Fingolimod, a structural analog of sphingosine derived from fungal metabolites, is a functional antagonist of the G-protein-coupled sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptors S1P1,3,4,5. In the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS), fingolimod acts by reversibly retaining central memory T cells and naïve T cells in lymph nodes, thereby reducing the recirculation of autoreactive lymphocytes to the central nervous system (CNS). Fingolimod also has differential effects on the trafficking and function of B-cell subtypes and natural killer (NK) cells in peripheral blood and the CNS. Fingolimod also crosses the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and accumulates in the CNS. Experimental evidence increasingly supports a direct action of fingolimod within the CNS on brain cells, providing protection against the neurodegenerative component of RMS. We review the direct influence of this compound on CNS pathogenesis in RMS, including the central effects of fingolimod in animal models of MS and on neural cell types that express S1P receptors, such as astrocytes, BBB endothelial cells, microglia, neurones, and oligodendrocytes, which are all involved in RMS pathology.
Key Points
Fingolimod can cross the blood–brain barrier and directly influence central nervous system (CNS) pathogenesis in relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS).
In animal models of RMS, fingolimod directly promotes myelin integrity.
Fingolimod exerts effects on each of the key brain cells involved in RMS pathology, and sphingosine 1-phosphate modulation of CNS cells may affect clinical outcomes.
1 Introduction
Fingolimod (Gilenya®, FTY720 [Novartis Pharma AG]) is a structural analog of sphingosine, derived from fungal metabolites, and affects the G-protein-coupled sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptors S1P1,3,4,5 [1, 2]. These S1P-receptor subtypes undergo differential G-protein coupling, and their associated downstream signaling pathways affect cell proliferation, survival, migration, and neural cell communication [3].
Anzeige
Fingolimod was approved as the first oral disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) by the US FDA in 2010, and subsequently by the European Medicines Agency in 2011 [4, 5]. The clinical effects of this agent, demonstrated in several large, randomized, controlled clinical trials of patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) [6‐11], include an early and sustained impact on brain atrophy [6, 7, 9, 12].
In the treatment of patients with relapsing forms of MS, fingolimod acts primarily by reversibly retaining circulating central memory T cells and naïve T cells in lymph nodes, thereby reducing the recirculation of autoreactive lymphocytes to the central nervous system (CNS) [1, 13‐15]. There are also differential effects on B cells and natural killer (NK) cells [16‐19]. Direct actions of fingolimod on cells within the CNS are likely to provide neuroprotection against the pathologic effects of MS and/or promote endogenous repair mechanisms. Fingolimod may be cytoprotective for neural cells (mediated by signals such as neurotrophins) or act via the blockade of the deleterious actions of inflammatory mediators that contribute to CNS pathology. Sphingolipid signaling systems include the breakdown of the myelin and plasma membrane sphingomyelin pool (via sphingomyelinases and ceramidases) to produce sphingosine, the molecule for which fingolimod is the pharmacologic analog. The central signaling pathway is potentially as important as the peripheral pathway owing to CNS enrichment of these lipids and sphingolipid mobilization during inflammatory demyelination. Evidence supports elaboration of these sphingolipid mediators, in part by inflammatory cytokines and myelin destruction, during the course of demyelinating insults. The detail of these biochemical pathways is reviewed elsewhere [20].
The underlying pathophysiology of MS is attributed to an autoimmune attack on the CNS, mediated by peripheral lymphocytes that are able to cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [21]. Focal white-matter lesions are a pathologic hallmark of MS [22‐24] and can evolve into ‘black holes’, which are indicative of persistent tissue loss [25]. Focal cortical gray matter lesions, which are not visualized by conventional imaging, correlate with disability status [26, 27]. Diffuse damage, which is the result of widespread irreversible demyelination and neuroaxonal loss, also occurs in grey matter and in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) [2, 24, 28‐31]. Together, focal and diffuse damage contribute to neurodegeneration, which manifests as brain atrophy [22‐24]. Spinal cord volume loss correlates with clinical disability in MS (reviewed by De Stefano et al. [32]). The loss of brain volume occurs more rapidly in patients with MS than in healthy individuals without MS and begins early in the course of the disease [28]. It continues throughout the course of MS, at a rate largely independent of MS subtype [33, 34]. Early in the course of MS, CNS neuronal plasticity and myelin repair limit the clinical expression of pathology [24]. Eventually, however, repair mechanisms are insufficient, and neurodegenerative damage accumulates, leading to irreversible disability [35].
A key objective of DMT is to diminish the immune system’s attack on the nervous system. Redressing the balance between damage and repair, two key factors determining MS disability, is also important.
Anzeige
This review was conducted to consolidate the available pharmacologic evidence for direct effects of fingolimod in the CNS. In order to evaluate all relevant literature, we conducted searches (in August 2014) in PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, and Ovid MEDLINE. The searches used the terms ‘fingolimod OR Gilenya OR FTY720 OR FTY720P OR sphingosine’ and ‘cytoprotec* OR neuroprotec* OR CNS OR “central nervous system” OR “brain-derived neurotrophic factor” OR remyelination OR neurone* OR microglia OR astrocytes OR oligodendrocytes’.
2 Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Pathogenesis: Demyelination and Neurodegeneration
Inflammatory autoimmune reactions play a role in the pathologic mechanisms involved in neurodegeneration and the formation of lesions in MS [24]. Inflammation within the CNS occurs when autoreactive T cells that have crossed the BBB are activated locally by microglia and astrocytes [36]. The resulting secretion of pro-inflammatory molecules from these T cells, which include cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules, increases the permeability of the BBB, leading to increased recruitment of other immune cells (monocytes, macrophages, and B cells) into the CNS [37]. Ultimately, the result is myelin destruction, demyelinated plaques, axonal loss, and injury to clinically eloquent and clinically silent regions of the CNS [38].
3 Remyelination and Neuronal Regeneration are Impaired in MS
The CNS has an intrinsic capacity to repair itself. However, as MS disease progresses, normal CNS repair and adaptation processes, including remyelination and neuroaxonal regeneration, are increasingly unable to compensate for the damage caused by immune-mediated injury and ongoing neurodegeneration [24, 35].
In the early stages of MS, inflammatory lesions can undergo some degree of myelin repair as peripherally derived macrophages at the site of myelin destruction stimulate the proliferation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) [24, 39]. Remyelination occurs as OPCs proliferate, migrate to the lesion, and differentiate into mature oligodendrocytes, forming compact myelin sheaths [39, 40]. The new myelin is recognizable histologically and is thinner and paler than normal CNS myelin [24, 39]. Following demyelination, astrocytes produce increased levels of endogenous neurotrophic factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which plays a key role in neuronal and axonal survival and mediates axonal protection [41]. In addition to providing support, astrocytes may also contribute to disease pathogenesis, the different roles depending on lesion stage [42, 43]. Astrogliosis and glial scar formation can also limit existing damage [44]; the glial scar forms a barrier that isolates the damage, protects healthy tissue from a cascading wave of uncontrolled tissue damage, and stimulates revascularization, which increases the nutritional, metabolic, and neurotrophic support to the nervous tissue around the site of injury [44].
Remyelination can fail over time. In chronic demyelinated lesions, significant myelin repair is lacking, despite an abundance of OPCs in the region; this may be caused by arrested oligodendroglial differentiation [40, 45‐47]. Inflammatory cytokines (such as interleukin [IL]-2 and transforming growth factor-β) have the potential to inhibit the differentiation of OPCs into oligodendrocytes [48]. Repeated bouts of demyelination may exhaust the limited pool of OPCs [49], and areas of remyelination may be more vulnerable to new demyelination compared with NAWM [24]. Nonetheless, OPCs that persist in a chronic non-permissive lesion have the capacity to myelinate, in the appropriate local environment [46]. As well as acting as a physical barrier to OPCs [42], the cells of glial scars secrete several molecules that have a potent inhibitory effect on axon growth, including chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans and semaphorins [44]. The gradual and sustained accumulation of these inhibitory factors and loss of OPC may explain why remyelination is more likely to fail with increased lesion age.
4 Fingolimod Influences Central Nervous System (CNS) Pathogenesis in MS Through Differential Effects on Lymphocyte Trafficking and Function
Fingolimod affects the trafficking of T-cell subsets between lymph nodes and the blood, with a specific effect on chemokine receptor (CCR)-7-positive lymphocytes [1]. Migration is dependent on S1P1, expressed on the surface of CCR7-positive cells [2]. Specifically, by inducing internalization of S1P1, functionally blocking the S1P signaling pathway, fingolimod reduces the numbers of CCR7-positive naïve T cells and central memory T cells in blood. In contrast, CCR7-negative effector and effector memory T-cell subsets do not regularly recirculate between lymphoid tissues and therefore remain in blood. Upon restimulation in vitro, these blood T cells display a reduced potential to proliferate [1, 2, 50].
Analysis of circulating cluster of differentiation (CD)-8+ T cells in fingolimod-treated patients shows persistence of late effector memory cells, with reduced expression of CCR2 compared with early effector memory cells [51]. The late effector memory cells have a reduced capacity to respond to chemokine signals that would lead to recruitment of these cells into tissues, including the CNS.
Importantly, a complex inter-relationship exists between immune cells in MS, particularly T- and B-cell subtypes. A 12-month study in patients treated with fingolimod demonstrated a relative change in the proportions of T and B cells and their expression of functional molecules [16, 17]. These data were consistent with earlier observations of fingolimod effects on T-cell subtypes, showing elevated proportions of memory and regulatory T cells and reductions of naïve conventional and regulatory T cells in peripheral blood. The proportion of memory B cells in the peripheral blood was decreased, while the proportion of naive B cells was increased during fingolimod treatment [16].
Anzeige
Fingolimod treatment increases the proportion of IL-10-producing regulatory B cells in the blood of MS patients [17], and these changes correlate with disease stability during treatment. This is an important observation because regulatory B cells may have protective functions in autoimmune diseases. Fingolimod also enhanced regulatory B-cell migration across brain endothelium in an in vitro model of the BBB and reduced naïve and memory B cell counts in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to control levels while retaining regulatory B cell numbers [17].
NK cells may also be involved in immunoregulation in MS. Changes during treatment are of particular interest from a therapeutic point of view. Fingolimod can increase NK-cell numbers in the CSF, but inconsistent results have been reported on total NK cells that are in circulation [18, 19]. However, fingolimod decreases the proportion of circulating CD56brightCD62L+ NK cells, without changing production of interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and IL-10 [19]. A large proportion of NK cells resident in lymph nodes display an immature CD56brightCD62L+ phenotype, suggesting that fingolimod blocks egress of immature NK cells from the lymph nodes [52, 53].
5 Fingolimod Enters the CNS and Directly Influences CNS Pathogenesis in MS
Radiolabeled fingolimod crosses the BBB and accumulates in the white matter of the CNS [54]. In humans, following intravenous injection, a radiolabeled fingolimod analog entered the brain, with uptake steadily increasing up to 26 h after dosing (Fig. 1) [48, 55, 56].
Fig. 1
Distribution of the fingolimod analog, iodine-123-labelled BZM055, in the human brain. MRI, mean SPECT image on day 2, and fused SPECT/MRI for a representative patient, depicting the brain uptake of the fingolimod analog [123I]BZM055. Chromatic changes indicate the range of no or low BZM055 uptake (blue/green), to moderate or high (yellow/red) uptake. Note that deep nuclei appear to exhibit the highest BZM055 uptake, however, there was no evidence of higher uptake in white matter relative to grey matter. Reproduced from Tamagnan et al. [55], with permission. MRI magnetic resonance imaging, SPECT single-photon emission computed tomography
×
Fingolimod itself is lipophilic; activated fingolimod phosphate is a charged ester and is not lipophilic. These two forms are in equilibrium [1, 57]. Fingolimod phosphate can be formed from fingolimod in the CNS [54], consistent with evidence that the brain contains endogenous sphingosine kinase 2, the primary enzyme that phosphorylates fingolimod [58].
Anzeige
S1P receptors are widely distributed across multiple human organs and systems [59]. They are expressed on most CNS cells, particularly glia and neurones [2, 3]. S1P promotes neuronal growth and function and has been linked with enhanced neurone proliferation, neurite outgrowth and survival, as well as excitability induced by nerve growth factor [60‐64]. Various lines of evidence support a neuroprotective role for receptor-mediated S1P signaling. In vivo, neural stem/progenitor cells migrate towards a site of CNS injury in response to locally elevated S1P concentrations [2, 65]. In vitro, S1P induces activation and proliferation of astrocytes, which parallels S1P-induced astrogliosis in vivo [2, 66].
