Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 5/2018

01.10.2018 | Original Research Article

Adaptation, Acceptance and Adaptive Preferences in Health and Capability Well-Being Measurement Amongst Those Approaching End of Life

verfasst von: Joanna Coast, Cara Bailey, Rosanna Orlando, Kathy Armour, Rachel Perry, Louise Jones, Philip Kinghorn

Erschienen in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Adaptive preferences occur when people subconsciously alter their views to account for the possibilities available to them. Adaptive preferences may be problematic where these views are used in resource allocation decisions because they may lead to underestimation of the true benefits of providing services. This research explored the nature and extent of both adaptation (changing to better suit the context) and adaptive preferences (altering preferences in response to restricted options) in individuals approaching the end of life (EoL).

Methods

Qualitative data from ‘thinkaloud’ interviews with 33 hospice patients, 22 close persons and 17 health professionals were used alongside their responses to three health/well-being measures for use in resource allocation decisions: EQ-5D-5L (health status); ICECAP-A (adult capability); and ICECAP-SCM (Supportive Care Measure; EoL capability). Constant comparative analysis combined a focus on both verbalised perceptions across the three groups and responses to the measures.

Results

Data collection took place between October 2012 and February 2014. Informants spoke clearly about how patients had adapted their lives in response to symptoms associated with their terminal condition. It was often seen as a positive choice to accept their state and adapt in this way but, at the same time, most patients were fully aware of the health and capability losses that they had faced. Self-assessments of health and capability generally appeared to reflect the pre-adaptation state, although there were exceptions.

Conclusion

Despite adapting to their conditions, the reference group for individuals approaching EoL largely remained a healthy, capable population, and most did not show evidence of adaptive preferences.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Coast J. Strategies for the economic evaluation of end-of-life care: making a case for the capability approach. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;14(4):473–82.CrossRefPubMed Coast J. Strategies for the economic evaluation of end-of-life care: making a case for the capability approach. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2014;14(4):473–82.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark DA. Adaptation, poverty and well-being: some issues and observations with special reference to the capability approach and development studies. J Hum Dev Capab. 2009;10(1):21–42.CrossRef Clark DA. Adaptation, poverty and well-being: some issues and observations with special reference to the capability approach and development studies. J Hum Dev Capab. 2009;10(1):21–42.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Qizilbash M. Well-being, adaptation and human limitations. R Inst Phil Suppl. 2006;59:83–110.CrossRef Qizilbash M. Well-being, adaptation and human limitations. R Inst Phil Suppl. 2006;59:83–110.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Oort FJ, Visser MRM, Sprangers MAG. Formal definitions of measurement bias and explanation bias clarify measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(11):1126–37.CrossRefPubMed Oort FJ, Visser MRM, Sprangers MAG. Formal definitions of measurement bias and explanation bias clarify measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(11):1126–37.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sen A. Choice, welfare and measurement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1982. Sen A. Choice, welfare and measurement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1982.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sen A. Inequality reexamined. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1992. Sen A. Inequality reexamined. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1992.
7.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Alkire S. Using the capability approach: prospective and evaluative analyses. In: Comin F, Qizilbash M, Alkire S, editors. The capability approach: concepts, measures and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 26–50.CrossRef Alkire S. Using the capability approach: prospective and evaluative analyses. In: Comin F, Qizilbash M, Alkire S, editors. The capability approach: concepts, measures and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 26–50.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sen A. Capabilities, Lists, and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation. Feminist Economics 2004;10:77–80CrossRef Sen A. Capabilities, Lists, and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation. Feminist Economics 2004;10:77–80CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Janabi H, Flynn TN, Coast J. Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:167–76.CrossRefPubMed Al-Janabi H, Flynn TN, Coast J. Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:167–76.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Coast J, Flynn TN, Natarajan L, Sproston K, Lewis J, Louviere JJ, et al. Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:874–82.CrossRefPubMed Coast J, Flynn TN, Natarajan L, Sproston K, Lewis J, Louviere JJ, et al. Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:874–82.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutton E, Coast J. Development of a supportive care measure for economic evaluation of end-of-life care, using qualitative methods. Palliat Med. 2014;28:151–7.CrossRefPubMed Sutton E, Coast J. Development of a supportive care measure for economic evaluation of end-of-life care, using qualitative methods. Palliat Med. 2014;28:151–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinghorn P, Robinson A, Smith RD. Developing a capability-based questionnaire for assessing well-being in patients with chronic pain. Soc Indic Res. 2014;120:897–916.CrossRef Kinghorn P, Robinson A, Smith RD. Developing a capability-based questionnaire for assessing well-being in patients with chronic pain. Soc Indic Res. 2014;120:897–916.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Greco G, Skordis-Worrall J, Mkandawire B, Mills A. What is a good life? Selecting capabilities to assess women’s quality of life in rural Malawi. Soc Sci Med. 2015;130:69–78.CrossRefPubMed Greco G, Skordis-Worrall J, Mkandawire B, Mills A. What is a good life? Selecting capabilities to assess women’s quality of life in rural Malawi. Soc Sci Med. 2015;130:69–78.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorgelly PK, Lorimer K, Fenwick EAL, Briggs AH, Anand P. Operationalising the capability approach as an outcome measure in public health: the development of the OCAP-18. Soc Sci Med. 2015;142:68–81.CrossRefPubMed Lorgelly PK, Lorimer K, Fenwick EAL, Briggs AH, Anand P. Operationalising the capability approach as an outcome measure in public health: the development of the OCAP-18. Soc Sci Med. 2015;142:68–81.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Simon J, Anand P, Gray A, Rugkasa J, Yeeles K, Burns T. Operationalising the capability approach for outcome measurement in mental health research. Soc Sci Med. 2013;98:187–96.CrossRefPubMed Simon J, Anand P, Gray A, Rugkasa J, Yeeles K, Burns T. Operationalising the capability approach for outcome measurement in mental health research. Soc Sci Med. 2013;98:187–96.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Nussbaum MC. Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Fem Econ. 2003;9(2–3):33–59.CrossRef Nussbaum MC. Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Fem Econ. 2003;9(2–3):33–59.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ericsson K, Simon H. Verbal reports as data. Psychol Rev. 1980;87:215–51.CrossRef Ericsson K, Simon H. Verbal reports as data. Psychol Rev. 1980;87:215–51.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ericsson K, Simon H. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1993. Ericsson K, Simon H. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1993.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2005.CrossRef Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing: a tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2005.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage; 1990. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage; 1990.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Huynh E, Coast J, Rose J, Kinghorn P, Flynn T. Values for the ICECAP-Supportive Care Measure (ICECAP-SCM) for use in economic evaluation at end of life. Soc Sci Med. 2017;189:114–28.CrossRefPubMed Huynh E, Coast J, Rose J, Kinghorn P, Flynn T. Values for the ICECAP-Supportive Care Measure (ICECAP-SCM) for use in economic evaluation at end of life. Soc Sci Med. 2017;189:114–28.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen MF, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1727–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen MF, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1727–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Flynn TN, Huynh E, Peters TJ, Al-Janabi H, Clemens S, Moody A, et al. Scoring the ICECAP-A capability instrument. Estimation of a UK general population tariff. Health Econ. 2015;24(3):258–69.CrossRefPubMed Flynn TN, Huynh E, Peters TJ, Al-Janabi H, Clemens S, Moody A, et al. Scoring the ICECAP-A capability instrument. Estimation of a UK general population tariff. Health Econ. 2015;24(3):258–69.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson; 1968. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson; 1968.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Coast J, Jackson L. Understanding primary data analysis. In: Coast J, editor. Qualitative methods for health economics. London: Rowman & Littlefield International; 2017. Coast J, Jackson L. Understanding primary data analysis. In: Coast J, editor. Qualitative methods for health economics. London: Rowman & Littlefield International; 2017.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell CL, Bailey C, Armour K, Perry R, Orlando R, Kinghorn P, et al. A team approach to recruitment in hospice research: engaging patients, close people and health professionals. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2016;22(7):324–32.CrossRef Campbell CL, Bailey C, Armour K, Perry R, Orlando R, Kinghorn P, et al. A team approach to recruitment in hospice research: engaging patients, close people and health professionals. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2016;22(7):324–32.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat National Audit Office. End of life care. Report by the comptroller and auditor general. London: The Stationery Office; 2008. National Audit Office. End of life care. Report by the comptroller and auditor general. London: The Stationery Office; 2008.
Metadaten
Titel
Adaptation, Acceptance and Adaptive Preferences in Health and Capability Well-Being Measurement Amongst Those Approaching End of Life
verfasst von
Joanna Coast
Cara Bailey
Rosanna Orlando
Kathy Armour
Rachel Perry
Louise Jones
Philip Kinghorn
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Elektronische ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-018-0310-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe