Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Medical Oncology 4/2013

01.12.2013 | Original Paper

Efficacy of estramustine phosphate sodium hydrate (EMP) monotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: report of 102 cases and review of literature

verfasst von: Kazuhiro Matsumoto, Nobuyuki Tanaka, Nozomi Hayakawa, Taisuke Ezaki, Kenjiro Suzuki, Takahiro Maeda, Akiharu Ninomiya, So Nakamura

Erschienen in: Medical Oncology | Ausgabe 4/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This retrospective chart review study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of estramustine phosphate sodium hydrate (EMP) monotherapy in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and to determine who would benefit from EMP therapy. EMP was administered at a daily dose of 560 mg to 102 patients as a third-line therapy, who had already received combined androgen blockade (CAB) and subsequent alternative antiandrogen therapy. The responses to EMP after its induction and its toxicity were evaluated. We also analyzed the association between the clinicopathological factors of the patients and their responses to EMP therapy. A reduction in the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 4 weeks after induction was observed in 70 patients (68.6 %), while 30 cases (29.4 %) achieved more than 50 % reduction of PSA. Long-term reduction of PSA from baseline for more than 6 months was observed in 31 patients (30.4 %). EMP treatment was discontinued in 11 patients (10.8 %) because of side effects (nausea in six patients, gynecomastia in three patients, eruption in one patient, and liver dysfunction in one patient). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that long duration of prior hormonal therapy was an independent favorable factor for reduced PSA levels, long responses, and overall survival. The data suggest that oral EMP administration as a third-line monotherapy is well tolerated and effective to some degree in patients with CRPC who have already received CAB and subsequent alternative antiandrogen therapy. Thus, EMP can be regarded as one treatment option, especially for patients whose prior duration of hormonal therapy was long.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat The Medical Research Council Prostate Cancer Working Party Investigators Group. Immediate versus deferred treatment for advanced prostatic cancer: initial results of the Medical Research Council Trial. Br J Urol. 1997;79:235–46.CrossRef The Medical Research Council Prostate Cancer Working Party Investigators Group. Immediate versus deferred treatment for advanced prostatic cancer: initial results of the Medical Research Council Trial. Br J Urol. 1997;79:235–46.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Miyake H, Hara I, Eto H. Clinical outcome of maximum androgen blockade using flutamide as second-line hormonal therapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2005;96:791–5.CrossRefPubMed Miyake H, Hara I, Eto H. Clinical outcome of maximum androgen blockade using flutamide as second-line hormonal therapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2005;96:791–5.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kojima S, Suzuki H, Akakura K, Shimbo M, Ichikawa T, Ito H. Alternative antiandrogens to treat prostate cancer relapse after initial hormone therapy. J Urol. 2004;171:679–83.CrossRefPubMed Kojima S, Suzuki H, Akakura K, Shimbo M, Ichikawa T, Ito H. Alternative antiandrogens to treat prostate cancer relapse after initial hormone therapy. J Urol. 2004;171:679–83.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MH, Lara PN Jr, Jones JA, Taplin ME, et al. Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1513–20.CrossRefPubMed Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MH, Lara PN Jr, Jones JA, Taplin ME, et al. Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1513–20.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, Horti J, Pluzanska A, Chi KN, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1502–12.CrossRefPubMed Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, Horti J, Pluzanska A, Chi KN, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1502–12.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Naito S, Tsukamoto T, Koga H, Harabayashi T, Sumiyoshi Y, Hoshi S, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisolone for the treatment of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a multicenter Phase II trial in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38:365–72.CrossRefPubMed Naito S, Tsukamoto T, Koga H, Harabayashi T, Sumiyoshi Y, Hoshi S, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisolone for the treatment of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a multicenter Phase II trial in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38:365–72.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Miura N, Numata K, Kusuhara Y, Shirato A, Hashine K, Sumiyoshi Y. Docetaxel-prednisolone combination therapy for Japanese patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a single institution experience. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40:1092–8.CrossRefPubMed Miura N, Numata K, Kusuhara Y, Shirato A, Hashine K, Sumiyoshi Y. Docetaxel-prednisolone combination therapy for Japanese patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a single institution experience. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40:1092–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hudes G. Estramustine-based chemotherapy. Semin Urol Oncol. 1997;15:13–9.PubMed Hudes G. Estramustine-based chemotherapy. Semin Urol Oncol. 1997;15:13–9.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Maier U, Hienert G, Simak R. Estramustine phosphate in secondary hormone-resistant carcinoma of the prostate. Eur Urol. 1990;17:216–8.PubMed Maier U, Hienert G, Simak R. Estramustine phosphate in secondary hormone-resistant carcinoma of the prostate. Eur Urol. 1990;17:216–8.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Elomaa I, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P, Rannikko S, Alfthan O. Hormone-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Comparisons between estramustine phosphate and low-dose epirubicin treatments. Eur Urol. 1991;19:12–5.PubMed Elomaa I, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P, Rannikko S, Alfthan O. Hormone-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Comparisons between estramustine phosphate and low-dose epirubicin treatments. Eur Urol. 1991;19:12–5.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Johansson JE, Andersson SO, Holmberg L. High-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate versus estramustine in therapy-resistant prostatic cancer: a randomised study. Br J Urol. 1991;68:67–73.CrossRefPubMed Johansson JE, Andersson SO, Holmberg L. High-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate versus estramustine in therapy-resistant prostatic cancer: a randomised study. Br J Urol. 1991;68:67–73.