nach oben

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

Erschienen in:

01.08.2017 | Commentary

Preferences for Health Interventions: Improving Uptake, Adherence, and Efficiency

verfasst von: Jan Ostermann, Derek S. Brown, Esther W. de Bekker-Grob, Axel C. Mühlbacher, Shelby D. Reed

Erschienen in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Many health interventions are used by far fewer patients and at less frequent intervals than recommended by clinical guidelines. Preventive care, screenings, vaccinations, and treatments may be highly cost effective when used as directed [1]. However, when interventions are not aligned with patients’ needs, low uptake and poor adherence can squander limited resources. To improve uptake, adherence, and efficiency, interventions must take into account the preferences of the intended target populations. …

Tengs TO, et al. Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness. Risk Anal. 1995;15(3):369–90.CrossRef

Craig BM, et al. Health preference research: an overview. Patient. 2017. doi:10.1007/s40271-017-0253-9.CrossRefPubMed

Mühlbacher A, Johnson FR. Choice experiments to quantify preferences for health and healthcare: state of the practice. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14(3):253–66.CrossRef

Whitty JA, Fraenkel L, Saigal CS, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, Regier DA, Marshall DA. Assessment of individual patient preferences to inform clinical practice. Patient. 2017. doi:10.1007/s40271-017-0254-8.CrossRefPubMed

Wallander L. 25 years of factorial surveys in sociology: a review. Soc Sci Res. 2009;38(3):505–20.CrossRef

van Helvoort-Postulart D, van der Weijden T, Dellaert B, de Kok M, von Meyenfeldt MF, Dirksen CD. Investigating the complementary value of discrete choice experiments for the evaluation of barriers and facilitators in implementation research: a questionnaire survey. Implement Sci. 2009;4:10.CrossRef

Terris-Prestholt F, Quaife M, Vickerman P. Parameterising user uptake in economic evaluations: the role of discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2016;25(Suppl. 1):116–23.CrossRef

Hainmueller J, Hangartner D, Yamamoto T. Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior. PNAS. 2015;112(8):2395–400.CrossRef

Lambooij MS, Harmsen IA, Veldwijk J, de Melker H, Mollema L, van Weert Y, de Wit GA. Consistency between stated and revealed preferences: a discrete choice experiment and a behavioural experiment on vaccination behaviour compared. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15:19.CrossRef

10.

Salampessy BH, Veldwijk J, Schuit AJ, van den Brekel-Dijkstra K, Neslo EJ, de Wit GA, Lambooij MS. The predictive value of discrete choice experiments in public health: an exploratory application. Patient. 2015;8(6):521–9.CrossRef

Titel: Preferences for Health Interventions: Improving Uptake, Adherence, and Efficiency
verfasst von: Jan Ostermann
Derek S. Brown
Esther W. de Bekker-Grob
Axel C. Mühlbacher
Shelby D. Reed
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2017
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Elektronische ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0251-y

Springer Medizin

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Preparing Parents to Make An Informed Choice About Antibiotic Use for Common Acute Respiratory Infections in Children: A Randomised Trial of Brief Decision Aids in a Hypothetical Scenario

Giving Patients a Meaningful Voice in European Health Technology Assessments: The Role of Health Preference Research

Measuring Compassion in Healthcare: A Comprehensive and Critical Review

EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Measures in Symptomatic benign Thyroid Nodules: Acceptability and Psychometric Evaluation

Speaking Up: How Patient and Physician Voices Shaped a Trial to Improve Goals-of-Care Discussions

Art and Science of Instrument Development for Stated-Preference Methods