Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 6/2018

09.02.2018 | Original Article

Long-term oncological outcomes after robotic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a prospective multicentre study

verfasst von: Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Benoit Peyronnet, Thibaut Benoit, Bastien Cabarrou, Thomas Seisen, Mathieu Roumiguié, Benjamin Pradere, Zine-Eddine Khene, Quentin Manach, Gregory Verhoest, Mathieu Thoulouzan, Jerome Parra, Nicolas Doumerc, Romain Mathieu, Christophe Vaessen, Michel Soulié, Morgan Roupret, Karim Bensalah

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed at reporting the long-term oncological outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Methods

Data from all consecutive patients who underwent RAPN for RCC from July 2009 to January 2012 in three departments of urology were prospectively collected. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease free-survival (DFS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic factors associated with CSS were sought in univariate analysis. The log-rank test was used for categorical variables and the Cox model for continuous variables.

Results

110 patients were included with a median follow-up of 64.4 months [95% CI = (61.0–66.7)]. Median age was 61 years (29–83) with 62.7% of men and 37.3% of women. Median RENAL score was 6 (4–10) with elective indications accounting for 95% of cases. Out of 27 patients (24.5%) who experienced peri-operative complication, 12 patients (10.9%) had a major complication (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3). The TRIFECTA achievement rate was 52.7%. Three patients (2.7%) experienced local recurrence and seven patients (6.4%) progressed to a metastatic disease. 5-year OS, CSS, DFS were 94.9, 96.8, 86.4%, respectively. In univariate analysis, no pre/peri-operative characteristic was associated with DFS. No port-site metastasis was observed and there was one case of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Conclusion

