nach oben

Erschienen in:

17.09.2019 | Responses to "Advancing quality‑of‑life research by deepening our understanding of response shift" by Bruce D. Rapkin & Carolyn E. Schwartz

Measurement of appraisal is a valuable adjunct to the current spine outcome tools: a clinician’s perspective on the Rapkin and Schwartz commentary

verfasst von: Joel A. Finkelstein

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 10/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

I have read with interest the commentary by Bruce Rapkin and Carolyn Schwartz, “Advancing quality-of-life research by deepening our understanding of response shift: A unifying theory of appraisal” [1]. These authors have identified the teleological assumption that there can be no quality-of-life (QOL) measurement and no patient-reported outcomes without some sort of cognitive appraisal going on. The QOL Appraisal Model by Rapkin and Schwartz [2] has built on the original foundational model of Sprangers and Schwartz [3] and enables the researcher to account for a mechanism of response shift at the individual level. The hard work now begins and putting a box around this abstraction with scientific rigor is the achievement I feel this commentary has outlined. I will speak to this from my area of clinical practice as a spine surgeon. …

Rapkin, B. D., & Schwartz, C. E. (2019). Advancing quality-of-life research by deepening our understanding of response shift: A unifying theory of appraisal. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02248-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rapkin, B. D., & Schwartz, C. E. (2004). Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2(1), 14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515.CrossRefPubMed

Schwartz, C. E., Ayandeh, A., & Finkelstein, J. A. (2015). When patients and surgeons disagree about surgical outcome: Investigating patient factors and chart note communication. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13(1), 161.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Finkelstein, J. A., Quaranto, B. R., & Schwartz, C. E. (2014). Threats to the internal validity of spinal surgery outcome assessment: Recalibration response shift or implicit theories of change? Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-013-9221-2.CrossRef

Schwartz, C. E., Zhang, J., Rapkin, B. D., & Finkelstein, J. A. (2019). Reconsidering the minimally important difference: Evidence of instability over time and across groups. The Spine Journal, 19, 726–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.09.010.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Measurement of appraisal is a valuable adjunct to the current spine outcome tools: a clinician’s perspective on the Rapkin and Schwartz commentary
verfasst von: Joel A. Finkelstein
Publikationsdatum: 17.09.2019
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02275-w

Springer Medizin

Excerpt

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2019

Introduction to “Advancing quality‑of‑life research by deepening our understanding of response shift”

Advancing quality-of-life research by deepening our understanding of response shift: a unifying theory of appraisal

A systematic scoping review of oral health models

Towards patients’ understanding of health-related quality of life—a mixed-method study in psoriasis and multiple sclerosis

Measurement properties of PROMIS short forms for pain and function in orthopedic foot and ankle surgery patients

A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences