Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 10/2009

01.12.2009 | Original Article

Impact of additional SPECT in bone scanning in tumor patients with suspected metastatic bone disease

verfasst von: Ivayla Apostolova, Elif Gölcük, Karl Heinz Bohuslavizki, Ralph Buchert, Winfried Brenner

Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Ausgabe 10/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the additional value of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for patient staging compared to planar bone scanning in an unselected cohort of cancer patients.

Methods

The study included 271 consecutive tumor patients in whom planar imaging and two-bed position SPECT of the spine and the pelvis had been performed. Retrospective image interpretation was performed independently for planar and SPECT scans. Findings were categorized as ‘benign’, ‘equivocal’, or ‘malignant’ on a lesion base, and as ‘no metastatic disease’, ‘equivocal’, or ‘metastatic disease’ on a patient base.

Results

447 lesions were detected by SPECT. Missing of lesions in planar images was rare (4.3% of all SPECT lesions). Planar findings differed from SPECT findings in 149 lesions (33.3%). Most of these ‘inconsistent’ lesions were rated as equivocal in the planar images but benign (14.5% of all lesions) or malignant (11.0%) by SPECT. On a patient base, 81.6% of patients with planar equivocal staging were classified as either benign (55.3%) or malignant (26.3%) by SPECT. Patients definitively staged as ‘no metastatic disease’ or ‘metastatic disease’ in planar images were staged differently by SPECT in only 3.7% of cases (up-staging in 2.6% and down-staging in 1.1%).

