Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Drug Investigation 6/2008

01.06.2008 | Original Research Article

Effect of Increasing Esomeprazole and Pantoprazole Doses on Acid Control in Patients with Symptoms of Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease

A Randomized, Dose-Response Study

Erschienen in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Ausgabe 6/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and objective: In patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), dose escalation or drug switching may be considered in those with symptoms that persist despite standard-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. This study set out to assess whether increasing the dosage of oral esomeprazole and pantoprazole improves acid control in GORD patients, and to compare the pharmacodynamic efficacy of esomeprazole and pantoprazole administered at different dosages.
Methods: This was an open-label, randomized, six-way crossover study that included Helicobacter pylori-negative GORD patients (aged 20–60 years) with <30% of time with intragastric pH >4. Patients were treated with oral once-daily esomeprazole 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg, and pantoprazole 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg, for 5 days. The main outcome measures were time with intragastric pH >4 over 24 hours, median pH over 24 hours and area under the hydrogen ion versus time curve on day 5 for each treatment period.
Results: Dose escalation with both PPIs improved acid control. The proportion of time with intragastric pH >4 (day 5) was 46.7% with esomeprazole 20 mg/day, 58.6% with esomeprazole 40 mg/day, and 65.8% with esomeprazole 80 mg/day; the corresponding percentages with pantoprazole were 28.6%, 36.9% and 44.9%, respectively. On a milligram-per-milligram basis, esomeprazole provided greater acid control than pantoprazole (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Dose escalation with oral esomeprazole and pantoprazole improves acid control in patients with GORD, although esomeprazole provides significantly greater acid control on a milligram-per-milligram basis.
Fußnoten
1
The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
 
