Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 6/2016

Open Access 06.05.2016 | Original Article

Report of a nationwide survey on actual administered radioactivities of radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic reference levels in Japan

verfasst von: Hiroshi Watanabe, Kazunari Ishii, Makoto Hosono, Etsuko Imabayashi, Koichiro Abe, Masayuki Inubushi, Kazuko Ohno, Yasuhiro Magata, Kinya Ono, Kei Kikuchi, Kei Wagatsuma, Tadashi Takase, Kyoko Saito, Yasuyuki Takahashi

Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The optimization of medical exposure is one of the major issues regarding radiation protection in the world, and The International Committee of Radiological Protection and the International Atomic Energy Agency recommend establishing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) as tools for dose optimization. Therefore, the development of DRLs based on the latest survey has been required for nuclear medicine-related societies and organizations. This prompted us to conduct a nationwide survey on the actual administered radioactivity to adults for the purpose of developing DRLs in nuclear medicine.

Methods

A nationwide survey was conducted from November 25, 2014 to January 16, 2015. The questionnaire was sent to all of the 1249 nuclear medicine facilities in Japan, and the responses were collected on a website using an answered form.

Results

Responses were obtained from 516 facilities, for a response rate of 41 %. 75th percentile of 99mTc-MDP and 99mTc-HMDP: bone scintigraphy, 99mTc-HM-PAO, 99mTc-ECD and 123I-IMP: cerebral blood flow scintigraphy, 99mTc-Tetrofosmin, 99mTc-MIBI and 201Tl-Cl; myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and 18F-FDG: oncology PET (in-house-produced or delivery) in representative diagnostic nuclear medicine scans were 932, 937, 763, 775, 200, 831, 818, 180, 235 and 252, respectively. More than 90 % of the facilities were within the range of 50 % from the median of these survey results in representative diagnostic nuclear medicine facilities in Japan. Responses of the administered radioactivities recommended by the package insert, texts and guidelines such as 740 MBq (99mTc-MDP and 99mTc-HMDP: bone scintigraphy), 740 MBq (99mTc-ECD and 99mTc-HM-PAO: cerebral blood flow scintigraphy) and 740 MBq (99mTc-Tetrofosmin and 99mTc-MIBI: myocardial perfusion scintigraphy), etc. were numerous. The administered activity of many radiopharmaceuticals of bone scintigraphy (99mTc-MDP and 99mTc-HMDP), cerebral blood flow scintigraphy (99mTc-HM-PAO) and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (99mTc-Tetrofosmin and 99mTc-MIBI), etc. were within the range of the EU DRLs and almost none of the administered radioactivity in Japan exceeded the upper limit of SNMMI standard administered radioactivity.

Conclusions

This survey indicated that the administered radioactivity in diagnostic nuclear medicine in Japan had been in the convergence zone and nuclear medicine facilities in Japan show a strong tendency to adhere to the texts and guidelines. Furthermore, the administered radioactivities in Japan were within the range of variation of the EU and the SNMMI administered radioactivities.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2–4). International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2–4).
2.
Zurück zum Zitat International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Radiological protection in medicine. ICRP Publication 105. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(6). International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Radiological protection in medicine. ICRP Publication 105. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(6).
3.
Zurück zum Zitat International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Radiological protection and safety in medicine. ICRP Publication 73. Ann ICRP. 1996;26(2). International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Radiological protection and safety in medicine. ICRP Publication 73. Ann ICRP. 1996;26(2).
4.
Zurück zum Zitat International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). International basic safety standards for protection against ionizing radiation and for the safety of radiation sources, IAEA Safety Series No. 115. 1996. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). International basic safety standards for protection against ionizing radiation and for the safety of radiation sources, IAEA Safety Series No. 115. 1996.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission. Radiation protection 109. Guidance on diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for medical exposures. Luxembourg: OOPEC; 1999. European Commission. Radiation protection 109. Guidance on diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for medical exposures. Luxembourg: OOPEC; 1999.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mettler FAJ, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008;248:254–63.CrossRefPubMed Mettler FAJ, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008;248:254–63.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mettler FAJ, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Ibbott GS, et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources—1950–2007. Radiology. 2009;253:520–31.CrossRefPubMed Mettler FAJ, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Ibbott GS, et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources—1950–2007. Radiology. 2009;253:520–31.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission. DDM2 project report part 2: diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in Europe. 2010. European Commission. DDM2 project report part 2: diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in Europe. 2010.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Reference levels and achievable doses in medical and dental imaging: recommendations for the United States. NCRP Report No. 172. Bethesda: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. 2012. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Reference levels and achievable doses in medical and dental imaging: recommendations for the United States. NCRP Report No. 172. Bethesda: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. 2012.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Roch P, Aubert B. French diagnostic reference levels in diagnostic radiology, computed tomography and nuclear medicine: 2004–2008 review. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2013;154:52–75.CrossRef Roch P, Aubert B. French diagnostic reference levels in diagnostic radiology, computed tomography and nuclear medicine: 2004–2008 review. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2013;154:52–75.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Alessio AM, Farrell MB, Fahey FH. Role of reference levels in nuclear medicine: a report of the SNMMI Dose Optimization Task Force. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1960–4.CrossRefPubMed Alessio AM, Farrell MB, Fahey FH. Role of reference levels in nuclear medicine: a report of the SNMMI Dose Optimization Task Force. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1960–4.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Committee for evaluation of proper use of radiopharmaceuticals, Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. Development of guideline for proper use of radiopharmaceuticals. Contract research of related academic society on trial project implementation for promotion of proper use of radiopharmaceuticals by Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 2001–2002. 2002. www.jsnm.org/files/pdf/guideline/iyakuhin_gaidorain.pdf. Accessed 22 Dec 2015. Committee for evaluation of proper use of radiopharmaceuticals, Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. Development of guideline for proper use of radiopharmaceuticals. Contract research of related academic society on trial project implementation for promotion of proper use of radiopharmaceuticals by Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 2001–2002. 2002. www.​jsnm.​org/​files/​pdf/​guideline/​iyakuhin_​gaidorain.​pdf. Accessed 22 Dec 2015.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat A new text book of clinical nuclear medicine. 3rd ed. Kanehara & Co., Ltd; 1999. A new text book of clinical nuclear medicine. 3rd ed. Kanehara & Co., Ltd; 1999.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat The Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and the Japan Association of Radiological Technologists, Medical exposure guideline committee. Medical exposure guideline (reduction target dose) for patients. J JART. 2000;47:1694–750 (in Japanese). The Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and the Japan Association of Radiological Technologists, Medical exposure guideline committee. Medical exposure guideline (reduction target dose) for patients. J JART. 2000;47:1694–750 (in Japanese).