The endogenous activities of S1P in the CNS and the therapeutic effects of fingolimod suggest that S1P signaling could be involved in the pathology of MS. Alterations in S1P biology do occur in the CNS of people with MS. In a study of 40 treatment-naïve patients with MS and 26 control subjects, mean S1P concentrations in CSF were significantly higher in those with MS than in controls (2.2 ± 2.7 nM vs. 0.69 ± 1.1 nM; p < 0.01); this difference was not observed in blood samples from the two groups [67]. Furthermore, a surprisingly high and significant positive correlation was found between CSF S1P levels and disability, measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (r = 0.5867; p < 0.001) [67]. Immunohistochemical studies have shown that S1P receptor expression levels and downstream signaling pathways are disrupted in MS. Levels of S1P1, S1P3, and S1P5 are altered in MS lesions compared with NAWM (Fig. 2) [68, 69]. These markers could simply reflect CNS damage. More telling is the increase in S1P1 expression on astrocytes in active and inactive MS lesions [68]. S1P1 on astrocytes may therefore have an early and persistent involvement in MS pathology. Blockade of S1P1 on reactive astrocytes by fingolimod could minimize damage by reducing the secretion of pro-inflammatory chemokines such as monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) [68].
Fig. 2
Immunohistochemical staining for S1P1. Compared with control brain tissue, S1P1 staining on astrocytes was upregulated in NAWM in MS, and to the greatest extent in reactive astrocytes in active MS lesions. MS multiple sclerosis, NAWM normal-appearing white matter, S1P sphingosine 1-phosphate. Reproduced from Van Doorn et al. [68], with permission
×
S1P5 expression levels on cells are also altered in MS. S1P5 is localized to myelinated areas in the CNS. In demyelinated MS lesions, global reductions in S1P5 immunoreactivity are similar to the levels of myelin loss [69]. S1P5 plays a complex role in the regulation of myelinating processes, mediating signaling via G-protein-coupled pathways to regulate oligodendrocyte cell survival or process retraction, depending on the developmental stage of the cell [70]. In vitro, fingolimod can enhance remyelination primarily via S1P5 signaling [71].
6 Fingolimod Acts Centrally in Animal Models
The therapeutic effects of fingolimod have been investigated using experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), an animal model for MS, and some of the findings support direct central activity. In a study using the Dark Agouti rat model, rescue therapy with fingolimod within the first 4–6 weeks of EAE onset was effective, with reversal of BBB permeability, reduced demyelination, decreased paralysis, and normalization of neurologic function [72, 73]. The glutamate hypothesis of damage in MS suggests excessive signaling at glutamate synapses is an intermediate step between inflammation and neurodegeneration in EAE and in MS [74, 75]. In murine EAE, fingolimod prevented and reversed pathological pre- and postsynaptic alterations in glutamate transmission, with a significant reduction in neuronal dendritic pathology (Fig. 3) [74]. These changes were associated with amelioration of the clinical deterioration normally observed in these mice.
Fig. 3
Effect of fingolimod on dendritic spine loss in a mouse model of EAE. Prophylactic fingolimod treatment reduced the dendritic spine loss observed during the acute phase of EAE (expressed as spine density: number per 100 μm). Examples of single-section Golgi preparations from healthy control mice (n = 5), untreated EAE mice (n = 5), and prophylactic fingolimod-treated EAE mice (n = 5) at 20 dpi. dpi dots per inch, EAE experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, FTY fingolimod, HC healthy control. Reproduced from Rossi et al. [74], with permission. *p < 0.05 vs. control; #p < 0.05 vs. untreated EAE
×
Anzeige
Data generated from EAE animals are of particular interest owing to the ability to separate central mechanisms from effects that are dependent on lymphocyte trafficking. Choi et al. [76] examined conditional null mouse mutants lacking S1P1 in CNS cell lineages. In all mice with the CNS mutation, wild-type lymphocyte trafficking was normal and responded normally to fingolimod. However, EAE was attenuated in mouse mutants lacking S1P1 on astrocytes, with reduced levels of astrogliosis, demyelination, and axonal damage compared with wild-type EAE mice. Fingolimod efficacy was also lost in these mutant animals. Thus, the benefit of fingolimod treatment in EAE may partly rely on direct S1P1-mediated effects on astrocytes in the CNS and cannot be fully accounted for by its peripheral immunologic effects. In support, direct infusion of fingolimod into the brains of rats with EAE decreased disease severity in the absence of peripheral lymphocyte depletion [77]. Improvement that is independent of a reduction in circulating lymphocytes suggests involvement of additional mechanisms of action within the CNS [77‐79].
