Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Oncology 6/2020

01.06.2020 | Leukemia (PH Wiernik, Section Editor)

Management of Myelofibrosis: from Diagnosis to New Target Therapies

verfasst von: Alessandra Iurlo, MD, PhD, Daniele Cattaneo, MD, Cristina Bucelli, MD

Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Oncology | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Opinion statement

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a clonal disorder of the pluripotent hematopoietic stem cell, whose clinical manifestations can be extremely heterogeneous, including cytopenias, organomegaly, constitutional symptoms, and cachexia. Median survival ranges from approximately 3.5 to 5.5 years; while the most frequent cause of death is the evolution to acute myeloid leukemia, also other conditions such as progression without transformation, complications due to cytopenias including infections or bleeding, and cardiovascular events may be fatal. Myelofibrosis is still orphan of curative treatments: allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), the only therapeutic approach that has clearly demonstrated an impact on disease progression, is associated with relevant morbidity and mortality and only a minority of patients is eligible for such an intensive procedure. While the discovery of the crucial role of JAK2 mutations and the consequent clinical use of JAK inhibitors has led to a dramatic improvement of symptoms control and quality of life, yet these drugs do not significantly modify the natural history of the disease. A better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis will hopefully foster the development of new targeted therapies aimed at improving MF prognosis. Herein, we review the most recent advances about JAK inhibitors and other molecules which are under investigation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobson RJ, Salo A, Fialkow PJ. Agnogenic myeloid metaplasia: a clonal proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells with secondary myelofibrosis. Blood. 1978;51:189–94.CrossRefPubMed Jacobson RJ, Salo A, Fialkow PJ. Agnogenic myeloid metaplasia: a clonal proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells with secondary myelofibrosis. Blood. 1978;51:189–94.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Barosi G. Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: diagnostic definition and prognostic classification for clinical studies and treatment guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2954–70.PubMedCrossRef Barosi G. Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: diagnostic definition and prognostic classification for clinical studies and treatment guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2954–70.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391–405 The new 2016 revision of the WHO classification provided new diagnostic criteria for all BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, in particular for primary myelofibrosis. •• Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391–405 The new 2016 revision of the WHO classification provided new diagnostic criteria for all BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, in particular for primary myelofibrosis.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbui T, Thiele J, Passamonti F, et al. Survival and disease progression in essential thrombocythemia are significantly influenced by accurate morphologic diagnosis: an international study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3179–84.PubMedCrossRef Barbui T, Thiele J, Passamonti F, et al. Survival and disease progression in essential thrombocythemia are significantly influenced by accurate morphologic diagnosis: an international study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3179–84.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Barosi G, Mesa RA, Thiele J, et al. Proposed criteria for the diagnosis of post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: a consensus statement from the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Leukemia. 2008;22:437–8.PubMedCrossRef Barosi G, Mesa RA, Thiele J, et al. Proposed criteria for the diagnosis of post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: a consensus statement from the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Leukemia. 2008;22:437–8.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kralovics R, Passamonti F, Buser AS, et al. A gain-of-function mutation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative disorders. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1779–90.PubMedCrossRef Kralovics R, Passamonti F, Buser AS, et al. A gain-of-function mutation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative disorders. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1779–90.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Baxter EJ, Scott LM, Campbell PJ, et al. Acquired mutation of the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human myeloproliferative disorders. Lancet. 2005;365:1054–61.PubMedCrossRef Baxter EJ, Scott LM, Campbell PJ, et al. Acquired mutation of the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human myeloproliferative disorders. Lancet. 2005;365:1054–61.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tefferi A. JAK2 mutations and clinical practice in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cancer J. 2007;13:366–71.PubMedCrossRef Tefferi A. JAK2 mutations and clinical practice in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cancer J. 2007;13:366–71.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Levine RL, Pardanani A, Tefferi A, Gilliland DG. Role of JAK2 in the pathogenesis and therapy of myeloproliferative disorders. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:673–83.PubMedCrossRef Levine RL, Pardanani A, Tefferi A, Gilliland DG. Role of JAK2 in the pathogenesis and therapy of myeloproliferative disorders. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:673–83.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pikman Y, Lee BH, Mercher T, et al. MPLW515L is a novel somatic activating mutation in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e270.