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell NJ, Hunt RH. Role of gastric acid suppression in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut 1992; 33: 118–24PubMedCrossRef Bell NJ, Hunt RH. Role of gastric acid suppression in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut 1992; 33: 118–24PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell NJ, Burget D, Howden CW, et al. Appropriate acid suppression for the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Digestion 1992; 51Suppl. 1: 59–67PubMedCrossRef Bell NJ, Burget D, Howden CW, et al. Appropriate acid suppression for the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Digestion 1992; 51Suppl. 1: 59–67PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang JQ, Hunt RH. pH, healing rate, and symptom relief in patients with GERD. Yale J Biol Med 1999; 72: 181–94PubMed Huang JQ, Hunt RH. pH, healing rate, and symptom relief in patients with GERD. Yale J Biol Med 1999; 72: 181–94PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunt RH. Importance of pH control in the management of GERD. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 649–57PubMedCrossRef Hunt RH. Importance of pH control in the management of GERD. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 649–57PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Miner Jr P, Katz PO, Chen Y, et al. Gastric acid control with esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole: a five-way crossover study. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 2616–20PubMedCrossRef Miner Jr P, Katz PO, Chen Y, et al. Gastric acid control with esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole: a five-way crossover study. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 2616–20PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Röhss K, Lind T, Wilder-Smith C. Esomeprazole 40 mg provides more effective intragastric acid control than lansoprazole 30 mg, omeprazole 20 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg and rabeprazole 20mg in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2004; 60: 531–9PubMedCrossRef Röhss K, Lind T, Wilder-Smith C. Esomeprazole 40 mg provides more effective intragastric acid control than lansoprazole 30 mg, omeprazole 20 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg and rabeprazole 20mg in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2004; 60: 531–9PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahrilas PJ, Falk GW, Johnson DA, et al. Esomeprazole improves healing and symptom resolution as compared with omeprazole in reflux oesophagitis patients: a randomized controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000; 14: 1249–58PubMedCrossRef Kahrilas PJ, Falk GW, Johnson DA, et al. Esomeprazole improves healing and symptom resolution as compared with omeprazole in reflux oesophagitis patients: a randomized controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000; 14: 1249–58PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson DA, Benjamin SB, Vakil NB, et al. Esomeprazole once daily for 6 months is effective therapy for maintaining healed erosive esophagitis and for controlling gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of efficacy and safety. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 27–34PubMedCrossRef Johnson DA, Benjamin SB, Vakil NB, et al. Esomeprazole once daily for 6 months is effective therapy for maintaining healed erosive esophagitis and for controlling gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of efficacy and safety. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 27–34PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Richter JE, Kahrilas PJ, Johanson J, et al. Efficacy and safety of esomeprazole compared with omeprazole in GERD patients with erosive esophagitis: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 656–65PubMedCrossRef Richter JE, Kahrilas PJ, Johanson J, et al. Efficacy and safety of esomeprazole compared with omeprazole in GERD patients with erosive esophagitis: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 656–65PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Labenz J, Armstrong D, Lauritsen K, et al. A randomized comparative study of esomeprazole 40mg versus pantoprazole 40mg for healing erosive esophagitis: the EXPO study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 21: 739–46PubMedCrossRef Labenz J, Armstrong D, Lauritsen K, et al. A randomized comparative study of esomeprazole 40mg versus pantoprazole 40mg for healing erosive esophagitis: the EXPO study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 21: 739–46PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Labenz J, Armstrong D, Lauritsen K, et al. Esomeprazole 20mg vs. pantoprazole 20mg for maintenance therapy of healed erosive esophagitis: results from the EXPO study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 22: 803–11PubMedCrossRef Labenz J, Armstrong D, Lauritsen K, et al. Esomeprazole 20mg vs. pantoprazole 20mg for maintenance therapy of healed erosive esophagitis: results from the EXPO study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 22: 803–11PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones R, Liker HR, Ducrotté P. Relationship between symptoms, subjective well-being and medication use in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61: 1301–7PubMedCrossRef Jones R, Liker HR, Ducrotté P. Relationship between symptoms, subjective well-being and medication use in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61: 1301–7PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaezi MF. ’Refractory GERD’: acid, nonacid, or not GERD? Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 989–90PubMedCrossRef Vaezi MF. ’Refractory GERD’: acid, nonacid, or not GERD? Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 989–90PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fass R, Shapiro M, Dekel R, et al. Systematic review: proton-pump inhibitor failure in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: where next? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 22: 79–94PubMedCrossRef Fass R, Shapiro M, Dekel R, et al. Systematic review: proton-pump inhibitor failure in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: where next? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 22: 79–94PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilder-Smith C, Lind T, Lundin C, et al. Acid control with esomeprazole and lansoprazole: a comparative dose-response study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 157–64PubMedCrossRef Wilder-Smith C, Lind T, Lundin C, et al. Acid control with esomeprazole and lansoprazole: a comparative dose-response study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 157–64PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilder-Smith CH, Gennoni MA, Triller J, et al. Is a fluoroscopic verification of the electrode position necessary in ambulatory intragastric pH monitoring? Digestion 1992; 52: 1–5PubMedCrossRef Wilder-Smith CH, Gennoni MA, Triller J, et al. Is a fluoroscopic verification of the electrode position necessary in ambulatory intragastric pH monitoring? Digestion 1992; 52: 1–5PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Röhss K, Wilder-Smith C, Nauclér E, et al. Esomeprazole 20mg provides more effective intragastric acid control than maintenance-dose rabeprazole, lansoprazole or pantoprazole in healthy volunteers. Clin Drug Invest 2004; 24: 1–7CrossRef Röhss K, Wilder-Smith C, Nauclér E, et al. Esomeprazole 20mg provides more effective intragastric acid control than maintenance-dose rabeprazole, lansoprazole or pantoprazole in healthy volunteers. Clin Drug Invest 2004; 24: 1–7CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Miner Jr PB, Tutuian R, Castell DO, et al. Intragastric acidity after switching from 5-day treatment with intravenous pantoprazole 40 mg/d to 5-day treatment with oral esomeprazole 40 mg/d or pantoprazole 40 mg/d: an open-label crossover study in healthy adult volunteers. Clin Ther 2006; 28: 725–33PubMedCrossRef Miner Jr PB, Tutuian R, Castell DO, et al. Intragastric acidity after switching from 5-day treatment with intravenous pantoprazole 40 mg/d to 5-day treatment with oral esomeprazole 40 mg/d or pantoprazole 40 mg/d: an open-label crossover study in healthy adult volunteers. Clin Ther 2006; 28: 725–33PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Miehlke S, Madisch A, Kirsch C, et al. Intragastric acidity during treatment with esomeprazole 40mg twice daily or pantoprazole 40mg twice daily: a randomized, two-way crossover study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 21: 963–7PubMedCrossRef Miehlke S, Madisch A, Kirsch C, et al. Intragastric acidity during treatment with esomeprazole 40mg twice daily or pantoprazole 40mg twice daily: a randomized, two-way crossover study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005; 21: 963–7PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hatlebakk JG, Katz PO, Kuo B, et al. Nocturnal gastric acidity and acid breakthrough on different regimens of omeprazole 40mg daily. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998; 12: 1235–40PubMedCrossRef Hatlebakk JG, Katz PO, Kuo B, et al. Nocturnal gastric acidity and acid breakthrough on different regimens of omeprazole 40mg daily. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998; 12: 1235–40PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson, LF, DeMeester TR. Development of the 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring composite scoring system. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986; 8: 52–8PubMedCrossRef Johnson, LF, DeMeester TR. Development of the 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring composite scoring system. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986; 8: 52–8PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz PO, Ginsberg GG, Hoyle PE, et al. Relationship between intragastric acid control and healing status in the treatment of moderate to severe erosive esophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 25: 617–28PubMedCrossRef Katz PO, Ginsberg GG, Hoyle PE, et al. Relationship between intragastric acid control and healing status in the treatment of moderate to severe erosive esophagitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 25: 617–28PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiba N, de Gara CJ, Wilkinson JM, et al. Speed of healing and symptom relief in grade II to IV gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1798–810PubMedCrossRef Chiba N, de Gara CJ, Wilkinson JM, et al. Speed of healing and symptom relief in grade II to IV gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1798–810PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards SJ, Lind T, Lundell L. Systematic review: proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the healing of reflux esophagitis. A comparison of esomeprazole with other PPIs. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24: 743–50PubMedCrossRef Edwards SJ, Lind T, Lundell L. Systematic review: proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the healing of reflux esophagitis. A comparison of esomeprazole with other PPIs. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24: 743–50PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Scholten T, Gatz G, Hole U. Once-daily pantoprazole 40mg and esomeprazole 40mg have equivalent overall efficacy in relieving GERD-related symptoms. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 18: 587–94PubMedCrossRef Scholten T, Gatz G, Hole U. Once-daily pantoprazole 40mg and esomeprazole 40mg have equivalent overall efficacy in relieving GERD-related symptoms. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 18: 587–94PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Gillessen A, Beil W, Modlin IM, et al. 40mg pantoprazole and 40mg esomeprazole are equivalent in the healing of esophageal lesions and relief from gastroesophageal reflux disease-related symptoms. J Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 38: 332–40PubMedCrossRef Gillessen A, Beil W, Modlin IM, et al. 40mg pantoprazole and 40mg esomeprazole are equivalent in the healing of esophageal lesions and relief from gastroesophageal reflux disease-related symptoms. J Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 38: 332–40PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Glatzel D, Abdel-Qader M, Gatz G, et al. Pantoprazole 40mg is as effective as esomeprazole 40mg to relieve symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease after 4 weeks of treatment and superior regarding the prevention of symptomatic relapse. Digestion 2007; 74: 145–54CrossRef Glatzel D, Abdel-Qader M, Gatz G, et al. Pantoprazole 40mg is as effective as esomeprazole 40mg to relieve symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease after 4 weeks of treatment and superior regarding the prevention of symptomatic relapse. Digestion 2007; 74: 145–54CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Vcev A, Begic I, Ostojic R, et al. Esomeprazole versus pantoprazole for healing erosive oesophagitis. Coll Antropol 2006; 30: 519–22PubMed Vcev A, Begic I, Ostojic R, et al. Esomeprazole versus pantoprazole for healing erosive oesophagitis. Coll Antropol 2006; 30: 519–22PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Gillessen A. Response to Madisch, Kuhlisch and Meihlke. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005; 39: 172–3 Gillessen A. Response to Madisch, Kuhlisch and Meihlke. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005; 39: 172–3
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Madisch A, Kuhlisch E, Miehlke S. A randomized controlled trial of equivalence between pantoprazole and esomeprazole that does not have the power to conclude [letter]. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005; 39: 172PubMed Madisch A, Kuhlisch E, Miehlke S. A randomized controlled trial of equivalence between pantoprazole and esomeprazole that does not have the power to conclude [letter]. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005; 39: 172PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh KL, Benamouzig R, Sander P, et al. Efficacy of pantoprazole 20mg daily compared with esomeprazole 20mg daily in the maintenance of healed gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized, double-blind comparative trial. The EMANCIPATE study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 19: 205–11PubMedCrossRef Goh KL, Benamouzig R, Sander P, et al. Efficacy of pantoprazole 20mg daily compared with esomeprazole 20mg daily in the maintenance of healed gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized, double-blind comparative trial. The EMANCIPATE study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 19: 205–11PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Galmiche J–P. EMANCIPATE study: drawing conclusions may be difficult in the absence of fundamental information [letter]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 20: 151–2PubMedCrossRef Galmiche J–P. EMANCIPATE study: drawing conclusions may be difficult in the absence of fundamental information [letter]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 20: 151–2PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Labenz J. EMANCIPATE versus EXPO: different results can be explained by differing study designs [letter]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 20: 152PubMedCrossRef Labenz J. EMANCIPATE versus EXPO: different results can be explained by differing study designs [letter]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 20: 152PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh K–L, Benamouzig R, Sander P, et al. Response to ‘EMANCIPATE study. Drawing conclusions may be difficult in the absence of fundamental information’ and ‘EMANCIPATE versus EXPO: different results can be explained by differing study designs’. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 20: 153–5CrossRef Goh K–L, Benamouzig R, Sander P, et al. Response to ‘EMANCIPATE study. Drawing conclusions may be difficult in the absence of fundamental information’ and ‘EMANCIPATE versus EXPO: different results can be explained by differing study designs’. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 20: 153–5CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Effect of Increasing Esomeprazole and Pantoprazole Doses on Acid Control in Patients with Symptoms of Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease
A Randomized, Dose-Response Study
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2008
Erschienen in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Ausgabe 6/2008
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-200828060-00001

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2008

Clinical Drug Investigation 6/2008 Zur Ausgabe