Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Infection 5/2016

16.04.2016 | Original Paper

Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing a penicillin or cephalosporin with a macrolide or lincosamide in the treatment of cellulitis or erysipelas

verfasst von: Athena Ferreira, Mark J. Bolland, Mark G. Thomas

Erschienen in: Infection | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Beta-lactam antibiotics, such as penicillin, flucloxacillin or cephalexin, are widely considered first-line treatment for cellulitis and erysipelas, while macrolides and lincosamides, such as erythromycin, azithromycin or clindamycin, are widely considered second-line agents. We attempted to determine whether outcomes differed between patients treated either with a beta-lactam or with a macrolide or lincosamide.

Methods

We conducted a meta-analysis of published trials in which patients with cellulitis or erysipelas were randomised to treatment either with a beta-lactam or with a macrolide or lincosamide. We searched PUBMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE and SCOPUS (up to March 2014) using the terms: cellulitis/erysipelas, penicillin/beta-lactam, macrolide/lincosamide, random*/controlled*/trial* as keywords. We included randomised trials that compared monotherapy with a beta-lactam with monotherapy with a macrolide or lincosamide for cellulitis or erysipelas.

Results

We identified 15 studies, 9 in patients with cellulitis or erysipelas and 6 in patients with various skin and soft tissue infections including cellulitis and erysipelas. The efficacy of treatment of cellulitis or erysipelas was similar with a beta-lactam [27/221 (12 %) not cured] and a macrolide or lincosamide [21/241 (9 %) not cured, RR 1.24, 95 % CI 0.72–2.41, p = 0.44]. Treatment efficacy was also similar for skin or soft tissue infections including cellulitis and erysipelas (RR 1.28, 95 % CI 0.96–1.69, p = 0.09). Risk of adverse effects was similar for beta-lactams [148/1295 (11 %) not cured] and macrolides or lincosamides [228/1737 (13 %) not cured, RR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.64–1.16, p = 0.31].

Conclusion

Treatment with a macrolide or lincosamide for cellulitis or erysipelas has a similar efficacy and incidence of adverse effects as treatment with a beta-lactam.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellis Simonsen SM, Van Orman ER, Hatch BE, Jones SS, Gren LH, Hegmann KT, et al. Cellulitis incidence in a defined population. Epidemiol Infect. 2006;134:293–9.CrossRefPubMed Ellis Simonsen SM, Van Orman ER, Hatch BE, Jones SS, Gren LH, Hegmann KT, et al. Cellulitis incidence in a defined population. Epidemiol Infect. 2006;134:293–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gunderson CG, Martinello RA. A systematic review of bacteremias in cellulitis and erysipelas. J Infect. 2012;64:148–55.CrossRefPubMed Gunderson CG, Martinello RA. A systematic review of bacteremias in cellulitis and erysipelas. J Infect. 2012;64:148–55.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jorup-Ronstrom C. Epidemiological, bacteriological and complicating features of erysipelas. Scand J Infect Dis. 1986;18:519–24.CrossRefPubMed Jorup-Ronstrom C. Epidemiological, bacteriological and complicating features of erysipelas. Scand J Infect Dis. 1986;18:519–24.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Eriksson B, Jorup-Ronstrom C, Karkkonen K, Sjoblom AC, Holm SE. Erysipelas: clinical and bacteriologic spectrum and serological aspects. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;23:1091–8.CrossRefPubMed Eriksson B, Jorup-Ronstrom C, Karkkonen K, Sjoblom AC, Holm SE. Erysipelas: clinical and bacteriologic spectrum and serological aspects. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;23:1091–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergkvist P-I, Sjobeck K. Antibiotic and prednisolone therapy of erysipelas: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Scand J Infect Dis. 1997;29:377–82.CrossRefPubMed Bergkvist P-I, Sjobeck K. Antibiotic and prednisolone therapy of erysipelas: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Scand J Infect Dis. 1997;29:377–82.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Pasternack MS, Swartz MN. Cellulitis, necrotizing fasciitis, and subcutaneous tissue infections. In: Bennet JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ, editors. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases, vol. 1. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2015. p. 1194–215. Pasternack MS, Swartz MN. Cellulitis, necrotizing fasciitis, and subcutaneous tissue infections. In: Bennet JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ, editors. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases, vol. 1. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2015. p. 1194–215.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Dellinger EP, Goldstein RJ, Gorbach SL, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:1373–406.CrossRefPubMed Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Dellinger EP, Goldstein RJ, Gorbach SL, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:1373–406.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ray GT, Suaya JA, Baxter R. Microbiology of skin and soft tissue infections in the age of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Diagn Micro Inf Dis. 2013;76:24–30.CrossRef Ray GT, Suaya JA, Baxter R. Microbiology of skin and soft tissue infections in the age of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Diagn Micro Inf Dis. 2013;76:24–30.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat David MZ, Daum RS. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and clinical consequences of an emerging epidemic. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23:616–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral David MZ, Daum RS. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and clinical consequences of an emerging epidemic. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23:616–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Green MD, Beall B, Marcon MJ, Allen CH, Bradley JS, Dashefsky B, et al. Multicentre surveillance of the prevalence and molecular epidemiology of macrolide resistance among pharyngeal isolates of group A streptococci in the USA. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57:1240–3.CrossRefPubMed Green MD, Beall B, Marcon MJ, Allen CH, Bradley JS, Dashefsky B, et al. Multicentre surveillance of the prevalence and molecular epidemiology of macrolide resistance among pharyngeal isolates of group A streptococci in the USA. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57:1240–3.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mulla ZD, Leaverton PE, Wiersma ST. Invasive group A streptococcal infections in Florida. South Med J. 2003;96:968–73.CrossRefPubMed Mulla ZD, Leaverton PE, Wiersma ST. Invasive group A streptococcal infections in Florida. South Med J. 2003;96:968–73.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Carapetis JR, Jacoby P, Carville K, Ang SJ, Curtis N, Andrews R. Effectiveness of clindamycin and intravenous immunoglobulin, and risk of disease in contacts, in invasive group A streptococcal infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:358–65.CrossRefPubMed Carapetis JR, Jacoby P, Carville K, Ang SJ, Curtis N, Andrews R. Effectiveness of clindamycin and intravenous immunoglobulin, and risk of disease in contacts, in invasive group A streptococcal infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:358–65.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Amsden GW. Anti-inflammatory effects of macrolides—an underappreciated benefit in the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections and chronic inflammatory pulmonary conditions? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;55:10–21.CrossRefPubMed Amsden GW. Anti-inflammatory effects of macrolides—an underappreciated benefit in the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections and chronic inflammatory pulmonary conditions? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;55:10–21.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chua K, Laurent F, Coombs G, Grayson ML, Howden BP. Not community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA)! A clinician’s guide to community MRSA—its evolving antimicrobial resistance and implications for therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:99–114.CrossRefPubMed Chua K, Laurent F, Coombs G, Grayson ML, Howden BP. Not community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA)! A clinician’s guide to community MRSA—its evolving antimicrobial resistance and implications for therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:99–114.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernard P, Plantin P, Roger H, Sassolas B, Villaret E, Legrain V, et al. Roxithromycin versus penicillin in the treatment of erysipelas in adults: a comparative study. Br J Dermatol. 1992;127:155–9.CrossRefPubMed Bernard P, Plantin P, Roger H, Sassolas B, Villaret E, Legrain V, et al. Roxithromycin versus penicillin in the treatment of erysipelas in adults: a comparative study. Br J Dermatol. 1992;127:155–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomas MG. Oral clindamycin compared with sequential intravenous and oral flucloxacillin in the treatment of cellulitis in adults. A randomized, double-blind trial. Infect Dis Clin Pract. 2014;22:330–4. Thomas MG. Oral clindamycin compared with sequential intravenous and oral flucloxacillin in the treatment of cellulitis in adults. A randomized, double-blind trial. Infect Dis Clin Pract. 2014;22:330–4.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Baig A, Grillage MG, Welch RB. A comparison of erythromycin and flucloxacillin in the treatment of infected skin lesions in general practice. Br J Clin Pract. 1988;42:110–5.PubMed Baig A, Grillage MG, Welch RB. A comparison of erythromycin and flucloxacillin in the treatment of infected skin lesions in general practice. Br J Clin Pract. 1988;42:110–5.PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pusponegoro EHD, Wiryadi BE. Clindamycin and cloxacillin compared in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections. Clin Ther. 1990;12:236–41.PubMed Pusponegoro EHD, Wiryadi BE. Clindamycin and cloxacillin compared in the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections. Clin Ther. 1990;12:236–41.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Daniel R, The European Azithromycin Study Group. Azithromycin, erythromycin and cloxacillin in the treatment of infections of skin and associated soft tissues. J Int Med Res. 1991;19:433–45.PubMed Daniel R, The European Azithromycin Study Group. Azithromycin, erythromycin and cloxacillin in the treatment of infections of skin and associated soft tissues. J Int Med Res. 1991;19:433–45.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiani R. Double-blind, double-dummy comparison of azithromycin and cephalexin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991;10:880–4.CrossRefPubMed Kiani R. Double-blind, double-dummy comparison of azithromycin and cephalexin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991;10:880–4.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mallory SB. Azithromycin compared with cephalexin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. Am J Med. 1991;91:36S–9S.CrossRefPubMed Mallory SB. Azithromycin compared with cephalexin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. Am J Med. 1991;91:36S–9S.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Nolen TM. Clinical trials of cefprozil for treatment of skin and skin-structure infections: review. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;14:S255–63.CrossRefPubMed Nolen TM. Clinical trials of cefprozil for treatment of skin and skin-structure infections: review. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;14:S255–63.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodriguez-Solares A, Perez-Gutierrez F, Prosperi J, Milgram E, Martin A. A comparative study of the efficacy, safety and tolerance of azithromycin, dicloxacillin and flucloxacillin in the treatment of children with acute skin and skin-structure infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993;31:103–9.CrossRefPubMed Rodriguez-Solares A, Perez-Gutierrez F, Prosperi J, Milgram E, Martin A. A comparative study of the efficacy, safety and tolerance of azithromycin, dicloxacillin and flucloxacillin in the treatment of children with acute skin and skin-structure infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993;31:103–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Arata J, Torigoe R, Ohkawara A, Koizumi H, Sato H, Furuya K, et al. A multicenter, double-blind, double placebo clinical trial of azithromycin versus cefaclor in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. Jpn J Chemother. 1995;43:837–50. Arata J, Torigoe R, Ohkawara A, Koizumi H, Sato H, Furuya K, et al. A multicenter, double-blind, double placebo clinical trial of azithromycin versus cefaclor in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections. Jpn J Chemother. 1995;43:837–50.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Jardim ML, Mendonca MG. Treatment of bacterial skin infections an open, randomized and comparative study among roxithromycin and cephalexin. Rev Bras Med. 1995;52:1047–51. Jardim ML, Mendonca MG. Treatment of bacterial skin infections an open, randomized and comparative study among roxithromycin and cephalexin. Rev Bras Med. 1995;52:1047–51.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Pereira LC. Comparative clinical study between roxithromycin and cephalexin in the treatment of folliculitis, furunculosis and erysipelas/cellulitis. Rev Bras Med. 1996;53:81–6. Pereira LC. Comparative clinical study between roxithromycin and cephalexin in the treatment of folliculitis, furunculosis and erysipelas/cellulitis. Rev Bras Med. 1996;53:81–6.