nach oben

Odontology

Erschienen in:

01.11.2016 | Original Article

Marginal integrity of low-shrinking versus methacrylate-based composite: effect of different one-step self-etch adhesives

verfasst von: Ladislav Gregor, Lefever Dorien, Tissiana Bortolotto, Albert J. Feilzer, Ivo Krejci

Erschienen in: Odontology | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of composite type and adhesive system on the quality of marginal adaptation in standardized Class V cavities before and after thermo-mechanical loading (TML). The cavities were restored using different combinations of three adhesive systems [(Silorane System Adhesive (SSA), Clearfil S³ Bond (S3), G-Bond (G-B)] and two resin composite materials (Filtek Silorane, Clearfil AP-X). Six groups (n = 10): Group A (SSA-Primer + SSA-Bond, Filtek Silorane), Group B (SSA-Primer + SSA-Bond, Clearfil AP-X), Group C (S3 + SSA-Bond, Filtek Silorane), Group D (S3 + SSA-Bond, Clearfil AP-X), Group E (G-B + SSA-Bond, Filtek Silorane) and Group F (G-B + SSA-Bond, Clearfil AP-X) were defined. Marginal adaptation was assessed on replicas in the SEM at 200 × magnification before and after TML (3000 × 5–55 °C, 1.2 10⁶ × 49 N; 1.7 Hz) under simulated dentinal fluid. The highest scores of continuous margins (%CM) were observed in the group F (G-B + SSA-Bond, Clearfil AP-X: before loading 96.4 (±3.2)/after loading 90.8 (±7.0)). A significant effect of adhesive system, composite type and loading interval was observed on the results (p < 0.05). Significantly lower scores of %CM were observed for silorane-based composite (Filtek Silorane) after TML in comparison with methacrylate-based composite (Clearfil AP-X) considering total marginal length (p < 0.05). For both Filtek Silorane and Clearfil AP-X, G-Bond performed significantly better than SSA-Primer and Clearfil S³ Bond (p < 0.05). For all combinations of one-step self-etch adhesives and SSA-Bond resin coating, silorane-based low-shrinking composite exhibited inferior marginal adaptation than did the methacrylate-based composite.

Ferracane JL. Buonacore memorial lecture. placing dental composites: a stressful axperience. Oper Dent. 2008;33:247–57.CrossRefPubMed

Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1636–9.CrossRefPubMed

Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2005;21:1150–7.CrossRefPubMed

Bouillaguet S, Gamba J, Forchelet J, Krejci I, Wataha JC. Dynamics of composite polymerization mediates the development of cuspal strain. Dent Mater. 2006;22:896–902.CrossRefPubMed

Pashley DH. Clinical considerations of microleakage. J Endod. 1990;16:70–7.CrossRefPubMed

Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R. Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater. 2005;21:68–74.CrossRefPubMed

Eick JD, Cota SP, Chappelow CC, Kilway KV, Giese GJ, Claros AG, Pinzino CS. Properties of silorane-based dental resins and composites containing a stress-reducing monomer. Dent Mater. 2007;23:1011–7.CrossRefPubMed

Mine A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Kuboki T, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. TEM characterization of a silorane composite bonded to enamel/dentin. Dent Mater. 2010;26:524–32.CrossRefPubMed

Odian G. Principles of polymerization. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1991. p. 541–4.

10.

Agrawal V, Parekh V, Shah N. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of silorane-based composite and nanohybrid composite with or without polyethylene fiber inserts in Class II restorations: an in vitro study. Oper Dent. 2012;37:1–7.

11.

Borges AF, Santos Jde S, Ramos CM, Ishikiriama SK, Shinohara MS. Effect of thermo-mechanical load cycling on silorane-based composite restorations. Dent Mater J. 2012;31:1054–9.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Gregor L, Bortolotto T, Feilzer AJ, Krejci I. Shrinkage kinetics of a methacrylate- and a silorane-based resin composite: effect on marginal integrity. J Adhes Dent. 2013;15:245–50.PubMed

13.

Krifka S, Federlin M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based Class V composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:1117–24.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Mahmoud SH, Al-Wakeel Eel S. Marginal adaptation of ormocer-, silorane-, and methacrylate-based composite restorative systems bonded to dentin cavities after water storage. Quintessence Int. 2011;42:131–9.

15.

Yazici AR, Ustunkol I, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations. Oper Dent. 2014;39:248–55.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Mahmoud SH, Ali AK, Hegazi HA. A three-year prospective randomized study of silorane- and methacrylate-based composite restorative systems in class II restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16:285–92.PubMed

17.

Yaman BC, Doğruer I, Gümüştaş B, Efes BG. Three-year randomized clinical evaluation of a low-shrinkage silorane-based resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:1071–9.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Schmidt M, Dige I, Kirkevang LL, Vaeth M, Hørsted-Bindslev P. Five-year evaluation of a low-shrinkage Silorane resin composite material: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:245–51.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Bortolotto T, Doudou W, Kunzelmann KH, Krejci I. The competition between enamel and dentin adhesion within a cavity: an in vitro evaluation of Class V restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16:1125–35.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Mayoral JR, Gregor L, Campos EA, Roig M, Krejci I. Marginal seal stability of one bottle adhesives in Class V vs. Class I cavities. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15:257–64.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Duarte S Jr, Phark JH, Varjão FM, Sadan A. Nanoleakage, ultramorphological characteristics, and microtensile bond strengths of a new low-shrinkage composite to dentin after artificial aging. Dent Mater. 2009;25:589–600.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Van Ende A, De Munck J, Mine A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Does a low-shrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface? Dent Mater. 2010;26:215–22.CrossRefPubMed

23.

