Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Drug Investigation 5/2019

01.05.2019 | Systematic Review

Benefits of Beta-Blockade in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review

verfasst von: Young R. Lee, Michael Sadanand Seth, Dylan Soney, Hanyu Dai

Erschienen in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Sepsis and septic shock are inflammatory disorders associated with high rates of mortality. Patients with sepsis and septic shock frequently become tachycardic as a result of the utilization of vasopressor therapy and cardiac overcompensation owing to hypotension, predisposing patients to an increased risk of atrial fibrillation. Previously, it was thought that beta-blocker therapy in patients with sepsis would exacerbate hypotension; however, recent studies have shown that may not be the case.

Objective

This review aims to ascertain whether beta-blocker therapy reduces heart rate in patients with sepsis without a corresponding decrease in blood pressure, and if beta-blockade has a beneficial effect on mortality.

Methods

Several databases including Cochrane, EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were scoured for trials pertaining to the utilization of beta-blockers in sepsis and septic shock, and trials that were either prospective or controlled were included in this review.

Results

In the initial search, 1839 articles were found, and those were subsequently reduced to 14 trials (five randomized controlled trials, nine non-randomized trials) that were deemed appropriate for inclusion in this review. All included trials displayed beneficial effects on heart rate without any detriments to blood pressure. Of the six trials that assessed mortality, four showed substantial benefits.

Conclusion

The majority of the trials assessed in this review displayed beneficial results for beta-blocker use in patients with sepsis. However, owing to the deficit of large-scale randomized controlled trials addressing this topic, further research is needed to ensure the veracity of these results.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS international sepsis definitions conference. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1250–6.CrossRefPubMed Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS international sepsis definitions conference. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1250–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Berk JL, Hagen JF, Maly G, Koo R. The treatment of shock with beta adrenergic blockade. Arch Surg. 1972;104(1):46–51.CrossRefPubMed Berk JL, Hagen JF, Maly G, Koo R. The treatment of shock with beta adrenergic blockade. Arch Surg. 1972;104(1):46–51.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindsay CA, Barton P, Lawless S, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of milrinone lactate in pediatric patients with septic shock. J Pediatr. 1998;132(2):329–34.CrossRefPubMed Lindsay CA, Barton P, Lawless S, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of milrinone lactate in pediatric patients with septic shock. J Pediatr. 1998;132(2):329–34.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Benefits of Beta-Blockade in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review
verfasst von
Young R. Lee
Michael Sadanand Seth
Dylan Soney
Hanyu Dai
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-019-00762-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

Clinical Drug Investigation 5/2019 Zur Ausgabe