Skip to main content
Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics 11/2004

01.08.2004 | Current Opinion

The Measurement of Contingent Valuation for Health Economics

verfasst von: Ahmed M. Bayoumi

Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics | Ausgabe 11/2004

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

In health economics, contingent valuation is a method that elicits an individual’s monetary valuations of health programmes or health states. This article reviews the theory and conduct of contingent valuation studies, with suggestions for improving the future measurement of contingent valuation for health economics applications.
Contingent valuation questions can be targeted to any of the following groups: the general population, to value health insurance premiums for programmes; users of a health programme, to value the associated programme costs; or individuals with a disease, to evaluate health states. The questions can be framed to ask individuals how much they would pay to obtain positive changes in health status or avoid negative changes in health status (’willingness to pay’; WTP) or how much they would need to be paid to compensate for a decrease in health status or for foregoing an improvement in heath status (‘willingness to accept’; WTA). In general WTP questions yield more accurate and precise valuations than WTA questions. Payment card techniques, with follow-up bidding using direct interviews with visual aids, are well suited for small contingent valuation studies.
Several biases may be operative when assessing contingent valuation, including biases in the way participants are selected, the way in which the questions are posed, the way in which individuals interpret probabilities and value gains relative to losses, and the way in which missing or extreme responses are interpreted. An important aspect of all contingent valuation studies is an assessment of respondents’ understanding of the evaluation method and the valuation task. Contingent valuation studies should measure the potential influence of biases, the validity of contingent valuation tests as measures of QOL, and the reliability and responsiveness of responses.
Future research should address equity concerns associated with using contingent valuation and explore contingent valuation as a measure of utility for health states, particularly those that are minor or temporary.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bala MV, Mauskopf JA, Wood LL. Willingness to pay as a measure of health benefits. Pharmacoeconorrucs 1999; 15: 9–18CrossRef Bala MV, Mauskopf JA, Wood LL. Willingness to pay as a measure of health benefits. Pharmacoeconorrucs 1999; 15: 9–18CrossRef
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Diener A, O’Brien B, Gafni A. Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature. Health Econ 1998; 7: 313–26PubMedCrossRef Diener A, O’Brien B, Gafni A. Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature. Health Econ 1998; 7: 313–26PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen JA, Smith RD. Theory versus practice: a review of‘willingness-to-pay’ in health and health care. Health Econ 2001; 10: 39–52PubMedCrossRef Olsen JA, Smith RD. Theory versus practice: a review of‘willingness-to-pay’ in health and health care. Health Econ 2001; 10: 39–52PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Drummond MF, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987 Drummond MF, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987
6.
Zurück zum Zitat McIntosh E, Donaldson C, Ryan M. Recent advances in the methods of cost-benefit analysis in healthcare: matching the art to the science. Pharmacceconomics 1999; 15: 357–67CrossRef McIntosh E, Donaldson C, Ryan M. Recent advances in the methods of cost-benefit analysis in healthcare: matching the art to the science. Pharmacceconomics 1999; 15: 357–67CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien B, Gafni A. When do the‘dollars’ make sense?: toward a conceptual framework for contingent valuation studies in health care. Mec Decis Making 1996; 16: 288–99PubMedCrossRef O’Brien B, Gafni A. When do the‘dollars’ make sense?: toward a conceptual framework for contingent valuation studies in health care. Mec Decis Making 1996; 16: 288–99PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Stinnett AA, Mullahy J. Net health benefits: a new framework for the analysis of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Moo Decis Making 1998; 18: 568–80 Stinnett AA, Mullahy J. Net health benefits: a new framework for the analysis of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Moo Decis Making 1998; 18: 568–80
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gold MR, Seigel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein Me, editors. Costeffectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996 Gold MR, Seigel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein Me, editors. Costeffectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Donaldson C. Valuing the benefits of publicly-provided health care: does ‘ability to pay’ preclude the use of ‘willingness to pay’? Soc Sci Moo 1999; 49: 551–63CrossRef Donaldson C. Valuing the benefits of publicly-provided health care: does ‘ability to pay’ preclude the use of ‘willingness to pay’? Soc Sci Moo 1999; 49: 551–63CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinstein Me, Manning Jr WG. Theoretical issues in costeffectiveness analysis. J Health Econ 1997; 16: 121–8CrossRef Weinstein Me, Manning Jr WG. Theoretical issues in costeffectiveness analysis. J Health Econ 1997; 16: 121–8CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, et al. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Fed Regist 1993; 58: 4607–14 Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, et al. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Fed Regist 1993; 58: 4607–14
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell RC, Carson RT. Using surveys to value pubic goods: the contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1989 Mitchell RC, Carson RT. Using surveys to value pubic goods: the contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1989
