Erschienen in:
01.05.2013 | Editor's Spotlight/Take 5
Editor’s Spotlight/Take 5: Comparative Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome (DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-2843-8)
verfasst von:
Seth S. Leopold, MD
Erschienen in:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®
|
Ausgabe 5/2013
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Excerpt
We have come a long way in reporting about what really matters in clinical research. In the early 1960s, Neviaser summarized his results of surgery for large rotator cuff tears rather simply: “My own experience has shown that … massive ruptures with marked separation and retraction of the cuff do not do well by operative repair” [
1]. He reported nothing regarding patients’ pain or function after surgery. This was common at the time. …