In this multicenter series, long-term OS, DFS and CSS after RPN appeared comparable to large series of open partial nephrectomy, with no port-site metastasis and one case of peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Smittenaar CR, Petersen KA, Stewart K, Moitt N (2016) Cancer incidence and mortality projections in the UK until 2035. Br J Cancer 115:1147–1155CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smittenaar CR, Petersen KA, Stewart K, Moitt N (2016) Cancer incidence and mortality projections in the UK until 2035. Br J Cancer 115:1147–1155CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S et al (2015) EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 67:913–924CrossRefPubMed Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S et al (2015) EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 67:913–924CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Zini L, Perrotte P, Capitanio U et al (2009) Radical versus partial nephrectomy: effect on overall and noncancer mortality. Cancer 115:1465–1471CrossRefPubMed Zini L, Perrotte P, Capitanio U et al (2009) Radical versus partial nephrectomy: effect on overall and noncancer mortality. Cancer 115:1465–1471CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR et al (2007) Comparison of 1800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 178:41–46CrossRefPubMed Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR et al (2007) Comparison of 1800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 178:41–46CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Marszalek M, Meixl H, Polajnar M, Rauchenwald M, Jeschke K, Madersbacher S (2009) Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients. Eur Urol 55:1171–1178CrossRefPubMed Marszalek M, Meixl H, Polajnar M, Rauchenwald M, Jeschke K, Madersbacher S (2009) Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients. Eur Urol 55:1171–1178CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lane BR, Gill IS (2010) 7-year oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy. J Urol 183:473–479CrossRefPubMed Lane BR, Gill IS (2010) 7-year oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy. J Urol 183:473–479CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi JE, You JH, Kim DK, Rha KH, Lee SH (2015) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 67:891–901CrossRefPubMed Choi JE, You JH, Kim DK, Rha KH, Lee SH (2015) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 67:891–901CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Masson-Lecomte A, Yates DR, Hupertan V et al (2013) A prospective comparison of the pathologic and surgical outcomes obtained after elective treatment of renal cell carcinoma by open or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Urol Oncol 31:924–929CrossRefPubMed Masson-Lecomte A, Yates DR, Hupertan V et al (2013) A prospective comparison of the pathologic and surgical outcomes obtained after elective treatment of renal cell carcinoma by open or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Urol Oncol 31:924–929CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Khalifeh A, Autorino R, Eyraud R et al (2013) Three-year oncologic and renal functional outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 64:744–750CrossRefPubMed Khalifeh A, Autorino R, Eyraud R et al (2013) Three-year oncologic and renal functional outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 64:744–750CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Peyronnet B, Seisen T, Oger E et al (2016) Comparison of 1800 robotic and open partial nephrectomies for renal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 23:4277–4283CrossRefPubMed Peyronnet B, Seisen T, Oger E et al (2016) Comparison of 1800 robotic and open partial nephrectomies for renal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 23:4277–4283CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Andrade HS, Zargar H, Caputo PA et al (2016) Five-year oncologic outcomes after transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 69:1149–1154CrossRefPubMed Andrade HS, Zargar H, Caputo PA et al (2016) Five-year oncologic outcomes after transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 69:1149–1154CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2009) The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 182:844–853CrossRefPubMed Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2009) The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 182:844–853CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolters U, Wolf T, Stutzer H, Schroder T (1996) ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth 77:217–222CrossRefPubMed Wolters U, Wolf T, Stutzer H, Schroder T (1996) ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth 77:217–222CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Zargar H, Allaf ME, Bhayani S et al (2015) Trifecta and optimal perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in surgical treatment of small renal masses: a multi-institutional study. BJU Int 116:407–414CrossRefPubMed Zargar H, Allaf ME, Bhayani S et al (2015) Trifecta and optimal perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in surgical treatment of small renal masses: a multi-institutional study. BJU Int 116:407–414CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lopez-Beltran A, Scarpelli M, Montironi R, Kirkali Z (2006) 2004 WHO classification of the renal tumors of the adults. Eur Urol 49:798–805CrossRefPubMed Lopez-Beltran A, Scarpelli M, Montironi R, Kirkali Z (2006) 2004 WHO classification of the renal tumors of the adults. Eur Urol 49:798–805CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Patard JJ, Baumert H, Bensalah K et al (2013) CCAFU recommendations 2013: renal cancer. Progres en urologie: Journal de l’Association francaise d’urologie et de la Societe francaise d’urologie 23(Suppl 2):S177–S204CrossRef Patard JJ, Baumert H, Bensalah K et al (2013) CCAFU recommendations 2013: renal cancer. Progres en urologie: Journal de l’Association francaise d’urologie et de la Societe francaise d’urologie 23(Suppl 2):S177–S204CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kyllo RL, Tanagho YS, Kaouk JH et al (2012) Prospective multi-center study of oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for pT1 renal cell carcinoma. BMC Urol 12:11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kyllo RL, Tanagho YS, Kaouk JH et al (2012) Prospective multi-center study of oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for pT1 renal cell carcinoma. BMC Urol 12:11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Marszalek M, Carini M, Chlosta P et al (2012) Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 61:757–763CrossRefPubMed Marszalek M, Carini M, Chlosta P et al (2012) Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 61:757–763CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernhard JC, Pantuck AJ, Wallerand H et al (2010) Predictive factors for ipsilateral recurrence after nephron-sparing surgery in renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 57:1080–1086CrossRefPubMed Bernhard JC, Pantuck AJ, Wallerand H et al (2010) Predictive factors for ipsilateral recurrence after nephron-sparing surgery in renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 57:1080–1086CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Khalifeh A, Kaouk JH, Bhayani S et al (2013) Positive surgical margins in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of oncologic outcomes (leave no tumor behind). J Urol 190:1674–1679CrossRefPubMed Khalifeh A, Kaouk JH, Bhayani S et al (2013) Positive surgical margins in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of oncologic outcomes (leave no tumor behind). J Urol 190:1674–1679CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Borghesi M, Brunocilla E, Schiavina R, Martorana G (2013) Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: incidence, clinical impact, and management. Clin Genitourin Cancer 11:5–9CrossRefPubMed Borghesi M, Brunocilla E, Schiavina R, Martorana G (2013) Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: incidence, clinical impact, and management. Clin Genitourin Cancer 11:5–9CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bensalah K, Pantuck AJ, Rioux-Leclercq N et al (2010) Positive surgical margin appears to have negligible impact on survival of renal cell carcinomas treated by nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 57:466–471CrossRefPubMed Bensalah K, Pantuck AJ, Rioux-Leclercq N et al (2010) Positive surgical margin appears to have negligible impact on survival of renal cell carcinomas treated by nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 57:466–471CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ristau BT, Kutikov A, Uzzo RG, Smaldone MC (2016) Active surveillance for small renal masses: when less is more. Eur Urol Focus 2(6):660–668CrossRefPubMed Ristau BT, Kutikov A, Uzzo RG, Smaldone MC (2016) Active surveillance for small renal masses: when less is more. Eur Urol Focus 2(6):660–668CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Prins FM, Kerkmeijer LGW, Pronk AA et al (2017) Renal cell carcinoma: alternative nephron-sparing treatment options for small renal masses, a systematic review. J Endourol 31(10):963–975CrossRefPubMed Prins FM, Kerkmeijer LGW, Pronk AA et al (2017) Renal cell carcinoma: alternative nephron-sparing treatment options for small renal masses, a systematic review. J Endourol 31(10):963–975CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Long-term oncological outcomes after robotic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a prospective multicentre study
verfasst von
Jean-Baptiste Beauval
Benoit Peyronnet
Thibaut Benoit
Bastien Cabarrou
Thomas Seisen
Mathieu Roumiguié
Benjamin Pradere
Zine-Eddine Khene
Quentin Manach
Gregory Verhoest
Mathieu Thoulouzan
Jerome Parra
Nicolas Doumerc
Romain Mathieu
Christophe Vaessen
Michel Soulié
Morgan Roupret
Karim Bensalah
Publikationsdatum
09.02.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2208-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

World Journal of Urology 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.