nach oben

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy

Erschienen in:

01.06.2004 | Article

Comparing utility scores before and after hearing-aid provision

Results according to the EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D

verfasst von: Mr Garry R. Barton, John Bankart, Adrian C. Davis, Quentin A. Summerfield

Erschienen in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | Ausgabe 2/2004

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Utility scores were estimated for 609 hearing-impaired adults who completed EQ-5D, Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI3) and SF-6D survey instruments both before and after being provided with a hearing aid. Pre-intervention, the mean utility scores for EQ-5D (0.80) and SF-6D (0.78) were significantly higher than the mean HUI3 utility score (0.58). Post-intervention, the mean improvement in the HUI3 (0.06 change) was significantly higher than the mean improvement according to the EQ-5D (0.01 change) or SF-6D (0.01 change). The estimated cost effectiveness of hearing-aid provision is therefore likely to be dependent on which instrument is used to measure utility.

Gerard K, Nicholson T, Mullee M, et al. EQ-5D versus SF-6D in an older, chronically ill patient group. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2004; 3: 91–102PubMedCrossRef

Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance G, et al. Multi-attribute and single-attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system. Med Care 2002; 40: 113–28PubMedCrossRef

Heyse J, Cook J, Carides G. Statistical considerations in analysing health care resource utilization and cost data. In: Drummond M, McGuire A, editors. Economic evaluation in health care. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001: 215–35

Palmer C, Niparko J, Wyatt J, et al. A prospective study of the cost-utility of the multi-channel cochlear implant. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125: 1221–8PubMed

Cheng AK, Rubin HR, Powe NR, et al. Cost-utility analysis of the cochlear implant in children. JAMA 2000; 284: 850–6PubMedCrossRef

Krabbe P, Hinderink JB, van den Broek P. The effect of cochlear implant use in postlingually deaf adults. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000; 16: 864–73PubMedCrossRef

UK Cochlear Implant Study Group. Criteria of candidature for unilateral cochlear implantation in post-lingually deafened adults. II: Cost-effectiveness analysis. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 336–60CrossRef

Joore MA, Van Der Stel H H, Peters HJ, et al. The cost-effectiveness of hearing-aid fitting in the Netherlands. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 129: 297–304PubMedCrossRef

Bosch JL, Hunink MG. Comparison of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and the EuroQol EQ-5D in patients treated for intermittent claudication. Qual Life Res 2000; 9: 591–601PubMedCrossRef

10.

Conner-Spady B, Suarez-Almazor ME. Variation in the estimation of quality-adjusted life-years by different preference-based instruments. Med Care 2003; 41: 791–801PubMedCrossRef

11.

O’Brien BJ, Spath M, Blackhouse G, et al. A view from the bridge: agreement between the SF-6D utility algorithm and the Health Utilities Index. Health Econ 2003; 12: 975–81PubMedCrossRef

12.

Hatoum HT, Brazier JE, Akhras KS. Comparison of the HUI3 with the SF-36 preference based SF-6D in a clinical trial setting. Value Health 2004; 7: 602–9PubMedCrossRef

13.

Taylor RS, Paisley S, Davis AC. Systematic review of the clinical and cost effectiveness of digital hearing aids. Br J Audiol 2001; 35: 271–88PubMed

14.

Rawlins MD, Culyer AJ. National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments. BMJ 2004; 329: 224–7PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Comparing utility scores before and after hearing-aid provision
Results according to the EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D
verfasst von: Mr Garry R. Barton
John Bankart
Adrian C. Davis
Quentin A. Summerfield
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2004
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy / Ausgabe 2/2004
Print ISSN: 1175-5652
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1896
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00148365-200403020-00006

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2004

Improving road safety and residential quality of life

The economics of prevention in a post-managed-care environment

The use of probabilistic decision models in technology assessment

EQ-5D versus SF-6D in an older, chronically ill patient group

Do interventions to increase income improve the health of the poor in developed economies and are such policies cost effective?

Modelling the ability of risk adjusters to reduce adverse selection in managed care