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pikman Y, Lee BH, Mercher T, et al. MPLW515L is a novel somatic activating mutation in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e270.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pardanani AD, Levine RL, Lasho T, et al. MPL515 mutations in myeloproliferative and other myeloid disorders: a study of 1182 patients. Blood. 2006;108:3472–6.PubMedCrossRef Pardanani AD, Levine RL, Lasho T, et al. MPL515 mutations in myeloproliferative and other myeloid disorders: a study of 1182 patients. Blood. 2006;108:3472–6.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Klampfl T, Gisslinger H, Harutyunyan AS, et al. Somatic mutations of calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. N Eng J Med. 2013;369:2379–90.CrossRef Klampfl T, Gisslinger H, Harutyunyan AS, et al. Somatic mutations of calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. N Eng J Med. 2013;369:2379–90.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nangalia J, Massie CE, Baxter EJ, et al. Somatic CALR mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms with nonmutated JAK2. N Eng J Med. 2013;369:2391–405.CrossRef Nangalia J, Massie CE, Baxter EJ, et al. Somatic CALR mutations in myeloproliferative neoplasms with nonmutated JAK2. N Eng J Med. 2013;369:2391–405.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tefferi A, Lasho TL, Finke CM, et al. CALR vs JAK2 vs MPL-mutated or triple-negative myelofibrosis: clinical, cytogenetic and molecular comparisons. Leukemia. 2014;28:1472–7.PubMedCrossRef Tefferi A, Lasho TL, Finke CM, et al. CALR vs JAK2 vs MPL-mutated or triple-negative myelofibrosis: clinical, cytogenetic and molecular comparisons. Leukemia. 2014;28:1472–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Nangalia J, Green TR. The evolving genomic landscape of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2014;2014:287–96.PubMedCrossRef Nangalia J, Green TR. The evolving genomic landscape of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2014;2014:287–96.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Vainchenker W, Delhommeau F, Constantinescu SN, Bernard OA. New mutations and pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2011;118:1–3.CrossRef Vainchenker W, Delhommeau F, Constantinescu SN, Bernard OA. New mutations and pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2011;118:1–3.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Vannucchi AM, Lasho TL, Guglielmelli P, et al. Mutations and prognosis in primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2013;27:1861–9.PubMedCrossRef Vannucchi AM, Lasho TL, Guglielmelli P, et al. Mutations and prognosis in primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2013;27:1861–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Iurlo A, Cattaneo D, Gianelli U. Blast transformation in myeloproliferative neoplasms: risk factors, biological findings, and targeted therapeutic options. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1839.PubMedCentralCrossRef Iurlo A, Cattaneo D, Gianelli U. Blast transformation in myeloproliferative neoplasms: risk factors, biological findings, and targeted therapeutic options. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1839.PubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2009;113:2895–901.CrossRefPubMed Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2009;113:2895–901.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWGMRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010;115:1703–8.CrossRefPubMed Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWGMRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010;115:1703–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:392–7.CrossRefPubMed Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:392–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Rotunno G, et al. MIPSS70: mutation-enhanced international prognostic score system for transplantation-age patients with primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:310–8.CrossRefPubMed Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Rotunno G, et al. MIPSS70: mutation-enhanced international prognostic score system for transplantation-age patients with primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:310–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, et al. MIPSS70+ version 2.0: mutation and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1769–70 This is a new prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis, which considers the most recent information about the molecular landscape of this disease.PubMedCrossRef •• Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, et al. MIPSS70+ version 2.0: mutation and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1769–70 This is a new prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis, which considers the most recent information about the molecular landscape of this disease.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Nicolosi M, et al. GIPSS: genetically inspired prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2018;32:1631–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Nicolosi M, et al. GIPSS: genetically inspired prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2018;32:1631–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Iurlo A, Elli EM, Palandri F, et al. Integrating clinical, morphological, and molecular data to assess prognosis in patients with primary myelofibrosis at diagnosis: a practical approach. Hematol Oncol. 2019;37:424–33 This is a new prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis, more simple, and easier to use than the previous ones as it only required information that represent the good clinical practice in the management of this disease.PubMedCrossRef •• Iurlo A, Elli EM, Palandri F, et al. Integrating clinical, morphological, and molecular data to assess prognosis in patients with primary myelofibrosis at diagnosis: a practical approach. Hematol Oncol. 2019;37:424–33 This is a new prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis, more simple, and easier to use than the previous ones as it only required information that represent the good clinical practice in the management of this disease.