nach oben

European Spine Journal

Erschienen in:

11.08.2018 | Original Article

Minimally invasive spinal decompression surgery in diabetic patients: perioperative risks, complications and clinical outcomes compared with non-diabetic patients’ cohort

verfasst von: G. J. Regev, R. Lador, K. Salame, L. Mangel, A. Cohen, Z. Lidar

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Prior studies have documented an increased complication rate in diabetic patients undergoing spinal surgery. However, the impact of diabetes on the risk of postoperative complications and clinical outcome following minimally invasive spinal (MIS) decompression is not well understood.

Objectives

To compare complication rates and outcomes of MIS decompression in diabetic patients with a cohort of non-diabetic patients undergoing similar procedures.

Methods

Medical records of 48 patients with diabetes and 151 control patients that underwent minimally invasive lumbar decompression between April 2009 and July 2014 at our institute were reviewed and compared. Past medical history, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, perioperative mortality, complication and revision surgeries rates were analyzed. Patient outcomes included: the visual analog scale and the EQ-5D scores.

Results

The mean age was 68.58 ± 11 years in the diabetic group and 51.7 ± 17.7 years in the control group. No major postoperative complications were recorded in either group. Both groups were statistically equivalent in their postoperative length of stay, minor complications and revision rates. Both groups showed significant improvement in their outcome scores following surgery.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that minimally invasive decompressive surgery is a safe and effective treatment for diabetic patients and does not pose an increased risk of complications. Future prospective studies are necessary to validate the specific advantages of the minimally invasive techniques in the diabetic population.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Chen S, Anderson MV, Cheng WK, Wongworawat MD (2009) Diabetes associated with increased surgical site infections in spinal arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(7):1670–1673CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Golinvaux NS, Varthi AG, Bohl DD, Basques BA, Grauer JN (2014) Complication rates following elective lumbar fusion in patients with diabetes: insulin dependence makes the difference. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(21):1809–1816CrossRef

Guzman JZ, Iatridis JC, Skovrlj B, Cutler HS, Hecht AC, Qureshi SA et al (2014) Outcomes and complications of diabetes mellitus on patients undergoing degenerative lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(19):1596–1604CrossRef

Kim CH, Chung CK, Shin S, Choi BR, Kim MJ, Park BJ et al (2015) The relationship between diabetes and the reoperation rate after lumbar spinal surgery: a nationwide cohort study. Spine J 15(5):866–874CrossRefPubMed

Sharma A, Muir R, Johnston R, Carter E, Bowden G, Wilson-MacDonald J (2013) Diabetes is predictive of longer hospital stay and increased rate of complications in spinal surgery in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 95(4):275–279CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Stevens KJ, Spenciner DB, Griffiths KL, Kim KD, Zwienenberg-Lee M, Alamin T et al (2006) Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(2):77–86CrossRefPubMed

Rahman M, Summers LE, Richter B, Mimran RI, Jacob RP (2008) Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the “classic” open approach. Minim Invasive Neurosurg MIN 51(2):100–105CrossRefPubMed

Mobbs RJ, Li J, Sivabalan P, Raley D, Rao PJ (2014) Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 21(2):179–186CrossRefPubMed

Wolters U, Wolf T, Stutzer H, Schroder T (1996) ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. Br J Anaesth 77(2):217–222CrossRefPubMed

10.

EuroQol G (1990) EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16(3):199–208CrossRef

11.

Khoo LT, Fessler RG (2002) Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery 51(5 Suppl):S146–S154PubMed

12.

Collaboration NCDRF (2016) Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet 387(10027):1513–1530CrossRef

13.

Fagot-Campagna A, Bourdel-Marchasson I, Simon D (2005) Burden of diabetes in an aging population: prevalence, incidence, mortality, characteristics and quality of care. Diabetes Metab 31(Spec No 2):5S35–5S52PubMed

14.

Anekstein Y, Smorgick Y, Lotan R, Agar G, Shalmon E, Floman Y et al (2010) Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for the development of lumbar spinal stenosis. Isr Med Assoc J 12(1):16–20PubMed

15.

Asadian L, Haddadi K, Aarabi M, Zare A (2016) Diabetes mellitus, a new risk factor for lumbar spinal stenosis: a case-control study. Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes 9:1–5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Glassman SD, Alegre G, Carreon L, Dimar JR, Johnson JR (2003) Perioperative complications of lumbar instrumentation and fusion in patients with diabetes mellitus. Spine J 3(6):496–501CrossRefPubMed

17.

Simpson JM, Silveri CP, Balderston RA, Simeone FA, An HS (1993) The results of operations on the lumbar spine in patients who have diabetes mellitus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(12):1823–1829CrossRefPubMed

18.

Browne JA, Cook C, Pietrobon R, Bethel MA, Richardson WJ (2007) Diabetes and early postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(20):2214–2219CrossRef

19.

Phan K, Mobbs RJ (2016) Minimally invasive versus open laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41(2):E91–E100CrossRef

20.

Regev GJ, Kim CW, Salame K, Behrbalk E, Keynan O, Lador R et al (2017) A comparison of different minimally invasive and open posterior spinal procedures using volumetric measurements of the surgical exposures. Clin Spine Surg 30(9):425–428CrossRefPubMed

21.

O’Toole JE, Eichholz KM, Fessler RG (2009) Surgical site infection rates after minimally invasive spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 11(4):471–476CrossRefPubMed

22.

Rasouli MR, Rahimi-Movaghar V, Shokraneh F, Moradi-Lakeh M, Chou R (2014) Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD010328

23.

Goldstein CL, Macwan K, Sundararajan K, Rampersaud YR (2014) Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(6):1727–1737CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Burton D (2004) Endocrine and metabolic response to surgery. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 4(5):144–147CrossRef

25.

Armaghani SJ, Archer KR, Rolfe R, Demaio DN, Devin CJ (2016) Diabetes is related to worse patient-reported outcomes at two years following spine surgery. JBJS 98(1):15–22CrossRef

26.

Cancienne JM, Werner BC, Chen DQ, Hassanzadeh H, Shimer AL (2017) Perioperative hemoglobin A1c as a predictor of deep infection following single level lumbar decompression in patients with diabetes. Spine J 17(8):1100–1105CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Minimally invasive spinal decompression surgery in diabetic patients: perioperative risks, complications and clinical outcomes compared with non-diabetic patients’ cohort
verfasst von: G. J. Regev
R. Lador
K. Salame
L. Mangel
A. Cohen
Z. Lidar
Publikationsdatum: 11.08.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5716-8

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Graphical abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Correction to: Can spinal surgery in England be saved from litigation: a review of 978 clinical negligence claims against the NHS

Revision adult spinal deformity surgery: Does the number of previous operations have a negative impact on outcome?

Classification of coronal imbalance in adult scoliosis and spine deformity: a treatment-oriented guideline

Correction to: Triplanar correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by asymmetrically shaped and simultaneously applied rods associated with direct vertebral rotation: clinical and radiological analysis of 36 patients

Correction to: Surgical correction of double major adolescent idiopathic scoliosis