D’Alpino PH, de Farias NC, Silva MS, de Goes MF, González AH, Di Hipólito V. Compatibility between silorane adhesive and simplified methacrylate-based adhesive systems. Dent Mater J. 2013;32:263–73.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007;28:3757–85.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2005;21:895–910.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Takahashi M, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Long-term evaluation of water sorption and ultimate tensile strength of HEMA-containing/-free one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent. 2011;39:506–12.CrossRefPubMed

27.

van Dijken JW. A randomized controlled 5-year prospective study of two HEMA-free adhesives, a 1-step self etching and a 3-step etch-and-rinse, in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater. 2013;29:271–80.CrossRef

28.

Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Ermis RB, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. Five-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free one-step self-etch adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:1045–52.PubMed

29.

van Dijken JW. A 6-year prospective evaluation of a one-step HEMA-free self-etching adhesive in Class II restorations. Dent Mater. 2013;29:1116–22.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Blunck U, Zaslansky P. Enamel margin integrity of class I one-bottle all-in-one adhesives-based restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2011;13:23–9.PubMed

31.

Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental 26. restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990;100:953–60.PubMed

32.

Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko SA, Reich SM. Marginal integrity: is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro? J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:107–16.PubMed

33.

Heintze SD. Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(Suppl 1):77–106.PubMed

34.

Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore memorial lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004;29:481–508.PubMed

35.

Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, Cenci MS, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U, Gaengler P, Lindberg A, Huysmans MC, van Dijken JW. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014;93(10):943–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Dietschi D, Olsburgh S, Krejci I, Davidson C. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003;111:73–80.CrossRefPubMed

37.

De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005;84:118–32.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Tay FR, Frankenberger R, Krejci I, Bouillaguet S, Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Lai CN. Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. I. In vivo evidence. J Dent. 2004;32:611–21.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Tay FR, Pashley DH. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69:726–31.PubMed

40.

Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh B, Carvalho R, Miller M. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part I. Bond strength and morphologic evidence. Am J Dent. 2004;17:271–8.PubMed

41.

Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Origin of interfacial droplets with one-step adhesives. J Dent Res. 2007;86:739–44.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Albuquerque M, Pegoraro M, Mattei G, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effect of double-application or the application of a hydrophobic layer for improved efficacy of one-step self-etch systems in enamel and dentin. Oper Dent. 2008;33:564–70.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Reis A, Albuquerque M, Pegoraro M, Mattei G, Bauer JR, Grande RH, Klein-Junior CA, Baumhardt-Neto R, Loguercio AD. Can the durability of one-step self-etch adhesives be improved by double application or by an extra layer of hydrophobic resin? J Dent. 2008;36:309–15.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Reis A, Leite TM, Matte K, Michels R, Amaral RC, Geraldeli S, Loguercio AD. Improving clinical retention of one-step self-etching adhesive systems with an additional hydrophobic adhesive layer. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140:877–85.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Carvalho AO, Oliveira MT, Nikaido T, Tagami J, Giannini M. Effect of adhesive system and application strategy on reduction of dentin permeability. Braz Oral Res. 2012;26:397–403.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Santini A, Miletic V. Comparison of the hybrid layer formed by Silorane adhesive, one-step self-etch and etch and rinse systems using confocal micro-Raman spectroscopy and SEM. J Dent. 2008;36:683–91.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Van Ende A, Mine A, De Munck J, Poitevin A, Van Meerbeek A. Bonding of low-shrinking composites in high C-factor cavities. J Dent. 2012;40:295–303.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Moura SK, Pelizzaro A, Dal Bianco K, de Goes MF, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Grande RH. Does the acidity of self-etching primers affect bond strength and surface morphology of enamel? J Adhes Dent. 2006;8:75–83.PubMed

49.

Ikeda T, De Munck J, Shirai K, Hikita K, Inoue S, Sano H, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Effect if air-drying and solvent evaporation on the strength of HEMA-rich versus HEMA-free one-step adhesives. Dent Mater. 2008;24:1316–23.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004;83:454–8.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Okihara T, Matsumoto T, Minagi S, Osaka A, Van Landuyt K, Van Meerbeek B. HEMA inhibits interfacial nano-layering of the functional monomer MDP. J Dent Res. 2012;91:1060–5.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Marginal integrity of low-shrinking versus methacrylate-based composite: effect of different one-step self-etch adhesives
verfasst von: Ladislav Gregor
Lefever Dorien
Tissiana Bortolotto
Albert J. Feilzer
Ivo Krejci
Publikationsdatum: 01.11.2016
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: Odontology / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1618-1247
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-1255
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0274-1

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Marginal integrity of low-shrinking versus methacrylate-based composite: effect of different one-step self-etch adhesives

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Localization and expression pattern of amelotin, odontogenic ameloblast-associated protein and follicular dendritic cell-secreted protein in the junctional epithelium of inflamed gingiva

The utility of bone scintigraphy in the assessment of mandibular metabolism during long-term bisphosphonate administration

Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on bovine enamel surface during in-office tooth bleaching ex vivo

Effect of adhesive system application for cavities prepared with erbium, chromium: yttrium scandium gallium garnet laser on rat dental pulp tissue

Soft tissue changes after a mandibular osteotomy for symmetric skeletal class III malocclusion

Use of a continual sweep motion to compare air polishing devices, powders and exposure time on unexposed root cementum

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter