Background
Methods
Literature search strategy
Selection of papers
Data extraction
Study demographics
Adherence measures
Data analysis
Results
Literature search and study selection
Study design
Number of studies | |
---|---|
Study design | |
RCT | 5 |
Cohort | 10 |
Case series | 2 |
Data collection | |
Prospective | 13 |
Retrospective | 4 |
Number of centres | |
Single-centre | 7 |
Multi-centre | 6 |
Unclear | 4 |
Country | |
UK | 2 |
Europe | 3 |
North America | 8 |
Asia | 3 |
Australasia | 1 |
Sample size | |
Median | 64 |
Range | 1–188 |
Anatomical location | |
Shoulder | 5 |
Hand/wrist | 8 |
Knee | 2 |
Foot/ankle | 2 |
Author + year | Study design | No. of centres | Country | Sample size (no. of patients) | Medical condition | Type of orthosis | Instructions for daily use | Method of instruction | Duration of immobilisation | Adherence measure(s) used | Risk of bias in assessment of adherence |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cuff 2012 [9] | Prospective cohort | Unclear | USA | 92 | Post-op rotator cuff repair | Shoulder immobiliser | Removal only for exercise, bathing, dressing | Verbal | 6 weeks | Single-item questionnaire + recorded therapy attendance | Low (objective assessment) |
Groth 1994 [10] | Retrospective cohort | Multi-centre | USA | 44 | Acute mallet finger injury | Finger splint | Removal only for finger hygiene | Verbal | Between 6 and 8 weeks | Multi-item questionnaire + therapist observation + recorded therapy attendance | Indeterminate (insufficient information) |
Guillodo 2011 [23] | Prospective cohort | Multi-centre | France | 111 | Sprained ankle | Aircast semi-rigid ankle brace | Not reported | Not reported | Between 5 and 6 weeks | Multi-item questionnaire | Low (independent assessor) |
Itoi 2013 [19] | Randomised controlled trial | Multi-centre | Japan | 109 | Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation | Shoulder immobiliser | Removal only for bathing | Verbal | 3 weeks | Unclear | Indeterminate (insufficient information) |
Liavaag 2011 [20] | Randomised controlled trial | Multi-centre | Norway | 188 | Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation | Shoulder immobiliser | Removal only for sleeping, bathing, dressing | Verbal + written | 3 weeks | Home diary | Low (independent patient report) |
McGrath 2008 [24] | Prospective cohort | Unclear | USA | 47 | Wrist stiffness post-trauma/surgery | Adjustable wrist brace | Worn intermittently dependent on progress | Verbal | Dependent on progress (mean 10 weeks) | Discussion with patient | Indeterminate (insufficient information) |
Midgley 2011 [25] | Prospective cohort | Single-centre | UK | 50 | Metacarpal fracture | Hand splint | Not reported | Written | 4 weeks | Multi-item questionnaire | Low (independent assessor) |
O’Brien 2011 [11] | Randomised controlled trial | Multi-centre | Australia | 64 | Acute mallet finger injury | Finger splint | Removal only for finger hygiene | Written | 8 weeks | Home diary + therapist observation + recorded therapy attendance | Low (independent patient report) |
Rives 1992 [13] | Prospective cohort | Unclear | USA | 23 | Surgically managed proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) contraction | Finger splint | Worn continuously | Verbal | 6 months | Discussion with patient | High (patient + clinician discussion) |
Rankin 2000 [26] | Prospective cohort | Unclear | Canada | 77 | Post-op anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction | Knee brace | Worn during high-risk sports | Not reported | 6–18 months | Multi-item questionnaire | Low (postal questionnaire) |
Roh 2016 [12] | Prospective cohort | Single-centre | South Korea | 72 | Acute mallet finger injury | Finger splint | Removal only for finger hygiene | Written | 7 weeks | Single-item questionnaire | Low (independent assessor) |
Sandford 2008 [28] | Retrospective cohort | Single-centre | UK | 80 | Post-op flexor/extensor tendon repair | Long forearm splint | Worn continuously | Not reported | 4 weeks | Multi-item questionnaire | Low (independent patient report) |
Silverio 2014 [27] | Prospective cohort | Single-centre | USA | 50 | Post-op rotator cuff repair | Shoulder immobiliser | Removal only for exercise, bathing, dressing | Verbal | 6 weeks | Multi-item questionnaire | Medium (questionnaire given by clinician at follow-up) |
Swirtun 2005 [21] | Randomised controlled trial | Single-centre | Sweden | 95 | ACL rupture (conservative management) | Knee brace | Worn during all daytime activities | Verbal | 12 weeks | Single-item questionnaire | Indeterminate (insufficient information) |
Whelan 2014 [22] | Randomised controlled trial | Multi-centre | Canada | 60 | Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation | Shoulder immobiliser | Removal only for exercise, bathing, dressing | Written | 4 weeks | Home diary + multi-item questionnaire | Low (independent patient report) |
Wollstein 2012 [29] | Case report | Single-centre | USA | 1 | PIPJ contracture | Finger splint | Not reported | Not reported | 12 weeks | Home diary | Indeterminate (insufficient information) |
Yang 2011 [30] | Case report | Single-centre | Taiwan | 1 | Lisfranc injury | Foot brace | Not reported | Not reported | Unclear | Discussion with patient | High (patient + clinician discussion) |
Adherence measures
Patient questionnaires
