Raz, MD
Oleg A. Safir, MD, MED, FRCSC
David J. Backstein, MD, MED, FRCSC
Allan E. Gross, MD, FRCSC, OOnt
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Ausgabe 12/2010
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Elektronische ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1591-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2010

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 12/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Symposium: Papers Presented at the 2009 Closed Meeting of the International Hip Society

Biographical Sketch: Sir John Charnley MD, 1911–1982

Symposium: Papers Presented at the 2009 Closed Meeting of the International Hip Society

Transtrochanteric Rotational Osteotomy for a Subchondral Insufficiency Fracture of the Femoral Head in Young Adults

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.