7 Fingolimod Promotes Myelin Integrity
Treatment with fingolimod supports a normal state of myelination by protecting against demyelination and promoting remyelination during in vivo and in vitro animal studies.
7.1 Protection Against Demyelination
A study using an established focal model of MS in rats—the delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) model—showed that fingolimod protected against demyelination behind an intact BBB independent of lymphocyte infiltration [80]. In the cuprizone model of non-inflammatory demyelination in mice, fingolimod protected against demyelination independent of T-cell activity [81] and also attenuated splenocyte-induced demyelination and pro-inflammatory cytokine release [82]. Finally, in rat organotypic cerebellar slice cultures, fingolimod inhibited lysolecithin (LPC)-induced (non-immune-mediated) demyelination (Fig. 4) [71, 83].
Fig. 4
Recovery of myelin in non-immune-mediated demyelinated cultures. Representative images of demyelinated slices, control or treated with fingolimod (100 pM) for 14 days in vitro post-lysolecithin, immunostained against myelin (MBP; red) and axons (NFM; green). Fingolimod increases the amount of myelin associated with axons compared with untreated control. Scale bar 20 µm. MBP myelin basic protein, NFM neurofilament. Reproduced from Miron et al. [71], with permission
×
7.2 Enhancement of Remyelination
Fingolimod stimulated remyelination and reduced axonal loss in the cuprizone model of chronic demyelination in mice [84]. Fingolimod also enhanced myelin recovery in two in vitro studies utilizing the LPC-induced model of demyelination, suggesting that fingolimod may at least directly affect the speed at which remyelination occurs (Fig. 4) [71, 84, 85]. Physiological doses of fingolimod phosphate applied to demyelinated organotypic cerebellar slice cultures led to enhanced remyelination and increased process extension of OPC and mature oligodendrocytes, mediated via S1P5 [71]. However, the effects of fingolimod on remyelination are not consistent across all studies [86, 87], perhaps because of methodological differences between the studies, such as the duration of cuprizone administration, which may have induced either acute or chronic demyelination, treatment duration, and use of supratherapeutic doses of fingolimod known to have deleterious effects on cell survival [26, 75, 87, 88].
Overall, the effects of fingolimod on demyelination and putative promotion of endogenous remyelination suggest a protective effect of fingolimod that is independent of effects on peripheral lymphocytes.
8 Fingolimod Exerts Effects on Each of the Key Neural Cells Involved in MS Pathology
S1P receptors are widely distributed within the CNS, and S1P-mediated signaling has been reported for astrocytes, neurones, oligodendrocytes, and microglia. Fingolimod affects each of these cells in ways relevant to MS pathology. These effects are summarized in Fig. 5.
Fig. 5
Summary of the effects of fingolimod treatment on different cells in the central nervous system. OPC oligodendrocyte precursor cell. Reproduced from Groves et al. [60], with permission
×
8.1 Astrocytes
Astrocytes are involved in many structural, metabolic, and immunoregulatory functions within the CNS [89]. Fingolimod has effects on astrocytes both in vivo and in vitro [27, 72, 76, 80, 90‐93], and their activation is associated with IL-17, an important mediator in MS pathology [42, 43, 94]. In post mortem brain tissue of patients with MS, reactive astrocytes are the primary source of elevated ceramide production in lesions [27]. Fingolimod treatment reduced generation of this pro-inflammatory lipid, which can induce BBB dysfunction and lead to infiltration of immune cells into the brain. Consistent with this, supernatants derived from reactive astrocytes treated with fingolimod significantly reduced transendothelial monocyte migration [27]. This ability of fingolimod to reduce the pro-inflammatory state of astrocytes is supported by other in vitro data. Phosphorylated fingolimod has an anti-inflammatory action on human astrocytes via restriction of the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and reactive astrocytes—either in MS lesions or cultured under pro-inflammatory conditions—also strongly enhance the expression of S1P1 [68]. A second in vitro study reported down-regulation of pro-inflammatory, pro-apoptotic, and B-cell-promoting proteins in astrocytes in response to fingolimod, as well as up-regulation of factors with neurotrophic potential, such as BDNF and nerve growth factor [95].
