Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 3/2013

01.06.2013 | Original Research Article

A Pilot Discrete Choice Experiment to Explore Preferences for EQ-5D-5L Health States

verfasst von: Richard Norman, Paula Cronin, Rosalie Viney

Erschienen in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | Ausgabe 3/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The EQ-5D-5L has recently been developed to improve the sensitivity of the widely used three-level version. Valuation studies are required before the use of this new instrument can be adopted. The use of discrete choice experiments (DCEs) in this area is a promising area of research.

Purpose

To test the plausibility and acceptability of estimating an Australian algorithm for the newly developed five-level version of the EQ-5D using a DCE.

Methods

A choice experiment was designed, consisting of 200 choice sets blocked such that each respondent answered 10 choice sets. Each choice set presented two health state–duration combinations, and an immediate death option. The experiment was implemented in an online Australian-representative sample. A random-effects probit model was estimated. To explore the feasibility of the approach, an indicative algorithm was developed. The algorithm is transformed to a 0 to 1 scale suitable for use to estimate quality-adjusted life-year weights for use in economic evaluation.

Results

A total of 973 respondents undertook the choice experiment. Respondents were slightly younger and better educated than the general Australian population. Of the 973 respondents, 932 (95.8 %) completed all ten choice sets, and a further 12 completed some of the choice sets. In choice sets in which one health state–duration combination dominated another, the dominant option was selected on 89.5 % of occasions. The mean and median completion times were 17.9 and 9.4 min, respectively, exhibiting a highly skewed distribution. The estimation results are broadly consistent with the monotonic nature of the EQ-5D-5L. Utility is increasing in life expectancy (i.e., respondents tend to prefer health profiles with longer life expectancy), and mainly decreases in higher levels in each dimension of the instrument. A high proportion of respondents found the task clear and relatively easy to complete.

Conclusions

DCEs are a feasible approach to the estimation of utility weights for more complex multi-attribute utility instruments such as the EQ-5D-5L.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Richardson J, McKie J, Bariola E. Review and critique of health related multi attribute utility instruments. Research Paper 64. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics, Monash University; 2011. Richardson J, McKie J, Bariola E. Review and critique of health related multi attribute utility instruments. Research Paper 64. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics, Monash University; 2011.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727–36.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727–36.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Hout B, Janssen MF, Feng Y-S, et al. Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value Health (in press). Van Hout B, Janssen MF, Feng Y-S, et al. Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value Health (in press).
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Norman R, Cronin P, Viney R, King M, Street D, Ratcliffe J. International comparisons in valuing EQ-5D health states: a review and analysis. Value Health. 2009;12(8):1194–200.PubMedCrossRef Norman R, Cronin P, Viney R, King M, Street D, Ratcliffe J. International comparisons in valuing EQ-5D health states: a review and analysis. Value Health. 2009;12(8):1194–200.PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsuchiya A, Ikeda S, Ikegami N, et al. Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: the case of Japan. Health Econ. 2002;11(4):341–53.PubMedCrossRef Tsuchiya A, Ikeda S, Ikegami N, et al. Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: the case of Japan. Health Econ. 2002;11(4):341–53.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tilling C, Devlin N, Tsuchiya A, Buckingham K. Protocols for time tradeoff valuations of health states worse than dead: a literature review. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(5):610–9.PubMedCrossRef Tilling C, Devlin N, Tsuchiya A, Buckingham K. Protocols for time tradeoff valuations of health states worse than dead: a literature review. Med Decis Making. 2010;30(5):610–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Robinson A, Spencer A. Exploring challenges to TTO utilities: valuing states worse than dead. Health Econ. 2006;15(4):393–402.PubMedCrossRef Robinson A, Spencer A. Exploring challenges to TTO utilities: valuing states worse than dead. Health Econ. 2006;15(4):393–402.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bansback N, Brazier J, Tsuchiya A, Anis A. Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate societal health state utility values. J Health Econ. 2012;31:306–18.PubMedCrossRef Bansback N, Brazier J, Tsuchiya A, Anis A. Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate societal health state utility values. J Health Econ. 2012;31:306–18.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Stolk EA, Oppe M, Scalone L, Krabbe PFM. Discrete choice modeling for the quantification of health states: the case of the EQ-5D. Value Health. 2010;13(8):1005–13.PubMedCrossRef Stolk EA, Oppe M, Scalone L, Krabbe PFM. Discrete choice modeling for the quantification of health states: the case of the EQ-5D. Value Health. 2010;13(8):1005–13.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Norman R, Viney R, Brazier J, Cronin P, King M, Ratcliffe J, Street D. Valuing EQ-5D health states: the australian experience. 2012 EuroQol Group Scientific Plenary. Rotterdam, 13/14 Sep 2012. Norman R, Viney R, Brazier J, Cronin P, King M, Ratcliffe J, Street D. Valuing EQ-5D health states: the australian experience. 2012 EuroQol Group Scientific Plenary. Rotterdam, 13/14 Sep 2012.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Street DJ, Burgess L. The construction of optimal stated choice experiments: theory and methods. Hoboken: Wiley; 2007.CrossRef Street DJ, Burgess L. The construction of optimal stated choice experiments: theory and methods. Hoboken: Wiley; 2007.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P, editor. Frontiers in econometrics. New York: New York Academic Press; 1974. p. 105–142. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P, editor. Frontiers in econometrics. New York: New York Academic Press; 1974. p. 105–142.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Thurstone LL. A law of comparative judgment. Psychol Rev. 1927;34:273–86.CrossRef Thurstone LL. A law of comparative judgment. Psychol Rev. 1927;34:273–86.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Viney R, Norman R, King MT, et al. Time trade-off derived EQ-5D weights for Australia. Value Health. 2011;14:928–36.PubMedCrossRef Viney R, Norman R, King MT, et al. Time trade-off derived EQ-5D weights for Australia. Value Health. 2011;14:928–36.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Coast J, Flynn TN, Salisbury C, Louviere J, Peters TJ. Maximising responses to discrete choice experiments: a randomised trial. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2006;5(4):249–60.PubMedCrossRef Coast J, Flynn TN, Salisbury C, Louviere J, Peters TJ. Maximising responses to discrete choice experiments: a randomised trial. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2006;5(4):249–60.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bleichrodt N, Wakker P, Johannesson M. Characterizing QALYs by risk neutrality. J Risk Uncertain. 1997;15(2):107–14.CrossRef Bleichrodt N, Wakker P, Johannesson M. Characterizing QALYs by risk neutrality. J Risk Uncertain. 1997;15(2):107–14.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hole AR. A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures. Health Econ. 2007;16:827–40.PubMedCrossRef Hole AR. A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures. Health Econ. 2007;16:827–40.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wittenberg E, Prosser LA. Ordering errors, objections and invariance in utility survey responses: a framework for understanding who, why and what to do. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9(4):225–41.PubMedCrossRef Wittenberg E, Prosser LA. Ordering errors, objections and invariance in utility survey responses: a framework for understanding who, why and what to do. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9(4):225–41.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health (Oxford). 2005;27(3):281–91.CrossRef Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health (Oxford). 2005;27(3):281–91.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Flynn TN, Louviere JJ, Peters TJ, Coast J. Best–worst scaling: what it can do for health care research and how to do it. J Health Econ. 2007;26(1):171–89.PubMedCrossRef Flynn TN, Louviere JJ, Peters TJ, Coast J. Best–worst scaling: what it can do for health care research and how to do it. J Health Econ. 2007;26(1):171–89.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Greene WH, Hensher DA. Does scale heterogeneity across individuals matter? An empirical assessment of alternative logit models. Transportation. 2011;37(3):413–28.CrossRef Greene WH, Hensher DA. Does scale heterogeneity across individuals matter? An empirical assessment of alternative logit models. Transportation. 2011;37(3):413–28.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowen D, Brazier J, Van Hout B. A comparison of methods for converting DCE values onto the full health-dead QALY scale. HEDS Discussion Paper 11/15; 2011. Rowen D, Brazier J, Van Hout B. A comparison of methods for converting DCE values onto the full health-dead QALY scale. HEDS Discussion Paper 11/15; 2011.
Metadaten
Titel
A Pilot Discrete Choice Experiment to Explore Preferences for EQ-5D-5L Health States
verfasst von
Richard Norman
Paula Cronin
Rosalie Viney
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2013
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy / Ausgabe 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1175-5652
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1896
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-013-0035-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2013

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 3/2013 Zur Ausgabe