nach oben

Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2015 | Poster presentation

The importance of stakeholder selection in core outcome set development: how surveying different health professionals may influence outcome selection

verfasst von: Kerry Avery, Katy Chalmers, Katie Whale, Natalie Blencowe, Rhiannon Macefield, Sara Brookes, Chris Metcalfe, Jane Blazeby

Erschienen in: Trials | Sonderheft 2/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Core outcome sets (COS) seek to overcome heterogeneity in outcome reporting by generating outcomes to be measured and reported as a minimum in all trials of specific conditions. Patients’ views are integral to this but less is understood about selecting which healthcare professionals to be involved. We examined whether differences in the health professionals surveyed influenced outcome selection in a COS. …

Titel: The importance of stakeholder selection in core outcome set development: how surveying different health professionals may influence outcome selection
verfasst von: Kerry Avery
Katy Chalmers
Katie Whale
Natalie Blencowe
Rhiannon Macefield
Sara Brookes
Chris Metcalfe
Jane Blazeby
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2015
Verlag: BioMed Central
Erschienen in: Trials / Ausgabe Sonderheft 2/2015
Elektronische ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P47

Springer Medizin

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 2/2015

Setting up a clinical trial in care homes: challenges encountered and recommendations for future research practice

Using the UK renal registry for a clinical trial in dialysis patients: the example of SIMPLIFIED

Role of NIHR HTA clinical trials on subsequent systematic reviews

Use of patient diaries in conjunction with standard reporting methods: duplication of data or a valuable resource?

Use of an embedded, micro-randomised trial to investigate non-compliance in telehealth trials

Citation analysis: a new approach to assess the uptake of core outcome sets