Skip to main content
Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics 6/2006

01.06.2006 | Original Research Article

Dalteparin versus Warfarin for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolic Events in Cancer Patients

A Pharmacoeconomic Analysis

verfasst von: George Dranitsaris, Mark Vincent, Mark Crowther

Erschienen in: PharmacoEconomics | Ausgabe 6/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective: In a recent randomised trial (CLOT [Comparison of Low molecular weight heparin versus Oral anticoagulant Therapy for long term anticoagulation in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism]), which evaluated secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients, dalteparin reduced the relative risk of recurrent VTEs by 52% compared with oral anticoagulation therapy (p = 0.002). A Canadian pharmacoeconomic analysis was conducted to measure the economic value of dalteparin for this indication.
Design: The study was conducted from the Canadian healthcare system. The first part of this study utilised the CLOT trial database, from which resource utilisation data were converted into Canadian cost estimates ($Can, year 2005 values). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to compare the total cost of therapy between patients randomised to treatment with dalteparin or oral therapy. Health state utilities and treatment preferences were then measured in 24 oncology care providers using the time trade-off technique.
Results: When all of the cost components were combined for the entire population (n = 676), patients in the dalteparin group had significantly higher overall costs than the control group ($Can4162 vs $Can2003; p < 0.001). The preference assessment revealed that 23 of 24 respondents (96%) selected dalteparin over warfarin, with an associated gain of 0.157 QALYs. When the incremental cost of dalteparin ($Can2159 per patient) was combined with the QALY gain, the findings revealed that dalteparin was associated with a cost of approximately $Can13 800 (95% CI 12 400, 15 100) per QALY gained.
Conclusions: Given the practical advantages of dalteparin in terms of convenience, improved efficacy and the acceptable economic value, this analysis suggests that long-term dalteparin therapy is a sound alternative to warfarin for the prevention of recurrent VTEs in patients with cancer
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kearon C. Natural history of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003; 107 Suppl. 1: 122–130CrossRef Kearon C. Natural history of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003; 107 Suppl. 1: 122–130CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Deitcher SR. Cancer-related deep venous thrombosis: clinical importance, treatment challenges, and management strategies. Semin Thromb Hemostasis 2003; 29: 247–258CrossRef Deitcher SR. Cancer-related deep venous thrombosis: clinical importance, treatment challenges, and management strategies. Semin Thromb Hemostasis 2003; 29: 247–258CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sallah S, Wan JY, Nguyen NP. Venous thrombosis in patients with solid tumors: determination of frequency and characteristics. Thromb Haemost 2002; 87: 575–579PubMed Sallah S, Wan JY, Nguyen NP. Venous thrombosis in patients with solid tumors: determination of frequency and characteristics. Thromb Haemost 2002; 87: 575–579PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2004. Toronto, 2004 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.cancer.ca [Accessed 2005 Feb 4] National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2004. Toronto, 2004 [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​cancer.​ca [Accessed 2005 Feb 4]
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee AY, Levine MN, Baker RI, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 146–153PubMedCrossRef Lee AY, Levine MN, Baker RI, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 146–153PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee A YY, Rickles FR, Julian JA, et al. Randomized comparison of low molecular weight heparin and coumarin derivatives on the survival of patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 2123–2129PubMedCrossRef Lee A YY, Rickles FR, Julian JA, et al. Randomized comparison of low molecular weight heparin and coumarin derivatives on the survival of patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 2123–2129PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Klerk CP, Smorenburg SM, Otten HM, et al. The effect of low molecular weight heparin on survival in patients with advanced malignancy. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 2130–2135PubMedCrossRef Klerk CP, Smorenburg SM, Otten HM, et al. The effect of low molecular weight heparin on survival in patients with advanced malignancy. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 2130–2135PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakkar AK, Levine MN, Kadziola Z, et al. Low molecular weight heparin, therapy with dalteparin, and survival in advanced cancer: the Fragmin Advanced Malignancy Outcome Study (FAMOUS). J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 1944–1948PubMedCrossRef Kakkar AK, Levine MN, Kadziola Z, et al. Low molecular weight heparin, therapy with dalteparin, and survival in advanced cancer: the Fragmin Advanced Malignancy Outcome Study (FAMOUS). J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 1944–1948PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien BJ, Anderson DR, Goeree R. Cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin versus warfarin prophylaxis against deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. CMAJ 1994; 150: 1083–1090PubMed O’Brien BJ, Anderson DR, Goeree R. Cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin versus warfarin prophylaxis against deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. CMAJ 1994; 150: 1083–1090PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Haentjens P, De Groote K, Annemans L. Prolonged enoxaparin therapy to prevent venous thromboembolism after primary hip or knee replacement: a cost-utility analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124: 507–517PubMedCrossRef Haentjens P, De Groote K, Annemans L. Prolonged enoxaparin therapy to prevent venous thromboembolism after primary hip or knee replacement: a cost-utility analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124: 507–517PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Botteman MF, Caprini J, Stephens JM, et al. Results of an economic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, versus warfarin for the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis and associated long-term complications in total hip replacement surgery in the United States. Clin Ther 2002; 24: 1960–1986PubMedCrossRef Botteman MF, Caprini J, Stephens JM, et al. Results of an economic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, versus warfarin for the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis and associated long-term complications in total hip replacement surgery in the United States. Clin Ther 2002; 24: 1960–1986PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hull RD, Pineo GF, Raskob GE. The economic impact of treating deep vein thrombosis with low molecular weight heparin: outcome of therapy and health economic aspects. Haemostasis 1998; 28 Suppl. 