Conclusions

Single-photon emission computed tomography changed a definite staging as based on planar images in less than 4% of the patients. In patients with planar equivocal staging, however, SPECT allowed a definite diagnosis in more than 80% of these cases, and, thus, should be performed routinely in patients with equivocal findings.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Galasko CS. Skeletal metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;210:18–30.PubMed Galasko CS. Skeletal metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;210:18–30.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Even-Sapir E, Metser U, Mishani E, Lievshitz G, Lerman H, Leibovitch I. The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:287–97.PubMed Even-Sapir E, Metser U, Mishani E, Lievshitz G, Lerman H, Leibovitch I. The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:287–97.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schirrmeister H, Glatting G, Hetzel J, Nussle K, Arslandemir C, Buck AK, et al. Prospective evaluation of the clinical value of planar bone scans, SPECT, and (18)F-labeled NaF PET in newly diagnosed lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1800–4.PubMed Schirrmeister H, Glatting G, Hetzel J, Nussle K, Arslandemir C, Buck AK, et al. Prospective evaluation of the clinical value of planar bone scans, SPECT, and (18)F-labeled NaF PET in newly diagnosed lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1800–4.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gratz S, Becker W. Nuclear medicine study potentials in diseases of the skeletal system. Radiologe. 2000;40:953–62.CrossRefPubMed Gratz S, Becker W. Nuclear medicine study potentials in diseases of the skeletal system. Radiologe. 2000;40:953–62.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gratz S, Höffken H, Kaiser W, Klose KJ, Behr TM. Is there still enough diagnostic confidence with bone SPECT scintigraphy alone: a retrospective evaluation and extended review of the literature. Open Med Imag J. 2008;2:7–13.CrossRef Gratz S, Höffken H, Kaiser W, Klose KJ, Behr TM. Is there still enough diagnostic confidence with bone SPECT scintigraphy alone: a retrospective evaluation and extended review of the literature. Open Med Imag J. 2008;2:7–13.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Han LJ, Au-Yong TK, Tong WC, Chu KS, Szeto LT, Wong CP. Comparison of bone single-photon emission tomography and planar imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases in patients with back pain. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:635–8.CrossRefPubMed Han LJ, Au-Yong TK, Tong WC, Chu KS, Szeto LT, Wong CP. Comparison of bone single-photon emission tomography and planar imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases in patients with back pain. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:635–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Reinartz P, Schaffeldt J, Sabri O, Zimny M, Nowak B, Ostwald E, et al. Benign versus malignant osseous lesions in the lumbar vertebrae: differentiation by means of bone SPET. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:721–6.CrossRefPubMed Reinartz P, Schaffeldt J, Sabri O, Zimny M, Nowak B, Ostwald E, et al. Benign versus malignant osseous lesions in the lumbar vertebrae: differentiation by means of bone SPET. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:721–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sedonja I, Budihna NV. The benefit of SPECT when added to planar scintigraphy in patients with bone metastases in the spine. Clin Nucl Med. 1999;24:407–13.CrossRefPubMed Sedonja I, Budihna NV. The benefit of SPECT when added to planar scintigraphy in patients with bone metastases in the spine. Clin Nucl Med. 1999;24:407–13.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Savelli G, Maffioli L, Maccauro M, De Deckere E, Bombardieri E. Bone scintigraphy and the added value of SPECT (single photon emission tomography) in detecting skeletal lesions. Q J Nucl Med. 2001;45:27–37.PubMed Savelli G, Maffioli L, Maccauro M, De Deckere E, Bombardieri E. Bone scintigraphy and the added value of SPECT (single photon emission tomography) in detecting skeletal lesions. Q J Nucl Med. 2001;45:27–37.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bushnell DL, Kahn D, Huston B, Bevering CG. Utility of SPECT imaging for determination of vertebral metastases in patients with known primary tumors. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24:13–6.CrossRefPubMed Bushnell DL, Kahn D, Huston B, Bevering CG. Utility of SPECT imaging for determination of vertebral metastases in patients with known primary tumors. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24:13–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Elmadani AE, Warwick JM, Ellmann A. The contribution of bone SPECT to the diagnosis of bone metastases in an African population. Nucl Med Commun. 2008;29:254–9.CrossRefPubMed Elmadani AE, Warwick JM, Ellmann A. The contribution of bone SPECT to the diagnosis of bone metastases in an African population. Nucl Med Commun. 2008;29:254–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fogelman I, Cook G, Israel O, Van der Wall H. Positron emission tomography and bone metastases. Semin Nucl Med. 2005;35:135–42.CrossRefPubMed Fogelman I, Cook G, Israel O, Van der Wall H. Positron emission tomography and bone metastases. Semin Nucl Med. 2005;35:135–42.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Delpassand ES, Garcia JR, Bhadkamkar V, Podoloff DA. Value of SPECT imaging of the thoracolumbar spine in cancer patients. Clin Nucl Med. 1995;20:1047–51.CrossRefPubMed Delpassand ES, Garcia JR, Bhadkamkar V, Podoloff DA. Value of SPECT imaging of the thoracolumbar spine in cancer patients. Clin Nucl Med. 1995;20:1047–51.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Even-Sapir E, Martin RH, Barnes DC, Pringle CR, Iles SE, Mitchell MJ. Role of SPECT in differentiating malignant from benign lesions in the lower thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. Radiology. 1993;187:193–8.PubMed Even-Sapir E, Martin RH, Barnes DC, Pringle CR, Iles SE, Mitchell MJ. Role of SPECT in differentiating malignant from benign lesions in the lower thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. Radiology. 1993;187:193–8.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Yueh TC, Zeng SQ, Hu P, Wu KN, Shi R, Li Y. The usefulness of Tc-99m MDP bone SPECT in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal lesions. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:127. Yueh TC, Zeng SQ, Hu P, Wu KN, Shi R, Li Y. The usefulness of Tc-99m MDP bone SPECT in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal lesions. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:127.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Romer W, Nomayr A, Uder M, Bautz W, Kuwert T. SPECT-guided CT for evaluating foci of increased bone metabolism classified as indeterminate on SPECT in cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1102–6.PubMed Romer W, Nomayr A, Uder M, Bautz W, Kuwert T. SPECT-guided CT for evaluating foci of increased bone metabolism classified as indeterminate on SPECT in cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1102–6.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Strobel K, Burger C, Seifert B, Husarik DB, Soyka JD, Hany TF. Characterization of focal bone lesions in the axial skeleton: performance of planar bone scintigraphy compared with SPECT and SPECT fused with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:W467–74.CrossRefPubMed Strobel K, Burger C, Seifert B, Husarik DB, Soyka JD, Hany TF. Characterization of focal bone lesions in the axial skeleton: performance of planar bone scintigraphy compared with SPECT and SPECT fused with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:W467–74.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Utsunomiya D, Shiraishi S, Imuta M, Tomiguchi S, Kawanaka K, Morishita S, et al. Added value of SPECT/CT fusion in assessing suspected bone metastasis: comparison with scintigraphy alone and nonfused scintigraphy and CT. Radiology. 2006;238:264–71.CrossRefPubMed Utsunomiya D, Shiraishi S, Imuta M, Tomiguchi S, Kawanaka K, Morishita S, et al. Added value of SPECT/CT fusion in assessing suspected bone metastasis: comparison with scintigraphy alone and nonfused scintigraphy and CT. Radiology. 2006;238:264–71.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Impact of additional SPECT in bone scanning in tumor patients with suspected metastatic bone disease
verfasst von
Ivayla Apostolova
Elif Gölcük
Karl Heinz Bohuslavizki
Ralph Buchert
Winfried Brenner
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2009
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Ausgabe 10/2009
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Elektronische ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-009-0317-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2009

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 10/2009 Zur Ausgabe