Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 3/2009

01.09.2009 | Original Research Article

Using the Health Utilities Index in Routine Clinical Care: Process, Feasibility, and Acceptability

A Randomized Controlled Trial

verfasst von: Dr Maria-Jose Santana, David H. Feeny

Erschienen in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Ausgabe 3/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and objective: Using measures of health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in routine clinical practice has the potential to improve the quality of healthcare and outcomes. The Health Utilities Index (HUI) is a generic, preference-based measure of HR-QOL. The aim of this study was to describe the process, feasibility and acceptability of use of the HUI in routine clinical care.
Methods: The study was conducted at the outpatient Heart and Lung Transplant Clinic, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Before seeing the clinician, patients attending the clinic completed the HUI on a touch-screen computer at each visit. This information was graphically represented on the HUI score card and presented to the clinicians during the visit. Patients completed a battery of questionnaires at baseline and at the end of the study. Training in the interpretation of the results was provided on a regular basis to the clinicians. The use of HUI in clinical practice was assessed from the perspectives of clinicians and patients. Clinicians completed two questionnaires, at baseline (on expectations) and at the end of the study (an evaluation), regarding the usefulness of the HUI measure in routine clinical care. Patients completed an evaluation form at the end of the study.
Results: Of 151 patients, 135 were happy to use the touch-screen computer and 138 patients confirmed that the questionnaire was easy to complete. Only 10 of 151 patients were unwilling to complete the questionnaires. Clinicians agreed that the results from the HUI helped to improve patient-clinician communication. Members of the team indicated that the HUI score card was clinically relevant and confirmed their diagnoses.
Conclusions: Patients quickly learned how to complete the HUI questionnaire on the computer. Clinicians found that the information provided was valuable and have subsequently incorporated the use of the HUI in the routine clinical care of their patients.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, et al. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288(23): 3027–34PubMedCrossRef Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, et al. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288(23): 3027–34PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Espallargues M, Valderas JM, Alonso J. Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: a systematic review of its impact. Med Care 2000; 38: 175–86PubMedCrossRef Espallargues M, Valderas JM, Alonso J. Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: a systematic review of its impact. Med Care 2000; 38: 175–86PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao JK, Anderson LA, Inuit TS, et al. Communication interventions make a difference in conversations between physicians and patients: a systematic review of the evidence. Med Care 2007; 45(4): 340–9PubMedCrossRef Rao JK, Anderson LA, Inuit TS, et al. Communication interventions make a difference in conversations between physicians and patients: a systematic review of the evidence. Med Care 2007; 45(4): 340–9PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Velikova G, Booth L, Smith A, et al. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(4): 714–24PubMedCrossRef Velikova G, Booth L, Smith A, et al. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22(4): 714–24PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Donaldson M. Use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical oncology practice: a nonvisit approach to patient care based on the IOM report. J Ambul Care Manage 2007; 30(4): 302–7PubMed Donaldson M. Use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical oncology practice: a nonvisit approach to patient care based on the IOM report. J Ambul Care Manage 2007; 30(4): 302–7PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein RM, Street Jr RL. Patient-centered communication in cancer care: promoting healing and reducing suffering. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute, 2007; NIH Publication No. 07-6225 Epstein RM, Street Jr RL. Patient-centered communication in cancer care: promoting healing and reducing suffering. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute, 2007; NIH Publication No. 07-6225
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Velikova G, Wright EP, Smith AB, et al. Automated collection of quality of life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 1999 Mar; 17(3): 998–1007PubMed Velikova G, Wright EP, Smith AB, et al. Automated collection of quality of life data: a comparison of paper and computer touch-screen questionnaires. J Clin Oncol 1999 Mar; 17(3): 998–1007PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Taenzer P, Bultz BD, Carlson LE, et al. Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psychooncology 2000; 9(3): 203–13PubMedCrossRef Taenzer P, Bultz BD, Carlson LE, et al. Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psychooncology 2000; 9(3): 203–13PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, et al. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system health utilities index mark 2. Med Care 1996; 34(7): 702–22PubMedCrossRef Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, et al. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system health utilities index mark 2. Med Care 1996; 34(7): 702–22PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, et al. Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system. Med Care 2002; 40(2): 113–28PubMedCrossRef Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, et al. Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system. Med Care 2002; 40(2): 113–28PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Med Care 1992; 30(6): 473–83PubMedCrossRef Ware JE, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Med Care 1992; 30(6): 473–83PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson EC, Wasson J, Kirk J, et al. Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40Suppl. 1:55–63CrossRef Nelson EC, Wasson J, Kirk J, et al. Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40Suppl. 1:55–63CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner AK, Ehrenberg BL, Tran TA, et al. Patient-based health status measurement in clinical practice: a study of its impact on epilepsy patients’ care. Qual Life Res 1997; 6: 329–41PubMedCrossRef Wagner AK, Ehrenberg BL, Tran TA, et al. Patient-based health status measurement in clinical practice: a study of its impact on epilepsy patients’ care. Qual Life Res 1997; 6: 329–41PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Using the Health Utilities Index in Routine Clinical Care: Process, Feasibility, and Acceptability
A Randomized Controlled Trial
verfasst von
Dr Maria-Jose Santana
David H. Feeny
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2009
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Ausgabe 3/2009
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Elektronische ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11313620-000000000-00000

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2009

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 3/2009 Zur Ausgabe