Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 4/2011

01.04.2011 | Symposium: Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Structural Allograft as an Option for Treating Infected Hip Arthroplasty with Massive Bone Loss

verfasst von: Paul T. H. Lee, MB BCh, MA, FRCS (Eng), FRCS (Tr & Orth), Robert A. Clayton, MBBS, FRCS (Edin), FRCS (Tr & Orth), Oleg A. Safir, MD, FRCSC, MEd, David J. Backstein, MD, FRCSC, MEd, Allan E. Gross, MD, FRCSC, OOnt

Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Ausgabe 4/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Revision of the infected hip arthroplasty with major bone loss is difficult. Attempts to restore bone stock with structural allograft are controversial.

Questions/purposes

We assessed the (1) reinfection rate; (2) rerevision rate; (3) radiographic graft union, resorption, and implant migration; (4) Harris hip scores at 1 year and at last followup compared with before surgery; and (5) other major complications associated with the use of bulk structural allograft to treat massive bone loss in infected hip arthroplasty.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 27 patients who underwent two-stage revision arthroplasty using structural allograft to treat massive bone defects in infected hip arthroplasty. There were 17 proximal femoral grafts, three acetabular major column grafts, two acetabular minor column grafts, and 10 cortical strut grafts used. Five patients had combinations of two allografts. The minimum followup was 1.1 years (mean, 8.2 years; range, 1.1–16.8 years).

Results

One of 27 patients had reinfection. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 93% at 10 years with rerevision for aseptic loosening as the end point. Radiographically, three patients had nonunion at the graft–host junction. All patients except two had graft resorption, of which all were mild except two, which were severe. Three patients had implant migration. The mean modified Harris hip scores were 39.2 points (range, 25–60) preoperatively, 67.3 points (range, 40–91) at 1-year followup, and 70.3 points (range, 46–81) at last followup. Other major complications included one patient with dislocation and one patient with transient sciatic nerve injury.

Conclusions

Based on our data, we believe the use of structural allografts is a reasonable option for treating massive bone loss in infected hip arthroplasties.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Alexeef M, Mahomed N, Morsi E, Garbuz D, Gross A. Structural allograft in two-stage revision for failed septic hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:213–216. Alexeef M, Mahomed N, Morsi E, Garbuz D, Gross A. Structural allograft in two-stage revision for failed septic hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:213–216.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Allan DG, Lavoie GJ, McDonald S, Oakeshott R, Gross AE. Proximal femoral allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:235–240.PubMed Allan DG, Lavoie GJ, McDonald S, Oakeshott R, Gross AE. Proximal femoral allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:235–240.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ammon P, Stockley I. Allograft bone in two-stage revision of the hip for infection. Is it safe? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:962–965.PubMedCrossRef Ammon P, Stockley I. Allograft bone in two-stage revision of the hip for infection. Is it safe? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:962–965.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Anract P, Coste J, Vastel L, Jeanrot C, Mascard E, Tomeno B. Proximal femoral reconstruction with megaprosthesis versus allograft prosthesis composite. A comparative study of functional results, complications and longevity in 41 cases [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000;86:278–288.PubMed Anract P, Coste J, Vastel L, Jeanrot C, Mascard E, Tomeno B. Proximal femoral reconstruction with megaprosthesis versus allograft prosthesis composite. A comparative study of functional results, complications and longevity in 41 cases [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2000;86:278–288.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bittar ES, Petty W. Girdlestone arthroplasty for infected total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;170:83–87.PubMed Bittar ES, Petty W. Girdlestone arthroplasty for infected total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;170:83–87.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bourne RB, Hunter GA, Rorabeck CH, Macnab JJ. A six-year follow-up of infected total hip replacement managed by Girdlestone’s arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:1074–1085. Bourne RB, Hunter GA, Rorabeck CH, Macnab JJ. A six-year follow-up of infected total hip replacement managed by Girdlestone’s arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:1074–1085.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Buttaro MA, Comba F, Pusso R, Piccaluga F. Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2482–2490.PubMedCrossRef Buttaro MA, Comba F, Pusso R, Piccaluga F. Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2482–2490.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dick HM, Strauch RJ. Infection of massive bone allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;306:46–53.PubMed Dick HM, Strauch RJ. Infection of massive bone allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;306:46–53.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat English H, Timperley D, Sunlop D, Gie G. Impaction grafting of the femur in two-stage revision for infected total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:700–705.PubMedCrossRef English H, Timperley D, Sunlop D, Gie G. Impaction grafting of the femur in two-stage revision for infected total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:700–705.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Farid Y, Lin PP, Lewis VO, Yasko AW. Endoprosthetic and allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction of the proximal femur for bone neoplasms. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;442:223–229.PubMedCrossRef Farid Y, Lin PP, Lewis VO, Yasko AW. Endoprosthetic and allograft-prosthetic composite reconstruction of the proximal femur for bone neoplasms. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;442:223–229.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fawcett K, Barr AR. Tissue Banking. Arlington, VA: American Association of Tissue Banks; 1987. Fawcett K, Barr AR. Tissue Banking. Arlington, VA: American Association of Tissue Banks; 1987.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fountain JR, Dalby-Ball J, Carroll FA, Stockley I. The use of total femoral arthroplasty as a limb salvage procedure: the Sheffield experience. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:663–669.PubMedCrossRef Fountain JR, Dalby-Ball J, Carroll FA, Stockley I. The use of total femoral arthroplasty as a limb salvage procedure: the Sheffield experience. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:663–669.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerber A, Pisan M, Zurakowski D, Isler B. Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2358–2364.PubMed Gerber A, Pisan M, Zurakowski D, Isler B. Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:2358–2364.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Graham NM, Stockley I. The use of structural proximal femoral allograft in complex revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:337–343.PubMedCrossRef Graham NM, Stockley I. The use of structural proximal femoral allograft in complex revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:337–343.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Grauer JD, Amstutz HC, O’Carrol PF, Dorey FJ. Resection arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:669–678.PubMed Grauer JD, Amstutz HC, O’Carrol PF, Dorey FJ. Resection arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:669–678.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross AE. Revision arthroplasty of the hip using allograft bone. In: Czitrom AA, Gross AE, eds. Allografts in Orthopedic Practice. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Williams; 1992:147–173. Gross AE. Revision arthroplasty of the hip using allograft bone. In: Czitrom AA, Gross AE, eds. Allografts in Orthopedic Practice. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Williams; 1992:147–173.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gross AE, Hutchinson CR. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1998:21:999–1001.PubMed Gross AE, Hutchinson CR. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1998:21:999–1001.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera A, Martínez AA, Cuenca J, Canales V. Management of types III and IV acetabular deficiencies with the longitudinal oblong revision cup. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:857–864.PubMedCrossRef Herrera A, Martínez AA, Cuenca J, Canales V. Management of types III and IV acetabular deficiencies with the longitudinal oblong revision cup. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:857–864.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsieh PH, Shih CH, Chang YH, Lee MS, Yang WE, Shih HN. Treatment of deep infection of the hip associated with massive bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:770–775.PubMedCrossRef Hsieh PH, Shih CH, Chang YH, Lee MS, Yang WE, Shih HN. Treatment of deep infection of the hip associated with massive bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:770–775.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jasty M, Harris W. Salvage total hip reconstruction in patients with major acetabular bone deficiency using structural femoral head allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:63–67.PubMed Jasty M, Harris W. Salvage total hip reconstruction in patients with major acetabular bone deficiency using structural femoral head allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72:63–67.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Koster G, Rading S. Revision of failed acetabular components utilizing a cementless oblong cup: an average 9-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:603–608.PubMedCrossRef Koster G, Rading S. Revision of failed acetabular components utilizing a cementless oblong cup: an average 9-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:603–608.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lakstein D, Backstein DJ, Safir O, Kosashvili Y, Gross AE. Trabecular metal for acetabular defects with 50% of less host bone contact. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2318–2324.PubMedCrossRef Lakstein D, Backstein DJ, Safir O, Kosashvili Y, Gross AE. Trabecular metal for acetabular defects with 50% of less host bone contact. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2318–2324.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Langlais F, Lambotte JC, Collin P, Thomazeau H. Long-term results of allograft composite total hip prosthesis for tumor. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;414:197–211.PubMedCrossRef Langlais F, Lambotte JC, Collin P, Thomazeau H. Long-term results of allograft composite total hip prosthesis for tumor. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;414:197–211.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lonner JH, Desai P, Dicesare PE, Sreiner G, Zuckerman JD. The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1553–1558.PubMed Lonner JH, Desai P, Dicesare PE, Sreiner G, Zuckerman JD. The reliability of analysis of intraoperative frozen sections for identifying active infection during revision hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1553–1558.PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lord CF, Gerhardt MC, Tomford WW, Mankin HJ. Infection in bone allografts: incidence, nature and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:369–376.PubMed Lord CF, Gerhardt MC, Tomford WW, Mankin HJ. Infection in bone allografts: incidence, nature and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:369–376.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Mallory TH. Excision arthroplasty with delayed wound closure for the infected total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;137:106–111.PubMed Mallory TH. Excision arthroplasty with delayed wound closure for the infected total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;137:106–111.PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Massin P, Schmidt L, Engh CA. Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration: an experimental study. J Arthroplasty. 1989;4:245–251.PubMedCrossRef Massin P, Schmidt L, Engh CA. Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration: an experimental study. J Arthroplasty. 1989;4:245–251.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Masterson EL, Duncan CP. Subsidence and the cement mantle in femoral impaction allografting. Orthopedics. 1997;20:821–822.PubMed Masterson EL, Duncan CP. Subsidence and the cement mantle in femoral impaction allografting. Orthopedics. 1997;20:821–822.PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat McElwaine JP, Colville J. Excision arthroplasty for infected total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66:168–171.PubMed McElwaine JP, Colville J. Excision arthroplasty for infected total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66:168–171.PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Medling JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Impaction bone grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1834–1841. Medling JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Impaction bone grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1834–1841.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Mowe JC. Standards for Tissue Banking. Arlington, VA: American Association of Tissue Banks; 1988. Mowe JC. Standards for Tissue Banking. Arlington, VA: American Association of Tissue Banks; 1988.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Murray D. The hip. In: Pynsent D, Fairbank J, Carr A, eds. Outcome Measurements in Orthopaedics. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993:198–227. Murray D. The hip. In: Pynsent D, Fairbank J, Carr A, eds. Outcome Measurements in Orthopaedics. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993:198–227.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Nusem I, Morgan DAF. Structural allograft for bone stock reconstruction in two-stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasty. Good outcome in 16 of 18 patients followed up for 5–14 years. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:92–97.PubMedCrossRef Nusem I, Morgan DAF. Structural allograft for bone stock reconstruction in two-stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasty. Good outcome in 16 of 18 patients followed up for 5–14 years. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:92–97.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Safir O, Kellett CF, Flint M, Backstein D, Gross AE. Revision of the deficient proximal femur with a proximal femoral allograft. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:206–212.PubMedCrossRef Safir O, Kellett CF, Flint M, Backstein D, Gross AE. Revision of the deficient proximal femur with a proximal femoral allograft. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:206–212.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni ASaleh L, Jaroszynski G, Wong P, Woodgate I, Davis A, Gross AE. Development, test reliability and validation of a classification for revision hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:50–56.PubMedCrossRef Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni ASaleh L, Jaroszynski G, Wong P, Woodgate I, Davis A, Gross AE. Development, test reliability and validation of a classification for revision hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2001;19:50–56.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, Clauss M, Mau H, Breusch SJ. Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2–17 years. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:234–241.PubMedCrossRef Schlegel UJ, Bitsch RG, Pritsch M, Clauss M, Mau H, Breusch SJ. Mueller reinforcement rings in acetabular revision: outcome in 164 hips followed for 2–17 years. Acta Orthop. 2006;77:234–241.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegmeth A, Duncan CP, Masri BS, Kim WY, Garbuz DS. Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:199–205.PubMedCrossRef Siegmeth A, Duncan CP, Masri BS, Kim WY, Garbuz DS. Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:199–205.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Sporer SM, O’Rourke M, Chong P, Paprosky WG. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:760–765.PubMedCrossRef Sporer SM, O’Rourke M, Chong P, Paprosky WG. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:760–765.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Haaren EH, Heyligers IC, Alexander FG, Wuisman PI. High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:296–300.PubMedCrossRef Haaren EH, Heyligers IC, Alexander FG, Wuisman PI. High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:296–300.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang JW, Chen CE. Reimplantation of infected hip arthroplasties using bone allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;335:202–210.PubMedCrossRef Wang JW, Chen CE. Reimplantation of infected hip arthroplasties using bone allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;335:202–210.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Woodgate I, Gross AE. Minor column structural acetabular allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:75–85.PubMedCrossRef Woodgate I, Gross AE. Minor column structural acetabular allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:75–85.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Zehr R, Enneking W, Scarborough M. Allograft-prosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;322:207–223.PubMedCrossRef Zehr R, Enneking W, Scarborough M. Allograft-prosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;322:207–223.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Structural Allograft as an Option for Treating Infected Hip Arthroplasty with Massive Bone Loss
verfasst von
Paul T. H. Lee, MB BCh, MA, FRCS (Eng), FRCS (Tr & Orth)
Robert A. Clayton, MBBS, FRCS (Edin), FRCS (Tr & Orth)
Oleg A. Safir, MD, FRCSC, MEd
David J. Backstein, MD, FRCSC, MEd
Allan E. Gross, MD, FRCSC, OOnt
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Ausgabe 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Elektronische ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1673-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2011

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 4/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Symposium: Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Biographical Sketch: William S. Baer (1872–1931)

Symposium: Controversies in Orthopaedics

Is a Silastic Radial Head Still a Reasonable Option?

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.