Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 5/2013

01.05.2013 | Editor's Spotlight/Take 5

Editor’s Spotlight/Take 5: Comparative Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome (DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-2843-8)

verfasst von: Seth S. Leopold, MD

Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Ausgabe 5/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

We have come a long way in reporting about what really matters in clinical research. In the early 1960s, Neviaser summarized his results of surgery for large rotator cuff tears rather simply: “My own experience has shown that … massive ruptures with marked separation and retraction of the cuff do not do well by operative repair” [1]. He reported nothing regarding patients’ pain or function after surgery. This was common at the time. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Neviaser JS. Ruptures of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop. 1954;3:92-98.PubMed Neviaser JS. Ruptures of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop. 1954;3:92-98.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Editor’s Spotlight/Take 5: Comparative Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome (DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-2843-8)
verfasst von
Seth S. Leopold, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Ausgabe 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Elektronische ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2886-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2013

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 5/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Symposium: Special Considerations for TKA in Asian Patients

Trends in Use of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Korea From 2001 to 2010

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.