Background
Methods
Study population
Socio-demographic, clinical and behavioural data
Laboratory tests
Ethical aspects
Statistical analysis
Results
Sociodemographic description of the study population
Characteristic | No. of women | % |
---|---|---|
Age groups (years) | ||
13–24 | 178 | 52.7 |
25–34 | 130 | 38.5 |
35–44 | 30 | 8.9 |
Birth place | ||
Mexico | 342 | 99.7 |
USA | 1 | 0.3 |
Residence State | ||
Durango State | 334 | 97.7 |
Other Mexican State | 8 | 2.3 |
Residence area | ||
Urban | 263 | 77.6 |
Suburban | 32 | 9.4 |
Rural | 44 | 13 |
Educational level | ||
No education | 13 | 4 |
Up to 12 years (College) | 297 | 91.7 |
13–19 years (Undergraduate) | 14 | 4.3 |
Occupation | ||
None | 1 | 0.3 |
Student | 21 | 6.2 |
Housewife | 296 | 87.6 |
Employee | 14 | 4.1 |
Professional | 5 | 1.5 |
Business | 1 | 0.3 |
Housing conditions index | ||
Bad | 19 | 9.1 |
Regular | 323 | 90.9 |
Trimester of pregnancy | ||
First | 22 | 6.5 |
Second | 80 | 23.6 |
Third | 237 | 69.9 |
Number of pregnancies | ||
One | 117 | 34.1 |
Two to four | 192 | 56 |
Five or more | 34 | 9.9 |
Serology and prevalence
Factors associated with seropositivity
Characteristic | Pregnant womena
| Positive test for anti-T gondii antibodies | P value |
---|---|---|---|
No. 343 (100%) | No. 21 (6.1%) | ||
Pork meat consumption | |||
Yes | 308 (90.1) | 20 (6.5) | 0.3 |
No | 34 (9.9) | 1 (2.9) | |
Beef meat consumption | |||
Yes | 337 (98.3) | 21 (6.2) | 0.6 |
No | 6 (1.7) | 0 (0) | |
Turkey meat consumption | |||
Yes | 102 (29.7) | 10 (9.8) | 0.06 |
No | 241 (70.3) | 11 (4.6) | |
Deer meat consumption | |||
Yes | 18 (5.2) | 3 (16.7) | 0.08 |
No | 325 (94.8) | 18 (5.5) | |
Squirrel meat consumption | |||
Yes | 12 (3.5) | 2 (16.7) | 0.1 |
No | 331 (96.5) | 19 (5.7) | |
Wild animal meat comsumptionb
| |||
Yes | 26 (7.6) | 4 (15.4) | 0.06 |
No | 315 (92.4) | 17 (5.4) | |
Degree of meat cooking | |||
Raw or undercooked | 7 (1.7) | 0 (0) | 0.6 |
Well done | 401 (98.3) | 21 (5.2) | |
Unwashed raw vegetable or fruit consumption | |||
Yes | 228 (66.5) | 13 (5.7) | 0.6 |
No | 115 (33.5) | 8 (7) | |
Contact with catc
| |||
Yes | 286 (83.4) | 17 (5.9) | 0.4 |
No | 57 (16.6) | 4 (7) | |
Gardening or agriculture | |||
Yes | 186 (54.2) | 13 (7) | 0.4 |
No | 157 (45.8) | 8 (5.1) | |
Residence outside Durango | |||
Yes | 8 (2.3) | 3 (37.5) | 0.009 |
No | 334 (97.7) | 18 (5.4) | |
Blood transfusion | |||
Yes | 24 (7.1) | 3 (12.5) | 0.1 |
No | 316 (92.9) | 18 (5.7) | |
Soil floors | |||
Yes | 28 (8.3) | 6 (21.4) | 0.004 |
No | 311 (91.7) | 15 (4.8) |
Characteristica
| Group | Adjusted odds ratio | 95% Confidence interval | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Turkey meat consumption | ||||
Yes | 3.85b
| 1.30–11.44 | 0.014 | |
No | ||||
Deer meat consumption | ||||
Yes | 0.8b
| 0.04–16.47 | 0.9 | |
No | ||||
Squirrel meat consumption | ||||
Yes | 1.38b
| 0.10–18.95 | 0.8 | |
No | ||||
Wild animal meat comsumptionc
| ||||
Yes | 2.4b
| 0.09–61.01 | 0.5 | |
No | ||||
Residence outside Durango | ||||
Yes | 4.25b
| 1.72–10.49 | 0.001 | |
No | ||||
Blood transfusion | ||||
Yes | 28.9b
| 0.00–250 | 0.8 | |
No | ||||
House with soil floors | ||||
Yes | 7.16b
| 1.39–36.84 | 0.018 | |
No |