nach oben

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Erschienen in:

01.02.2012 | Symposium: Papers Presented at the Annual Meetings of The Hip Society

Predictors of Participation in Sports After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

verfasst von: Daniel H. Williams, MBBCh, MSc, Nelson V. Greidanus, MD, MPH, Bassam A. Masri, MD, Clive P. Duncan, MD, MSc, Donald S. Garbuz, MD, MHSc

Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Ausgabe 2/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

While the primary objective of joint arthroplasty is to improve patient quality of life, pain, and function, younger active patients often demand a return to higher function that includes sporting activity. Knowledge of rates and predictors of return to sports will help inform expectations in patients anticipating return to sports after joint arthroplasty.

Questions/purposes

We measured the rate of sports participation at 1 year using the UCLA activity score and explored 11 variables, including choice of procedure/prosthesis, that might predict return to a high level of sporting activity, when controlling for potential confounding variables.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 736 patients who underwent primary metal-on-polyethylene THA, metal-on-metal THA, hip resurfacing arthroplasty, revision THA, primary TKA, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, and revision TKA between May 2005 and June 2007. We obtained UCLA activity scores on all patients; we defined high activity as a UCLA score of 7 or more. We evaluated patient demographics (age, sex, BMI, comorbidity), quality of life (WOMAC score, Oxford Hip Score, SF-12 score), and surgeon- and procedural/implant-specific variables to identify factors associated with postoperative activity score. Minimum followup was 11 months (mean, 12.1 months; range, 11–13 months).

Results

Preoperative UCLA activity score, age, male sex, and BMI predicted high activity scores. The type of operation and implant characteristics did not predict return to high activity sports.

Conclusions

Our data suggest patient-specific factors predict postoperative activity rather than factors specific to type of surgery, implant, or surgeon factors.

Level of Evidence

Level II, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:28–39.PubMed

Amstutz HC, Campbell P, McKellop H, Schmalzreid TP, Gillespie WJ, Howie D, Jacobs J, Medley J, Merritt K. Metal on metal total hip replacement workshop consensus document. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329(suppl)S297–S303.PubMedCrossRef

Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah RF, Kim WF, Grogan TF, Yale C. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip: a comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:228–241.PubMed

Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings: an independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:324–329.PubMedCrossRef

Bauman S, Williams DF, Petruccelli DF, Elliott WF, de Beer J. Physical activity after total joint replacement: a cross-sectional survey. Clin J Sport Med. 2007;17:104–108.PubMedCrossRef

Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, Hoke RF, Leduff MF, Amstutz HC. The value of patient activity level in the outcome of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:547–552.PubMedCrossRef

Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:87–93.PubMedCrossRef

Bellamy NF, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell JF, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833–1840.PubMed

Bradbury NF, Borton DF, Spoo GF, Cross MJ. Participation in sports after total knee replacement. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:530–535.PubMed

10.

Chan FW, Bobyn JD, Medley JB, Krygier JJ, Tanzer M. The Otto Aufranc Award. Wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;369:10–24.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Chan FW, Bobyn JD, Medley JB, Krygier JJ, Yue S, Tanzer M. Engineering issues and wear performance of metal on metal hip implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;333:96–107.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1972;54:61–76.PubMed

13.

Chatterji U, Ashworth MJ, Lewis PL, Dobson PJ. Effect of total hip arthroplasty on recreational and sporting activity. ANZ J Surg. 2004;74:446–449.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ, Grosse E. Regression by local fitting. J Econometrics. 1988;37:87–114.CrossRef

15.

Corten K, Bourne RB, Charron KD, Au K, Rorabeck CH. What works best, a cemented or cementless primary total hip arthroplasty? Minimum 17-year followup of a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:209–217.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Dahm DL, Barnes SA, Harrington JR, Sayeed SA, Berry DJ. Patient-reported activity level after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:401–407.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:177–184.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:185–190.PubMed

19.

Delaunay CP. Metal-on-metal bearings in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:35–40.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Dorr LD, Wan Z, Longjohn DB, Dubois B, Murken R. Total hip arthroplasty with use of the Metasul metal-on-metal articulation: four to seven-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:789–798.PubMed

21.

Dumbleton JH, Manley MT. Metal-on-metal total hip replacement: what does the literature say? J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:174–188.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Eswaramoorthy V, Moonot P, Kalairajah Y, Biant LC, Field RE. The Metasul metal-on-metal articulation in primary total hip replacement: clinical and radiological results at ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1278–1283.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Fisher N, Agarwal M, Reuben SF, Johnson DS, Turner PG. Sporting and physical activity following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2006;13:296–300.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Grubl A, Marker M, Brodner W, Giurea A, Heinze G, Meisinger V, Zehetgruber H, Kotz R. Long-term follow-up of metal-on-metal total hip replacement. J Orthop Res. 2007;25:841–848.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Huch KF, Muller KA, Sturmer TF, Brenner HF, Puhl WF, Gunther KP. Sports activities 5 years after total knee or hip arthroplasty: the Ulm Osteoarthritis Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:1715–1720.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Jacobsson SA, Djerf K, Wahlstrom O. Twenty-year results of McKee-Farrar versus Charnley prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329(suppl):S60–S68.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Long WT, Dorr LD, Gendelman V. An American experience with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties: a 7-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:29–34.PubMed

28.

McKellop H, Park SH, Chiesa RF, Doorn PF, Lu BF, Normand PF, Grigoris P, Amstutz H. In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329(suppl):S128–S140.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Mont MA, Marker DR, Seyler TM, Jones LC, Kolisek FR, Hungerford DS. High-impact sports after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23:80–84.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Naal FD, Fischer MF, Preuss AF, Goldhahn JF, von Knoch FF, Preiss S, Munzinger U, Drobny T. Return to sports and recreational activity after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1688–1695.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M. Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:958–965.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Naal FD, Maffiuletti NA, Munzinger UF, Hersche O. Sports after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:705–711.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Rieker CB, Schon RF, Kottig P. Development and validation of a second-generation metal-on-metal bearing: laboratory studies and analysis of retrievals. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:5–11.PubMed

34.

Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Lewis PL, Nott L. The Miller-Galante knee prosthesis for the treatment of osteoarthrosis: a comparison of the results of partial fixation with cement and fixation without any cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:402–408.PubMed

35.

Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Mulliken BD, Nayak N, Laupacis A, Tugwell P, Feeney D. The Nicolas Andry Award. Comparative results of cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;325:330–344.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Schmidt M, Weber H, Schon R. Cobalt chromium molybdenum metal combination for modular hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;329(suppl):S35–S47.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Scott SC, Goldberg MS, Mayo NE. Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:45–55.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Sechriest VF, Kyle RF, Marek DJ, Spates JD, Saleh KJ, Kuskowski M. Activity level in young patients with primary total hip arthroplasty: a 5-year minimum follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:39–47.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Sharma S, Vassan U, Bhamra MS. Metal-on-metal total hip joint replacement: a minimum follow-up of five years. Hip Int. 2007;17:70–77.PubMed

40.

Sieber HP, Rieker CB, Kottig P. Analysis of 118 second-generation metal-on-metal retrieved hip implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:46–50.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Palan J, Beard DJ, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Murray DW, Gill HS. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:436–441.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:167–170.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Wagner M, Wagner H. Medium-term results of a modern metal-on-metal system in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;379:123–133.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Wylde VF, Blom AF, Dieppe PF, Hewlett S, Learmonth I. Return to sport after joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:920–923.PubMedCrossRef

46.

Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:890–895.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Predictors of Participation in Sports After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
verfasst von: Daniel H. Williams, MBBCh, MSc
Nelson V. Greidanus, MD, MPH
Bassam A. Masri, MD
Clive P. Duncan, MD, MSc
Donald S. Garbuz, MD, MHSc
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2012
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Ausgabe 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Elektronische ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2198-y

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Questions/purposes

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of Evidence

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2012

A New High-flexion Knee Scoring System to Eliminate the Ceiling Effect

Surgical Technique: A Cup-in-Cup Technique to Restore Offset in Severe Protrusio Acetabular Defects

Is an Algorithmic Approach to the Treatment of Recurrent Dislocation After THA Effective?

Does Ipsilateral Knee Pain Improve after Hip Arthroplasty?

Antimicrobial Gauze as a Dressing Reduces Pin Site Infection: A Randomized Controlled Trial