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Montero L. A comparative study of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of azithromycin and cefaclor in the treatment of children with acute skin and/or soft tissue infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;37:125–31.CrossRefPubMed Montero L. A comparative study of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of azithromycin and cefaclor in the treatment of children with acute skin and/or soft tissue infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;37:125–31.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Blaszczyk-Kostanecka M, Dobozy A, Dominguez-Soto L, Guerrero R, Hunyadi J, Lopera J, et al. Comparison of two regimens of oral clindamycin versus dicloxacillin in the treatment of mild-to-moderate skin and soft-tissue infections. Curr Ther Res. 1998;59:341–53.CrossRef Blaszczyk-Kostanecka M, Dobozy A, Dominguez-Soto L, Guerrero R, Hunyadi J, Lopera J, et al. Comparison of two regimens of oral clindamycin versus dicloxacillin in the treatment of mild-to-moderate skin and soft-tissue infections. Curr Ther Res. 1998;59:341–53.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Arata J, Shimizu H, Watanabe S, Miyachi Y, Iwatsuki K, Furue M, et al. Clinical evaluation of telithromycin in patients with skin and soft tissue infections. Phase III double-blind comparative study of telithromycin versus cefdinir. Jpn J Chemother. 2005;53:183–206. Arata J, Shimizu H, Watanabe S, Miyachi Y, Iwatsuki K, Furue M, et al. Clinical evaluation of telithromycin in patients with skin and soft tissue infections. Phase III double-blind comparative study of telithromycin versus cefdinir. Jpn J Chemother. 2005;53:183–206.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Kilburn SA, Featherstone P, Higgins B, Brindle R. Interventions for cellulitis and erysipelas. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;6:CD004299.PubMed Kilburn SA, Featherstone P, Higgins B, Brindle R. Interventions for cellulitis and erysipelas. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;6:CD004299.PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernard P, Chosidow O, Vaillant L, The French Erysipelas Study Group. Oral pristinamycin versus standard penicillin regimen to treat erysipelas in adults: randomised, non-inferiority, open trial. BMJ. 2002;325:864.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bernard P, Chosidow O, Vaillant L, The French Erysipelas Study Group. Oral pristinamycin versus standard penicillin regimen to treat erysipelas in adults: randomised, non-inferiority, open trial. BMJ. 2002;325:864.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Seaton RA, Sharp E, Bezlyak V, Weir CJ. Factors associated with outcome and duration of therapy in outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) patients with skin and soft-tissue infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;38:243–8.CrossRefPubMed Seaton RA, Sharp E, Bezlyak V, Weir CJ. Factors associated with outcome and duration of therapy in outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) patients with skin and soft-tissue infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;38:243–8.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Grayson ML, McDonald M, Gibson K, Athan E, Munckhof WJ, Paull P, et al. Once-daily intravenous cefazolin plus oral probenecid is equivalent to once daily intravenous ceftriaxone plus oral placebo for the treatment of moderate-to-severe cellulitis in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:1440–8.CrossRefPubMed Grayson ML, McDonald M, Gibson K, Athan E, Munckhof WJ, Paull P, et al. Once-daily intravenous cefazolin plus oral probenecid is equivalent to once daily intravenous ceftriaxone plus oral placebo for the treatment of moderate-to-severe cellulitis in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:1440–8.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Owens RC, Donskey CJ, Gaynes RP, Loo VG, Muto CA. Antimicrobial-associated risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:S19–31.CrossRefPubMed Owens RC, Donskey CJ, Gaynes RP, Loo VG, Muto CA. Antimicrobial-associated risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:S19–31.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown KA, Khanafer N, Daneman N, Fisman DN. Meta-analysis of antibiotics and the risk of community-associated Clostridium difficile infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:2326–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brown KA, Khanafer N, Daneman N, Fisman DN. Meta-analysis of antibiotics and the risk of community-associated Clostridium difficile infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:2326–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Nemeth J, Oesch G, Kuster SP. Bacteriostatic versus bactericidal antibiotics for patients with serious bacterial infections: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:382–95.CrossRefPubMed Nemeth J, Oesch G, Kuster SP. Bacteriostatic versus bactericidal antibiotics for patients with serious bacterial infections: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70:382–95.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing a penicillin or cephalosporin with a macrolide or lincosamide in the treatment of cellulitis or erysipelas
verfasst von
Athena Ferreira
Mark J. Bolland
Mark G. Thomas
Publikationsdatum
16.04.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Infection / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0300-8126
Elektronische ISSN: 1439-0973
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-016-0895-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Infection 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.