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Newling DW, Fossa SD, Tunn UW, Kurth KH, de Pauw M, Sylvester R. Mitomycin C versus estramustine in the treatment of hormone resistant metastatic prostate cancer: the final analysis of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, genitourinary group prospective randomized phase III study (30865). J Urol. 1993;150:1840–4.PubMed Newling DW, Fossa SD, Tunn UW, Kurth KH, de Pauw M, Sylvester R. Mitomycin C versus estramustine in the treatment of hormone resistant metastatic prostate cancer: the final analysis of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, genitourinary group prospective randomized phase III study (30865). J Urol. 1993;150:1840–4.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Iversen P, Rasmussen F, Asmussen C, Christensen IJ, Eickhoff J, Klarskov P, et al. Estramustine phosphate versus placebo as second line treatment after orchiectomy in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: DAPROCA study 9002. Danish Prostatic Cancer Group. J Urol. 1997;157:929–34.CrossRefPubMed Iversen P, Rasmussen F, Asmussen C, Christensen IJ, Eickhoff J, Klarskov P, et al. Estramustine phosphate versus placebo as second line treatment after orchiectomy in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: DAPROCA study 9002. Danish Prostatic Cancer Group. J Urol. 1997;157:929–34.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Albrecht W, Van Poppel H, Horenblas S, Mickisch G, Horwich A, Serretta V, et al. Randomized Phase II trial assessing estramustine and vinblastine combination chemotherapy vs estramustine alone in patients with progressive hormone-escaped metastatic prostate cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:100–5.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Albrecht W, Van Poppel H, Horenblas S, Mickisch G, Horwich A, Serretta V, et al. Randomized Phase II trial assessing estramustine and vinblastine combination chemotherapy vs estramustine alone in patients with progressive hormone-escaped metastatic prostate cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:100–5.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirano D, Minei S, Kishimoto Y, Yamaguchi K, Hachiya T, Yoshida T, et al. Prospective study of estramustine phosphate for hormone refractory prostate cancer patients following androgen deprivation therapy. Urol Int. 2005;75:43–9.CrossRefPubMed Hirano D, Minei S, Kishimoto Y, Yamaguchi K, Hachiya T, Yoshida T, et al. Prospective study of estramustine phosphate for hormone refractory prostate cancer patients following androgen deprivation therapy. Urol Int. 2005;75:43–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Naiki T, Okamura T, Kawai N, Sakagami H, Yamada Y, Fujita K, et al. Advantages of second line estramustine for overall survival of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009;10:71–4.PubMed Naiki T, Okamura T, Kawai N, Sakagami H, Yamada Y, Fujita K, et al. Advantages of second line estramustine for overall survival of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009;10:71–4.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Serretta V, Altieri V, Morgia G, Siragusa A, De Grande G, Napoli M, et al. Oral chemotherapy in hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma patients unwilling to be admitted to hospital. Urol Int. 2009;83:452–7.CrossRefPubMed Serretta V, Altieri V, Morgia G, Siragusa A, De Grande G, Napoli M, et al. Oral chemotherapy in hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma patients unwilling to be admitted to hospital. Urol Int. 2009;83:452–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Noguchi M, Kakuma T, Uemura H, Nasu Y, Kumon H, Hirao Y, et al. A randomized phase II trial of personalized peptide vaccine plus low dose estramustine phosphate (EMP) versus standard dose EMP in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2010;59:1001–9.CrossRefPubMed Noguchi M, Kakuma T, Uemura H, Nasu Y, Kumon H, Hirao Y, et al. A randomized phase II trial of personalized peptide vaccine plus low dose estramustine phosphate (EMP) versus standard dose EMP in patients with castration resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2010;59:1001–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Minato A, Fujimoto N, Kubo T, Harada S, Akasaka S, Matsumoto T. Efficacy of estramustine phosphate according to risk classification of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Med Oncol. 2012;29:2895–900.CrossRefPubMed Minato A, Fujimoto N, Kubo T, Harada S, Akasaka S, Matsumoto T. Efficacy of estramustine phosphate according to risk classification of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Med Oncol. 2012;29:2895–900.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Scher HI, Halabi S, Tannock I, Morris M, Sternberg CN, Carducci MA, et al. Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1148–59.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Scher HI, Halabi S, Tannock I, Morris M, Sternberg CN, Carducci MA, et al. Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1148–59.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Maffezzini M, Bossi A, Collette L. Implications of prostate-specific antigen doubling time as indicator of failure after surgery or radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2007;51:605–13.CrossRefPubMed Maffezzini M, Bossi A, Collette L. Implications of prostate-specific antigen doubling time as indicator of failure after surgery or radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2007;51:605–13.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazumdar M, Glassman JR. Categorizing a prognostic variable: review of methods, code for easy implementation and applications to decision-making about cancer treatments. Stat Med. 2000;19:113–32.CrossRefPubMed Mazumdar M, Glassman JR. Categorizing a prognostic variable: review of methods, code for easy implementation and applications to decision-making about cancer treatments. Stat Med. 2000;19:113–32.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Efficacy of estramustine phosphate sodium hydrate (EMP) monotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: report of 102 cases and review of literature
verfasst von
Kazuhiro Matsumoto
Nobuyuki Tanaka
Nozomi Hayakawa
Taisuke Ezaki
Kenjiro Suzuki
Takahiro Maeda
Akiharu Ninomiya
So Nakamura
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2013
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Medical Oncology / Ausgabe 4/2013
Print ISSN: 1357-0560
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-131X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-013-0717-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2013

Medical Oncology 4/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

25.04.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Das Risiko für Rezidiv oder Tod von Patienten und Patientinnen mit reseziertem ALK-positivem NSCLC ist unter einer adjuvanten Therapie mit dem Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitor Alectinib signifikant geringer als unter platinbasierter Chemotherapie.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.