The EAE model gives the astrocyte a central role in CNS pathology as well as identifying these cells as the likely proximate cellular target of fingolimod action [72, 76, 92]. In a transgenic mouse study, astrocytes were the main cell type activated during EAE, and this activation was blocked by fingolimod [91]. In a separate study, fingolimod at different times significantly ameliorated murine EAE and significantly reduced astrogliosis [92].
A prominent, though still poorly understood, feature of MS is reactive astrogliosis [96]. Mouse mutants with targeted deletion of astrocyte S1P1 had markedly reduced levels of astrogliosis compared with wild-type EAE animals [76]. Fingolimod treatment and deleting S1P1 on astrocytes had similar effects. Astrocytes are activated by IL-17 [94]. By reducing pro-inflammatory T cells (Th17) that produce IL-17 [97], fingolimod may also contribute to less activation of astrocytes. Fingolimod also reduced astrogliosis in a mouse model of thrombotic stroke [90, 94].
Endothelial cells are also a major component of the BBB, and penetration of immune cells into the CNS across endothelial cells of the BBB is a critical event in the pathogenesis of MS [60, 98]. Cellular interactions between endothelial cells and astrocytes are essential in maintaining normal BBB function [98]. Both astrocytes and endothelial cells express S1P receptors and so fingolimod may have effects on endothelial cells and on astrocytes to influence BBB integrity and function. Fingolimod may increase the ability of endothelial cells to survive cytokine challenge via S1P1 receptors, by a mechanism that is still to be fully elucidated, while inducing granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) release from astrocytes to further increase BBB stability [98].
8.2 Neurones
S1P receptors appear to have a role in neurogenesis; it would therefore be reasonable to expect fingolimod to promote this process. Animal evidence also supports the action of fingolimod in improving neuronal function and neuroprotection. When investigating the effect of fingolimod on hippocampal neurogenesis in vivo in adult and aging mice, fingolimod treatment significantly increased the number of neural stem cells (NSCs) in the dentate gyrus region, possibly via BDNF [99]. This finding is consistent with the observation that, in non-MS models, fingolimod increased levels of BDNF in cultured cortical neurones in vitro [100, 101] and in rat and mouse hippocampus, cortex, and striatum in vivo [100, 102]. Evidence suggests that fingolimod also protects neurones against excitotoxic cell death [103].
It is noteworthy that in the study described above of conditional null mouse mutants lacking S1P1 in CNS cell lineages, the effects upon EAE of eliminating S1P1 from astrocytes were not seen when S1P1 was removed from neurones [76]. This supports direct CNS neuroprotection, inhibiting demyelination through modulation of astrocyte S1P1.
8.3 Oligodendrocytes
Mature oligodendrocytes, the myelin-producing cells of the CNS, together with their migratory OPC precursors, are additional therapeutic targets for fingolimod. Demyelination and the failure of remyelination by oligodendrocytes contribute to progression of disease in MS. Cells of oligodendrocyte lineage can respond to fingolimod owing to expression of S1P1,3,5 [71, 104, 105]. In vitro analysis of oligodendrocytes derived from adult human brain tissue revealed that membrane dynamics and survival responses are affected by fingolimod in a dose- and treatment duration-dependent manner [104]. Chronic treatment with fingolimod at micromolar levels induced process extension in OPCs, mediated via the ERK1/2 pathway [105]. In vitro daily treatment with fingolimod enhanced the differentiation and the axonal ensheathment capacity of OPCs co-cultured with rat dorsal root ganglia neurones, predominantly via effects on S1P1 and possibly S1P5 [106, 107]. Combined with the aforementioned diverse effects of fingolimod on reducing demyelination and enhancing remyelination, this suggests that enhancing the myelinating potential of OPCs may potentially promote tissue repair and functional recovery in MS.