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirth RA, Bloom BS, Chernew ME, et al. Patient, physician, and payer perceptions and misperceptions of willingness to pay for diagnostic certainty. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000; 16: 35–49PubMedCrossRef Hirth RA, Bloom BS, Chernew ME, et al. Patient, physician, and payer perceptions and misperceptions of willingness to pay for diagnostic certainty. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000; 16: 35–49PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen JA. Aiding priority setting in health care: is there a role for the contingent valuation method? Health Econ 1997; 6: 603–12PubMedCrossRef Olsen JA. Aiding priority setting in health care: is there a role for the contingent valuation method? Health Econ 1997; 6: 603–12PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Liljas B, Blumenschein K. On hypothetical bias and calibration in cost-benefit studies. Health Policy 2000; 52: 53–70PubMedCrossRef Liljas B, Blumenschein K. On hypothetical bias and calibration in cost-benefit studies. Health Policy 2000; 52: 53–70PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Johannesson M, Blomquist GC, Blumenschein K, et al. Calibrating hypothetical willingness to pay responses. J Risk Uncertain 1999; 18: 21–32CrossRef Johannesson M, Blomquist GC, Blumenschein K, et al. Calibrating hypothetical willingness to pay responses. J Risk Uncertain 1999; 18: 21–32CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979; 47: 263–91CrossRef Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979; 47: 263–91CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bayoumi AM, Redelrreier DA. Decision analysis with cumilative prospect theory. Med Decis Making 2000; 20: 404–12PubMedCrossRef Bayoumi AM, Redelrreier DA. Decision analysis with cumilative prospect theory. Med Decis Making 2000; 20: 404–12PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lundberg L, Johannesson M, Silverdahl M, et al. Quality of life, health-state utilities and willingness to pay in patients with psoriasis and atopic eczema. Br J Dermatol 1999; 141: 1067–75PubMedCrossRef Lundberg L, Johannesson M, Silverdahl M, et al. Quality of life, health-state utilities and willingness to pay in patients with psoriasis and atopic eczema. Br J Dermatol 1999; 141: 1067–75PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Onwujekwe O. Searching for a better willingness to pay elicitation method in rural Nigeria: the binary question with followup method versus the bidding game technique. Health Econ 2001; 10: 147–58PubMedCrossRef Onwujekwe O. Searching for a better willingness to pay elicitation method in rural Nigeria: the binary question with followup method versus the bidding game technique. Health Econ 2001; 10: 147–58PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Dalmau-Matarrodona E. Alternative approaches to obtain optimal bid values in contingent valuation studies and to model protest zeros: estimating the determinants of individuals’ willingness to pay for home care services in day case surgery. Health Econ 2001; 10: 101–18PubMedCrossRef Dalmau-Matarrodona E. Alternative approaches to obtain optimal bid values in contingent valuation studies and to model protest zeros: estimating the determinants of individuals’ willingness to pay for home care services in day case surgery. Health Econ 2001; 10: 101–18PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Krabbe PF, Essink-Bot ML, Bonsel GJ. The comparability and reliability of five health-state valuation methods. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1641–52PubMedCrossRef Krabbe PF, Essink-Bot ML, Bonsel GJ. The comparability and reliability of five health-state valuation methods. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1641–52PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Blumenschein K, Johannesson M. Relationship between quality of life instruments, health state utilities, and willingness to pay in patients with asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Imminol 1998; 80: 189–94CrossRef Blumenschein K, Johannesson M. Relationship between quality of life instruments, health state utilities, and willingness to pay in patients with asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Imminol 1998; 80: 189–94CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Torrance GW. Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 593–603PubMedCrossRef Torrance GW. Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 593–603PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sorum PC. Measuring patient preferences by willingness to pay to avoid: the case of acute otitis media. Med Decis Making 1999; 19: 27–37PubMedCrossRef Sorum PC. Measuring patient preferences by willingness to pay to avoid: the case of acute otitis media. Med Decis Making 1999; 19: 27–37PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Corso PS, Hammitt JK, Graham JD. Valuing mortality-risk reduction: using visual aids to improve the validity of contingent valuation. J Risk Uncertain 2001; 23: 165–84CrossRef Corso PS, Hammitt JK, Graham JD. Valuing mortality-risk reduction: using visual aids to improve the validity of contingent valuation. J Risk Uncertain 2001; 23: 165–84CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith RD. The discrete-choice willingness-to-pay question format in health economics: should we adopt environmental guidelines? Med Decis Making 2000; 20: 194–206PubMedCrossRef Smith RD. The discrete-choice willingness-to-pay question format in health economics: should we adopt environmental guidelines? Med Decis Making 2000; 20: 194–206PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Bala MV, Zarkin GA. Are QALYs an appropriate measure for valuing morbidity in acute diseases? Health Econ 2000; 9: 177–80PubMedCrossRef Bala MV, Zarkin GA. Are QALYs an appropriate measure for valuing morbidity in acute diseases? Health Econ 2000; 9: 177–80PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Measurement of Contingent Valuation for Health Economics
verfasst von
Ahmed M. Bayoumi
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2004
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
PharmacoEconomics / Ausgabe 11/2004
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200422110-00001

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2004

PharmacoEconomics 11/2004 Zur Ausgabe