3: 8–16PubMed Hull RD, Pineo GF, Raskob GE. The economic impact of treating deep vein thrombosis with low molecular weight heparin: outcome of therapy and health economic aspects. Haemostasis 1998; 28 Suppl. 3: 8–16PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gordois A, Posnett J, Borris L, et al. The cost effectiveness of fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin as prophylaxis against thromboembolism following major orthopedic surgery. J Thromb Haemost 2003; 1: 2167–2174PubMedCrossRef Gordois A, Posnett J, Borris L, et al. The cost effectiveness of fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin as prophylaxis against thromboembolism following major orthopedic surgery. J Thromb Haemost 2003; 1: 2167–2174PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dranitsaris G, Kahn S, Sturrpo C, et al. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin for the prevention of thromboembolic events in orthopedic surgery patients. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2004; 4: 325–333PubMedCrossRef Dranitsaris G, Kahn S, Sturrpo C, et al. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin for the prevention of thromboembolic events in orthopedic surgery patients. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2004; 4: 325–333PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Dranitsaris G. The cost of blood transfusions in cancer patients: a reanalysis of a Canadian economic evaluation. J Oncol Pharm Prac 2000; 6: 1–6 Dranitsaris G. The cost of blood transfusions in cancer patients: a reanalysis of a Canadian economic evaluation. J Oncol Pharm Prac 2000; 6: 1–6
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Statistics Canada [online]. Available from URL: http://www.statcan.ca [Accessed 2005 Feb 4] Statistics Canada [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​statcan.​ca [Accessed 2005 Feb 4]
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Torrance GW. Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 593–600PubMedCrossRef Torrance GW. Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 593–600PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gafni A. Alternatives to the QAL Y measure for economic evaluations. Support Care Cancer 1997; 5: 105–111PubMedCrossRef Gafni A. Alternatives to the QAL Y measure for economic evaluations. Support Care Cancer 1997; 5: 105–111PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung P, Tanock IF, Oza AM, et al. Cost utility analysis of chemotherapy using paclitaxel, docetaxel or vinorelbine for patients with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 3082–3090PubMed Leung P, Tanock IF, Oza AM, et al. Cost utility analysis of chemotherapy using paclitaxel, docetaxel or vinorelbine for patients with anthracycline-resistant breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 3082–3090PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ortega A, Dranitsaris G, Sturgeon J, et al. Cost utility analysis of paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1997; 66: 454–463PubMedCrossRef Ortega A, Dranitsaris G, Sturgeon J, et al. Cost utility analysis of paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1997; 66: 454–463PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, et al. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. CMAJ 1992; 146: 473–481PubMed Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, et al. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. CMAJ 1992; 146: 473–481PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Aujesky D, Smith KJ, Cornuz J, et al. Cost effectiveness of low molecular weight heparin for secondary prophylaxis of cancer related venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 2005; 93: 592–599PubMed Aujesky D, Smith KJ, Cornuz J, et al. Cost effectiveness of low molecular weight heparin for secondary prophylaxis of cancer related venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost 2005; 93: 592–599PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin SC, Gagnon DD, Zhang L, et al. Cost-utility analysis of survival with epoetin-alfa versus placebo in stage IV breast cancer. Pharmacoeconomics 2003; 21: 1153–1169PubMedCrossRef Martin SC, Gagnon DD, Zhang L, et al. Cost-utility analysis of survival with epoetin-alfa versus placebo in stage IV breast cancer. Pharmacoeconomics 2003; 21: 1153–1169PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Silber JH, Fridman M, Shpilsky A, et al. Modeling the cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 2435–2444PubMed Silber JH, Fridman M, Shpilsky A, et al. Modeling the cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 2435–2444PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson FA, Speneer FA. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003; 107: 19–116CrossRef Anderson FA, Speneer FA. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003; 107: 19–116CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Dalteparin versus Warfarin for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolic Events in Cancer Patients
A Pharmacoeconomic Analysis
verfasst von
George Dranitsaris
Mark Vincent
Mark Crowther
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2006
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
PharmacoEconomics / Ausgabe 6/2006
Print ISSN: 1170-7690
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2027
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200624060-00006

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2006

PharmacoEconomics 6/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Correspondence

The Authors’ Reply