Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Radiation Oncology 1/2020

Open Access 01.12.2020 | Research

Missed radiation therapy sessions in first three weeks predict distant metastasis and less favorable outcomes in surgically treated patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

verfasst von: Yin-Yin Chiang, Yung-Chih Chou, Kai-Ping Chang, Chun-Ta Liao, Yao-Yu Wu, Wing-Keen Yap, Ping-Ching Pai, Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang, Chien-Yu Lin, Kang-Hsing Fan, Bing-Shen Huang, Tsung-Min Hung, Ngan-Ming Tsang

Erschienen in: Radiation Oncology | Ausgabe 1/2020

Abstract

Background

We sought to investigate the prognostic impact of missed RT sessions in patients who had undergone surgery for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).

Methods

The study sample consisted of 905 patients with surgically treated OCSCC who fulfilled criteria of RT course ≤8 weeks. The study participants were divided into three groups based on the characteristics of missed RT, as follows: 1) early missed RT, 2) late missed RT, and 3) RT as scheduled.

Results

The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in the early missed RT, late missed RT, and RT as scheduled groups were 53.0, 58.1, and 64.5%, respectively (p = 0.046). In multivariate analysis, early missed RT was independently associated with both OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.486; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.122–1.966; p = 0.006) and the occurrence of distant metastasis (HR = 1.644; 95% CI: 1.047–2.583; p = 0.031).

Conclusion

Early missed RT was independently associated with a higher occurrence of distant metastasis and less favorable OS in patients who had undergone surgery for OCSCC.
Hinweise

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13014-020-01632-1.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
OCSCC
oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
OS
overall survival
LRC
locoregional control
FFDM
freedom from distant metastasis
PORT
postoperative radiotherapy
3DCRT
three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy
IMRT
intensity-modulated radiation therapy
VMAT
volumetric-modulated arc therapy
RTT
radiation treatment time
TPT
treatment package time
HR
hazard ratio
CI
confidence interval

Background

Malignancies of the oral cavity represent a major public health concern, with over 350,000 new yearly cases being diagnosed worldwide [1]. In Taiwan, oral cavity cancer accounts for approximately 70% of all newly diagnosed head and neck tumors [2] – with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) being the most common histological type. Radical surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for OCSCC. Patients carrying unfavorable pathological risk factors are also candidate to receive adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) – either with or without chemotherapy – in an effort to improve local and systemic control rates [36]. Adherence to the initially prescribed RT regimen is paramount to ensure optimal treatment outcomes, and deviations from the initial schedule may have adverse prognostic implications. In this context, published studies have shown that several variables related to the RT schedule – including length of radiation time, premature discontinuation of RT, and time to initiation of postoperative RT – predict prognosis in patients with head and neck malignancies [712].
The question as to whether missed RT sessions could be associated with clinical outcomes has received less attention [7], even in studies that focused on RT as definitive treatment in patients who did not undergo radical surgery [1315]. We therefore designed the current retrospective study to specifically investigate this issue in a large series of patients with OCSCC who had previously undergone surgery. Missed sessions were analyzed in relation to their temporal occurrence during the RT course and examined with respect to overall survival (OS) and other outcomes of interest – including locoregional control (LRC) and freedom from distant metastasis (FFDM) rates.

Methods

Study patients

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 1058 adult patients with histology-proven OCSCC who received radical surgery and RT – either alone or in combination with chemotherapy – at the Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Taoyuan City, Taiwan) between January 2005 and December 2012. All participants were restaged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual, Eighth Edition by an experienced radiation oncologist after reviewing medical records. The institutional tumor board performed central review of each new case. Before the routine use of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging (2009), staging was performed with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging along with abdominal ultrasound and bone scan. Currently, both MR and PET can be performed for staging purposes. As of 2009, tumor board routinely suggested a second PET scan (post-operative/pre-RT PET) prior to adjuvant treatment for high-risk patients (e.g., those presenting with extranodal spread) to detect early recurrences. Only patients who underwent surgery with curative intent (including neck dissection) and who received a radiation dose of 2 Gy per fraction were deemed eligible. Exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) history of second primary malignancies; 2) local, regional, or distant failure occurring during the course of RT; 3) total RT dose < 60 Gy or > 72 Gy; and 4) presence of distant recurrences identified on the second PET scan. Owing to the retrospective nature of the study, the need for informed consent was waived.

Treatment approach

Primary tumors were excised with ≥1 cm margins (both peripheral and deep margins). Patients with clinically positive nodal disease underwent level I–V neck dissections, whereas level I–III neck dissections were performed in presence of clinically negative nodes. The procedures for collection and classification of pathologic risk factors and the indications for adjuvant treatment have been previously described in detail [16, 17]. Patients received homogeneous treatment according to our institutional guidelines (Supplementary Table 1). All patients underwent postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) consisting of a conventional fractionated daily dose of 2 Gy per fraction, 5 days per week. A 6-MV photon beam was used to achieve a target total dose between 60 and 66 Gy. Suspicious FDG-avid lesions detected on PET imaging before the beginning of RT received a simultaneous integrated boost at a dose of 70–72 Gy [18]. The initial treatment volume comprised the primary tumor bed and the regional cervical nodes. PORT was performed using different techniques – including conventional two-dimensional RT, three-dimensional conformal RT, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). A conventional field arrangement generally included a bilateral opposing field and a low anterior portal – with the spinal cord being shielded upon delivering of a dose of 46 Gy or more. The dose delivered to the brain stem and spinal cord was limited to 54 Gy. Upon administration of 46–50 Gy, the irradiation area was reduced to include the tumor bed and metastatic nodes only. Concurrent chemotherapy was offered to patients harboring adverse prognostic factors [17]. Cisplatin – generally administered as a single dose of 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks or at a weekly dose of 40 mg/m2 – was the most commonly used chemotherapy agent [19, 20].

Definition of variables

The performance status was calculated with the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale. Cigarette smoking was dichotomized as yes (subjects who smoked ≥100 cigarettes in their lifetime) versus no (subjects who smoked < 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and who were not currently smoking) [21]. Alcohol consumption (current or former drinkers versus nondrinkers) and betel quid chewing (current or former chewers versus non-chewers) were also considered as dichotomous variables. Chemotherapy was dichotomized as yes (concurrent chemotherapy or chemotherapy administered in the 2 weeks preceding the start of RT) versus no. The Charlson Comorbidity Index [22] was used to categorize the presence of comorbidities as yes (score ≥ 1) versus no. Preoperative PET imaging was dichotomized as yes versus no.
Because a prolonged RT course is known to be associated with a less favorable OS [23], we solely focused on patients with a radiation treatment time (RTT) – defined as the time from the beginning to the end of RT – of less than 8 weeks. The treatment package time (TPT) was calculated from the date of surgery to the last RT session. The interval between surgery and RT was calculated from the date of surgery to the first RT session. For the purpose of analysis, the study participants were divided into three groups based on the characteristics of missed RT, as follows: 1) early missed RT (defined as having received < 14 fractions in the first 3 weeks), 2) late missed RT (defined as having received ≥14 fractions in the first 3 weeks but less than 29 fractions in the first 6 weeks), and 3) RT as scheduled (defined as having received ≥14 fractions in the first 3 weeks and ≥ 29 fractions in the first 6 weeks).

Definition of outcomes

OS – calculated as the time elapsed (in years) from the start of RT to the date of death – was the main outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included LRC and FFDM rates. LRC was defined as the time from the start of RT to the date of local or regional recurrence, whereas FFDM was the time elapsed from the start of RT to the date of diagnosis of distant metastases.

Data analysis

Intergroup differences in terms of continuous variables were assessed with the Student’s t-test, whereas the chi-square test was used for categorical data. Survival curves were plotted with the Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of OS, LRC, and FFDM rates. The following covariates were entered into the multivariate model: age, sex, pT, pN, tumor differentiation, TPT, pattern of missed RT sessions (early missed RT, late missed RT, RT as scheduled), cigarette smoking, betel quid chewing, alcohol consumption, presence of comorbidities, concurrent chemotherapy, and PET imaging. The results are expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In all analyses, two-tailed p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

The median age of the 905 study participants was 50.8 years (range, 25.1–89.4 years) (Table 1). There were 37 (3.1%) patients who had pathological stage I − II disease, whereas 868 (95.9%) had stage III − IV disease. Pathological nodal metastases were identified in 409 patients (63.3%). PET/CT imaging was performed during the preoperative staging work-up in 442 (48.8%) study participants. Concurrent chemoradiation was administered to 505 (55.8%) patients. A total of 642 (70.9%) patients began PORT within 6 weeks of radical surgery, with 436 (48.2%) having a TPT ≤85 days. The median RTT was 47 days (range, 39–56 days). A total of 556 (61.4%) and 905 (100%) patients completed RT within 7 and 8 weeks of surgery, respectively.
Table 1
General characteristics of the study patients
 
RT as scheduled
Late missed RT
Early missed RT
Entire cohort
p value
Number
448
341
116
905
 
Sex, n (%)
    
0.210
 Women
26 (5.8%)
21 (6.2%)
12 (10.3%)
59 (6.5%)
 
 Men
422 (94.2%)
320 (93.8%)
104 (89.7%)
846 (93.5%)
 
Age (years), median (range)
50.8 (25.1–89.4)
51.1 (28.0–83.6)
49.8 (25.1–78.8)
50.8 (25.1–89.4)
0.330
Age (years), n (%)
    
0.481
  < 60
363 (81.0%)
274 (80.4%)
95 (81.9%)
732 (80.9%)
 
  ≥ 60
85 (19.0%)
67 (19.6%)
21 (18.1%)
173 (19.1%)
 
Differentiation
    
0.305
 Well differentiated
104 (23.2%)
87 (25.5%)
40 (34.5%)
232 (25.6%)
 
 Moderately differentiated
284 (63.4%)
199 (58.4%)
62 (53.5%)
545 (60.2%)
 
 Poorly differentiated
60 (13.4%)
55 (16.1%)
14 (12.0%)
128 (14.2%)
 
pStage, n (%)
    
0.710
 Stage I
6 (1.3%)
2 (0.6%)
0 (0%)
8 (0.9%)
 
 Stage II
16 (3.6%)
11 (3.2%)
2 (1.7%)
29 (3.2%)
 
 Stage III
123 (27.5%)
100 (29.3%)
33 (28.4%)
256 (28.3%)
 
 Stage IV
303 (67.6%)
228 (66.9%)
81 (69.8%)
612 (67.6%)
 
pT − Stage, n (%)
    
0.824
 T1/2
58 (12.9%)
40 (11.7%)
16 (13.8%)
114 (12.6%)
 
 T3/4
390 (87.1%)
301 (88.3%)
100 (86.2%)
791 (87.4%)
 
pN − Stage, n (%)
    