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Passamonti F, Giorgino T, Mora B, et al. A clinical-molecular prognostic model to predict survival in patients with post polycythemia vera and post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2017;31:2726–31 This is the first prognostic scoring system which was specifically developed for post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis.CrossRefPubMed •• Passamonti F, Giorgino T, Mora B, et al. A clinical-molecular prognostic model to predict survival in patients with post polycythemia vera and post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2017;31:2726–31 This is the first prognostic scoring system which was specifically developed for post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Barbui T, Tefferi A, Vannucchi AM, et al. Philadelphia chromosome-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: revised management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet. Leukemia. 2018;32:1057–69 The most recent recommendations for the management of BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef •• Barbui T, Tefferi A, Vannucchi AM, et al. Philadelphia chromosome-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: revised management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet. Leukemia. 2018;32:1057–69 The most recent recommendations for the management of BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta V, Hari P, Hoffman R. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in the era of JAK inhibitors. Blood. 2012;120:1367–79.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gupta V, Hari P, Hoffman R. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in the era of JAK inhibitors. Blood. 2012;120:1367–79.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kröger NM, Deeg JH, Olavarria E, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in primary myelofibrosis: a consensus process by an EBMT/ELN international working group. Leukemia. 2015;29:2126–33.PubMedCrossRef Kröger NM, Deeg JH, Olavarria E, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in primary myelofibrosis: a consensus process by an EBMT/ELN international working group. Leukemia. 2015;29:2126–33.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Quintás-Cardama A, Vaddi K, Liu P, et al. Preclinical characterization of the selective JAK1/2 inhibitor INCB018424: therapeutic implications for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2010;115:3109–17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Quintás-Cardama A, Vaddi K, Liu P, et al. Preclinical characterization of the selective JAK1/2 inhibitor INCB018424: therapeutic implications for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2010;115:3109–17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Marchetti M, Barosi G, Cervantes F, et al. Which patients with myelofibrosis should receive ruxolitinib therapy? ELN-SIE evidence-based recommendations. Leukemia. 2017;31:882–8.PubMedCrossRef Marchetti M, Barosi G, Cervantes F, et al. Which patients with myelofibrosis should receive ruxolitinib therapy? ELN-SIE evidence-based recommendations. Leukemia. 2017;31:882–8.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:799–807.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:799–807.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrison C, Kiladjian J-J, Kathrin H, et al. JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:609–19.CrossRef Harrison C, Kiladjian J-J, Kathrin H, et al. JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:609–19.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ, et al. Long-term findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study of ruxolitinib vs best available therapy for myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2016;30:1701–7 The most recent update of the phase III COMFORT-II trial.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef •• Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ, et al. Long-term findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study of ruxolitinib vs best available therapy for myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2016;30:1701–7 The most recent update of the phase III COMFORT-II trial.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, et al. Long-term treatment with ruxolitinib for patients with myelofibrosis: 5-year update from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 COMFORT-I trial. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:55 The most recent update of the phase III COMFORT-I trial.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef •• Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, et al. Long-term treatment with ruxolitinib for patients with myelofibrosis: 5-year update from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 COMFORT-I trial. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:55 The most recent update of the phase III COMFORT-I trial.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Mead AJ, Milojkovic D, Knapper S, et al. Response to ruxolitinib in patients with intermediate-1-, intermediate-2-, and high-risk myelofibrosis: results of the UK ROBUST Trial. Br J Haematol. 2015;170:29–39.PubMedCrossRef Mead AJ, Milojkovic D, Knapper S, et al. Response to ruxolitinib in patients with intermediate-1-, intermediate-2-, and high-risk myelofibrosis: results of the UK ROBUST Trial. Br J Haematol. 2015;170:29–39.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Ali HK, Griesshammer M, le Coutre P, et al. Safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase 3b expanded-access study in patients with myelofibrosis: a snapshot of 1144 patients in the JUMP trial. Haematologica. 2016;101:1065–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Al-Ali HK, Griesshammer M, le Coutre P, et al. Safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase 3b expanded-access study in patients with myelofibrosis: a snapshot of 1144 patients in the JUMP trial. Haematologica. 2016;101:1065–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Kvasnicka H, Thiele J, Bueso-Ramos CE, et al. Long-term intervention effects on bone marrow morphology in myelofibrosis: patients treated with ruxolitinib and best available therapy [Abstract S591]. Haematologica. 2013;98:249. Kvasnicka H, Thiele J, Bueso-Ramos CE, et al. Long-term intervention effects on bone marrow morphology in myelofibrosis: patients treated with ruxolitinib and best available therapy [Abstract S591]. Haematologica. 2013;98:249.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkins BS, Radia D, Woodley C, et al. Resolution of bone marrow fibrosis in a patient receiving JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor treatment with ruxolitinib. Haematologica. 2013;98:1872–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wilkins BS, Radia D, Woodley C, et al. Resolution of bone marrow fibrosis in a patient receiving JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor treatment with ruxolitinib. Haematologica. 2013;98:1872–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Molica M, Serrao A, Saracino R, et al. Disappearance of fibrosis in secondary myelofibrosis after ruxolitinib treatment: new endpoint to achieve? Ann Hematol. 2014;93:1951–2.PubMedCrossRef Molica M, Serrao A, Saracino R, et al. Disappearance of fibrosis in secondary myelofibrosis after ruxolitinib treatment: new endpoint to achieve? Ann Hematol. 2014;93:1951–2.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Iurlo A, Cattaneo D, Boiocchi L, et al. Clinical and morphologic features in five post-polycythemic myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib. Ann Hematol. 2015;94:1749–51.PubMedCrossRef Iurlo A, Cattaneo D, Boiocchi L, et al. Clinical and morphologic features in five post-polycythemic myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib. Ann Hematol. 2015;94:1749–51.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Gianelli U, Vener C, Bossi A, et al. The European Consensus on grading of bone marrow fibrosis allows a better prognostication of patients with primary myelofibrosis. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:1193–202.PubMedCrossRef Gianelli U, Vener C, Bossi A, et al. The European Consensus on grading of bone marrow fibrosis allows a better prognostication of patients with primary myelofibrosis. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:1193–202.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Mora B, Guglielmelli P, Rumi E, et al. Impact of bone marrow fibrosis grade in post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: A study of the MYSEC group. Am J Hematol. 2020;95:E1–3.PubMedCrossRef Mora B, Guglielmelli P, Rumi E, et al. Impact of bone marrow fibrosis grade in post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: A study of the MYSEC group. Am J Hematol. 2020;95:E1–3.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Bose P, Verstovsek S. Management of Myelofibrosis-Related Cytopenias. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2018;13:164–72.PubMedCrossRef Bose P, Verstovsek S. Management of Myelofibrosis-Related Cytopenias. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2018;13:164–72.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Heine A, Brossart P, Wolf D. Ruxolitinib is a potent immunosuppressive compound: is it time for anti-infective prophylaxis? Blood. 2013;122:3843–4.PubMedCrossRef Heine A, Brossart P, Wolf D. Ruxolitinib is a potent immunosuppressive compound: is it time for anti-infective prophylaxis? Blood. 2013;122:3843–4.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Heine A, Held SA, Daecke SN, et al. The JAK-inhibitor ruxolitinib impairs dendritic cell function in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 2013;122:1192–202.PubMedCrossRef Heine A, Held SA, Daecke SN, et al. The JAK-inhibitor ruxolitinib impairs dendritic cell function in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 2013;122:1192–202.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Elli EM, Baratè C, Mendicino F, Palandri F, Palumbo GA. Mechanisms Underlying the Anti-inflammatory and Immunosuppressive Activity of Ruxolitinib. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1186.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Elli EM, Baratè C, Mendicino F, Palandri F, Palumbo GA. Mechanisms Underlying the Anti-inflammatory and Immunosuppressive Activity of Ruxolitinib. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1186.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Caocci G, Murgia F, Podda L, et al. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection following ruxolitinib treatment in a patient with myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2014;28:225–7.PubMedCrossRef Caocci G, Murgia F, Podda L, et al. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection following ruxolitinib treatment in a patient with myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2014;28:225–7.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Wysham NG, Sullivan DR, Allada G. An opportunistic infection associated with ruxolitinib, a novel janus kinase 1,2 inhibitor. Chest. 2013;143:1478–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wysham NG, Sullivan DR, Allada G. An opportunistic infection associated with ruxolitinib, a novel janus kinase 1,2 inhibitor. Chest. 2013;143:1478–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Tong LX, Jackson J, Kerstetter J, Worswick SD. Reactivation of herpes simplex virus infection in a patient undergoing ruxolitinib treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70:e59–60.PubMedCrossRef Tong LX, Jackson J, Kerstetter J, Worswick SD. Reactivation of herpes simplex virus infection in a patient undergoing ruxolitinib treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70:e59–60.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Hultcrantz M, Lund SH, Andersson TM, Björkholm M, Kristinsson S. Myeloproliferative neoplasms and infections; a population-based study on 9,665 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms diagnosed in Sweden 1987–2009 [Abstract 666]. Haematologica. 2015;100:260–1. Hultcrantz M, Lund SH, Andersson TM, Björkholm M, Kristinsson S. Myeloproliferative neoplasms and infections; a population-based study on 9,665 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms diagnosed in Sweden 1987–2009 [Abstract 666]. Haematologica. 2015;100:260–1.
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Sant'Antonio E, Bonifacio M, Breccia M, Rumi E. A journey through infectious risk associated with ruxolitinib. Br J Haematol. 2019;187:286–95.PubMedCrossRef Sant'Antonio E, Bonifacio M, Breccia M, Rumi E. A journey through infectious risk associated with ruxolitinib. Br J Haematol. 2019;187:286–95.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Porpaczy E, Tripolt S, Hoelbl-Kovacic A, et al. Aggressive B-cell lymphomas in patients with myelofibrosis receiving JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy. Blood. 2018;132:694–706 This is the first report of an increased risk of aggressive B cell lymphoma development during ruxolitinib treatment in primary myelofibrosis patients.PubMedCrossRef •• Porpaczy E, Tripolt S, Hoelbl-Kovacic A, et al. Aggressive B-cell lymphomas in patients with myelofibrosis receiving JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy. Blood. 2018;132:694–706 This is the first report of an increased risk of aggressive B cell lymphoma development during ruxolitinib treatment in primary myelofibrosis patients.PubMedCrossRef
55.
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Palandri F, Breccia M, Bonifacio M, et al. Life after ruxolitinib: reasons for discontinuation, impact of disease phase, and outcomes in 218 patients with myelofibrosis. Cancer. 2019 Dec;20 [epub ahead of print]. Palandri F, Breccia M, Bonifacio M, et al. Life after ruxolitinib: reasons for discontinuation, impact of disease phase, and outcomes in 218 patients with myelofibrosis. Cancer. 2019 Dec;20 [epub ahead of print].
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Pardanani A, Lasho T, Smith G, et al. CYT387, a selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor: in vitro assessment of kinase selectivity and preclinical studies using cell lines and primary cells from polycythemia vera patients. Leukemia. 2009;23:1441–5.PubMedCrossRef Pardanani A, Lasho T, Smith G, et al. CYT387, a selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor: in vitro assessment of kinase selectivity and preclinical studies using cell lines and primary cells from polycythemia vera patients. Leukemia. 2009;23:1441–5.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyner JW, Bumm TG, Deininger J, et al. CYT387, a novel JAK2 inhibitor, induces hematologic responses and normalizes inflammatory cytokines in murine myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2010;115:5232–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tyner JW, Bumm TG, Deininger J, et al. CYT387, a novel JAK2 inhibitor, induces hematologic responses and normalizes inflammatory cytokines in murine myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2010;115:5232–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Pardanani A, Laborde RR, Lasho TL, et al. Safety and efficacy of CYT387, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2013;27:1322–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pardanani A, Laborde RR, Lasho TL, et al. Safety and efficacy of CYT387, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2013;27:1322–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Pardanani A, Gotlib J, Roberts AW, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of momelotinib, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2018;32:1034–7.CrossRef Pardanani A, Gotlib J, Roberts AW, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of momelotinib, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2018;32:1034–7.CrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Pardanani A, Abdelrahman RA, Finke C, et al. Genetic determinants of response and survival in momelotinib-treated patients with myelofibrosis Leukemia. 2015;29:741–4. Pardanani A, Abdelrahman RA, Finke C, et al. Genetic determinants of response and survival in momelotinib-treated patients with myelofibrosis Leukemia. 2015;29:741–4.
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Spiegel JY, McNamara C, Kennedy JA, et al. Impact of genomic alterations on outcomes in myelofibrosis patients undergoing JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy. Blood Adv. 2017;1:1729–38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Spiegel JY, McNamara C, Kennedy JA, et al. Impact of genomic alterations on outcomes in myelofibrosis patients undergoing JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy. Blood Adv. 2017;1:1729–38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta V, Mesa RA, Deininger MW, et al. A phase 1/2, open-label study evaluating twice-daily administration of momelotinib in myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2017;102:94–102.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gupta V, Mesa RA, Deininger MW, et al. A phase 1/2, open-label study evaluating twice-daily administration of momelotinib in myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2017;102:94–102.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Mesa RA, Kiladjian JJ, Catalano JV, et al. SIMPLIFY-1: a phase III randomized trial of momelotinib versus ruxolitinib in Janus kinase inhibitor-naïve patients with myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3844–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mesa RA, Kiladjian JJ, Catalano JV, et al. SIMPLIFY-1: a phase III randomized trial of momelotinib versus ruxolitinib in Janus kinase inhibitor-naïve patients with myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3844–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Platzbecker U, et al. Momelotinib versus best available therapy in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (SIMPLIFY 2): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5:e73–81.PubMedCrossRef Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Platzbecker U, et al. Momelotinib versus best available therapy in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (SIMPLIFY 2): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5:e73–81.