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Watanabe H. Medical exposure guideline 2006 (6; nuclear medicine) (reduction target dose in radiation practice). J JART. 2007;54:29–42 (in Japanese). Watanabe H. Medical exposure guideline 2006 (6; nuclear medicine) (reduction target dose in radiation practice). J JART. 2007;54:29–42 (in Japanese).
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Takahashi Y, Ono K, Kikuchi K, Saito K, Takase T, Morozumi K. Radiopharmaceutical administered doses for nuclear medicine. J JART. 2013;60:359–67 (in Japanese). Takahashi Y, Ono K, Kikuchi K, Saito K, Takase T, Morozumi K. Radiopharmaceutical administered doses for nuclear medicine. J JART. 2013;60:359–67 (in Japanese).
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Piepsz A, Hahn K, Roca I, Ciofetta G, Toth G, Gordon I, et al. A radiopharmaceuticals schedule for imaging in paediatrics. Paediatric Task Group European Association Nuclear Medicine. Eur J Nucl Med. 1990;17(3–4):127–9.PubMed Piepsz A, Hahn K, Roca I, Ciofetta G, Toth G, Gordon I, et al. A radiopharmaceuticals schedule for imaging in paediatrics. Paediatric Task Group European Association Nuclear Medicine. Eur J Nucl Med. 1990;17(3–4):127–9.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith T, Gordon I. An update of radiopharmaceutical schedules in children. Nucl Med Commun. 1998;19:1023–36.CrossRefPubMed Smith T, Gordon I. An update of radiopharmaceutical schedules in children. Nucl Med Commun. 1998;19:1023–36.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs F, Thierens H, Piepsz A, Bacher K, Van de Wiele C, Ham H, et al. Optimised tracer-dependent dosage cards to obtain weight-independent effective doses. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;32:581–8.CrossRefPubMed Jacobs F, Thierens H, Piepsz A, Bacher K, Van de Wiele C, Ham H, et al. Optimised tracer-dependent dosage cards to obtain weight-independent effective doses. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;32:581–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lassmann M, Biassoni L, Monsieurs M, Franzius C, Jacobs F. The new EANM paediatric dosage card. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:769–98.CrossRef Lassmann M, Biassoni L, Monsieurs M, Franzius C, Jacobs F. The new EANM paediatric dosage card. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:769–98.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Treves ST, Davis RT, Fahey FH. Administrated radiopharmaceutical doses in children: a survey of 13 pediatric hospitals in North America. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1024–2027.CrossRefPubMed Treves ST, Davis RT, Fahey FH. Administrated radiopharmaceutical doses in children: a survey of 13 pediatric hospitals in North America. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1024–2027.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gelfand MJ, Parisi MT, Treves ST. Pediatric radiopharmaceutical administered doses: 2010 North American consensus guidelines. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:318–22.CrossRefPubMed Gelfand MJ, Parisi MT, Treves ST. Pediatric radiopharmaceutical administered doses: 2010 North American consensus guidelines. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:318–22.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Treves ST, Parisi MT, Gelfand MJ. Pediatric radiopharmaceutical doses: new guidelines. Radiology. 2011;261:347–9.CrossRefPubMed Treves ST, Parisi MT, Gelfand MJ. Pediatric radiopharmaceutical doses: new guidelines. Radiology. 2011;261:347–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Fahey FH, Treves ST, Adelstein SJ. Minimizing and communicating radiation risk in pediatric nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1240–51.PubMed Fahey FH, Treves ST, Adelstein SJ. Minimizing and communicating radiation risk in pediatric nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1240–51.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Zanzonico P. Virtual reality for dose optimization in pediatric nuclear medicine: better than the real thing. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1845–7.CrossRefPubMed Zanzonico P. Virtual reality for dose optimization in pediatric nuclear medicine: better than the real thing. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1845–7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Koizumi K, Masaki H, Matsuda H, Uchiyama M, Okuno M, Oguma E, et al. Japanese consensus guidelines for pediatric nuclear medicine Part 1: pediatric radiopharmaceutical administered doses (JSNM pediatric dosage card). Part 2: Technical considerations for pediatric nuclear medicine imaging procedures. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28:498–503.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Koizumi K, Masaki H, Matsuda H, Uchiyama M, Okuno M, Oguma E, et al. Japanese consensus guidelines for pediatric nuclear medicine Part 1: pediatric radiopharmaceutical administered doses (JSNM pediatric dosage card). Part 2: Technical considerations for pediatric nuclear medicine imaging procedures. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28:498–503.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Report of a nationwide survey on actual administered radioactivities of radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic reference levels in Japan
verfasst von
Hiroshi Watanabe
Kazunari Ishii
Makoto Hosono
Etsuko Imabayashi
Koichiro Abe
Masayuki Inubushi
Kazuko Ohno
Yasuhiro Magata
Kinya Ono
Kei Kikuchi
Kei Wagatsuma
Tadashi Takase
Kyoko Saito
Yasuyuki Takahashi
Publikationsdatum
06.05.2016
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Elektronische ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-016-1079-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to the Editor

Reply to ‘PEM or MBI?’