Study name | Assessor | Method of questionnaire administration | Validated tool? | Timing of assessment | Description of measure | Adherence score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Target behaviour | Response type | ||||||
Swirtun 2005 [21] | Patient | ‘Paper’ no other details provided | No | Weeks 8 & 12 post-injury | Daily usage of brace | Percentage of daily activities brace used (ordinal): 0–25%, 26–50%, 51–75%, 76–99%, 100% | Percentage in each group |
Cuff 2012 [9] | Clinician | Unclear | No | Days 1, 2, 3 (home visit) Clinic at 1, 3, 6 weeks | Wearing brace | Dichotomous: Yes/No | Non-compliant: 1+ non-compliant event recorded |
Roh 2016 [12] | Patient | Unclear | No | Week 7 post-injury (at splint removal) | Splint removal | Ordinal: 3 = never removed (or only with extreme care), 2 = accidentally dislodged or loose but instantly replaced, 1 = not worn properly or removed several times | 3: Compliant 2: Secondary compliant 1: Non-compliant |
Study name | Assessor | Method of questionnaire administration | Validated tool? | Timing of assessment | Description of measure | Adherence score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of items | Target behaviour | Response type | Combined score? | Description | |||||
Groth 1994 [10] | Patient | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | 2 | 1. Use of splint as prescribed 2. Adherence to exercise programme | Dichotomous: Yes/No | Yes | Adherent = Yes to both |
Guillodo 2011 [23] | Patient | Telephone call | No | 60–90 days post-injury | 2 | 1. Use of brace 2. Length of use (total days) | 1. Dichotomous Yes/No 2. Continuous: no. of days | No | Reported individually |
Midgley 2011 [25] | Patient | Telephone call | No | Min 10 weeks post-injury | 2 | 1. Compliance with splint use (subjective) 2. Length of use (total weeks) | 1. Dichotomous Yes/No 2. Continuous: no. of weeks | No | Reported individually |
Rankin 2000 [26] | Patient | Postal questionnaire | Pre-tested, not validated | 12–36 months post-reconstruction | 16 | 1. Compliance with splint use during different sports 2. Compliance with home exercise programme | Continuous: visual analogue scale (100-mm line) | No | Reported individually |
Sandford 2008 [28] | Patient | Paper questionnaire | No | Clinic appt 4 w post-surgery | 4 | 1. Has splint been removed? 2. Frequency of removal 3. Duration of removal 4. Reasons for removal | 1. Dichotomous: Yes/No 2. Ordinal: never, once, 2–6 times, daily 3. Ordinal: < 1 h, > 1 h 4. Descriptive | No | Reported individually |
Silverio 2014 [27] | Patient | Paper questionnaire | Not in this population | Clinic appt 6 w post-surgery | 4 | 1. Daily hours without sling 2. Days per week without sling 3. Why was sling removed? 4. Subjective adherence | 1. Continuous 2. Continuous 3. Nominal 4. Scale of 1–10 | Yes | Adherence (%) = 100 x [(hours of sling use/ 24 × 0.5) + (% activities performed with sling on × 0.25) + (self-ranked adherence/ 10 × 0.25)] |
Whelan 2014 [22] | Patient | Unclear | No | After 4 w of immobilisation | 2 | 1. Was brace used full time? 2. Was brace used for whole (4-w) period? | Not reported | Yes | Compliant = full time use for at least 75% (3 w out of 4) of immobilisation period |
Home diaries
Study name | Frequency of information recording | Instructions for adherence information recording | What information was recorded | Adherence score |
---|---|---|---|---|
Liavaag 2011 [20] | Daily | Total duration of use (days) + daily duration of immobilisation (hours) 1. No use 2. < 8 h 3. 8–16 h 4. > 16 h | Total no. of days used + hours per day: 0 h, < 8 h, 8–16 h, > 16 h | Compliant = > 16 h for 20 + days (otherwise non-compliant) |
O’Brien 2011 [11] | As needed | Any instances of splint removal, modification, dislodgement | Time/date of incident + reason for incident | • Compliant: never removed (or only with extreme care) • secondary compliant: splint dislodged/loose but instantly replaced • Non-compliant: splint not worn properly/removed multiple times |
Whelan 2014 [22] | As needed | Brace/sling usage + attendance at physical therapy | Unclear | Unclear |
Wollstein 2012 [29] | Fortnightly | Average daily splint wear (hours) | No. of hours | No adherence score |
Interview/consultation-based methods
Association between adherence and outcome
Study name | Type of association | What was reported? | Were outcomes improved in compliant patients? |
---|---|---|---|
Cuff 2012 [9] | Statistical quantitative analysis | Comparison of outcomes between compliance groups | Yes |
Groth 1994 [10] | Statistical quantitative analysis | Comparison of outcomes between compliance groups | Yes |
Guillodo 2011 [23] | Statistical quantitative analysis | Correlation between length of brace use + subjective assessment of recovery | No |
Midgley 2011 [25] | Narrative analysis | States no difference in outcomes with length of orthosis use | No |
O’Brien 2011 [11] | Statistical quantitative analysis | Correlation between compliance + clinical outcome | Mixed |
Rives 1992 [13] | Descriptive quantitative analysis | Outcomes for each group without statistical comparison | Yes |
Roh 2016 [12] | Statistical quantitative analysis | Multivariate regression analysis of adherence as a predictor of outcome | Yes |
Sandford 2008 [28] | Narrative analysis | Recorded individual compliance of patients with poor outcome | Inconclusive |
Silverio 2014 [27] | Statistical quantitative analysis | Correlation between compliance + clinical outcome | No |