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Hood J, Cao J, Chow C, et al. Development of TG101348 for the treatment of JAK2-driven malignancies. J Clin Onc. 2008;26(Suppl 15):7083.CrossRef Hood J, Cao J, Chow C, et al. Development of TG101348 for the treatment of JAK2-driven malignancies. J Clin Onc. 2008;26(Suppl 15):7083.CrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Wernig G, Kharas MG, Okabe R, et al. Efficacy of TG101348, a selective JAK2 inhibitor, in treatment of a murine model of JAK2V617F-induced polycythemia vera. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:311–20.PubMedCrossRef Wernig G, Kharas MG, Okabe R, et al. Efficacy of TG101348, a selective JAK2 inhibitor, in treatment of a murine model of JAK2V617F-induced polycythemia vera. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:311–20.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Pardanani A, Gotlib J, Jamieson C, et al. Safety and efficacy of TG101348, a selective JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:789–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pardanani A, Gotlib J, Jamieson C, et al. Safety and efficacy of TG101348, a selective JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:789–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Pardanani A, Tefferi A, Jamieson C, et al. A phase 2 randomized dose-ranging study of the JAK2-selective inhibitor fedratinib (SAR302503) in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood Cancer J. 2015;5:e335.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pardanani A, Tefferi A, Jamieson C, et al. A phase 2 randomized dose-ranging study of the JAK2-selective inhibitor fedratinib (SAR302503) in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood Cancer J. 2015;5:e335.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrison CN, Schaap N, Vannucchi AM, et al. Janus kinase-2 inhibitor fedratinib in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (JAKARTA-2): a single-arm, open-label, non-randomised, phase 2, multicentre study. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4:e317–24.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Harrison CN, Schaap N, Vannucchi AM, et al. Janus kinase-2 inhibitor fedratinib in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (JAKARTA-2): a single-arm, open-label, non-randomised, phase 2, multicentre study. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4:e317–24.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Pardanani A, Harrison C, Cortes JE, et al. Safety and efficacy of fedratinib in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:643–51.PubMedCrossRef Pardanani A, Harrison C, Cortes JE, et al. Safety and efficacy of fedratinib in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:643–51.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrison CN, Mesa RA, Jamieson C, et al. Case series of potential Wernicke's encephalopathy in patients treated with fedratinib. Blood. 2017;130:4197.CrossRef Harrison CN, Mesa RA, Jamieson C, et al. Case series of potential Wernicke's encephalopathy in patients treated with fedratinib. Blood. 2017;130:4197.CrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Verstovsek S, Harrison CN, Barosi G, Kiladjian JJ, Buglio D, Chia V. FREEDOM: a phase 3b efficacy and safety study of fedratinib in intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis patients previously treated with ruxolitinib. J Clin Oncol. 2019 May;26 [epub ahead of print]. Verstovsek S, Harrison CN, Barosi G, Kiladjian JJ, Buglio D, Chia V. FREEDOM: a phase 3b efficacy and safety study of fedratinib in intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis patients previously treated with ruxolitinib. J Clin Oncol. 2019 May;26 [epub ahead of print].
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Singer JW, Al-Fayoumi S, Ma H, et al. Comprehensive kinase profile of pacritinib, a non myelosuppressive Janus kinase 2 inhibitor. J Exp Pharmacol. 2016;8:11–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Singer JW, Al-Fayoumi S, Ma H, et al. Comprehensive kinase profile of pacritinib, a non myelosuppressive Janus kinase 2 inhibitor. J Exp Pharmacol. 2016;8:11–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Verstovsek S, Odenike O, Singer JW, et al. Phase 1/2 study of pacritinib, a next generation JAK2/FLT3 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis or other myeloid malignancies. J Hematol Oncol. 2016;9(1):137.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Verstovsek S, Odenike O, Singer JW, et al. Phase 1/2 study of pacritinib, a next generation JAK2/FLT3 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis or other myeloid malignancies. J Hematol Oncol. 2016;9(1):137.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Komrokji RS, Seymour JF, Roberts AW, et al. Results of a phase 2 study of pacritinib (SB1518), a JAK2/JAK2(V617F) inhibitor, in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2015;125:2649–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Komrokji RS, Seymour JF, Roberts AW, et al. Results of a phase 2 study of pacritinib (SB1518), a JAK2/JAK2(V617F) inhibitor, in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2015;125:2649–55.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Mesa RA, Vannucchi AM, Mead A, et al. Pacritinib versus best available therapy for the treatment of myelofibrosis irrespective of baseline cytopenias (PERSIST-1): an international, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4:e225–36.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Mesa RA, Vannucchi AM, Mead A, et al. Pacritinib versus best available therapy for the treatment of myelofibrosis irrespective of baseline cytopenias (PERSIST-1): an international, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2017;4:e225–36.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Mascarenhas J, Hoffman R, Talpaz M, et al. Pacritinib vs best available therapy, including ruxolitinib, in patients with myelofibrosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:652–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Mascarenhas J, Hoffman R, Talpaz M, et al. Pacritinib vs best available therapy, including ruxolitinib, in patients with myelofibrosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:652–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Diaz AE, Mesa RA. Pacritinib and its use in the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis who have thrombocytopenia. Future Oncol. 2018;14:797–807.PubMedCrossRef Diaz AE, Mesa RA. Pacritinib and its use in the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis who have thrombocytopenia. Future Oncol. 2018;14:797–807.PubMedCrossRef