0.828
 N0/1
255 (56.9%)
198 (58.0%)
63 (54.3%)
516 (57.0%)
 
 N2/3
193 (43.1%)
143 (42.0%)
53 (45.7%)
389 (43.0%)
 
RTT (days), median (range)
46 (39–53)
49 (44–56)
50 (43–56)
47 (39–56)
0.131
 Mean ± SD
45.6 ± 2.52
49.0 ± 2.77
50.3 ± 2.94
47.5 ± 3.28
0.120
S/RT interval (days), median (range)
39 (15–106)
40 (15–94)
37 (17–77)
39 (15–106)
0.078
 Mean ± SD
40.2 ± 12.2
41.6 ± 13.4
38.4 ± 10.4
40.5 ± 12.5
0.061
S/RT interval (days), n (%)
    
0.256
  ≤ 42
326 (72.8%)
231 (67.7%)
85 (73.3%)
642 (70.9%)
 
  > 42
122 (27.2%)
110 (32.3%)
31 (26.7%)
263 (29.1%)
 
TPT (days), median (range)
84 (50–152)
88 (63–143)
86 (65–128)
86 (59–152)
0.058
 Mean ± SD
85.8 ± 12.4
90.5 ± 13.8
88.6 ± 10.7
88.0 ± 12.9
0.029
TPT (days), n (%)
    
< 0.001
  ≤ 85
254 (56.7%)
133 (39.0%)
49 (42.2%)
436 (48.2%)
 
  > 85
194 (43.3%)
208 (61.0%)
67 (57.7%)
469 (51.8%)
 
RT techniques
    
0.691
 2D RT
76 (16.9%)
68 (19.9%)
20 (17.2%)
164 (18.1%)
 
 3D conformal RT
43 (9.6%)
14 (4.1%)
12 (10.3%)
69 (7.6%)
 
 IMRT
296 (66.1%)
223 (65.4%)
80 (70.0%)
599 (66.2%)
 
 VMAT
33 (7.4%)
36 (10.6%)
4 (3.5%)
73 (8.1%)
 
Chemotherapy, n (%)
    
0.933
 Yes
248 (55.4%)
190 (55.7%)
67 (57.8%)
505 (55.8%)
 
 No
200 (44.6%)
151 (44.3%)
49 (42.2%)
400 (44.2%)
 
PET imaging, n (%)
    
0.095
 Yes
233 (52.0%)
151 (44.3%)
58 (50.0%)
442 (48.8%)
 
 No
215 (48.0%)
190 (55.7%)
58 (50.0%)
463 (51.2%)
 
Smoking, n (%)
    
0.864
 No
65 (14.5%)
46 (13.5%)
18 (15.5%)
129 (14.3%)
 
 Yes
383 (85.5%)
295 (86.5%)
98 (84.5%)
776 (85.7%)
 
Betel quid chewing, n (%)
    
0.366
 No
94 (21.0%)
85 (24.9%)
29 (25.0%)
208 (23.0%)
 
 Yes
354 (79.0%)
256 (75.1%)
87 (75.0%)
697 (77.0%)
 
Alcohol use, n (%)
    
0.171
 No
182 (40.6%)
116 (34.0%)
43 (37.1%)
341 (37.7%)
 
 Yes
266 (59.4%)
225 (66.0%)
73 (62.9%)
564 (62.3%)
 
Comorbidities, n (%)
    
0.227
 No
237 (52.9%)
159 (46.6%)
61 (52.6%)
456 (50.3%)
 
 Yes
211 (47.1%)
182 (53.4%)
55 (47.4%)
448 (49.5%)
 
Data are given as counts (percentages), means ± standard deviations, or medians (ranges), as appropriate. Abbreviations: RT radiotherapy, RTT radiation treatment time, S surgery, SD standard deviation, TPT treatment package time, 2D two-dimensional, 3D three-dimensional, IMRT intensity-modulated radiation therapy, VMAT volumetric-modulated arc therapy, PET positron emission tomography

Missed radiation therapy sessions

There were 116, 341, and 448 patients in the early missed RT, late missed RT, and RT as scheduled groups, respectively. The reasons for early missed RT were as follows: operational causes (machine breakdown, public holidays; n = 69), treatment plan modifications because of physician’s decision (including re-simulation and re-optimization of the treatment plan due to modifications of the facial profile, physician’s discretion, missing of fixation cast or oral bite block; n = 13), patients taking leaves (unknown reasons; n = 34), frailty (hospital admissions, weight loss; n = 18), and mixed reasons (operational causes and other reasons; n = 32).

Survival outcomes

The median duration of follow-up was 6.1 years (range, 0.2–13.9 years), during which 451 (49.8%) patients died. The 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates in the entire study cohort were 71.1, 67.6, and 60.6%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates according to pathologic stage (AJCC Eight Edition Staging Manual) are shown in Fig. 1a. Kaplan-Meier survival plots of OS, FFDM, and LRCR according to the patterns of missed RT sessions (early missed RT, late missed RT, RT as scheduled) are depicted in Fig. 1b−d. The 5-year OS rates in patients with early missed RT, late missed RT, and RT as scheduled were 53.0, 58.1, and 64.5%, respectively. The 5-year OS rate of patients with early missed RT was significantly lower than of patients with RT as schedule (p = 0.021). The 5-year FFDM rates in patients with early missed RT, late missed RT, and RT as scheduled were 76.1, 84.3, and 82.2%, respectively. Patients with early missed RT had a significantly higher rate of distant metastasis when compared with patients with late missed RT (p = 0.048). Finally, the 5-year LRC rates in patients with early missed RT, late missed RT, and RT as scheduled were 70.1, 69.1, and 77.8%, respectively. Patients with late missed RT had a significantly lower local-regional control rate when compared with patients with RT as scheduled (p = 0.011).

Predictors of survival outcomes

Table 2 summarizes the results of univariate analysis of variables associated with 5-year OS, FFDM, and LRCR rates. In addition to other variables, early missed RT (versus RT as scheduled) was identified as a significant adverse predictor of OS. Moreover, early missed RT (versus late missed RT) was significantly associated with a less favorable FFDM. After allowance for potential confounders in multivariate analysis (Table 3), early missed RT (versus RT as scheduled) retained its independent adverse prognostic significance for OS (HR = 1.201; 95% CI: 0.978–1.474; p = 0.008). Notably, early missed RT (versus RT as scheduled) was also independently associated with a less favorable FFDM (HR = 1.644; 95% CI: 1.047–2.583; p = 0.031).
Table 2
Univariate analyses of freedom from distant metastases, locoregional control, and overall survival rates
 
FFDM
 
LRC
 
OS
 
Covariate
HR (95% CI)
p value
HR (95% CI)
p value
HR (95% CI)
p value
RT schedule
 Early missed RT vs. RT as scheduled
1.470 (0.946–2.283)
0.086
1.383 (0.920–2.079)
0.118
1.385 (1.052–1.821)
0.020*
 Late missed RT vs. RT as scheduled
0.916 (0.641–1.311)
0.632
1.453 (1.091–1.935)
0.011
1.177 (0.962–1.439)
0.112
 Early missed RT vs. late missed RT
1.602 (1.004–2.564)
0.048
1.050 (0.700–1.576)
0.812
1.176 (0.889–1.557)
0.254
pT Stage (3/4 vs.1/2)
1.679 (0.951–2.964)
0.074
1.670 (1.043–2.67)
0.033
1.459 (1.072–1.98)
0.016*
pN Stage (2/3 vs. 0/1)
3.332 (2.370–4.685)
< 0.001
1.621 (1.243–2.11)
< 0.001
1.708 (1.419–2.05)
< 0.001*
Differentiation
  (Moderately vs. Well)
1.647 (1.067–2.541)
0.024
1.264 (0.915–1.747)
0.155
1.215 (0.973–1.518)
0.086
  (Poorly vs. Well)
2.395 (1.422–4.033)
0.001
1.201 (0.764–1.890)
0.427
1.224 (0.895–1.674)
0.205
Sex (Male vs. Female)
1.169 (0.596–2.292)
0.650
0.901 (0.541–1.49)
0.688
1.110 (0.752–1.63)
0.600
Age (> 60 vs. ≤60 years)
0.654 (0.654–1.237)
0.899
0.835 (0.639–1.090)
0.184
1.342 (1.114–1.616)
0.002*
Chemotherapy (Yes vs. no)
0.509 (0.361–0.717)
< 0.001
0.742 (0.566–0.974)
0.032
0.718 (0.594–0.867)
< 0.001*
TPT (days)
(> 85 vs. ≤85)
1.083 (0.788–1.490)
0.622
1.395 (1.038–1.734)
0.026
1.142 (0.948–1.313)
0.161
Alcohol (Yes vs. No)
1.291(0.921–1.811)
0.139
1.363 (1.026–1.81)
0.033
1.315 (1.078–1.60)
0.007*
Betel quid (Yes vs. no)
1.456 (0.961–2.208)
0.077
1.137 (0.823–1.570)
0.435
1.150 (0.919–1.432)
0.222
Smoking (Yes vs. no)
1.421 (0.846–2.385)
0.184
0.923 (0.637–1.336)
0.670
0.978 (0.752–1.2)
0.871
Comorbidity (Yes vs. no)
0.953 (0.839–1.585)
0.380
1.047 (0.803–1.366)
0.733
1.210 (1.006–1.456)
0.040*
S/RT interval
1.006 (0.708–1.428)
0.975
1.575 (1.142–2.172)
0.006
1.252(1.030–1.521)
0.024*
PET (Yes vs. no)
0.838 (0.610–1.153)
0.278
1.522 (1.161–1.997)
0.002
1.119 (0.928–1.350)
0.238
Abbreviations: FFDM freedom from distant metastases, LRC locoregional control, OS overall survival, RT radiotherapy, TPT total package time, S surgery, PET positron emission tomography, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval. *Denotes statistically significant p values
Table 3
Multivariate analyses of freedom from distant metastases, locoregional control, and overall survival rates
 
FFDM
 
LRCR
 
OS
 
Covariate
HR (95% CI)
p value
HR (95% CI)
p value
HR (95% CI)
p value
RT schedule
 Early missed RT vs. RT as scheduled
1.644 (1.047–2.583)
0.031
1.422 (0.877–2.204)
0.152
1.486 (1.122–1.966)
0.006*
 Late missed RT vs. RT as scheduled
1.022 (0.710–1.472)
0.903
1.389 (1.032–1.878)
0.031
1.201 (0.978–1.474)
0.080
 Early missed RT vs. late missed RT
1.683 (1.047–2.702)
0.031
0.981 (0.608–1.582)
0.937
1.246 (0.939–1.652)
0.164
pT Stage (3/4 vs.1/2)
1.952 (1.097–3.472)
0.023
1.722 (1.083–2.930)
0.039
1.56 (1.144–2.142)
0.006*
pN Stage (2/3 vs.0/1)
3.612 (2.327–5.609)
< 0.001
1.650 (1.170–2.313)
0.007
1.805 (1.423–2.316)
< 0.001*
Differentiation
 (Moderately vs. Well)
1.323 (0.844–2.074)
0.223
1.203 (0.859–1.686)
0.282
1.163 (0.921–1.468)
0.205
 (Poorly vs. Well)
2.078 (1.204–3.586)
0.009
1.103 (0.690–1.764)
0.682
1.155 (0.825–1.585)
0.389
Sex (Male vs. Female)
1.078 (0.463–2.036)
0.938
0.924 (0.530–1.613)
0.781
1.079 (0.746–1.727)
0.726
Age (> 60 vs. ≤60 years)
1.082 (0.774–1.513)
0.643
0.884 (0.668–1.170)
0.390
1.500 (1.234–1.824)
< 0.001*
Chemotherapy (Yes vs. no)
1.244 (0.798–1.923)
0.335
0.950 (0.696–1.407)
0.955
1.026 (0.791–1.303)
0.915
TPT (days)
(> 85 vs. ≤85)
0.901 (0.597–1.360)
0.619
1.108 (0.775–1.584)
0.575
0.866 (0.670–1.119)
0.272
Alcohol (Yes vs. No)
1.135 (0.789–1.631)
0.496
1.224 (0.901–1.664)
0.197
1.269 (1.025–1.569)
0.028*
Betel quid (Yes vs. no)
1.406 (0.897–2.203)
0.137
1.445 (0.926–2.256)
0.105
1.168 (0.913–1.494)
0.216
Smoking (Yes vs. no)
1.484 (0.841–2.619)
0.173
0.859 (0.572–1.290)
0.463
0.916 (0.684–1.226)
0.555
Comorbidity (Yes vs. no)
1.090 (0.784–1.515)
0.609
1.040 (0.792–1.367)
0.777
1.115 (0.922–1.348)
0.260
S/RT interval
1.049 (0.659–1.669)
0.841
1.236 (0.800–1.910)
0.340
1.199 (0.913–1.575)
0.191
PET (Yes vs. no)
0.937 (0.665–1.319)
0.708
1.470 (1.048–1.063)
0.026
1.115 (0.922–1.348)
0.138
Abbreviations: FFDM freedom from distant metastases, LRC locoregional control, OS overall survival, RT radiotherapy, TPT total package time, S surgery, PET positron emission tomography, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval. *Denotes statistically significant p values

Discussion

The present retrospective study demonstrates that early missed RT (versus RT as scheduled) was an independent adverse predictor of OS in a large cohort of patients with OCSCC enrolled in an endemic betel quid chewing area. Moreover, early missed RT was independently associated with a higher occurrence of distant metastasis. Notably, late missed RT was an independent adverse predictor of local-regional control but not of OS. Taken together, our results indicate that the prognostic significance of missed sessions varies in relation to the course of RT – with early missing being independently associated with a less favorable OS.
The clinical outcomes of our patients who completed RT as scheduled were in line with those reported in previous studies [24, 25]. Conversely, growing evidence indicates that deviations from originally scheduled RT plans predict poor outcomes in patients with solid malignancies [26, 27]. A prolonged TPT has been previously associated with less favorable survival figures in head and neck malignancies [25]. A TPT > 85 days and an interval from surgery to RT initiation > 6 weeks have been related to an increased likelihood of locoregional recurrences [25, 28]. An RTT > 8 weeks was found to predict poor OS rates and a higher risk of local and distant recurrences [29] in different solid neoplasms [7, 12, 30]. Another report identified a prolonged TPT as an adverse predictor of cancer-specific survival and FFDM in patients with locally advanced laryngeal cancer [31].
Based on the available literature, it remains difficult to identify the most useful parameter for RT treatment gaps in relation to clinical outcomes. By taking advantage of a large clinical cohort of OCSCC patients treated in a homogenous manner, we deliberately used a different approach to this problem. Specifically, we investigated the prognostic impact of missed sessions according to their temporal occurrence during the course of RT. Notably, all of our patients did not have a total package time > 85 days and the time interval between surgery and RT initiation was well-balanced in the three study groups. Our findings indicate that early missed – but not late missed – RT sessions have an adverse impact on OS. Late missed RT sessions were associated with a less favorable local-regional control. While early missed sessions may exert a significant detrimental effect on survival possibly through an increased risk of distant metastases, only a trend was observed for late missed sessions. The association between early missed RT sessions and an increased occurrence of distant metastasis may be explained by the precocious effects elicited by radiation on target tissues – including alterations in immune response, cytokine signaling, and gene expression levels [3234]. An escape of the tumor from such early effects may favor disease progression, which could account for the unfavorable prognostic significance attributable to early missed RT both in terms of OS and distant metastases. The RT-induced tissue effects elicited by initial sessions seem therefore to have a paramount prognostic significance, although the molecular underpinnings underlying this phenomenon deserve further scrutiny.
The reasons for missing RT sessions can depend on the patient (e.g., avoidance of adverse events, lack of adherence) or other factors (e.g., national holidays, machine breakdown). In general, early missed RT sessions are unlikely to be caused by treatment toxicity – whose onset generally occurs following at least 3 weeks of treatment [35]. Our current data highlight the importance of compensatory strategies when unexpected deviations from the original RT plan occur. Strategies to achieve this goal include 1) the delivery of compensatory RT sessions on weekends aimed at preserving the originally planned treatment duration, total dose, and dose per fraction, 2) an increased number of daily fractions (e.g., deliver of two fractions on Fridays with an interval of 6 h between fractions) and 3) an increased dose per fraction [36].
Our findings need to be interpreted in the context of some limitations. First, the retrospective nature of our investigation is inherently subjected to selection biases and recall biases. Second, we cannot rule out residual confounding effects due to unmeasured variables. Additionally, this is a single-institution study that may have limited external validity because it was conducted in betel quid chewing endemic area. Findings from single-center investigations are not necessarily generalizable to all patients with OCSCC because of different institutional practices and disparate patient populations. Independent confirmation of our findings is necessary before drawing more definitive conclusions.
These caveats notwithstanding, our current data indicate that early missed RT was independently associated with less favorable outcomes in patients with OCSCC who had previously undergone surgery. Efforts to maximize early adherence to RT can ultimately improve prognosis in this patient group.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13014-020-01632-1.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all members of the Cancer Center (Chang Gung Memorial Hospital) for their invaluable support.
The study was granted ethical approval (No. 201601077B0) by the Institutional Review Board of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Lin-Kou.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Yao M, Chang K, Funk GF, Lu H, Tan H, Wacha J, et al. The failure patterns of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy-the university of Iowa experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67(5):1332–41.PubMedCrossRef Yao M, Chang K, Funk GF, Lu H, Tan H, Wacha J, et al. The failure patterns of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy-the university of Iowa experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67(5):1332–41.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Blanchard P, Baujat B, Holostenco V, Bourredjem A, Baey C, Bourhis J, et al. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): a comprehensive analysis by tumour site. Radiotherapy Oncol. 2011;100(1):33–40.CrossRef Blanchard P, Baujat B, Holostenco V, Bourredjem A, Baey C, Bourhis J, et al. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): a comprehensive analysis by tumour site. Radiotherapy Oncol. 2011;100(1):33–40.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ooishi M, Motegi A, Kawashima M, Arahira S, Zenda S, Nakamura N, et al. Patterns of failure after postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced and recurrent head and neck cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46(10):919–27.PubMedCrossRef Ooishi M, Motegi A, Kawashima M, Arahira S, Zenda S, Nakamura N, et al. Patterns of failure after postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced and recurrent head and neck cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016;46(10):919–27.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Daly ME, Le QT, Kozak MM, Maxim PG, Murphy JD, Hsu A, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: patterns of failure and predictors of local control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80(5):1412–22.PubMedCrossRef Daly ME, Le QT, Kozak MM, Maxim PG, Murphy JD, Hsu A, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: patterns of failure and predictors of local control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80(5):1412–22.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Suwinski R, Sowa A, Rutkowski T, Wydmanski J, Tarnawski R, Maciejewski B. Time factor in postoperative radiotherapy: a multivariate locoregional control analysis in 868 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56(2):399–412.PubMedCrossRef Suwinski R, Sowa A, Rutkowski T, Wydmanski J, Tarnawski R, Maciejewski B. Time factor in postoperative radiotherapy: a multivariate locoregional control analysis in 868 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56(2):399–412.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Su NW, Liu CJ, Leu YS, Lee JC, Chen YJ, Chang YF. Prolonged radiation time and low nadir hemoglobin during postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy are both poor prognostic factors with synergistic effect on locally advanced head and neck cancer patients. OncoTargets Therapy. 2015;8:251–8.PubMedCrossRef Su NW, Liu CJ, Leu YS, Lee JC, Chen YJ, Chang YF. Prolonged radiation time and low nadir hemoglobin during postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy are both poor prognostic factors with synergistic effect on locally advanced head and neck cancer patients. OncoTargets Therapy. 2015;8:251–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lazarev S, Gupta V, Ghiassi-Nejad Z, Miles B, Scarborough B, Misiukiewicz KJ, et al. Premature discontinuation of curative radiation therapy: insights from head and neck irradiation. Advances Radiation Oncol. 2018;3(1):62–9.CrossRef Lazarev S, Gupta V, Ghiassi-Nejad Z, Miles B, Scarborough B, Misiukiewicz KJ, et al. Premature discontinuation of curative radiation therapy: insights from head and neck irradiation. Advances Radiation Oncol. 2018;3(1):62–9.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris JP, Chen MM, Orosco RK, Sirjani D, Divi V, Hara W. Association of Survival with Shorter Time to radiation therapy after surgery for US patients with head and neck Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol-- Head Neck Surg. 2018;144(4):349–59.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Harris JP, Chen MM, Orosco RK, Sirjani D, Divi V, Hara W. Association of Survival with Shorter Time to radiation therapy after surgery for US patients with head and neck Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol-- Head Neck Surg. 2018;144(4):349–59.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Graboyes EM, Garrett-Mayer E, Ellis MA, Sharma AK, Wahlquist AE, Lentsch EJ, et al. Effect of time to initiation of postoperative radiation therapy on survival in surgically managed head and neck cancer. Cancer. 2017;123(24):4841–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Graboyes EM, Garrett-Mayer E, Ellis MA, Sharma AK, Wahlquist AE, Lentsch EJ, et al. Effect of time to initiation of postoperative radiation therapy on survival in surgically managed head and neck cancer. Cancer. 2017;123(24):4841–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng YJ, Tsai MH, Chiang CJ, Tsai ST, Liu TW, Lou PJ, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy after curative surgery for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma and treatment effect of timing and duration on outcome-A Taiwan Cancer Registry national database analysis [published online ahead of print, 2018 Jun 14]. Cancer Med. 2018;7(7):3073–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1611. Cheng YJ, Tsai MH, Chiang CJ, Tsai ST, Liu TW, Lou PJ, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy after curative surgery for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma and treatment effect of timing and duration on outcome-A Taiwan Cancer Registry national database analysis [published online ahead of print, 2018 Jun 14]. Cancer Med. 2018;7(7):3073–83. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cam4.​1611.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson AG, Robertson C, Perone C, Clarke K, Dewar J, Elia MH, et al. Effect of gap length and position on results of treatment of cancer of the larynx in Scotland by radiotherapy: a linear quadratic analysis. Radiotherapy Oncol. 1998;48(2):165–73.CrossRef Robertson AG, Robertson C, Perone C, Clarke K, Dewar J, Elia MH, et al. Effect of gap length and position on results of treatment of cancer of the larynx in Scotland by radiotherapy: a linear quadratic analysis. Radiotherapy Oncol. 1998;48(2):165–73.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Skladowski K, Law MG, Maciejewski B, Steel GG. Planned and unplanned gaps in radiotherapy: the importance of gap position and gap duration. Radiotherapy Oncol. 1994;30(2):109–20.CrossRef Skladowski K, Law MG, Maciejewski B, Steel GG. Planned and unplanned gaps in radiotherapy: the importance of gap position and gap duration. Radiotherapy Oncol. 1994;30(2):109–20.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tarnawski R, Fowler J, Skladowski K, Świerniak A, Suwiński R, Maciejewski B, et al. How fast is repopulation of tumor cells during the treatment gap? International journal of radiation oncology, biology. Physics. 2002;54(1):229–36. Tarnawski R, Fowler J, Skladowski K, Świerniak A, Suwiński R, Maciejewski B, et al. How fast is repopulation of tumor cells during the treatment gap? International journal of radiation oncology, biology. Physics. 2002;54(1):229–36.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Liao C-T, Lee L-Y, Hsueh C, Lin C-Y, Fan K-H, Wang H-M, et al. Pathological risk factors stratification in pN3b oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: focus on the number of positive nodes and extranodal extension. Oral Oncol. 2018;86:188–94.PubMedCrossRef Liao C-T, Lee L-Y, Hsueh C, Lin C-Y, Fan K-H, Wang H-M, et al. Pathological risk factors stratification in pN3b oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: focus on the number of positive nodes and extranodal extension. Oral Oncol. 2018;86:188–94.PubMedCrossRef
18.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsan D-L, Lin C-Y, Kang C-J, Huang S-F, Fan K-H, Liao C-T, et al. The comparison between weekly and three-weekly cisplatin delivered concurrently with radiotherapy for patients with postoperative high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7(1):215.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tsan D-L, Lin C-Y, Kang C-J, Huang S-F, Fan K-H, Liao C-T, et al. The comparison between weekly and three-weekly cisplatin delivered concurrently with radiotherapy for patients with postoperative high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7(1):215.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang HM, Liao CT, Chang TC, Chen JS, Liaw CC, Chen IH, et al. Biweekly paclitaxel, cisplatin, tegafur, and leucovorin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer. 2004;101(8):1818–23.PubMedCrossRef Wang HM, Liao CT, Chang TC, Chen JS, Liaw CC, Chen IH, et al. Biweekly paclitaxel, cisplatin, tegafur, and leucovorin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer. 2004;101(8):1818–23.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen KH, Marshall L, Brown S, Neff L. State-specific prevalence of current cigarette smoking and smokeless tobacco use among adults - United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(39):1045–51.PubMedCrossRef Nguyen KH, Marshall L, Brown S, Neff L. State-specific prevalence of current cigarette smoking and smokeless tobacco use among adults - United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(39):1045–51.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.CrossRef Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Graboyes EM, Kompelli AR, Neskey DM, Brennan E, Nguyen S, Sterba KR, et al. Association of Treatment Delays with Survival for patients with head and neck Cancer: a systematic review. JAMA Otolaryngol-- Head Neck Surg. 2019;145(2):166–77.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Graboyes EM, Kompelli AR, Neskey DM, Brennan E, Nguyen S, Sterba KR, et al. Association of Treatment Delays with Survival for patients with head and neck Cancer: a systematic review. JAMA Otolaryngol-- Head Neck Surg. 2019;145(2):166–77.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper JS, Zhang Q, Pajak TF, Forastiere AA, Jacobs J, Saxman SB, et al. Long-term follow-up of the RTOG 9501/intergroup phase III trial: postoperative concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy in high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84(5):1198–205.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cooper JS, Zhang Q, Pajak TF, Forastiere AA, Jacobs J, Saxman SB, et al. Long-term follow-up of the RTOG 9501/intergroup phase III trial: postoperative concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy in high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84(5):1198–205.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenthal DI, Mohamed ASR, Garden AS, Morrison WH, El-Naggar AK, Kamal M, et al. Final report of a prospective randomized trial to evaluate the dose-response relationship for postoperative radiation therapy and pathologic risk groups in patients with head and neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98(5):1002–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Rosenthal DI, Mohamed ASR, Garden AS, Morrison WH, El-Naggar AK, Kamal M, et al. Final report of a prospective randomized trial to evaluate the dose-response relationship for postoperative radiation therapy and pathologic risk groups in patients with head and neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98(5):1002–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Yao JJ, Zhang F, Gao TS, et al. Survival impact of radiotherapy interruption in nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: a big-data intelligence platform-based analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2019;132:178–87.PubMedCrossRef Yao JJ, Zhang F, Gao TS, et al. Survival impact of radiotherapy interruption in nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: a big-data intelligence platform-based analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2019;132:178–87.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez Ferreira JA, Jaen Olasolo J, Azinovic I, Jeremic B. Effect of radiotherapy delay in overall treatment time on local control and survival in head and neck cancer: review of the literature. Reports Practical Oncol Radiotherapy. 2015;20(5):328–39.CrossRef Gonzalez Ferreira JA, Jaen Olasolo J, Azinovic I, Jeremic B. Effect of radiotherapy delay in overall treatment time on local control and survival in head and neck cancer: review of the literature. Reports Practical Oncol Radiotherapy. 2015;20(5):328–39.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ang KK, Trotti A, Brown BW, Garden AS, Foote RL, Morrison WH, et al. Randomized trial addressing risk features and time factors of surgery plus radiotherapy in advanced head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;51(3):571–8.PubMedCrossRef Ang KK, Trotti A, Brown BW, Garden AS, Foote RL, Morrison WH, et al. Randomized trial addressing risk features and time factors of surgery plus radiotherapy in advanced head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;51(3):571–8.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Soyfer V, Geva R, Michelson M, Inbar M, Shacham-Shmueli E, Corn BW. The impact of overall radiotherapy treatment time and delay in initiation of radiotherapy on local control and distant metastases in gastric cancer. Radiation Oncol (London, England). 2014;9:81.CrossRef Soyfer V, Geva R, Michelson M, Inbar M, Shacham-Shmueli E, Corn BW. The impact of overall radiotherapy treatment time and delay in initiation of radiotherapy on local control and distant metastases in gastric cancer. Radiation Oncol (London, England). 2014;9:81.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaikh T, Handorf EA, Murphy CT, Mehra R, Ridge JA, Galloway TJ. The impact of radiation treatment time on survival in patients with head and neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96(5):967–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Shaikh T, Handorf EA, Murphy CT, Mehra R, Ridge JA, Galloway TJ. The impact of radiation treatment time on survival in patients with head and neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96(5):967–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosseini H, Obradović MMS, Hoffmann M, Harper KL, Sosa MS, Werner-Klein M, et al. Early dissemination seeds metastasis in breast cancer. Nature. 2016;540(1476-4687 (Electronic)):552–8. Hosseini H, Obradović MMS, Hoffmann M, Harper KL, Sosa MS, Werner-Klein M, et al. Early dissemination seeds metastasis in breast cancer. Nature. 2016;540(1476-4687 (Electronic)):552–8.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Castano Z, San Juan BP, Spiegel A, Pant A, DeCristo MJ, Laszewski T, et al. IL-1beta inflammatory response driven by primary breast cancer prevents metastasis-initiating cell colonization. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(9):1084–97.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Castano Z, San Juan BP, Spiegel A, Pant A, DeCristo MJ, Laszewski T, et al. IL-1beta inflammatory response driven by primary breast cancer prevents metastasis-initiating cell colonization. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(9):1084–97.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Laan HP, Bijl HP, Steenbakkers RJ, van der Schaaf A, Chouvalova O, Vemer-van den Hoek JG, et al. Acute symptoms during the course of head and neck radiotherapy or chemoradiation are strong predictors of late dysphagia. Radiotherapy Oncol 2015;115(1):56–62. van der Laan HP, Bijl HP, Steenbakkers RJ, van der Schaaf A, Chouvalova O, Vemer-van den Hoek JG, et al. Acute symptoms during the course of head and neck radiotherapy or chemoradiation are strong predictors of late dysphagia. Radiotherapy Oncol 2015;115(1):56–62.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Bese NS, Hendry J, Jeremic B. Effects of prolongation of overall treatment time due to unplanned interruptions during radiotherapy of different tumor sites and practical methods for compensation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68(3):654–61.PubMedCrossRef Bese NS, Hendry J, Jeremic B. Effects of prolongation of overall treatment time due to unplanned interruptions during radiotherapy of different tumor sites and practical methods for compensation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68(3):654–61.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Missed radiation therapy sessions in first three weeks predict distant metastasis and less favorable outcomes in surgically treated patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
verfasst von
Yin-Yin Chiang
Yung-Chih Chou
Kai-Ping Chang
Chun-Ta Liao
Yao-Yu Wu
Wing-Keen Yap
Ping-Ching Pai
Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang
Chien-Yu Lin
Kang-Hsing Fan
Bing-Shen Huang
Tsung-Min Hung
Ngan-Ming Tsang
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2020
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Radiation Oncology / Ausgabe 1/2020
Elektronische ISSN: 1748-717X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01632-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Radiation Oncology 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

25.04.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Das Risiko für Rezidiv oder Tod von Patienten und Patientinnen mit reseziertem ALK-positivem NSCLC ist unter einer adjuvanten Therapie mit dem Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitor Alectinib signifikant geringer als unter platinbasierter Chemotherapie.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.