8.4 Microglia
Microglia are resident immunocompetent and weak antigen-presenting CNS cells with the capacity to transform from a ‘resting’ ramified phenotype to an ‘activated’ macrophage phenotype following appropriate stimulation [108]. Their primary role is to maintain cellular, synaptic, and myelin homeostasis during the normal function of the CNS and in response to CNS injury [109]. Pro-inflammatory activated microglia may be involved in the development and expansion of MS [110]. They can regulate T-cell functions by promoting T-cell activation and differentiation towards Th1 and Th17 pathogenic subtypes, release pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, impair the function of OPCs and NSCs, and also induce synaptic deficits, both of the latter processes reportedly via TNF-α [110]. Microglia have a substantial role in MS pathogenesis. In vivo, fingolimod reduces microglial activation in the DTH model of MS [80, 111, 112]. In vitro, fingolimod down-regulates activated microglial production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6), and up-regulates microglial production of BDNF and glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor [113]. However, there are differences in the effects of fingolimod on brain-resident microglia and blood-derived monocytes [114]. Microglia in human CNS tissue express a pattern of S1P receptors similar to mature dendritic cells and macrophages but distinct from that seen in circulating monocytes. The myeloid cell populations present in the human CNS exhibit varying responses and intracellular signaling responses to fingolimod under inflammatory conditions [114]. Such varied effects on infiltrating and endogenous myeloid cells might be able to modify the inflammatory environment within the CNS.
9 Clinical Use of Fingolimod: Immunosurveillance and Considerations when Switching Treatments
Immunocompetent regulatory and memory cells are free to circulate throughout the body during fingolimod treatment, so differential effects on immune cell subtypes are also relevant to the maintenance of immunosurveillance and for patient safety monitoring [4]. The relative sparing of effector memory cells and the preserved function of cells sequestered in lymph nodes suggest that key features of the immune system may be maintained during fingolimod therapy [115, 116]. Careful observation for signs and symptoms of serious infections is certainly necessary during fingolimod treatment [4, 115, 116].
The temporal changes in relative immune cell number and function should be considered when switching between fingolimod and other DMTs [4]. The mode of action and duration of both fingolimod and prior or subsequently prescribed immune-modulating or immunosuppressive drugs need to be considered to avoid unintended additive effects. Recent studies have focused specifically on the appropriate washout period in patients switching from natalizumab to fingolimod [117‐119]. These have recommended 8–12 weeks or even shorter intervals (4–8 weeks) to reduce the likelihood of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or clinical disease reactivation, with careful consideration given to the risk of additive effects on the immune system in the first months following treatment change because of the long elimination half-life of natalizumab [117‐119].
Vigilance for serious infections, including progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), is warranted, and should not be restricted only to patients who have previously undergone treatment with natalizumab [4]. The emergence of PML, after 5 years of post-marketing surveillance, suggests that under rare circumstances, the immune effects of fingolimod may be associated with reduced immunosurveillance towards the JC virus. US label guidelines state that, at the first sign or symptom suggestive of PML, fingolimod should be withheld and an appropriate diagnostic evaluation should be conducted [4]. Particular attention should be given to those patients with risk factors for opportunistic infection, such as advanced age, and previous or concomitant use of immunosuppressant drugs.
10 Conclusions
Taken together, three fundamental factors support direct activity of fingolimod within the CNS of patients with MS. First, the lipophilic fingolimod molecule readily crosses the BBB into the CNS and accumulates in myelin [54, 55]. Second, S1P1,3,4,5 are expressed throughout the CNS, in neurones, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia [2]. Third, the endogenous processes relevant to MS pathology, such as astrogliosis and demyelination, are mediated by S1P signaling in the CNS.
Fingolimod phosphate, the active metabolite of fingolimod, regulates signaling in second messenger pathways for both pro-inflammatory and trophic factors, which are downstream of plasma membrane and myelin sphingomyelin (and ceramide) breakdown. This pathway may unify, via a common mechanism, the central and peripheral actions of fingolimod, for example, the peripheral (S1PR-mediated lymphocyte egress) as well as CNS trophic signaling and decreased astro- and microglial activation [20]. Given the widespread distribution of sphingomyelin and its enrichment in the CNS, an important action of fingolimod directly in the CNS would not be unexpected and is supported by the evidence described in this review.
Molecular and animal evidence support a direct S1P1-mediated, favorable action of fingolimod in the CNS. In vivo and in vitro studies indicate that fingolimod can help preserve the integrity and function of multiple neural cells involved in MS. Fingolimod protects against demyelination, axonal loss, dendritic loss, and astrogliosis, may enhance remyelination, and can enhance the proliferation and survival of neural cells.
Clinical studies suggest that the benefits of fingolimod may be in part due to a direct action on the CNS. Fingolimod has an early and sustained impact on brain atrophy, suggesting an effect on diffuse as well as focal damage [6‐11, 26]. In the FREEDOMS study, fingolimod had beneficial effects on brain atrophy within 6 months of treatment versus placebo [7] that were maintained over the 2-year study, irrespective of the presence of Gd-enhancing inflammatory lesions [9]. Fingolimod had a sustained impact on atrophy for up to 4 years in the FREEDOMS extension study and for up to 7 years in a phase II study [46, 120]. Brain atrophy occurs early in the course of MS [33] and ranges from 0.5 to 1.35 % per year in patients with RRMS, compared with the normal age-related deterioration in healthy individuals of 0.1–0.3 % per year [32]. Brain atrophy correlates with clinical impairment, leading to suggestions that irreversible tissue loss may prove to be more closely associated with disease progression than conventional MRI assessments of lesion activity and load [28]. Therefore, the rate of brain volume loss (BVL) may be a useful clinical assessment of neurodegeneration in MS [34, 121‐123].
In the placebo-controlled study of fingolimod in patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS, INFORMS), there was no effect of treatment on the risk of disability progression confirmed at 3 months or on the rate of BVL [124, 125]. Mean percent brain volume changes from baseline to final MRI were (±standard deviation [SD]) 1.34 ± 1.22 for fingolimod versus 1.42 ± 1.27 for placebo (p = 0.707). Although the overall level of inflammatory activity in the PPMS population was low, fingolimod reduced the number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesions by 78 % and of new/newly enlarging T2 lesions by 73 % (both p < 0.001) [124, 125]. The implications of these data in the context of the CNS effects of fingolimod are not yet clear, but differences in underlying disease processes between RRMS and PPMS mean that distinct, targeted therapeutic strategies may be required for the progressive and relapsing forms of MS.
There is a failure of the CNS repair mechanisms to compensate for worsening neurodegeneration, and this failure is superimposed on inflammatory damage. Evidence summarized here shows that fingolimod has the potential to reduce inflammation both within the periphery as well as in the CNS and to promote neuroprotection and repair of the glio-axonal unit directly. It may redress the balance between damage and repair, two key factors determining MS disability.
Acknowledgments
This article represents the opinion of the authors in their respective domain of expertise. The authors interpreted the literature, critically revised content for important intellectual aspects, and approved the content for publication. Oxford Pharmagenesis conducted literature searches and provided technical writing and editorial support. Funding support and review of the accuracy of scientific data were provided by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, USA.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Funding
The authors received no funding for the preparation of this review. Funding for medical writing support and review of the accuracy of scientific data was provided by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, USA. The open access fees were paid by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, USA.
Conflict of interest
Samuel F. Hunter has received consulting fees and/or research support from and/or served on speakers’ bureaus for Acorda, Avanir, Bayer, Biogen Idec, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, Novartis, Osmotica, Roche, and Teva.
James D. Bowen has received consulting fees, speaker fees, and/or research support from Acorda, Bayer, Biogen Idec, Genzyme Corporation, GlaxoSmithKline, Medimmune, Novartis, Osmotica, Pfizer/EMD Serono, Roche, SanofiAventis, Synthon, Teva, Vaccinex, and Xenoport, and is an Amgen shareholder.
Anthony T. Reder has received consulting fees from or has been an advisory board member for Abbott Laboratories, Accorda, Astra/Merck, Athena Neurosciences, Bayer, BioMS Medical Corp, Biogen Idec, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Boehringer Ingelheim, Caremark, Cephalon, Connetics (Connective Therapeutics), Elan, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, Immunex, Neurocrine Biosciences, Novartis, Parke-Davis, Pfizer, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Questcor, Quintiles, Serono, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and Teva Marion.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Mit e.Med Neurologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes, den Premium-Inhalten der neurologischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Neurologie-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
Mit e.Med Neurologie & Psychiatrie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der dazugehörigen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.
Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.
Ist die Tau-Last noch gering, scheint der Vorteil von Lecanemab besonders groß zu sein. Und beginnen Erkrankte verzögert mit der Behandlung, erreichen sie nicht mehr die kognitive Leistung wie bei einem früheren Start. Darauf deuten neue Analysen der Phase-3-Studie Clarity AD.
Neue arznei- und zellbasierte Ansätze, Frühdiagnose mit Bewegungssensoren, Rückenmarkstimulation gegen Gehblockaden – in der Parkinsonforschung tut sich einiges. Auf dem Deutschen Parkinsonkongress ging es auch viel um technische Innovationen.
Update Neurologie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletterund bleiben Sie gut informiert.