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Kremyanskaya M, Hoffman R, Mascarenhas J, et al. A phase 2 study of Cpi-0610, a bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) inhibitor, in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):5481.CrossRef Kremyanskaya M, Hoffman R, Mascarenhas J, et al. A phase 2 study of Cpi-0610, a bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) inhibitor, in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):5481.CrossRef
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleppe M, Koche R, Zou L, et al. Dual targeting of oncogenic activation and inflammatory signaling increases therapeutic efficacy in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:29–43e7.PubMedCrossRef Kleppe M, Koche R, Zou L, et al. Dual targeting of oncogenic activation and inflammatory signaling increases therapeutic efficacy in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:29–43e7.PubMedCrossRef
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Sashida G, Wang C, Tomioka T, et al. The loss of Ezh2 drives the pathogenesis of myelofibrosis and sensitizes tumor-initiating cells to bromodomain inhibition. J Exp Med. 2016;213:1459–77.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sashida G, Wang C, Tomioka T, et al. The loss of Ezh2 drives the pathogenesis of myelofibrosis and sensitizes tumor-initiating cells to bromodomain inhibition. J Exp Med. 2016;213:1459–77.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Mascarenhas J, Kremyanskaya M, Hoffman R, et al. MANIFEST, a phase 2 study of CPI-0610, a bromodomain and extraterminal domain inhibitor (BETi), as monotherapy or “add-on” to ruxolitinib, in patients with refractory or intolerant advanced myelofibrosis (abstract). Blood. 2019. Mascarenhas J, Kremyanskaya M, Hoffman R, et al. MANIFEST, a phase 2 study of CPI-0610, a bromodomain and extraterminal domain inhibitor (BETi), as monotherapy or “add-on” to ruxolitinib, in patients with refractory or intolerant advanced myelofibrosis (abstract). Blood. 2019.
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrison CN, Patriarca A, Mascarenhas J, et al. Preliminary report of MANIFEST, a phase 2 study of CPI-0610, a bromodomain and extraterminal domain inhibitor (BETi), in combination with ruxolitinib in Jak inhibitor (JAKi) treatment naïve myelofibrosis patients (abstract). Blood. 2019. Harrison CN, Patriarca A, Mascarenhas J, et al. Preliminary report of MANIFEST, a phase 2 study of CPI-0610, a bromodomain and extraterminal domain inhibitor (BETi), in combination with ruxolitinib in Jak inhibitor (JAKi) treatment naïve myelofibrosis patients (abstract). Blood. 2019.
87.
Zurück zum Zitat Bose P, Daver N, Pemmaraju N, et al. Sotatercept (ACE-011) alone and in combination with ruxolitinib in patients (pts) with myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated myelofibrosis (MF) and anemia. Blood. 2017;130(suppl 1):255. Bose P, Daver N, Pemmaraju N, et al. Sotatercept (ACE-011) alone and in combination with ruxolitinib in patients (pts) with myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated myelofibrosis (MF) and anemia. Blood. 2017;130(suppl 1):255.
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Foltz LM, et al. Phase 2 trial of PRM-151, an anti-fibrotic agent, in patients with myelofibrosis: stage 1 results. Blood. 2014;124(21):713.CrossRef Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Foltz LM, et al. Phase 2 trial of PRM-151, an anti-fibrotic agent, in patients with myelofibrosis: stage 1 results. Blood. 2014;124(21):713.CrossRef
89.
Zurück zum Zitat Gangat N, Stein BL, Marinaccio C, et al. Alisertib (MLN8237), an oral selective inhibitor of aurora kinase A, has clinical activity and restores GATA1 expression in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):688.CrossRef Gangat N, Stein BL, Marinaccio C, et al. Alisertib (MLN8237), an oral selective inhibitor of aurora kinase A, has clinical activity and restores GATA1 expression in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):688.CrossRef
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Mascarenhas J, Komrokji RS, Cavo M, et al. Imetelstat is effective treatment for patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis who have relapsed on or are refractory to janus kinase inhibitor therapy: results of a phase 2 randomized study of two dose levels. Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):685.CrossRef Mascarenhas J, Komrokji RS, Cavo M, et al. Imetelstat is effective treatment for patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis who have relapsed on or are refractory to janus kinase inhibitor therapy: results of a phase 2 randomized study of two dose levels. Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):685.CrossRef
91.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerds AT, Tauchi T, Ritchie E, et al. Phase 1/2 trial of glasdegib in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib [published correction appears in Leuk Res. 2019;81:105]. Leuk Res. 2019;79:38–44.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Gerds AT, Tauchi T, Ritchie E, et al. Phase 1/2 trial of glasdegib in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib [published correction appears in Leuk Res. 2019;81:105]. Leuk Res. 2019;79:38–44.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
92.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta V, Harrison CN, Hasselbalch H, et al. Phase 1b/2 study of the efficacy and safety of sonidegib (LDE225) in combination with ruxolitinib (INC424) in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2015;126:825.CrossRef Gupta V, Harrison CN, Hasselbalch H, et al. Phase 1b/2 study of the efficacy and safety of sonidegib (LDE225) in combination with ruxolitinib (INC424) in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2015;126:825.CrossRef
93.
Zurück zum Zitat Durrant ST, Nagler A, Guglielmelli P, et al. Results from HARMONY: an open-label, multicentre, 2-arm, phase 1b, dose-finding study assessing the safety and efficacy of the oral combination of ruxolitinib and buparlisib in patients with myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2019;104:e551–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Durrant ST, Nagler A, Guglielmelli P, et al. Results from HARMONY: an open-label, multicentre, 2-arm, phase 1b, dose-finding study assessing the safety and efficacy of the oral combination of ruxolitinib and buparlisib in patients with myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2019;104:e551–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
94.
Zurück zum Zitat Daver NG, Kremyanskaya M, O’Connell C, et al. A phase 2 study of the safety and efficacy of INCB050465, a selective PI3Kd inhibitor, in combination with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):353.CrossRef Daver NG, Kremyanskaya M, O’Connell C, et al. A phase 2 study of the safety and efficacy of INCB050465, a selective PI3Kd inhibitor, in combination with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2018;132(suppl 1):353.CrossRef
95.
Zurück zum Zitat Mascarenhas J, Lu M, Li T, et al. A phase I study of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-polycythaemia vera/essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF). Br J Haematol. 2013;161:68-75.PubMedCrossRef Mascarenhas J, Lu M, Li T, et al. A phase I study of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-polycythaemia vera/essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF). Br J Haematol. 2013;161:68-75.PubMedCrossRef
96.
Zurück zum Zitat DeAngelo DJ, Mesa RA, Fiskus W, et al. Phase II trial of panobinostat, an oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor in patients with primary myelofibrosis, post-essential thrombocythaemia, and post-polycythaemia vera myelofibrosis. Br J Haematol. 2013;162:326–35.PubMedCrossRef DeAngelo DJ, Mesa RA, Fiskus W, et al. Phase II trial of panobinostat, an oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor in patients with primary myelofibrosis, post-essential thrombocythaemia, and post-polycythaemia vera myelofibrosis. Br J Haematol. 2013;162:326–35.PubMedCrossRef
97.
Zurück zum Zitat Mascarenhas J, Sandy L, Lu M, et al. A phase II study of panobinostat in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF). Leuk Res. 2017;53:13–9.PubMedCrossRef Mascarenhas J, Sandy L, Lu M, et al. A phase II study of panobinostat in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF). Leuk Res. 2017;53:13–9.PubMedCrossRef
98.
Zurück zum Zitat Mascarenhas J, Marcellino BK, Lu M, et al. A phase I study of panobinostat and ruxolitinib in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF). Leuk Res. 2020;88:106272.PubMedCrossRef Mascarenhas J, Marcellino BK, Lu M, et al. A phase I study of panobinostat and ruxolitinib in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (post-PV/ET MF). Leuk Res. 2020;88:106272.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Management of Myelofibrosis: from Diagnosis to New Target Therapies
verfasst von
Alessandra Iurlo, MD, PhD
Daniele Cattaneo, MD
Cristina Bucelli, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Treatment Options in Oncology / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1527-2729
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6277
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-020-00734-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

Current Treatment Options in Oncology 6/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Neuroendocrine Cancers (JR Strosberg, Section Editor)

Hereditary Syndromes in Neuroendocrine Tumors

Skin Cancer (T Ito, Section Editor)

Current Treatment of Melanoma Brain Metastasis

Leukemia (PH Wiernik, Section Editor)

Biology and Treatment of Hairy Cell Leukemia

Neuroendocrine Cancers (JR Strosberg, Section Editor)

Surgical Principles in the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

25.04.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Das Risiko für Rezidiv oder Tod von Patienten und Patientinnen mit reseziertem ALK-positivem NSCLC ist unter einer adjuvanten Therapie mit dem Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitor Alectinib signifikant geringer als unter platinbasierter Chemotherapie.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.